03.12.2012 Views

Deconstruction and Reconstruction: The Family Experience

Deconstruction and Reconstruction: The Family Experience

Deconstruction and Reconstruction: The Family Experience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deconstruction</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reconstruction</strong>:<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Experience</strong><br />

Florida State University Museum of Fine Arts<br />

May 12 — June 2, 2006


<strong>Deconstruction</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reconstruction</strong>:<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Experience</strong><br />

Florida State University Museum of Fine Arts<br />

May 12 - June 2, 2006<br />

An Educational Supplement to the Museum’s Exhibition<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Families: How <strong>The</strong>y Have Evolved .........................................................................2<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Depictions in Art Through History................................................................4<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Depictions in Art Through History: <strong>The</strong> Images ...........................................7<br />

Quotes on <strong>Family</strong>....................................................................................................11<br />

Artists: Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher.........................................................13<br />

Artist: Andrew Joseph Ortiz ....................................................................................15<br />

Artist: Laura Straus .................................................................................................17<br />

Artist: Chelsy Walker...............................................................................................19<br />

Lesson Plan 1: Photographing Families..................................................................21<br />

Lesson Plan 2: <strong>Family</strong> Tree ....................................................................................23<br />

Lesson Plan 3: Analysis Fun!..................................................................................25<br />

Vocabulary Sheet .............................................................................27<br />

Worksheet ........................................................................................28<br />

Lesson Plan 4: Families are Unique .......................................................................29<br />

Worksheet........................................................................................31<br />

Bibliography ............................................................................................................32<br />

Sunshine State St<strong>and</strong>ards ......................................................................................33<br />

Selected Image List ................................................................................................35<br />

Edited by Emilee Hubbard <strong>and</strong> Viki D. Thompson Wylder<br />

Graphic Design by Emilee Hubbard<br />

This educational packet was written by Emilee Hubbard under the direction of Viki D.<br />

Thompson Wylder, Curator of Education, Florida State University Museum of Fine Arts.<br />

Tours Available: Contact Viki D. Thompson Wylder at 644-1299<br />

Cover: Laura Straus, Mamaronech, NY: Rafferty <strong>Family</strong><br />

*Images for one-time educational use only.<br />

1


Kais, Jamal, <strong>and</strong> Malach, Palestinian Americans<br />

Charles Rushton<br />

Families: How <strong>The</strong>y Have Evolved<br />

<strong>The</strong> American family looks much different than it did in the time of television<br />

shows like Ozzie <strong>and</strong> Harriet. During the post-war years, when shows like this ran on<br />

the air, Americans celebrated the nuclear family. <strong>The</strong> nuclear family consists of a<br />

breadwinning dad, homemaker mom, <strong>and</strong> two to three children. <strong>The</strong> name “nuclear”<br />

was coined long after the concept of the nuclear family arose. <strong>The</strong> nuclear family was<br />

first conceived during the Middle Ages in Europe. Even though the idea of the nuclear<br />

family has existed for a long time, it rarely embodied the majority of families in human<br />

history. Many still seek this ideal today.<br />

If we take a snapshot of families in 1960 <strong>and</strong> 2000, we can see how different<br />

they are. After the world wars, America sought stability. <strong>The</strong> year 1960 marks the heart<br />

of this period. From the 1940s to the 1960s the nuclear family thrived. Through a look<br />

at statistics for the year 1960 <strong>and</strong> 2000, the differences<br />

in the American family are clear. <strong>The</strong> divorce rate<br />

doubled. In 1960, ¼ of all marriages ended in divorce.<br />

In 2000, that rate rose to ½. <strong>The</strong> percentage of single<br />

parent families with children under 18 went from 5% to<br />

13%. Only 5% of children were born to unmarried<br />

mothers in 1960; in 2000 the number jumped to 33%.<br />

<strong>The</strong> percentage of the marriageable population actually<br />

married dropped 15%. Americans are marrying later;<br />

the average age of women was 20 <strong>and</strong> men 23 in 1960.<br />

In 2000, the average age for women was 25 <strong>and</strong> for<br />

men, 27. <strong>The</strong> number of children in the family has<br />

decreased since 1960 from 2.3 kids to 1.9 per family.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se statistics can lead to a number of conclusions<br />

about the American family today <strong>and</strong> its future, but in<br />

general families are becoming more diverse <strong>and</strong> more<br />

realistic than idealistic.<br />

In the earliest days, humans approached the<br />

issue of family in practical fashion. Early humans “pair-bonded,” marriage-like, mainly<br />

to take care of their children. <strong>The</strong>y were grouped together through extended families for<br />

survival. Since the Middle Ages <strong>and</strong> the development of the idea of “<strong>The</strong> Holy <strong>Family</strong>,”<br />

society eventually developed one idealized goal, the nuclear family. This ideal has<br />

been sought even in times when it became impractical. <strong>The</strong> Commercial <strong>and</strong> Industrial<br />

Revolutions brought a new emphasis on education, especially of women. As time<br />

passed more women gradually achieved higher education <strong>and</strong> eventually more women<br />

were working outside the home. <strong>The</strong> emphasis on extended education for both sexes<br />

delayed marriage. <strong>The</strong> homemaker mom diminished during the world wars, particularly<br />

WWII, when a large number of women entered the workforce, the result of the absence<br />

of men. After WWII, there was a slight increase in divorce. Yet, after these years of<br />

women working outside the home <strong>and</strong> a rise in the divorce rate, the concept of the<br />

nuclear family was never stronger.<br />

2


After the 1960s the nuclear family was on the decline, <strong>and</strong> still is today. Yet,<br />

Americans remain nostalgic for the “good old days” when mom stayed at home <strong>and</strong> had<br />

dinner on the table when dad returned from work. <strong>The</strong> “good old days,” however,<br />

existed only during a very small fraction of historical time. Families rarely operated in<br />

nuclear fashion before the 1940s.<br />

When Americans finally reached that ideal of the nuclear family, why did it<br />

decline so rapidly? <strong>The</strong> number one reason centers on young mothers who tend to<br />

work outside the home. With the advent of educational <strong>and</strong> valuable career<br />

opportunities, women are starting families later <strong>and</strong> no longer looking for financial<br />

security as their major reason for marriage.<br />

Yet today women still do 2/3 of the housework <strong>and</strong> 4/5 of the childcare. <strong>The</strong> idea<br />

of the nuclear family has not been completely ab<strong>and</strong>oned. Although nostalgia for<br />

nuclear roles still exists, families on television<br />

shows have changed from Ozzie <strong>and</strong><br />

Harriet’s nuclear structure. Shows like<br />

Friends have numerous examples of modern<br />

families; divorced parents, same sex<br />

marriage, single parents, <strong>and</strong> adoption are all<br />

portrayed on the show. Yet, the cleaning<br />

product commercials on television still pitch<br />

to married women. What effect will come<br />

from this idealized nostalgia mixed with the<br />

realism of women working outside the home?<br />

Does the future hold a return to realism in<br />

family life or will we still seek the nuclear<br />

family?<br />

New directions in society are taking<br />

Eleanor at the Computer, Dad Watching<br />

Cathy Lees<br />

place. Society accepts, to varying degrees, single parents, foster parents, mixed race<br />

