The dual nature of homologous recombination in plants

Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.21 No.3 March 2005 18132 Bennett, C.B. et al. (1993) Lethality induced by a single site-specificdouble-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5613–561733 Lieber, M.R. et al. (2003) Mechanism and regulation of human nonhomologousDNA end-joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 712–72034 Mengiste, T. et al. (1999) An SMC-like protein is required for efficienthomologous recombination in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 18, 4505–451235 Takeda, S. et al. (2004) BRU1, a novel link between responses to DNAdamage and epigenetic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18,782–79336 Onoda, F. et al. (2004) SMC6 is required for MMS-induced interchromosomaland sister chromatid recombinations in Saccharomycescerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst.) 3, 429–43937 Gorbunova, V. et al. (2000) A new hyperrecombinogenic mutant ofNicotiana tabacum. Plant J. 24, 601–61138 Gherbi, H. et al. (2001) Homologous recombination in planta isstimulated in the absence of Rad50. EMBO Rep. 2, 287–29139 Heitzeberg, F. et al. (2004) The Rad17 homologue of Arabidopsis isinvolved in the regulation of DNA damage repair and homologousrecombination. Plant J. 38, 954–96840 Gallego, M.E. and White, C.I. (2001) RAD50 function is essential fortelomere maintenance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 1711–171641 Ries, G. et al. (2000) UV-damage-mediated induction of homologousrecombination in Arabidopsis is dependent on photosyntheticallyactive radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 13425–1342942 Filkowski, J. et al. (2004) Systemic plant signal triggers genomeinstability. Plant J. 38, 1–1143 Lucht, J.M. et al. (2002) Pathogen stress increases somatic recombinationfrequency in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 30, 311–31444 Molinier, J. et al. (2004) SNM-dependent recombinational repair ofoxidatively induced DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBORep. 5, 994–99945 Molinier, J. et al. Dynamic response of plant genome to ultravioletradiation and other genotoxic stresses. Mutat. Res. (in press)46 Molinier, J. et al. (2004) CENTRIN2 modulates homologous recombinationand nucleotide excision repair in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16,1633–164347 Fritsch, O. et al. (2004) The INO80 protein controls homologousrecombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell 16, 479–48548 van Attikum, H. et al. (2004) Recruitment of the INO80 complex byH2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodellingwith DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119, 777–78849 McClintock, B. (1984) The significance of responses of the genome tochallenge. Science 226, 792–80150 Kovalchuk, I. et al. (1998) Transgenic plants are sensitive bioindicatorsof nuclear pollution caused by the Chernobyl accident. Nat.Biotechnol. 16, 1054–105951 Kovalchuk, O. et al. (1999) Radiation hazard caused by the Chernobylaccident in inhabited areas of Ukraine can be monitored by transgenicplants. Mutat. Res. 446, 49–5552 Ries, G. et al. (2000) Elevated UV-B radiation reduces genome stabilityin plants. Nature 406, 98–10153 Kovalchuk, O. et al. (2001) A sensitive transgenic plant system todetect toxic inorganic compounds in the environment. Nat. Biotechnol.19, 568–57254 Brakke, M.K. (1984) Mutations, the aberrant ratio phenomenon, andvirus infection of maize. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 22, 77–9455 Kovalchuk, I. et al. (2003) Pathogen-induced systemic plant signaltriggers DNA rearrangements. Nature 423, 760–76256 Leister, D. (2004) Tandem and segmental gene duplication andrecombination in the evolution of plant disease resistance gene.Trends Genet. 