13.07.2015 Views

Mannheimer Manuskripte 177 gk-mp-9403/3 SOME CONCEPTS OF ...

Mannheimer Manuskripte 177 gk-mp-9403/3 SOME CONCEPTS OF ...

Mannheimer Manuskripte 177 gk-mp-9403/3 SOME CONCEPTS OF ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 MARTIN SCHLICHENMAIERRemark 1. It is enough to test the vanishing with respect to the generators of the idealin the definition.Remark 2. There is no finiteness condition mentioned in the definition. Indeed this isnot necessary, because the polynomial ring R n is a noetherian ring. Recall a ring isa noetherian ring if every ideal has a finite set of generators. There are other usefulequivalent definitions of a noetherian ring. Let me here recall only the fact that everystrictly ascending chain of ideals (starting from one ideal) consists only of finitely manyideals. But every field K has only the (trivial) ideals {0} and K (why?), hence Kis noetherian. Trivially, all principal ideal rings (i.e. rings where every ideal can begenerated by just one element) are noetherian. Beside the fields there are two i<strong>mp</strong>ortantexa<strong>mp</strong>les of principal ideal rings: Z the integers, and K[X] the polynomial ring in onevariable over the field K. Let me recall the proof for Z. Take I an ideal of Z. If I = {0}we are done. Hence assume I ≠ {0} then there is a n ∈ N with n ∈ I minimal. Wenow claim I = (n). To see this take m ∈ I. By the division algorithm of Euklid thereare q,r ∈ Z with 0 ≤ r < n such that m = qn + r . Hence, with m and n in I weget r = m − qn ∈ I. But n was chosen minimal, hence r = 0 and m ∈ (n). Note thatthe proof for K[X] is co<strong>mp</strong>letely analogous if we replace the division algorithm for theintegers by the division algorithm for polynomials.Now we haveHilbertscher Basissatz. Let R be a noetherian Ring. Then R[X] is also noetherian.As a nice exercise you may try to proof it by yourself (maybe guided by [Ku]).Remark 3. If R is a noncommutative ring one has to deal with left, right and two-sidedideals. It is also necessary to define left, right, and two-sided noetherian.It is time to give some exa<strong>mp</strong>les of algebraic sets:(1) The whole affine space is the zero set of the zero ideal: K n = V (0).(2) The e<strong>mp</strong>ty set is the zero set of the whole ring R n : ∅ = V ((1)).(3) Let α = (α 1 ,α 2 ,... ,α n ) ∈ K n be a point given by its coordinates. Define the idealthen {α} = V (I α ).I α = (X 1 − α 1 ,X 2 − α 2 ,... ,X n − α n ),(4) Now take 2 points α,β and their associated ideals I α ,I β as defined in (3). ThenI α ∩ I β is again an ideal and we get {α,β} = V (I α ∩ I β ) .This is a general fact. Let A = V (I) and B = V (J) be two algebraic sets then theunion A ∪ B is again an algebraic set because A ∪ B = V (I ∩ J). Let me give a proofof this. Obviously, we get for two ideals K and L with K ⊆ L for their vanishing sets

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!