parents, same sex parents, disabled family members, <strong>and</strong> combination homes with one<br />

or both parents having children from previous marriages. Many couples will go to<br />

couples counseling now to try to reconcile before making the decision to divorce. As<br />

stated, one half of marriages are ending in divorce. However, the other half are making<br />

these new family situations work. Accommodations are being made for young children<br />

of working moms. We have daycares, after school care, stay-at-home dads, <strong>and</strong><br />

opportunities to work at home <strong>and</strong> make money. It seems as though Americans today,<br />

with all the accommodations being made, are heading toward a more realistic view of<br />

the family.<br />

3


Depictions of <strong>Family</strong> Through Art History<br />

<strong>The</strong> portrayal of family arises throughout the history of art. Styles vary<br />

<strong>and</strong> themes differ, but as is natural for the human race, the family is always<br />

present. In some epochs, family is a main theme <strong>and</strong> in other periods it is not as<br />

prevalent yet still exists. Some major types of family representations emerge.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are the Marriage Portrait, Artists’ Families, the Symbolic <strong>Family</strong>, the<br />

Everyday <strong>Family</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the Noble <strong>Family</strong>. We will explore the different themes in<br />

which family has been depicted through the history of primarily Western art.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Marriage Portrait was one of the earliest of “family in art” types to be<br />

formulated. Affectionate couples appeared surprisingly early. However, the<br />

marriage portrait was not moved out of tombs <strong>and</strong> into the home until the 1 st<br />

century BCE. Marriage portraits placed in the<br />

home from this time are equivalent to modern<br />

wedding portraits, reminiscent of the modern<br />

couple commissioning a portrait to celebrate<br />

their marriage. Depending on the era, the<br />

celebratory wedding portrait was executed in<br />

the contemporary style in which it was<br />

commissioned <strong>and</strong> portrayed the contemporary<br />

marriage culture. Sometimes the artists chose<br />

to show their contemporary marriage culture as<br />

negative as in William Hogarth’s series,<br />

Marriage a la Mode. However, the overall<br />

Doll <strong>Family</strong> Sculptures<br />

Pat Magers<br />

Frances (Engl<strong>and</strong>), Lek, Nick – Thail<strong>and</strong><br />

Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher<br />

2003<br />

theme of marriage portraits was an increasing emphasis on a realistic vision of<br />

the couple.<br />

Artists also chose to represent family in their artworks by featuring a<br />

Symbolic <strong>Family</strong>. This Symbolic <strong>Family</strong> portrait generally included Mary, Joseph,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Jesus from the Christian religion or the<br />

Roman <strong>and</strong> Greek gods from mythological<br />

stories. <strong>The</strong>se Symbolic <strong>Family</strong> images were<br />

widespread throughout art history. <strong>The</strong> era that<br />

favored the Holy <strong>Family</strong> was the Italian<br />

Renaissance, yet its frequent portrayal occurred<br />

long before as a staple in the Middle Ages. <strong>The</strong><br />

many “Virgin <strong>and</strong> Child” paintings, nativity scenes,<br />

<strong>and</strong> pietas represent the love between parent <strong>and</strong><br />

child. <strong>The</strong> Italian Renaissance painters also<br />

depicted Roman gods who represented certain<br />

attributes of family.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se family works, whether Christian or mythological, sometimes<br />

bestowed importance to extended family. Many Christian paintings of the Holy<br />

<strong>Family</strong> include cousins <strong>and</strong> aunts. For example, Leonardo da Vinci’s cartoon<br />

drawing, Virgin <strong>and</strong> Child with Saint Anne <strong>and</strong> Infant Saint John shows Jesus’<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>mother <strong>and</strong> second cousin. Mythological works of Roman <strong>and</strong> Greek gods<br />

4


often show various figures in family roles <strong>and</strong> relationships as in Titian’s painting<br />

of a potential husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wife, Bacchus <strong>and</strong> Adriadne.<br />

Artists sometimes portray family by depicting their own families. In the<br />

Italian Renaissance the few women artists during the era had limited access to<br />

models. Sometimes a woman artist chose to paint her most accessible subject,<br />

her own family. For example, Sofonisba Anguissola painted Portrait of the<br />

Artist’s Sisters <strong>and</strong> Brother. This is not exclusive to women artists of the Italian<br />

Renaissance. Women artists did this<br />

throughout art history <strong>and</strong> many men worked in<br />

this tradition as well. In the Rococo era,<br />

François Boucher used his family as models in<br />

his painting titled <strong>The</strong> Luncheon. Artists may<br />

find their families as unique entities. <strong>The</strong><br />

access to the family makes it an easy subject to<br />

use.<br />

In the early eighteenth century, artists<br />

occasionally painted their own families to show<br />

the wealth of the family <strong>and</strong> to highlight fond<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Rituals: Discount Store #4<br />

Severn Eaton<br />

Untitled #1<br />

Laine Wyatt<br />

interaction between children <strong>and</strong> elders. Women artists, with the ability to carry a<br />

child, sometimes chose to portray their maternal attributes in their works.<br />

Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun’s painting, Self-Portrait with Her Daughter, emphasizes<br />

this attribute.<br />

Other artists painted family members who resided far away geographically<br />

or members that were deceased. <strong>The</strong> artists’ longing for the missing family<br />

members was usually the reason behind the subject choice. For example,<br />

Arshille Gorky painted <strong>The</strong> Artist <strong>and</strong> His Mother several years after her death.<br />

<strong>The</strong> artists who chose to portray their own families did so for many<br />

reasons. As stated, one incentive was the family’s ready availability, especially<br />

for early women artists. Another reason was the desire to honor the family <strong>and</strong><br />

its influence. Families acculturate or “frame” the people within them. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

artists, in turn, literally reversed the framing by placing family within the confines<br />

of their canvases. By putting their families into their works, these artists revealed<br />

a bit of their own personalities through the people closest to them or at least<br />

revealed those traits they wanted the public to see.<br />

An extension of the Artists’ <strong>Family</strong> Portrait<br />

was the portrayal of the Everyday <strong>Family</strong>. Some<br />

artists chose to show what we see everyday in<br />

our own family lives <strong>and</strong> in other families around<br />

us. Dependent on the time period in which it<br />

was painted the Everyday <strong>Family</strong> Portrait<br />

emphasized one family member or the other. In<br />

the first half of the eighteenth century the<br />

importance of the mother’s role in the family was<br />

emphasized. An example of this is the painting<br />

by Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin titled Mother’s<br />

Advice. In the second half of that century, the<br />

5


father became central to the family. This can be seen in the painting titled <strong>The</strong><br />

