03.12.2012 Views

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Time ... - City of Wausau

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Time ... - City of Wausau

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Time ... - City of Wausau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ECONOMIC</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>COMMITTEE</strong><br />

<strong>Time</strong> and Place: The Economic Development Committee met on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 at<br />

2:00 PM in the Board Room at <strong>City</strong> Hall<br />

ED Members Present: Jim Rosenberg (Chair), Gary Gisselman, Jim Brezinski, Steve Foley, and Ed<br />

Gale<br />

Others Present: Heather Wessling, Joe Pribanich, Anne Jacobson, Mayor Jim Tipple, MaryAnne<br />

Groat, Mindy Brandenburg, Cal Tillisch, Todd Pagel, Aaron Wicker, John Flad,<br />

Chris Horak<br />

In accordance with Chapter 19, Wisc. Stats., notice <strong>of</strong> this meeting was posted and sent to the Daily<br />

Herald in the proper manner. Rosenberg noted there was a quorum and called the meeting to order at<br />

2:00 PM.<br />

(1) <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> AGREEMENT FOR PROPOSED WALGREENS PROJECT AT 17 TH AND<br />

STEWART AVENUE<br />

Pribanich discussed the proposed Walgreens development on 17 th Avenue. He indicated there were<br />

previous cost estimates from Wisconsin Public Service that have changed due to an error on their behalf.<br />

He said the developer, John Flad, was requesting the <strong>City</strong> pay for a portion <strong>of</strong> the cost to remove the<br />

power lines in the Northeast corner <strong>of</strong> the proposed site. He said the total cost would now be $158,000,<br />

<strong>of</strong> which Flad would cover $75,000. Pribanich said any cost over the $158,000 would be Flad’s<br />

responsibility. Pribanich discussed reimbursement costs to the federal government in regards to<br />

removing 70 feet <strong>of</strong> access restrictions on Wegner Street. He also noted we would have to vacate a<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> Stewart Avenue, which would revert ownership back to the State <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin. The <strong>City</strong> has<br />

hired an appraiser to determine what the values <strong>of</strong> the properties are that would need to be paid to the<br />

State. Brezinski indicated this is blighted area and something needed to be done. Rosenberg questioned<br />

Groat and Wessling regarding TIF funds. Wessling discussed the TIF district for this project wouldn’t be<br />

extended until 2010. Pribanich noted TIF 6 can be extended from the North, but there may be a<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> extending it sooner to capture Sherman Street. He noted they may amend TIF 6 this year to<br />

account for Sherman Street and amend it next year for this development. Rosenberg questioned how<br />

many amendments were allowed. Groat said 5. Gale questioned if the estimated numbers can change.<br />

Pribanich said he will not know until the final figures come back from the appraiser. Gale amended the<br />

motion to be contingent upon the development area becoming part <strong>of</strong> TIF 6. Groat indicated there is a<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> going outside <strong>of</strong> the TIF boundaries since we are allowed to go up to ½ mile radius outside<br />

the district. Gale withdrew the amendment and asked that if TIF 6 gets amended, to extend if far enough<br />

to the north to accommodate any other projects that may be in the future. Tillisch stressed the time factor<br />

for Flad as well as his client, Chris Horak. Wessling questioned if Pribanich knew when to expect the<br />

appraisals. Pribanich indicated they should be done soon. Flad discussed this development and told<br />

the committee how costs had changed from the beginning until now. Pribanich noted in the staff report<br />

there was discussion about the sidewalks required by the developer’s agreement. He indicated the staff<br />

report said the sidewalk was required on the East side <strong>of</strong> 17 th Avenue, when in fact it should have<br />

reflected the West side <strong>of</strong> Stewart Avenue. Horak indicated there were no sidewalks extending in front <strong>of</strong><br />

other properties that have been developed in the last 24 months. Gale assured Horak that there was not<br />

much input from the community regarding sidewalks when the other properties were developed like there<br />

were now. He noted there would be sidewalks extended to the other properties in the near future.<br />

Motion by Brezinski to approve the agreement with the additional costs, second by Gale. Motion carried<br />

5-0.<br />

(2) FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL – ROSE GARDEN PROPERTY AT 131 WEST THOMAS STREET


Rosenberg discussed the Rose Garden property that is next to the Old Incubator site, which is owned by<br />

the <strong>City</strong>. Pribanich indicated the committee should have a staff report in their packets. He discussed that<br />

the <strong>City</strong> may need some <strong>of</strong> the right <strong>of</strong> way property for the widening <strong>of</strong> Thomas Street, but noted<br />

whatever is not used by the <strong>City</strong>, would go back to the owner. Pribanich suggested capping the right <strong>of</strong><br />

way needed at 3,000 square feet, which he thought would be more than enough. Wicker questioned the<br />

elimination <strong>of</strong> the driveway on Thomas Street. Pribanich indicated they may or may not eliminate this<br />

access, but couldn’t tell for sure at this time. Pribanich noted the access on Cleveland would not be<br />

affected except there may be two access points to the property. He said the engineers needed to<br />

evaluate the property and median size before a determination could be made on the driveway access.<br />

Pagel questioned when this decision would be made. He indicated this may be an access that is only<br />

right turn in and right turn out. Tillisch questioned if any <strong>of</strong> the plans called for the complete elimination <strong>of</strong><br />

this driveway. Pribanich said no but there may be limited access.<br />

Motion to approve the resolution as presented by Gale, second Foley. Motion carried 5-0.<br />

(3) ADJOURN<br />

Motion by Gale, second by Foley to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0.<br />

Respectfully Submitted,<br />

<strong>ECONOMIC</strong> <strong>COMMITTEE</strong><br />

Jim Rosenberg, Chairperson

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!