20, 116–12257 Ramakrishna, W. et al. (2002) Structural analysis of the maize rp1complex reveals numerous sites and unexpected mechanisms of localrearrangement. Plant Cell 14, 3213–322358 Richter, T.E. et al. (1995) New rust resistance specificities associatedwith recombination in the Rp1 complex in maize. Genetics 141, 373–38159 Wulff, B.B. et al. (2004) Genetic variation at the tomato Cf-4/Cf-9 locusinduced by EMS mutagenesis and intralocus recombination. Genetics167, 459–47060 Kovalchuk, I. et al. (2000) Genome-wide variation of the somaticmutation frequency in transgenic plants. EMBO J. 19, 4431–443861 Reddy, K.C. and Villeneuve, A.M. (2004) C. elegans HIM-17 linkschromatin modification and competence for initiation of meioticrecombination. Cell 118, 439–45262 Terada, R. et al. (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologousrecombination in rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 1030–103463 Hanin, M. et al. (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 28,671–67764 Iida, S. and Terada, R. (2004) A tale of two integrations, transgene andT-DNA: gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice. Curr.Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 132–13865 Reiss, B. et al. (2000) RecA stimulates sister chromatid exchange andthe fidelity of double-strand break repair, but not gene targeting, inplants transformed by Agrobacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.97, 3358–336366 Jelesko, J.G. et al. (2004) Meiotic recombination between paralogousRBCSB genes on sister chromatids of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics166, 947–95767 Jelesko, J.G. et al. (1999) Rare germinal unequal crossing-over leadingto recombinant gene formation and gene duplication in Arabidopsisthaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 10302–1030768 Christianson, M.L. (1975) Mitotic crossing-over as an importantmechanism of floral sectoring in Tradescantia. Mutat. Res. 28, 389–39569 Burk, L.G. and Menser, H.A. (1964) A dominant aurea mutation intobacco. Tob. Sci. 8, 101–10470 Molinier, J. et al. (2004) Interchromatid and interhomolog recombinationin Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 16, 342–35271 Haubold, B. et al. (2002) Recombination and gene conversion in a 170-kbgenomic region of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 161, 1269–127872 Culligan, K. et al. (2004) ATR regulates a G2-phase cell-cyclecheckpoint in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 16, 1091–110473 Dubest, S. et al. (2004) Roles of the AtErcc1 protein in recombination.Plant J. 39, 334–34274 Hanin, M. et al. (2000) Elevated levels of intrachromosomalhomologous recombination in Arabidopsis overexpressing the MIMgene. Plant J. 24, 183–18975 Liu, Z. et al. (2000) Repair of UV damage in plants by nucleotideexcision repair: Arabidopsis UVH1 DNA repair gene is a homolog ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae Rad1. Plant J. 21, 519–52876 Gallego, F. et al. (2000) AtRAD1, a plant homologue of human andyeast nucleotide excision repair endonucleases, is involved in darkrepair of UV damages and recombination. Plant J. 21, 507–51877 Dubest, S. et al. (2002) Role of the AtRad1p endonuclease inhomologous recombination in plants. EMBO Rep. 3, 1049–105478 Fidantsef, A.L. et al. (2000) The Arabidopsis UVH1 gene is a homologof the yeast repair endonuclease RAD1. Plant Physiol. 124, 579–58679 Costa, R.M. et al. (2001) The participation of AtXPB1, the XPB/RAD25homologue gene from Arabidopsis thaliana, in DNA repair and plantdevelopment. Plant J. 28, 385–39580 Harlow, G.R. et al. (1994) Isolation of uvh1, an Arabidopsis mutanthypersensitive to ultraviolet light and ionizing radiation. Plant Cell 6,227–23581 Landry, L.G. et al. (1997) An Arabidopsis photolyase mutant ishypersensitive to ultraviolet-B radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U. S. A. 94, 328–33282 Filkowski, J. et al. (2004) Genome stability of vtc1, tt4, and tt5Arabidopsis thaliana mutants impaired in protection against oxidativestress. Plant J. 38, 60–6983 Conklin, P.L. et al. (1996) Environmental stress sensitivity of anascorbic acid-deficient Arabidopsis mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U. S. A. 93, 9970–997484 Li, J. et al. (1993) Arabidopsis flavonoid mutants are hypersensitive toUV-B irradiation. Plant Cell 5, 171–179www.sciencedirect.com