Village Bride by Jean-Baptiste Greuze. Despite the title, the father figure is<br />

placed at the center of the canvas with his family extending compositionally to<br />

the left <strong>and</strong> the right. At the end of the nineteenth century, importance centered<br />

on the child in the artwork. For example, Félix Vallottan painted Dinner by<br />

Lamplight in which the child is centralized <strong>and</strong> becomes the focal point.<br />

As in the Marriage Portrait, Everyday Families were not always depicted in<br />

a celebratory way. Some artists chose to portray problems in common families.<br />

Some chose to depict everyday families in a didactic manner hoping to influence<br />

society by visual example. An artist who did this was Jan Steen as in his<br />

painting, <strong>The</strong> Dissolute Household.<br />

<strong>The</strong> artists who chose to represent the Everyday<br />

<strong>Family</strong> did so in the styles of their own epochs. <strong>The</strong> artists<br />

placed emphasis on what they saw as important <strong>and</strong> what<br />

their society deemed as important in family life.<br />

In opposition to the Everyday <strong>Family</strong> other artists<br />

chose to portray the Noble <strong>Family</strong> life. <strong>The</strong> Noble <strong>Family</strong><br />

consisted of royalty, aristocrats, gentry, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />

Royalty had, for a long time, commissioned likenesses of<br />

themselves <strong>and</strong> their families. <strong>The</strong>re are hundreds of<br />

models of these. Some of these artworks included<br />

religious scenes. <strong>The</strong> noble family wanted renditions of<br />

themselves witnessing the scene within the painting. An<br />

example of this is the painting Madonna of the Pesaro<br />

<strong>Family</strong> by Titian. Artwork containing representations of<br />

Mother <strong>and</strong> Daughter<br />

Janet McKenzie<br />

royal families can even be found in the Egyptian pyramids. Royal <strong>and</strong> noble<br />

families still commission artists in a similar fashion today.<br />

Depictions of family retain their importance in our own time, though new<br />

sub-genres may be developing. Images in this section are indicative. Illustrated<br />

works like Severn Eaton’s <strong>Family</strong> Rituals: Discount Store #4 or Laine Wyatt’s<br />

Untitled #1 fall into such historical categories as the Everyday <strong>Family</strong>. Pat<br />

Mager’s Doll <strong>Family</strong> Sculptures bear a resemblance to the Symbolic <strong>Family</strong><br />

category. Works like those by Bezzubov, Sucher, <strong>and</strong> McKenzie strike new<br />

notes in family representation. Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Sucher show an English mother<br />

<strong>and</strong> a Thai father with their mixed race son. McKenzie’s Mother <strong>and</strong> Daughter<br />

image shows a mother of color with a blond-haired child. Both these works,<br />

suggestive of the global society of today, point to the emergence of artwork<br />

emphasizing the multicultural composition of many contemporary families. <strong>The</strong><br />

Multicultural <strong>Family</strong>, <strong>and</strong> other new sub-genres, may be joining those found<br />

traditionally in art history.<br />

<strong>The</strong> existence of sub-genres of the family portrait testifies to the popularity<br />

<strong>and</strong> significance of the family theme art historically. <strong>The</strong>se various sub-genres,<br />

the Noble <strong>Family</strong>, the Everyday <strong>Family</strong>, the Symbolic <strong>Family</strong>, Artists’ Families,<br />

the Marriage Portrait, as well as those developing today, all reflect the art style<br />

contemporaneous to their making, but more importantly they reflect western<br />

culture’s view of family’s place, function, <strong>and</strong> intricacies over time.<br />

6


<strong>Family</strong> Depictions in Art through History<br />

<strong>The</strong> Images<br />

Raherka <strong>and</strong> Merseankh,<br />

Husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wife<br />

c. 2500-2350 BCE<br />

Egyptain<br />

A painted<br />

limestone statue<br />

found in a tomb<br />

shows a wedded<br />

couple embracing<br />

affectionately.<br />

Pompeii<br />

c. 70-69 CE<br />

<strong>The</strong> Marriage Portrait<br />

<strong>The</strong> marriage<br />

portrait is placed<br />

in the home. This<br />

portrait is painted<br />

on the wall, <strong>and</strong> is<br />

equivalent to the<br />

modern day<br />

celebratory<br />

wedding portrait.<br />

Marriage of Giovanni Arnolfini<br />

<strong>and</strong> Giovanna Cenami<br />

1434<br />

Jan van Eyck<br />

This painting is a<br />

typical celebratory<br />

marriage portrait done<br />

in a naturalistic style of<br />

the time it was<br />

comssioned.<br />

Sarcophagus of the Wedded Couple<br />

Late 6 th century BCE<br />

Etruscan<br />

This piece, made of<br />

terracotta, shows another<br />

affectionate couple in a<br />

conversation or<br />

interaction of some sort.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se affectionate<br />

couples are surprising in<br />

early art.<br />

From series Marriage a la Mode<br />

1744<br />

William Hogarth<br />

In this series, Hogarth<br />

paints the failing of a<br />

marriage. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

paintings give a negative<br />

portrayal of the marriage<br />

<strong>and</strong> family culture of<br />

Hogarth’s contemporaries.<br />

7


Virgin <strong>and</strong> Child with<br />

Saint Anne <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Infant Saint John<br />

Leonardo da Vinci<br />

Virgin <strong>and</strong> Child with Saint<br />

Anne <strong>and</strong> a lamb<br />

c. 1510<br />

Leonardo da Vinci<br />

Portrait of the Artist’s<br />

Sisters <strong>and</strong> Brother<br />

1555<br />

Sofonisba Anguissola<br />

This female artist<br />

regularly painted<br />

her family because<br />

during this time it<br />

was her most<br />

accessible subject.<br />

Self-Portrait with Her Daughter<br />

1786<br />

Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun<br />

<strong>The</strong> artist portrays<br />

herself <strong>and</strong> her<br />

daughter to<br />

emphasize her<br />

own maternity,<br />

her own ability to<br />

produce family.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Symbolic <strong>Family</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong>se images show<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>mother,<br />

mother, child,<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>child, second<br />

cousin, <strong>and</strong> greataunt<br />

relations.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se relationships<br />

are seen though the<br />

portrayals of Mary,<br />

Saint Anne, Saint<br />

John the Baptiste,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Jesus.<br />

Artists’ Families<br />

<strong>The</strong> Luncheon<br />

1739<br />

François Boucher<br />

Bacchus <strong>and</strong> Adriadne<br />

1520<br />

Titian<br />

<strong>The</strong> Roman god<br />

Bacchus shows his<br />

love for the<br />

returning Adriadne<br />

in a proposal for<br />

marriage.<br />

This painting shows<br />

the fashionable<br />

interior, the wealth,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the fond<br />

interactions between<br />

the children <strong>and</strong><br />

elders in the Boucher<br />

family.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Artist <strong>and</strong> His Mother<br />

