13.07.2015 Views

Strategic Plan (PDF) - Cioarchives.ca.gov - State of California

Strategic Plan (PDF) - Cioarchives.ca.gov - State of California

Strategic Plan (PDF) - Cioarchives.ca.gov - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Message from the <strong>State</strong> CIONovember 2006I am pleased to present the <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Information Technology <strong>Strategic</strong><strong>Plan</strong>, as updated by the Information Technology Council pursuant to its annualreview and strategic planning process. The plan, originally adopted in November<strong>of</strong> 2004, guides the acquisition, management and use <strong>of</strong> technology within theExecutive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment for a fi ve-year period (2005-2009). Weare now entering the third year <strong>of</strong> the plan.The ideas and contents <strong>of</strong> the original plan were developed over a two-yearperiod and represented the collective research and judgment <strong>of</strong> literally hundreds<strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s IT and program leaders. We began executing on that plan during2005. We fully accomplished a number <strong>of</strong> the action items and objectives, beganothers and held the initiation <strong>of</strong> some pending the completion <strong>of</strong> requisitecontingencies. The plan was updated in November 2005. During 2006, ourprogress has accelerated, and we are now fully executing on all <strong>of</strong> the goalsand most <strong>of</strong> the objectives in the plan. We have transitioned from planning toexecution.The list <strong>of</strong> strategic plan accomplishments is growing:• Consolidation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s two general-purpose data centers into theDepartment <strong>of</strong> Technology Services (DTS) which is now <strong>of</strong>fering newstatewide services;• A series <strong>of</strong> statewide information technology procurements conductedby the Department <strong>of</strong> General Services with the active assistance andguidance <strong>of</strong> the IT Council’s Acquisitions Committee, procurementsthat have resulted in estimated cost avoidance <strong>of</strong> 43 million dollars(representing a 40% savings over historic purchasing levels);• Completion <strong>of</strong> an Enterprise Architecture framework, as well aspubli<strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> selected key architecture documents dealing with“service oriented architecture” (SOA);• Agreement among key stakeholders on a long-term vision forestablishing, over a 10-year period, the <strong>State</strong>’s next generation <strong>of</strong>common business management systems based on an integratedfi nancial and administrative system built on Enterprise Resource<strong>Plan</strong>ning s<strong>of</strong>tware which will evolve to become the <strong>State</strong>standard;• Initial rollout <strong>of</strong> a new eServices strategy and refresh <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s webpages as a result <strong>of</strong> the combined efforts and leadership <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANPortal Steering Committee, the Director <strong>of</strong> eServices in the <strong>State</strong> andConsumer Services Agency, the Department <strong>of</strong> Technology Services,the <strong>State</strong> Librarian, the Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> and Consumers ServicesAgency, and the <strong>State</strong> CIO;• Passage <strong>of</strong> AB 2241, which authorizes a skills-based certifi <strong>ca</strong>tionprocess, and the development <strong>of</strong> a new IT classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion system which,when implemented in the coming year, should substantially improve theyield resulting from our recruitment efforts;• Creation <strong>of</strong> a “Leadership for the Government Executive Certifi <strong>ca</strong>teProgram” <strong>of</strong>fered by <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> University Sacramento, which isdesigned to help us build both IT and business-side executive leadershipin <strong>State</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment, leadership that is attuned to the 21st century’sdigital environment;• Passage <strong>of</strong> SB 834 which elevates the <strong>State</strong> CIO to a <strong>ca</strong>binet-levelposition and makes the <strong>State</strong> CIO the Executive Branch’s chief leaderand adviser on information technology and telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tionstechnologies.We are doing IT right, and we are doing it from an enterprise-wide perspective.Much <strong>of</strong> our fundamental planning has now been completed, and we arebeginning to move into sustained execution <strong>of</strong> major portions <strong>of</strong> our strategicplan. Our challenge is to continue executing on these plans. The plan has a fullmenu <strong>of</strong> activities, and an aggressive timetable for implementation. We are askinga great deal <strong>of</strong> ourselves, and we will need the strong support <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’spolicy-makers in the Executive and Legislative Branches to accomplish our goals.The plan is worthy <strong>of</strong> that support. It sets us on the right course to improveservices to the public while reforming <strong>State</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment operations in theprocess.Working collaboratively as a team, we <strong>ca</strong>n keep the <strong>State</strong>’s informationtechnology program on track and, in the process, provide the support that is soessential to improving <strong>State</strong> operations. For the <strong>State</strong>’s information technologyleaders, that is our challenge, our obligation and our opportunity.Join me in transforming <strong>California</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment, making it more responsive to thediverse needs <strong>of</strong> our great <strong>State</strong>.J. Clark KelsoChief Information Offi cer<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>ii


