Circumcision - Yahuah Is Life

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TWOT 282a; covenant; Gesenius Lexicon; a feminine noun – a covenant, so called from the idea ofcutting since it was the custom of making solemn covenants to pass between the divided parts ofvictims..can also mean a meal to enter into a covenant; Ernest Klein’s Etymological Dictionary ofHebrew Words pg. 85; masculine noun – covenant, treaty, and alliance.3מול…‏lwm mul (H# 4135): Strong’s Dictionary; a primitive root/verb - to cut short,i.e. curtail (specifically the prepuce, i.e. to circumcise), (by implication) to blunt, (figuratively) to destroy;BDB 557d; verb – to circumcise, cut off; TWOT 1161; circumcise, let oneself be circumcised, be cut off;Gesenius Lexicon; a primitive root/verb – to cut off, to be circumcised, to circumcise oneself; ErnestKlein’s Etymological Dictionary of Hebrew Words pg. 324; to circumcise.מל4מ lmm…mamal (H# 5243): Strong’s Dictionary; a primitive root/verb, to becomeclipped or (spec.) circumcised; BDB 576c; verb - same as mul, circumcise; TWOT 1161; circumcise, letoneself be circumcised, be cut off; Gesenius Lexicon; a primitive root/verb, to cut off, to be cut off;Ernest Klein’s Etymological Dictionary of Hebrew Words pg. 324; to circumcise.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Topic StudyCircumcision of the Flesh Was an Everlasting Covenantבראשית…‏tyvarb (B-r‘ashyth/Genesis) 17:1-14, 23-27…hwhy said that circumcision (H# 5243)was a mark (H# 226) of the covenant (H# 1285) for our flesh…He specifically said that we are to guardthe covenant of circumcision. Verse 13 states that those circumcised (H# 4135), would have thecovenant of hwhy in their flesh. Verse 14 states that the one who is not circumcised in the flesh shall becut off and has violated the covenant. This covenant (H# 1285 – baryth) was made by cutting flesh,which subsequently produces the spilling of blood. Much like the ‘cutting’ of the covenant we readabout in B-r‘ashyth /Genesis 15:8-17, this covenant was made by cutting; a very accurate depiction ofhow many covenants came to be.I believe it is important to really take note to B-r‘ashyth /Genesis 17:14: “An uncircumcised male childwho is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, his life shall be cut off, he has broken My covenant.”If hwhy said those not circumcised in the flesh are covenant breakers, and never gave a word changingthis ordinance, why did Paul say that circumcision means nothing? In his letter to those at Korinthos(Paul only wrote letters, his writings were not the Turah of hwhy) Paul clearly says that circumcisionmeans nothing (I Corinthians 7:19). Many stand on the writings of Paul as Turah, they even choose himover hwhy and [vwhy…but a deeper look into this letter in I Corinthians reveals something wrong. ICorinthians 7:12-24 actually has Paul stating that the words following were from him and not [vwhy.He states that unbelieving spouses are made set apart by the one who believes and that each personshould remain in the same state he/she is in when called. If you are married to a non-believer, stay thatway. If you are uncircumcised…stay that way. None of these statements are in line with Turah…but in all
fairness, Paul made it know that these were his orders (verse 17). Physical circumcision means nothing?hwhy said it was the mark of the covenant.Seeing that Abraham faithfully obeyed the command of hwhy and bore the covenant in his flesh at theage of 99, what are we to make of Romans 4:7-15? Paul explains that faith was reckoned unto Abrahamfor righteousness while in a state of un-circumcision, and that the mark of circumcision was a seal of therighteousness of the faith. However, in B-r‘ashyth /Genesis 17:11, hwhy said that the mark ofcircumcision was a sign of the covenant…not a seal of the righteousness of faith. Paul explains that faithwas found in un-circumcision…he never mentions that circumcision didn’t make Abraham faithful, itmade him obedient…which in turn proved his faithfulness.Circumcision of the Flesh Was A Condition for Pasachשמות…‏twmv (Shamuth/Exodus) 12:43-49…the importance of the Pasach amongst Yashar῾ål trulyneeds no explanation. It was so important that it is the only one of the mu’adym that we were given a‘make up’ day to take it (B-mdbar/Numbers 9:9-14). The Pasach was extremely important…yet nouncircumcised male could eat of it and there was no make-up day for Pasach for those not circumcised;no uncircumcised male could eat of the Pasach of hwhy. This passage is speaking 100% of a physicalcircumcision.After passing over the Yardan, Yahusha Bn Nun was instructed to circumcise all males that were notcircumcised before the Pasach. In Yahusha Bn Nun 5:2-11, a second circumcision was administered forthose who had been born in the wilderness and had not carried the covenant of hwhy in their flesh. Indoing so, hwhy said that the reproach/scorn/shame of Matsraym was rolled away…is physicalcircumcision still so important today that by not having it done we could still bear the scorn/shame ofMatsraym?Circumcision of the Flesh Did Not Cease in the Time of [vwhyNor Was a Command Given to Do SoLuke 2:21…as the command for circumcision of the flesh was not changed during the time of [vwhy,He was circumcised on the eighth day (according to the command) and carried the covenant of hwhy inHis flesh. We know that Yahuchanan was to prepare the way for [vwhy, he also was circumcised (onthe eighth day) – thus carrying the covenant of hwhy in his flesh (Luke 1:59 & 60). In Yahuchanan/John7:21-23, to show an example of righteous judgment, [vwhy made the comparison of Him healing onShabath versus the fact that men would even circumcise on the Shabath in order to keep the Turah.There was no command given by [vwhy from hwhy to end the physical act of circumcision…so wheredid this doctrine come from?The Four Necessities - Words of Man, and Not the Word of hwhyIn Christianity, there is a term that you may be familiar with – I believe it is referred to as ‘the fournecessities.’ This is basically the four things that you must do to inherit salvation as a ‘New Covenant’believer. The scary thing about these four necessities is that they did not come from hwhy, but from fourmen.Acts 15:1-29…because of a dispute about circumcision, the introduction of the four necessities wasgiven by Yʿâqb, not hwhy. Circumcision was basically suspended by the elders, Paul, Kaph, Yʿâqb, and
Page 1: What does Turah truly say about cir
Page 5 and 6: to write that there is no strength
Page 7: Your servant in the work of hwhy an

Circumcision - Yahuah Is Life

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?