1926-1936<br />

Arshille Gorky<br />

This painting shows<br />

the artist’s longing<br />

for his mother who<br />

died several years<br />

before he painted<br />

this work.<br />

8


S<br />

Gaul <strong>and</strong> his Wife<br />

225 CE<br />

Hellenistic<br />

It was traditional<br />

for a Gaul male to<br />

take his wife <strong>and</strong><br />

children with him<br />

to battle<br />

campaigns. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

soldiers took what<br />

was important to<br />

them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Everyday <strong>Family</strong><br />

Peasant Wedding Feast<br />

1567<br />

Pieter Brughel the Elder<br />

<strong>The</strong> Northern<br />

Renaissance artists<br />

produced many scenes<br />

of common family life<br />

like this one.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dissolute Household<br />

c. 1668<br />

Jan Steen<br />

This didactic painting<br />

shows how laziness<br />

among other things<br />

can lead to chaos<br />

within a household.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Villiage Bride<br />

1761<br />

Jean-Baptiste Greuze<br />

Greuze shows the<br />

father as central to<br />

the family in this<br />

painting.<br />

Squirt<br />

1982<br />

Eric Fischl<br />

Fischl represents<br />

middle class America in<br />

many of his works.<br />

This painting shows the<br />

misbehaving boy <strong>and</strong><br />

the general events in<br />

which the middle class<br />

takes part.<br />

January from <strong>The</strong> Book of Hours<br />

Early 15 th century<br />

<strong>The</strong> Limborg Brothers<br />

Many of the<br />

medieval illustrations<br />

in the book are<br />

concerned with<br />

family focusing on<br />

courtship rituals <strong>and</strong><br />

community activities.<br />

A Mother Beside a Cradle<br />

c. 1659<br />

Pieter de Hooch<br />

This painting is not<br />

celebrating common<br />

family life.<br />

Rather,the artist is<br />

showing a mother,<br />

distant both<br />

physically <strong>and</strong><br />

emotionally, from<br />

her child.<br />

Mother’s Advice<br />

1738<br />

Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin<br />

This painting gives<br />

importance to the<br />

mother’s role in<br />

the family<br />

emphasized in the<br />

contemporary<br />

society of the<br />

time.<br />

Dinner by Lamplight<br />

1899<br />

Félix Vallottan<br />

Along with his<br />

contemporaries,<br />

Vallottan gives<br />

importance to<br />

the child.<br />

9


Madoona of the Pesaro <strong>Family</strong><br />

1519-1526<br />

Titian<br />

Titian portrays a<br />

religious scene with the<br />

patron <strong>and</strong> his family<br />

looking onto the event.<br />

<strong>The</strong> family, as painted,<br />

only shows males. <strong>The</strong><br />

Pesaro family did not<br />

consist of only males,<br />

but the female<br />

members were not<br />

valued enough to be<br />

painted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Noble <strong>Family</strong><br />

Las Meninas<br />

1656<br />

Diego Velásquez<br />

This is a scene<br />

of rich patrons<br />

looking on to<br />

their young<br />

daughter having<br />

her portrait<br />

painted.<br />

10


Quotes on <strong>Family</strong><br />

“Friend of my bosom, thou more than a brother,<br />

Why wert not thou born in my father’s dwelling?”<br />

- Charles Lamb<br />

“Nobody’s family can hang out the sign, ‘Nothing the matter here.’”<br />

- Chinese Proverb<br />

“<strong>Family</strong> jokes, though rightly cursed by strangers, are the bond that keeps most<br />

families alive.”<br />

- Stella Benson<br />

“Home is where the heart is.”<br />

- Pliny the Elder<br />

“<strong>The</strong> family. We were a strange little b<strong>and</strong> of characters trudging through life<br />

sharing diseases <strong>and</strong> toothpaste, coveting one another’s desserts, hiding<br />

shampoo, borrowing money, locking each other out of our rooms, inflicting pain<br />

<strong>and</strong> kissing to heal it in the same instant, loving, laughing, defending, <strong>and</strong> trying<br />

to figure out the common thread that bound us all together.”<br />

- Erma Bombeck<br />

“All happy families resemble one another; every unhappy family is unhappy in its<br />

own fashion.”<br />

- Leo Tolstoy<br />

“<strong>The</strong> happiest moments of my life have been the few which I have passed at the<br />

home in the bosom of my family.”<br />

- Thomas Jefferson<br />

“I hate to be a failure. I hate <strong>and</strong> regret the failure of my marriages. I would<br />

gladly give all my millions for just one lasting marital success.”<br />

- J. Paul Getty<br />

“Although today there are many trial marriages…there is no such thing as a trial<br />

child.”<br />

- Gail Sheehy<br />

“As the family goes, so goes the nation <strong>and</strong> so goes the world in which we live.”<br />

- Pope John Paul II<br />

“<strong>The</strong> family is one of nature’s masterpieces.”<br />

- George Santayana<br />

11


“<strong>The</strong> family is a place where principles are hammered <strong>and</strong> honed on the anvil of<br />

everyday living.”<br />

- Charles Swindoll<br />

“Without a family, man, alone in the world, trembles with the cold.”<br />

- Andre Maurois<br />

“<strong>The</strong> family is the nucleus of civilization.”<br />

- Will Durant<br />

“No one knows a son better than the father.”<br />

- Chinese Proverb<br />

“If you ever start feeling like you have the goofiest, craziest, most dysfunctional<br />

family in the world, all you have to do is go to a state fair. Because five minutes<br />

at the fair, you’ll be going, ‘you know, we’re alright. We are dang near royalty.”<br />

- Jeff Foxworthy<br />

“Relations are simply a tedious pack of people, who haven’t got the remotest<br />

knowledge of how to live, nor the smallest instinct about when to die.”<br />

- Oscar Wilde<br />

“<strong>The</strong> family is the test of freedom; because the family is the only thing that the<br />

free man makes for himself <strong>and</strong> by himself.”<br />

- Gilbert Keith Chesterton<br />

“It is not flesh <strong>and</strong> blood but the heart which makes us fathers <strong>and</strong> sons.”<br />

- Johan Schiller<br />

“<strong>Family</strong> isn’t about whose blood you have. It’s about who you care about.”<br />

- Trey Parker <strong>and</strong> Matt Stone<br />

12


Artists: Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher<br />

Thai <strong>Family</strong><br />

2002<br />

Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher<br />

Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher started their series, Families, after<br />

coming across a phenomenon in Costa Rica. <strong>The</strong>y encountered a German<br />

environmentalist in Costa Rica married to a native. <strong>The</strong>y soon discovered this is<br />

not rare. <strong>The</strong> two photographers traveled through Costa Rica, Nicaragua,<br />