TABLE OF CONTENTSINTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1MISSION ..............................................................................................................................................5GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONSGOAL 1 .............................................................................................................................................7GOAL 2 ............................................................................................................................................15GOAL 3 ............................................................................................................................................19GOAL 4 ........................................................................................................................................... 23GOAL 5 ........................................................................................................................................... 29GOAL 6 ............................................................................................................................................33APPENDIXA—Government Code § 11545 and the Technology Governance Structure ...................37B—Graphi<strong>ca</strong>l <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Summary Charts ..................................................................... 39Glossary ............................................................................................................................................. 49Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................53Contributors ......................................................................................................................................55


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANiv


INTRODUCTIONThe <strong>State</strong> is moving forward with collaborative planning and coordinated executionto make <strong>gov</strong>ernment services more accessible to the people it serves, to improvethe cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment programs and operations, and to embracethe spirit <strong>of</strong> innovation that is <strong>California</strong>’s distinctive characteristic. Information andtelecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions technologies lie at the heart <strong>of</strong> nearly all signifi <strong>ca</strong>nt improvementsin statewide programs and operations. As a consequence, we have invested substantialtime and effort in our IT <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Process to make sure that our informationtechnology and telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions systems stay well aligned with the <strong>State</strong>’s businessneeds and goals.Technology for a Changing <strong>California</strong>As the Nation’s largest state and one <strong>of</strong> the world’s most powerful economic engines,<strong>California</strong> has long been the home <strong>of</strong> innovation and change. <strong>State</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment mustbe integrated into the fabric <strong>of</strong> this change. How the <strong>State</strong> manages its informationtechnology (IT) resources in the coming years will be criti<strong>ca</strong>l to the success <strong>of</strong> itsprogram efforts.The trends that are faced by <strong>California</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment are staggering:• The <strong>State</strong>’s population continues to grow vigorously, with about 500,000 new<strong>California</strong> residents added each year.• Diversity is unparalleled; <strong>State</strong> and lo<strong>ca</strong>l <strong>gov</strong>ernment employees provideservices to people having over 100 different native tongues.• Our population is bulging at the ends <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>ca</strong>le – with the largest numeri<strong>ca</strong>lgrowth among the young and the highest rate <strong>of</strong> growth among the elderly.• Privacy and security – both physi<strong>ca</strong>l and cyber – are increasingly important to<strong>California</strong> residents.• <strong>California</strong>ns continue to be concerned about the environment and demand<strong>gov</strong>ernment action to preserve our natural heritage.These facts add up to continuing increases in demand for <strong>State</strong> and lo<strong>ca</strong>l <strong>gov</strong>ernmentservices. Moreover, the taxpayers have made it clear that higher taxes <strong>ca</strong>nnot beviewed as an instant <strong>gov</strong>ernmental remedy. Consequently, greater effectiveness andeffi ciencies are the best avenues available to <strong>State</strong> program managers for improvingthe satisfaction <strong>of</strong> their clientele.Information technology is a key contributor to the execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> programs and ameasurement <strong>of</strong> their success. Although each department and program has uniquetechnology needs that must be addressed and focused on the specifi c business needs1


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN<strong>of</strong> the organization, several cross-cutting needs and priorities <strong>ca</strong>n be identifi ed thatare important to most or all <strong>State</strong> programs and customers. Among these are thefollowing:• Further development <strong>of</strong> Internet- and technology-based channels for thedelivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> information and services for the convenience <strong>of</strong> the public.• A need for consistent and accurate data that will interface with other systemsas necessary.• The assurance that confi dential information and valued assets are secure.• The ability to easily access information and services while ensuring that suchaccess is allowed only to those intended.• Availability <strong>of</strong> appropriate tools for executive oversight, managementdecisions, and program implementation.• Effi cient and cost saving means to deliver services.• Need to respond and transact quickly.• Need to maintain systems and services in adequate working orderthroughout their life cycles and to replace or retire them when support is nolonger possible.Strategy for a Changing <strong>California</strong>This statewide Information Technology <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> outlines a bold but necessaryagenda for redefi ning how we manage our information technology resources toimprove service delivery and streamline internal operations. It is a plan to align ourtechnology to an enterprise perspective and focus our investments on those initiativesthat will enable signifi <strong>ca</strong>nt improvement in statewide service delivery and businessoperations.Our adopted mission statement recognizes and emphasizes information technology’sorganizational role as a support player – information technology should not driveprogram design and implementation; instead, business needs should drive informationtechnology. Our mission is as follows:Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong>Government will operate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, costeffective,reliable, accessible and secure services that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> itsdiverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>, itsbusiness communities and its public sector agencies.We have adopted six strategic goals to focus our efforts. These goals, and theirassociated objectives and action items, detail the steps necessary for <strong>California</strong>to harness the power <strong>of</strong> information technology to improve service delivery andstreamline internal operations. The goals are as follows:2


Goals, Objectives, and Actions1. Make Government services more accessible.2. Implement common business appli<strong>ca</strong>tions and systems to improve effi ciencyand cost-effectiveness.3. Ensure <strong>State</strong> information assets are secured and privacy protected.4. Lower costs and improve the security, reliability and performance <strong>of</strong> the<strong>State</strong>’s IT infrastructure.5. Strengthen our technology workforce.6. Establish a technology <strong>gov</strong>ernance structure.In order to keep our action items as concrete and meaningful as possible, we havegenerally limited their horizon to the next twelve to eighteen months. We updateaction items annually, and issue a revised plan that refl ects current progress andnext year’s activities. This means in many <strong>ca</strong>ses that full implementation <strong>of</strong> a goal orobjective will require additional action items that have not yet been included in thisdocument.Visit the <strong>State</strong> CIO’s web site http://www.cio.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong> for more information about the<strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Information Technology <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>s and Program.3


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN4


MISSIONInformation technology support for the ExecutiveBranch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government will operateas a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, costeffective,reliable, accessible and secure services thatsatisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and privatecustomers, including the People <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>, itsbusiness communities and its public sector agencies.5


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN6


GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONSGOAL 1Make Government Services More Accessible.The <strong>State</strong> will complete a technology-enabled transformation in the delivery <strong>of</strong>services, improving the accessibility, value, and cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> services,benefi ts and information provided to the public, businesses, other <strong>gov</strong>ernmentagencies and <strong>State</strong> employees.Government services must be made widely available through multiple deliverychannels. We must move beyond the traditional face-to-face, paper-basedinteractions and demonstrate <strong>California</strong> technology prowess by making informationand services available inexpensively and on a 24x7 basis. Modern information andtelecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tion technologies are the foundation for this transformation <strong>of</strong> servicedelivery.However, it is not enough to take existing services and processes as-is and make themelectronic. There is a need to rethink the entire service delivery model. Integration<strong>of</strong> like services into a “service center” model is a must. For example, an entrepreneurstarting a new business should not have to visit ten or more different agencies (ortheir web sites) when this could be done in a single transaction. This type <strong>of</strong> atransformation <strong>ca</strong>n only happen when there is a deeper collaboration between related<strong>gov</strong>ernment agencies and willingness to share data.Finally, the widespread deployment <strong>of</strong> network technologies and broadband iscreating brand new opportunities that never existed before. Health IT and GeospatialInformation System (GIS) technologies are a harbinger <strong>of</strong> a new world in which<strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment could dramati<strong>ca</strong>lly enhance the value <strong>of</strong> its services.Objective 1Develop A Foundation For Transforming GovernmentThe <strong>State</strong> will implement a foundation for transforming <strong>gov</strong>ernment service delivery andoperations, enabling business solutions and processes that are more customer-focused,strategic, and cost-effective.7


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANThe essential ingredients <strong>of</strong> this foundation include:• Leadership focused on the redesign <strong>of</strong> business processes and the appli<strong>ca</strong>tion<strong>of</strong> technologies across organizational boundaries to improve effi ciency,interoperability, and cross-organizational program integration• A collaborative <strong>gov</strong>ernance process for evaluating <strong>gov</strong>ernment needs andchallenges across organizational boundaries, and prioritizing those initiativesbased on value to customers, public acceptance and a high return oninvestment• Further development <strong>of</strong> the e-Government service delivery channel,recognizing that digital and web-based transactions and interactions are nowthe preferred way in which millions <strong>of</strong> people and businesses conduct theiraffairs• Shared architectures, infrastructure, and tools for rapid deployment <strong>of</strong> newappli<strong>ca</strong>tions and services• Streamlined project development, management and implementation to<strong>ca</strong>pture early benefi ts and encourage transformation• <strong>State</strong> workforce skilled in implementing industry best practicesA key facilitator for this transformation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s Internet presence is our federatedownership and architecture, a federation that empowers independent, yet parallel andcoordinated, implementation by agencies across <strong>State</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment. Other objectives andaction items throughout this plan will also contribute to the essential ingredients listedabove.Actions1. By February 2007, the Director <strong>of</strong> eServices, who provides statewideleadership for the refresh and expansion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s web presence, will haveavailable on the eServices website (www.eservices.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>) a comprehensiveset <strong>of</strong> policies, standards, web templates and toolkits to assist agencies in thetransformation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s portals and web pages.2. By February 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO, the Director <strong>of</strong> eServices and the eServicesSteering Committee, using the Government Services on the Web: “<strong>California</strong> In-Touch” report as foundation, will adopt a <strong>California</strong> In-Touch Initiative Charterand a model Charter for the development <strong>of</strong> Service Centers for various lines<strong>of</strong> business (e.g., “Tax Service Center”, “Business Service Center”, “HealthService Center”, and so on).83. By March 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will initiate ongoing discussions, to be led bythe <strong>State</strong> Librarian and <strong>State</strong> Archivist, with communities <strong>of</strong> interest acrossAgencies and Departments to develop policies and methodologies for thepreservation <strong>of</strong> information on <strong>State</strong> portals and web pages, thereby ensuringlong-term public access to important public information.


Goals, Objectives, and Actions4. By April 2007, the Director <strong>of</strong> eServices in collaboration with the Department<strong>of</strong> Technology Services, <strong>State</strong> and Consumer Services Agency, and the<strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Library will take steps to provide guidance for the agenciesto train internal resources in various web development disciplines such as:Usability, Accessibility, Graphics, and others.5. By June 2007, the DTS Director and the Director <strong>of</strong> eServices will implement acontract to re-build the current <strong>State</strong> portal and provide advanced technologyresources for optional use by <strong>State</strong> agencies to upgrade their Internet services.6. By November 2007, each <strong>State</strong> agency will have completed a refresh <strong>of</strong> its webpages consistent with the policies, standards and web templates available onthe eServices website, or will have reported to the Director <strong>of</strong> eServices on itsplans for completing the refresh.Objective 2Leverage Services between <strong>State</strong> Agencies, Federal and Lo<strong>ca</strong>lGovernment and Promote Interagency and Inter<strong>gov</strong>ernmentalData SharingThe <strong>State</strong> will pursue opportunities to collaborate with federal and lo<strong>ca</strong>l agencies andwithin state <strong>gov</strong>ernment to leverage e-Government services. The <strong>State</strong> will coordinateinteragency and inter<strong>gov</strong>ernmental data collection and management, to improve datasharing <strong>ca</strong>pabilities and reduce costs <strong>of</strong> acquiring and managing data.Many federal, state and lo<strong>ca</strong>l <strong>gov</strong>ernment programs are interrelated or interdependent.Working together, <strong>gov</strong>ernmental agencies <strong>ca</strong>n deliver better services to citizens andreduce the overall cost <strong>of</strong> implementing and maintaining service delivery systems.System and database designs <strong>of</strong>ten prescribe unique defi nitions and program-focusedrestrictions, inhibiting the use <strong>of</strong> data for other purposes, and resulting in dupli<strong>ca</strong>tion andincompatibility <strong>of</strong> data. The <strong>State</strong> <strong>ca</strong>n do a much better job <strong>of</strong> sharing data throughcollaborative planning efforts.Actions1. By January 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will establish a Federated Identity ManagementSteering Committee responsible for establishing a <strong>State</strong> vision, policies andstandards regarding identifi <strong>ca</strong>tion and authenti<strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> system users anddata.2. By April 2007, the Federated Identity Management Steering Committee willidentify selected <strong>State</strong> agencies as the owners <strong>of</strong> identity data for persons,businesses and other entities consistent with the intent to maximize secure andreliable collaborative data collection, management, and data sharing.9


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN3. By July 2007, the Federated Identity Management Steering Committee willdevelop policy, privacy, and data sharing rules recommendations to supportstatewide business needs for identity management.4. By July 2007, one or more <strong>State</strong> agencies will work with the Social SecurityAdministration to develop data sharing <strong>ca</strong>pabilities using s<strong>ca</strong>lable enterprisetechnologies. The <strong>State</strong> will use the architecture <strong>of</strong> these initial systems as afoundation and model for enterprise data sharing.5. The <strong>State</strong> CIO will work with Agency Information Offi cers and ChiefInformation Offi cers to identify other opportunities for expanding interagencydata sharing consistent with privacy interests and fair information practices.Objective 3Leverage and Secure the <strong>State</strong>’s Geospatial Information Assets<strong>California</strong> needs to enhance its organizational and institutional <strong>ca</strong>pacity to develop,share and serve an integrated set <strong>of</strong> digital geospatial data resources in a manner thatis closely aligned with the <strong>State</strong>’s business needs. <strong>State</strong> agencies must work togetherto stand up the <strong>California</strong> Spatial Data Infrastructure: framework geospatial data sets,systems, standards, policies and practices. This will require an entity charged withthe responsibility for coordinating the geospatial activities with policy makers from keybusiness units providing executive sponsorship and oversight.<strong>California</strong> faces signifi <strong>ca</strong>nt challenges in a number <strong>of</strong> important areas that require themarshalling <strong>of</strong> quality geospatial information and services. These include among others:• Guarding against terrorism and criminal activitiesActions• Emergency preparedness and response• <strong>Plan</strong>ning strategic growth (e.g., San Joaquin Partnership)• <strong>Plan</strong>ning and operating criti<strong>ca</strong>l infrastructure• Mitigating the affects <strong>of</strong> global warming (e.g., Delta Vision)• Sustainable management <strong>of</strong> our natural resources• Restoring and ensuring environmental quality• Pandemic detection and response101. By January 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will sponsor the Geospatial InformationExecutive Committee to oversee the planning, acquisition, implementationand support <strong>of</strong> geospatial data assets, systems and solutions. The GeospatialInformation Executive Committee is comprised <strong>of</strong> the Secretary <strong>of</strong> ResourcesAgency; the Director <strong>of</strong> Offi ce <strong>of</strong> Homeland Security; the Director <strong>of</strong> Offi ce <strong>of</strong>


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsEmergency Services; the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the <strong>California</strong> Environment ProtectionAgency; Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency; theSecretary <strong>of</strong> the Health and Human Services Agency; the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the<strong>State</strong> and Consumer Services Agency; the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong>Corrections and Rehabilitation; the Director <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> GeneralServices; the Director <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Personnel Administration; the<strong>California</strong> Geospatial Services Director; and the <strong>State</strong> CIO.2. By July 2007, there will be a Geospatial Services Offi ce reporting to theGeospatial Services Director in the Resources Agency with the responsibilityfor providing strong statewide leadership for the review <strong>of</strong> business processesthat lend themselves to better leverage geospatial data assets and relatedweb services for business decisions. The Director and the Geospatial ServicesOffi ce will collaborate with Cabinet Secretaries, the Department <strong>of</strong> Finance(DOF), the Department <strong>of</strong> Personnel Administration (DPA), the Department<strong>of</strong> Technology Services, the Department <strong>of</strong> General Services (DGS) and otherstate agencies to facilitate the appli<strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> enabling geospatial technologiesand services.3. The Geospatial Services Director will work with the <strong>California</strong> GIS Councilto plan and begin implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>California</strong> Spatial Data Infrastructure(CSDI). The CSDI will defi ne the data architecture, systems, standards,processes and coordinate the availability <strong>of</strong> geospatial data and web servicesused by state agencies and partner entities. The Geospatial Services Directorwill seek opportunities to share GIS data and services with cities and countiesthrough collaborative efforts.Objective 4Support <strong>State</strong>wide Efforts to Develop Health Information TechnologySolutions and Promote Health Information ExchangeAs both a major purchaser <strong>of</strong> health <strong>ca</strong>re and a regulator <strong>of</strong> the market, <strong>State</strong><strong>gov</strong>ernment has a role to play in leading and facilitating the transformation <strong>of</strong> the health<strong>ca</strong>re industry in Health IT.The health<strong>ca</strong>re industry is beginning to examine how best to take advantage <strong>of</strong>information and telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions technologies across the industry to improve quality<strong>of</strong> <strong>ca</strong>re, expand patient access to and control over medi<strong>ca</strong>l records, and address issues<strong>of</strong> affordability, while maintaining the highest levels <strong>of</strong> security and privacy protectionover personal health information. Early experience with Health Information Technology(HIT) indi<strong>ca</strong>tes that it <strong>ca</strong>n reduce medi<strong>ca</strong>l errors by providing physicians and pharmacieswith more complete patient histories, computerized ordering <strong>of</strong> services and electronicreminders. With HIT, medi<strong>ca</strong>l information <strong>ca</strong>n follow consumers so that they are at11


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANthe center <strong>of</strong> their own <strong>ca</strong>re. HIT may also reduce dupli<strong>ca</strong>tion, waste, and fraud inhealth<strong>ca</strong>re. Over the next de<strong>ca</strong>de, HIT is expected to revolutionize health<strong>ca</strong>re, makingit more consumer-centric, and improving both the quality and cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong>health<strong>ca</strong>re in <strong>California</strong>.Actions1. By December 31, 2006, pursuant to Executive Order S-12-06, the Secretaries<strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services Agency and Business, Transportation andHousing Agency, and the <strong>State</strong> CIO, will deliver to the Governor a roadmapfor a health information technology program that improves quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>ca</strong>re,accessibility and affordability for <strong>California</strong>ns.2. By December 31, 2006, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will incorporate the existing CAGovernment Committee on Health Information Technology into the <strong>State</strong>’s IT<strong>gov</strong>ernance structure.Objective 5Support <strong>State</strong>wide Efforts to Expand Broadband Access and Usage in<strong>California</strong><strong>California</strong> is taking action to reduce barriers to broadband access and adoption andadopting measures to ensure that <strong>State</strong> policies evolve in response to ever-changingconditions in the technology marketplace.Pursuant to Executive Order S-21-06, Executive Branch agencies will identify barriers tobroadband access and opportunities for increased broadband adoption. The ExecutiveOrder focuses on strategies that <strong>ca</strong>n be pursued at an administrative level and willeither reduce bottlenecks or build upon “best practices.” An in-depth analysis will alsobe done relating to identifi <strong>ca</strong>tion and resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>gov</strong>ernment-imposed barriers orobstacles, technology-neutral recommendations for how to achieve statewide ubiquitousbroadband coverage, metrics for evaluating private and public sector efforts, targetsfor region-by-region annual increases in availability and adoption rates, identifi <strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong>regionally based business broadband deployment models, identifi <strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> areas wherestakeholders may aggregate demand for broadband and create opportunities that resultin increased adoption rates, evaluation <strong>of</strong> value-added appli<strong>ca</strong>tions, analysis <strong>of</strong> howpublic and private organizations <strong>ca</strong>n best integrate their efforts, and recommendationsfor how <strong>California</strong> <strong>ca</strong>n better leverage federal, state, and private foundation grant andloan programs relating to broadband. Together, public and private stakeholders willenable continued improvements in health<strong>ca</strong>re, public safety, edu<strong>ca</strong>tion, and the economy.Actions1. By February 27, 2007, the <strong>California</strong> Broadband Task Force will deliver to theGovernor a preliminary report that identifi es administrative actions that <strong>ca</strong>n12


Goals, Objectives, and Actionsresult in immediate promotion <strong>of</strong> broadband access and usage in the <strong>State</strong>.Task Force members will include, but are not limited to, senior representativesfrom <strong>gov</strong>ernment entities having a role in infrastructure deployment,information technology, and economic development; representativesfrom <strong>California</strong>’s private sector technology and investment industries; andrepresentatives <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>i t organizations.2. By November 27, 2007, pursuant to Executive Order S-21-06, the <strong>California</strong>Broadband Task Force will deliver to the Governor and Legislature acomprehensive report on broadband deployment and usage, including specifi crecommendations for how <strong>California</strong> <strong>ca</strong>n take advantage <strong>of</strong> opportunities forand eliminate any related barriers to broadband access and adoption.3 The Business, Transportation and Housing Agency (BTH) shall be the leadagency for coordinating implementation <strong>of</strong> policies and practices set forth inExecutive Order S-21-06, including:• Leading the <strong>California</strong> Broadband Task Force;• Modifying rights-<strong>of</strong>-way policies and practices; and,• Instituting broadband data collection and analysis.4. The DTS and the Department <strong>of</strong> General Services (DGS) shall take steps t<strong>of</strong>acilitate use <strong>of</strong> state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art technologies such as:• Use by <strong>gov</strong>ernment agencies <strong>of</strong> advanced communi<strong>ca</strong>tion technologies,such as web <strong>ca</strong>sting and Voice-over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services; and,• Development <strong>of</strong> public access, wireless Internet in public buildings.13


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN14


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsGOAL 2Implement Common Business Appli<strong>ca</strong>tions and Systemsto Improve Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness.To serve the best interests <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> and to optimize the business management<strong>of</strong> state <strong>gov</strong>ernment, we will collaboratively and successfully develop, implement,utilize, and maintain an integrated fi nancial management system. This effort willensure best business practices by embracing opportunities to re-engineer the <strong>State</strong>’sbusiness processes and will encompass the management <strong>of</strong> resources and dollarsin the areas <strong>of</strong> budgeting, accounting, procurement, <strong>ca</strong>sh management, fi nancialmanagement, fi nancial reporting, cost accounting, asset management, projectaccounting, grant management and human resources management.Objective 1Develop an integrated financial management system for use byall agencies and the Legislature initially encompassing budgeting,accounting and procurement functions, and continue development <strong>of</strong>the statewide payroll projectThe Department <strong>of</strong> Finance, in partnership with the Department <strong>of</strong> General Services,the <strong>State</strong> Controller and the <strong>State</strong> Treasurer, will undertake a 10-year initiative based ona phased development and rollout to establish the <strong>State</strong>’s next generation <strong>of</strong> commonbusiness management systems.Actions1. By January 2007, the Department <strong>of</strong> Finance, in partnership with the <strong>State</strong>Controller, the <strong>State</strong> Treasurer and the Department <strong>of</strong> General Services, willfi nish preparing a Special Project Report for the “FI$Cal Project” to acquirea system that will ultimately encompass the management <strong>of</strong> resources anddollars in the areas <strong>of</strong> budgeting, accounting, procurement, <strong>ca</strong>sh management,fi nancial management, fi nancial reporting, cost accounting, asset management,project accounting, grant management and human resources management. Theeffort will ensure the best interests <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> and its citizens, and optimizethe business management <strong>of</strong> state <strong>gov</strong>ernment. The Special Project Reportwill propose that <strong>California</strong> establish an integrated fi nancial and administrativesystem based on Enterprise Resource <strong>Plan</strong>ning (ERP) s<strong>of</strong>tware.2. During 2007, the Fi$Cal partners will develop a Request For Proposal (RFP)for the FI$Cal Project, and in 2008, the Department <strong>of</strong> Finance will conduct15


Goals, Objectives, and Actions• Secretary, Health and Human Services Agency• Secretary, Labor and Workforce Development Agency• Secretary, Resources Agency• Secretary, <strong>State</strong> and Consumer Services Agency• Secretary, Department <strong>of</strong> Veteran’s Affairs• Director, Department <strong>of</strong> Personnel Administration• <strong>State</strong> Controller• <strong>State</strong> Treasurer• Executive Director, Board <strong>of</strong> Equalization• <strong>State</strong> Chief Information Offi cer2. By January 2007, an “Enterprise Systems Governing Board” (ESGB), formed through acharter <strong>of</strong> its members and empowered by the collective decision-making authority <strong>of</strong>its members, will be charged with making fi nal policy decisions <strong>of</strong> statewide import andimpact in matters referred to it, with or without recommendations, by the EnterpriseLeadership Council. The <strong>State</strong> CIO’s <strong>of</strong>fi ce will provide staff support to the ESGB. Themembers <strong>of</strong> the ESGB will be:• Director, Department <strong>of</strong> Finance• Secretary, <strong>State</strong> and Consumer Services Agency• <strong>State</strong> Controller• <strong>State</strong> Chief Information Offi cerObjective 3Create Coherent <strong>State</strong> Processes For Access, Management and Preservation OfDigital MaterialThe <strong>State</strong> will develop processes to ensure the long-term preservation <strong>of</strong> and public access to digitalrecords that have enduring legal, histori<strong>ca</strong>l or administrative value. The <strong>State</strong> CIO and agencies willcoordinate to develop a statewide digital preservation plan including the development <strong>of</strong> metadatastandards.Actions1. By March 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will initiate ongoing discussions, to be led by the <strong>State</strong>Librarian and <strong>State</strong> Archivist, with groups or communities <strong>of</strong> interest across Agencies anddepartments to develop policies and methodologies for the preservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> recordsand documents that are created in or converted to digital form, ensuring long-term public17


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANaccess. These policies and methodologies shall include standards for metadatato ensure the ability to lo<strong>ca</strong>te, <strong>ca</strong>talog and process digital information.2. By December 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will coordinate the sponsorship <strong>of</strong> one ormore projects to demonstrate an integrated approach to transitioning digitaldocuments from dynamic working fi les to permanent archives available to thepublic.3. By December 2007, the appropriate state entities, with input from the<strong>State</strong> Library and <strong>State</strong> Archives, will adopt and publish policies and relatedprocedures to require full lifecycle management <strong>of</strong> digital material. Thesepolicies and procedures shall include provisions that will ensure that potentiallong-term value <strong>of</strong> material is properly assessed; that provisions, when deemedappropriate, for transfer to the <strong>State</strong> Archives and Library are established; andthat all necessary steps are taken for the long-term access, preservation andusability <strong>of</strong> digital material.18


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsGOAL 3Ensure <strong>State</strong> Information Assets are Secured andPrivacy Protected.The <strong>State</strong> will improve interdepartmental coordination, conduct rigorous securityassessments, adopt secure architectures, mitigate security and privacy risks toits systems, infrastructure and information, and provide guidance for adequate<strong>gov</strong>ernance <strong>of</strong> information security.As the <strong>State</strong>’s information systems become more complex and the need for rapidcollection, storage and distribution <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> data continues to grow, thechallenge for their protection becomes criti<strong>ca</strong>lly important. Catastrophic events, aswell as attacks against our technology infrastructure and systems, <strong>ca</strong>n have a severeimpact on business operations. We must work together to ensure <strong>California</strong>’s systemsare suffi ciently safeguarded and robust enough to support homeland security needsand to maintain business continuity <strong>of</strong> state <strong>gov</strong>ernment.Moreover, the <strong>State</strong>’s possession <strong>of</strong> signifi <strong>ca</strong>nt amounts <strong>of</strong> personal and confi dentialinformation, and the risk <strong>of</strong> disclosure or inappropriate use <strong>of</strong> that information, makesprivacy protection a signifi <strong>ca</strong>nt concern. In <strong>California</strong>, where “privacy” is expresslyprotected by our <strong>State</strong> Constitution, the <strong>State</strong>’s obligation to safeguard this informationis <strong>of</strong> paramount importance.Objective 1Adopt <strong>State</strong>wide Security and Privacy Protection StandardsThe <strong>State</strong> will adopt statewide security and privacy protection policies and standardsconsistent with the <strong>State</strong>’s enterprise architecture, for program data access, networkconnectivity, desktop management, server confi guration, