Circumcision - Yahuah Is Life

to write that there is no strength in circumcision nor un-circumcision once in Mashýakh. Paul fails toexplain that even though Ishmael was born according to the flesh and Yatschaq according to thepromise; both were circumcised. Yes, the promise of the covenant was to be carried on throughYatschaq and not Ishmael; but both were circumcised per the command. We clearly read of thecircumcision of Ishmael in B-r‘ashyth /Genesis 17:23-25, and we also clearly see that Yatschaq was alsocircumcised in B-r‘ashyth /Genesis 21:4. If Paul used such a powerful allegory to explain the twocovenants, and also how we are as Yatschaq and not Ishmael (thus explaining why there is no need forcircumcision)…why did he not explain how both were circumcised of the flesh? Why write only half ofthe story in his letter? He continued to use half quotes to solidify his stand against circumcision;Galatians 5:14…For the entire Turah is completed in one word, in this, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”Is this not a form of deception? Paul is quoting, or better yet misquoting [vwhy. When asked what thegreater command in the Turah was, the Mashýakh actually said;“‘You shall love hwhy your Alahym with all your heart, and with all your being, and with all your mind.This is the first and great command. And the second is like it, ‘You shall love your neighbor asyourself.’ On these two commands hang all the Turah and the Nabyaym.” (MathathYahu/Matthew22:37-40).There is a huge difference in the two responses. Maybe if Paul quoted the saying in its entirety, hewould have realized that loving hwhy is a combination of faith and works that are held together byobedience and trust…circumcision would definitely be pretty high on the list. Instead, Paul basicallystates that those who are circumcised have fallen from favor (they that justify themselves throughTurah). All of his words are in direct opposition to Turah. He also said that Mashyach is of no use tothose who are circumcised…this is blasphemy.In Galatians 6:12-15, Paul writes that those who want to make a good show of the flesh compel othersto be circumcised. He gives a strange explanation about others wanting to boast in your flesh forcircumcision when they themselves do not watch over Turah. It is possible that he was speaking abouthypocrisy amongst those of the circumcision, but he also states again there once in Mashýakh; there isno strength in circumcision nor un-circumcision. By stating this and then writing ‘shalum andcompassion be upon those that live according to this rule’…he continues to blaspheme the covenant (Br‘ashyth/Genesis17:9 & 10) and the foretelling of hwhy destroying those not circumcised of the flesh aswell as those not circumcised of the heart (YaramYahu/Jeremiah 9:22-26). He also makes sure to addthat he has ‘the scars’, so let no one trouble him.Paul’s Blasphemy of the Turah of Circumcision to the PhilippiansIn Philippians 3:1-6, Paul writes to those in Philippi and warns them to look out for 3 things: dogs (thosewith no shame), laborers of wickedness, and circumcision. Paul actually lists circumcision in the samecategory as dogs and laborers of wickedness…this again is blasphemy. He goes on to write about aspiritual circumcision and speaks of having no persuasion (some versions read ‘confidence’) in the flesh,he then begins to speak in a somewhat arrogant tone, but cleans it up by stating that the things thatwere a gain for him – he counts them a loss for Mashýakh. Once again, Paul continues to blaspheme thecovenant (B-r‘ashyth/Genesis 17:9 & 10) and the foretelling of hwhy destroying those not circumcisedof the flesh as well as those not circumcised of the heart (YaramYahu/Jeremiah 9:22-26).