Thail<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Cambodia to find Westerners, mainly men, moving to these<br />

developing countries to marry natives. <strong>The</strong> Westerners hailed primarily from<br />

homel<strong>and</strong>s in Europe <strong>and</strong> North America. <strong>The</strong>se people wanted to marry into<br />

paradise.<br />

This phenomenon quickly found its way into Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Sucher’s<br />

photography. <strong>The</strong>y posed the couples for the camera, yet not in a formal<br />

manner. <strong>The</strong> couples are sometimes accompanied by their children. Behind the<br />

figures, the backgrounds show the paradise-like l<strong>and</strong>scapes the Westerners<br />

desired. Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Sucher photograph in color to enhance the l<strong>and</strong>scapes<br />

as well as the varying ethnicities of the families.<br />

13


Although paradise is in the background, the expressions on the faces of<br />

the families do not suggest they are living a utopian lifestyle. None of the family<br />

members in the photographs smile; rather they look quite solemn. Each of the<br />

figures st<strong>and</strong> next to each other, yet no connections nor loving interactions are<br />

photographed.<br />

Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Sucher comment on the native aspirations that become<br />

part of these family relationships. <strong>The</strong> native half in each marriage carries as<br />

many, yet different, hopes <strong>and</strong> dreams as the Western half. <strong>The</strong> native family<br />

members have fancied illusions of money <strong>and</strong> security symbolized by marrying a<br />

Westerner. Yet these Westerners may no longer comm<strong>and</strong> the same earning<br />

power. <strong>The</strong>y have left their jobs in Europe <strong>and</strong> North America <strong>and</strong> have a new<br />

source of income based on the new homel<strong>and</strong> economy. <strong>Family</strong> finance issues<br />

arise for many of these couples. Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Sucher say, “Perhaps the same<br />

frustrations they left in the West” arise in their new homes. <strong>The</strong> Westerners<br />

dreams of paradise break down when local politics <strong>and</strong> customs make divisions<br />

in their marriages. <strong>The</strong> idealistic goals are not fulfilled, but the families still exist<br />

<strong>and</strong> endure.<br />

Wesley <strong>and</strong> Maria<br />

Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher<br />

Yuri, Surayoum, Carsten (Germany), - Costa Rica<br />

2002<br />

Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher<br />

14


Artist: Andrew Joseph Ortiz<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Structure 4<br />

1995<br />

Andrew Joseph Ortiz<br />

Andrew Joseph Ortiz was born in Los Angeles to Mexican immigrants.<br />

Yet, because he was born <strong>and</strong> raised in the U.S. he feels an inconsistency<br />

between his lineages. In his artwork, he <strong>and</strong> his Spanish-speaking parents are<br />

often shown in conflict. Ortiz does not speak the same language as his parents.<br />

Cultural conflict erupts within his family <strong>and</strong> undermines his sense of self. <strong>The</strong><br />

identity clash Ortiz includes in his artwork carries meaning for all people who<br />

have such issues within their families <strong>and</strong> society.<br />

Ortiz moved to Texas in 1997. This move energized his curiosity about<br />

his heritage <strong>and</strong> his own cultural identity. He started a series in 1999 titled,<br />

Disconnection/Reconnection. In this series Ortiz “visually explores <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on feelings of cultural alienation <strong>and</strong>…attempt[s] to ‘reconnect’ with<br />

his heritage.” This issue continues to appear <strong>and</strong> evolve in Ortiz’s work.<br />

Ortiz’s art relates not only to an audience raised in the U.S. by parents of<br />

a foreign heritage, but his work transcends cultural boundaries. His works are<br />

understood by all people who deal with miscommunication within their families.<br />

15


<strong>The</strong> miscommunication, as Ortiz describes it, is “both literal…<strong>and</strong> on an<br />

emotional level.” Ortiz includes text in his pieces to clarify the story line centered<br />

on his family’s disconnection <strong>and</strong> his place within his family.<br />

Andrew Joseph Ortiz’s series in the <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Experience</strong> is titled Mi Familia:<br />

Words Unspoken, Words Unheard. <strong>The</strong> title itself emphasizes the separation<br />

created by language. Part of the title utilizes Spanish words <strong>and</strong> part of the title<br />

is written in English. Each piece in this series is a scanned collage of<br />

photographs <strong>and</strong> objects to create unique images of sometimes jumbled <strong>and</strong><br />

other times uncluttered scenes. Ortiz h<strong>and</strong>writes text on the bottom of each<br />

piece. <strong>The</strong> series is fearless in its revelation of the artist’s personal family life<br />

from his childhood to present. Ortiz creates work based on his family, but he<br />

surmounts simply personal expression by making the work symbolic for<br />

situations in many families.<br />

Stretching Line<br />

1995<br />

Andrew Joseph Ortiz<br />

16


Birmingham, Alabama: Nadine <strong>and</strong> Frank<br />

Laura Straus<br />

Artist: Laura Straus<br />

Laura Straus began her career as a photographer after years spent in<br />

photo editing. As an editor she worked closely with the works of photographers<br />

such as Cartier-Bresson, Sebastiao Salgado, <strong>and</strong> Eugene Richards. <strong>The</strong><br />

photography of these artists became key influences in her own work. Her<br />

photography style is that of the photo essay. Her subject matter deals mainly<br />

with family <strong>and</strong> relationships.<br />

Laura Straus’s photography of families takes on the various cultures <strong>and</strong><br />

classes of American society. In 2002, Straus started working in <strong>The</strong> Fields<br />

Project, in which she documented the lives of a four-generation farming family in<br />

Oregon, Illinois. She also documented a Mexican-American family in Texas for a<br />

small project. Laura Straus says her goal is to “live with twelve families in<br />

America – from the Northeast <strong>and</strong> South to Midwest, North, <strong>and</strong> Southwest.”<br />

Her American family photography is usually focused on children. Some works<br />

take on the family through the children’s eyes, while others show interactions<br />

within the relationships between parents <strong>and</strong> children. She explains, “<strong>Family</strong> is<br />

the first love that we live in <strong>and</strong> see through – it is the primary source from which<br />

all our other relationships <strong>and</strong> ways of seeing the world are formed. Watching<br />

families interact, with an emphasis on children, has become a powerful tool for<br />

exploring my many questions about the way we love.”<br />

17


Love is as present in her photography as the families themselves. Her<br />

photo essay style shows each family’s unique bond <strong>and</strong> the way in which they<br />

survive as a loving unit.<br />

Mamaronech, NY: Rafferty <strong>Family</strong><br />

Laura Straus<br />

Greene <strong>Family</strong><br />

Laura Straus<br />

18


Seeds of <strong>Family</strong><br />

Chelsy Walker<br />

Artist: Chelsy Walker<br />

Chelsy Walker began her work on family due to a persistent need to learn<br />

about her ancestors. She went through numerous microfilms to catch a glimpse<br />

of someone related to her. Walker believes, “we are all a product of the<br />

traditions of our fore[parents].” She searched for her own identity <strong>and</strong> that of her<br />

immediate family. Records such as census records, death records, cemetery<br />

listings, or obituaries may seem trivial in the search for identity, but to Chelsy<br />

Walker they mean everything. She says she relates the records she finds to an<br />

“’I was here’ scribbled on the wall <strong>and</strong> then dated; a proof of presence, of being.”<br />

Walker also seeks to find some sort of synopsis of each ancestor’s life. This<br />

biographical aspect of archived records is, as she says, “so inadequate, so<br />

indescript, a mere passing of a windblown seed, planted in my mind, yet without<br />

form or face.”<br />

<strong>The</strong>se ideas led Chelsy Walker to make Seeds of the <strong>Family</strong>. In this<br />

installation she links her family’s past to the present. Each seed represents one<br />

of her ancestors. Walker explains this piece by saying, “the parachute-type windcatching<br />

part of the seed is made up of all the records that I have found for one<br />

particular individual.” Each whole seed of the installation is slightly different,<br />

representing the unique ancestor or family member. Together these seeds,<br />

19


these individuals, make a whole, a family. She reminds viewers of the human<br />

origins of her work by having a resin-cast foot act as the actual seedling.<br />

Detail<br />

Seeds of <strong>Family</strong><br />

Chelsy Walker<br />

Detail<br />

Seeds of <strong>Family</strong><br />

Chelsy Walker<br />

20


Lesson Plan 1<br />

Photographing Families<br />

Session Activity: Students will be introduced to artwork by Sasha Bezzubov,<br />

Jessica Sucher, Anya E. Liftig, Robin Radin, Charles Rushton, Laura Straus, <strong>and</strong><br />

M. Laine Wyatt. Students will participate in an activity that will require them to<br />

photograph their families <strong>and</strong> then aesthetically judge their own work.<br />

Levels: 3-12<br />

Key Concepts/Objectives:<br />

1) <strong>The</strong> students will become familiar with the artwork of family photographers<br />

through analysis <strong>and</strong> discussion of their work.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> students will create art from scenes of their own families.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> students will learn to evaluate their own artwork.<br />

Materials:<br />

1) CD-Rom<br />

2) Computer/Projector<br />

3) Cameras<br />

Vocabulary:<br />

1) Pose<br />

Procedure:<br />

1) Explain to students how families have evolved since the 1960’s. Review<br />

the section titled “Families: How <strong>The</strong>y Have Evolved.”<br />

2) Follow up with images of family photography (all images can be found on<br />

the CD at the end of the packet):<br />

• Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher, Frances (Engl<strong>and</strong>), Lek, Nick<br />

– Thail<strong>and</strong>, 2003<br />

• Anya E. Liftig, Untitled #1<br />

• Robin Radin, July Fourth<br />

• Charles Rushton, Kais, Jamal, <strong>and</strong> Malach, Palestinian Americans<br />

• Laura Straus, Greene <strong>Family</strong><br />

• M. Laine Wyatt, Untitled #1 <strong>and</strong> Untitled #6<br />

3) For each image ask the following questions:<br />

• Describe what you see in the photograph.<br />

• How are the people in the photograph related?<br />

• Does this look like a photograph from your family album? What is<br />

different or the same?<br />

• Are the people in the photograph posed? If yes, describe the pose.<br />

21


• Do you think this is the only photograph the photographer took of<br />

the family?<br />

• How does the photograph make you feel?<br />

• What is special about this family? How can you tell?<br />

4) Talk to the students about how they intend to pose their family members<br />

or not pose them; how they intend to show something special about their<br />

families.<br />

5) Have the students take multiple photographs of their families.<br />

6) When the prints have been developed, have students bring them to class.<br />

7) Students will then pick their best ones to show what is special about their<br />

families – students will make an aesthetic judgement.<br />

8) Students can then share with the class the photographs they chose to<br />

represent their families. Students will explain the reasons for their<br />

choices.<br />

Evaluation:<br />

Students will show an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the photography of chosen <strong>Family</strong><br />

<strong>Experience</strong> artists <strong>and</strong> of their own family through discussion <strong>and</strong> through the<br />

process of photographing their families. <strong>The</strong>y will underst<strong>and</strong> criteria used to<br />

evaluate the intent <strong>and</strong> message of an artwork.<br />

22


Lesson Plan 2<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Tree<br />

Session Activity: Students will be introduced to the artwork of Chelsy Walker<br />

<strong>and</strong> Inga Finch. Students will participate in an activity that will require them to<br />

make a classroom family tree.<br />

Levels: Grades 3 – 6<br />

Key Concepts/Objectives:<br />

1) <strong>The</strong> students will become familiar with the work of Chelsy Walker <strong>and</strong> Inga<br />

Finch through analysis <strong>and</strong> discussion of their work.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> students will learn what makes a family.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> students will make a family tree with the entire class.<br />

Materials:<br />

1) CD-Rom<br />

2) Computer/Projector<br />

3) Scissor<br />

4) Glue<br />

5) Bulletin Board<br />

Variation 1<br />

6) Markers<br />

7) Paper<br />

Variation 2<br />

8) Photographs<br />

9) Copy Machine<br />

Vocabulary:<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Tree<br />

Ancestors<br />

Procedure:<br />

1) Begin by having a discussion about what makes a family, about who the<br />

members of a family can be. Ask the following questions:<br />

• Who are the members in your family?<br />

• Would you include anyone else?<br />

• Can your friends, pets, or neighbors be your family? Why or why<br />

not?<br />

2) Follow up with images of family trees (all images can be found on the CD<br />

at the end of the packet):<br />

• Inga Finch, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Family</strong> Tree<br />

• Chelsy Walker, Seeds of the <strong>Family</strong><br />

23


3) For each image ask the following questions:<br />

• What is a family tree?<br />

• What makes this family tree distinctive?<br />

• Who is usually placed in a family tree?<br />

• Do you think the artist might include any people other than relatives<br />

in her tree?<br />

• Do you think she would exclude some people to whom she was<br />

related? Why or why not?<br />

4) Make a bulletin board with a tree trunk drawn on it.<br />

Variation 1<br />

5) Have the students draw family members individually or as groups. Have<br />

the students write the names <strong>and</strong> relations of the people on their drawings.<br />

6) Have students cut around the family members to create leaf shapes.<br />

7) Glue all the leaves to the bulletin board to form the treetop.<br />

Variation 2<br />

8) Have the students bring in photographs of their families.<br />

9) Photocopy the pictures <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong> them back to the students.<br />

10) Have students cut out their photocopied pictures into leaf shapes.<br />

11) Glue the leaves to the bulletin board to form the treetop.<br />

12) Ask the following questions upon completion of the classroom family tree:<br />

• What makes our tree unique?<br />

• Can all the people in our tree be a family? Why or why not?<br />

• Do you think the family members you included will always be your<br />

family or will they change?<br />

Evaluation:<br />

Students will show an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of whom a family consists through their<br />

responses to discussion questions, through an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the work of Inga<br />

Finch <strong>and</strong> Chelsy Walker, <strong>and</strong> through the pictures they contribute to the<br />

classroom family tree.<br />

24


Lesson Plan 3<br />

Analysis Fun!<br />

Session Activity: Students will be introduced to selected artists from <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Family</strong> <strong>Experience</strong> exhibition. <strong>The</strong>se artists are Severn Eaton, Cathy Lees,<br />

Andrew Joseph Ortiz, <strong>and</strong> Pat Ward Williams. Students will participate in an<br />

activity that will require them to analyze an artwork though a critical analysis<br />

process.<br />

Levels: Grades 6 – 12<br />

Key Concepts/Objectives:<br />

1) <strong>The</strong> students will become familiar with selected <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Experience</strong><br />

artwork.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> students will learn to evaluate art <strong>and</strong> its meaning through the critical<br />

analysis of a work.<br />

Materials:<br />

1) CD-Rom<br />

2) Computer Projector<br />

3) Worksheets<br />

4) Vocabulary Lists<br />

5) Pencils<br />

Vocabulary:<br />

1) Elements of Design<br />

2) Principles of Design<br />

Procedure:<br />

1) H<strong>and</strong> out vocabulary lists <strong>and</strong> discuss with the class the definitions of the<br />

elements of design <strong>and</strong> the principles of design.<br />

2) Show the following images of <strong>The</strong> <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Experience</strong> artists (images can<br />

be found on the CD at the end of the packet). Briefly discuss one or more<br />

of the works.<br />

• Severn Eaton, <strong>Family</strong> Rituals: Discount Store, details of #2 <strong>and</strong><br />

#4<br />

• Cathy Lees, Eleanor at the Computer, Dad Watching<br />

• Andrew Joseph Ortiz, I Don’t Have the Words, 1995<br />

• Pat Ward Williams, I Hear My Mother’s Voice When I Talk to My<br />

Daughter, 1993<br />

3) H<strong>and</strong> out the worksheets <strong>and</strong> have the students record their answers on<br />

the worksheets.<br />

4) Ask the students the following questions for each artwork:<br />

• What medium was used?<br />

25


• What element of design is most clear? Why?<br />

• What principle of design is most clear? Why?<br />

• How does this work relate to you?<br />

• Do the words on the piece or title affect the image? Why or why<br />

not?<br />

• What title would you give the artwork?<br />

• What do you think the meaning of the work is?<br />

• Would you include this work in an exhibition about family? Why or<br />

why not?<br />

Evaluation: Through analyzing artwork the students show that they underst<strong>and</strong><br />

the elements <strong>and</strong> principles of design, how art can relate to the viewer<br />

personally, how words <strong>and</strong> titles can affect a work, <strong>and</strong> the messages of the<br />

artists’ works.<br />

26


Elements of Design<br />

Analysis Fun!<br />

Vocabulary List<br />

Line: <strong>The</strong> path traced by a moving point.<br />

Shape: <strong>The</strong> general outline of something that can be categorized as geometric<br />

or natural.<br />

Space: Actual space is two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Pictorial space is<br />

the flat surface of the paper, canvas, or other material, also known as the picture<br />

plane.<br />

Value: <strong>The</strong> light <strong>and</strong> shade of something.<br />

Texture: <strong>The</strong> degree of roughness or smoothness of any surface; it can be<br />

actual texture or simulated texture.<br />

Color: <strong>The</strong>y can be descriptive, symbolic, or emotional. Color can be described<br />

as primary, secondary, or tertiary, cool or warm, <strong>and</strong> in terms of its value <strong>and</strong><br />

intensity. Colors can be described in their relationships like analogous or<br />

complementary.<br />

Principles of Design<br />

Unity: Each element is so arranged that it contributes to a desirable oneness or<br />

wholeness.<br />

Rhythm: Controlled movements that may be established through any of the<br />

design elements. Rhythm can flow or can be a repetition of elements.<br />

Proportion: <strong>The</strong> size relationships within a composition.<br />

Balance: Achieved when the eye is attracted equally to the various imaginary<br />

axes of a composition.<br />

Centers of Interest: A main focal point or secondary focal areas that can be<br />

established though any of the elements of design.<br />

Variety of Design: Used to generate visual interest within an artwork. Variation<br />

of any or all of the design elements will give variety of design.<br />

27


Analysis Fun!<br />

Worksheet<br />

1. Pick one of the artworks shown <strong>and</strong> fill out the following information about that<br />

artwork.<br />

Artist:<br />

Title:<br />

Medium:<br />

2. Identify <strong>and</strong> write down one element <strong>and</strong> one principle from the vocabulary list<br />

that st<strong>and</strong> out the most; the ones that draw you into the artwork.<br />

3. Does something personal come to mind as you look at this work? If so, write<br />

it here. If not explain why.<br />

4. What do you think is the artist’s message based on what you have described<br />

in questions 1, 2, <strong>and</strong> 3? Can you think of an alternative message other than<br />

your first interpretation?<br />

5. Would you include this artwork in an exhibition about family? Explain your<br />

answer.<br />

28


Lesson Plan 4<br />

Families are Unique<br />

Session Activity: Students will participate in an activity that will require them to<br />

determine what makes each of their families unique.<br />

Levels: Grades 3 – 12<br />

Key Concepts/Objectives:<br />

1) <strong>The</strong> students will determine what makes each of their families unique.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> students will create artwork from the uniqueness of their family.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> students will learn to determine meaning in an artwork through an<br />

analysis of subject matter <strong>and</strong> the element of color.<br />

Materials:<br />

1) Paper<br />

2) Markers, crayons, <strong>and</strong>/or colored pencils<br />

3) Worksheet<br />

Vocabulary:<br />

1) Unique<br />

Procedure:<br />

1) Artists who create work about their own families often show what is unique<br />

about them. Have the students ponder the following questions:<br />

• Describe the members of your family.<br />

• Do you think your family is like everyone else’s?<br />

• What is it about your family that makes it different?<br />

• What is a feeling word you would use to describe your family?<br />

• Identify a color you think matches your feeling about your family.<br />

2) Have each student complete a drawing to show uniqueness or<br />

specialness of his or her family. Tell the student to emphasize in the<br />

drawing the color chosen to identify feeling about the family.<br />

3) Do <strong>and</strong> discuss the following after students have completed their artwork:<br />

• Have the students display their drawings on a table.<br />

• Have each student choose another classmate’s work to examine.<br />

• Have each student answer the questions on the worksheet about<br />

the artwork he or she has chosen.<br />

• Have each student present a classmate’s artwork using the<br />

answers on the worksheet.<br />

4) Have a group discussion, asking the following questions:<br />

• Did any of your classmate’s families resemble yours? How?<br />

29


• Was there any family completely unlike yours?<br />

• Is there one classmate’s family you especially liked because of its<br />

uniqueness? Why?<br />

• Has looking at a variety of families made you more appreciative of<br />

something about your own family?<br />

• If you were to do this exercise over who else would you include?<br />

Would you use the same color to convey your emotions?<br />

Evaluation: Students will learn to value their own families <strong>and</strong> appreciate family<br />

differences through their artwork. <strong>The</strong>ir answers on the worksheets, <strong>and</strong> their<br />

responses to the group discussion will show their underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

uniqueness of families.<br />

30


Families are Unique<br />

Worksheet<br />

Carefully examine the artwork you have selected <strong>and</strong> then write your answers to<br />

the following questions.<br />

1) Who makes up this family?<br />

2) What colors did the person emphasize in his or her artwork? Based on the<br />

choice of color, name a feeling word you would say describes the artwork.<br />

3) What makes this family unique?<br />

4) How do you know this?<br />

5) Does this family resemble your family? Why or why not?<br />

31


Bibliography<br />

Artists’ Statements. 2005. <strong>Deconstruction</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reconstruction</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Experience</strong>,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Florida State University Museum of Fine Arts.<br />

Bonfante-Warren, Alex<strong>and</strong>ra. <strong>The</strong> Louvre. New York: Barnes <strong>and</strong> Noble, Inc., 2000.<br />

Bonfante-Warren, Alex<strong>and</strong>ra. <strong>The</strong> Musée d’Orsay. New York: Barnes <strong>and</strong> Noble, Inc.,<br />

2000.<br />

Fineberg, Jonathon. Art Since 1940. 2 nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall,<br />

2000.<br />

Hayes, Steven J. “Basic Quotes.” 2002-2004. April 12, 2005.<br />

.<br />

Gore, Al <strong>and</strong> Tipper. Joined at the Heart. New York: Henry Holt <strong>and</strong> Company, LLC,<br />

2002.<br />

Guillemets, Terri. “Quote Garden.” Phoenix, AZ: 1998-2005. April 12, 2005.<br />

.<br />

Kleiner, Fred S., Christin J. Mamiya, <strong>and</strong> Richard G. Tansey. Gardner’s Art Through the<br />

Ages. 11 th ed. Thompson Learning Inc., 2001.<br />

Minor, Vernon Hyde. Baroque <strong>and</strong> Rococo. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall,<br />

1999.<br />

Moncur, Michael. “Quotations Page.” 1994-2005. April 12, 2005.<br />

.<br />

32


Sunshine State St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

<strong>The</strong> Arts<br />

<strong>The</strong> student underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> applies media, techniques, <strong>and</strong> processes.<br />

• Uses <strong>and</strong> organizes two-dimensional <strong>and</strong> three-dimensional media,<br />

techniques, tools, <strong>and</strong> processes to produce works of art that are derived<br />

from personal experience, observation, or imagination.<br />

<strong>The</strong> student creates <strong>and</strong> communicates a range of subject matter, symbols, <strong>and</strong><br />

ideas using knowledge of structures <strong>and</strong> functions of visual arts.<br />

• Uses the elements of art <strong>and</strong> the principles of design with sufficient<br />

manipulative skills, confidence, <strong>and</strong> sensitivity when communicating ideas.<br />

<strong>The</strong> student assesses, evaluates, <strong>and</strong> responds to the characteristics of works of<br />

art.<br />

• Develops <strong>and</strong> justifies criteria for the evaluation of visual works of art<br />

using appropriate vocabulary.<br />

<strong>The</strong> student creates <strong>and</strong> communicates a range of subject matter, symbols, <strong>and</strong><br />

ideas using knowledge of structures <strong>and</strong> functions of visual arts.<br />

• Knows <strong>and</strong> uses the interrelated elements of art <strong>and</strong> the principles of<br />

design to improve the communication of ideas.<br />

<strong>The</strong> student underst<strong>and</strong>s the visual arts in relation to history <strong>and</strong> culture.<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> uses information from historical <strong>and</strong> cultural themes,<br />

trends, styles, periods of art, <strong>and</strong> artists.<br />

<strong>The</strong> student assesses, evaluates, <strong>and</strong> responds to the characteristics of works of<br />

art.<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>s how a work can be judged by more than one st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />

Language Arts<br />

<strong>The</strong> student uses speaking strategies effectively.<br />

• Speaks for special occasions, audiences <strong>and</strong> purposes, including<br />

conversations, discussions, projects, <strong>and</strong> informational or imaginative<br />

presentations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> student uses viewing strategies effectively.<br />

• Determines main concept <strong>and</strong> supporting details, <strong>and</strong> recognizes <strong>and</strong><br />

responds to nonverbal cues used in a variety of nonprint media message,<br />

such as motion pictures, television advertisements, <strong>and</strong> works of art.<br />

33


Social Studies<br />

<strong>The</strong> student underst<strong>and</strong>s historical chronology <strong>and</strong> the historical perspective.<br />

• Compares everyday life in different places <strong>and</strong> times <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>s that<br />

people, places, <strong>and</strong> things change over time.<br />

<strong>The</strong> student underst<strong>and</strong>s how scarcity requires individuals <strong>and</strong> institutions to<br />

make choices about how to use resources.<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>s how scarcity affects the choices people make in everyday<br />

situations.<br />

34


1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

Selected Image List<br />

Frances (Engl<strong>and</strong>), Lek, Nick – Thail<strong>and</strong><br />

Sasha Bezzubov <strong>and</strong> Jessica Sucher<br />

2003<br />

July Fourth<br />

Robin Radin<br />

Kais, Jamal, <strong>and</strong> Malach, Palestinian Americans<br />

Charles Rushton<br />

Greene <strong>Family</strong><br />

Laura Straus<br />

35


5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Family</strong> Tree<br />

Inga Finch<br />

detail, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Family</strong> Tree<br />

Inga Finch<br />

Seeds of <strong>Family</strong><br />

Chelsy Walker<br />

detail, Seeds of <strong>Family</strong><br />

Chelsy Walker<br />

36


9.<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

detail, Seeds of <strong>Family</strong><br />

Chelsy Walker<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Rituals: Discount Store #2<br />

Severn Eaton<br />

<strong>Family</strong> Rituals: Discount Store #4<br />

Severn Eaton<br />

Eleanor at the Computer, Dad Watching<br />

Cathy Lees<br />

37


13.<br />

14.<br />

I Don’t Have the Words<br />

Andrew Joseph Ortiz<br />

1995<br />

I Hear My Mother’s Voice When I Talk to My<br />

Daughter<br />

Pat Ward Williams<br />

1993<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!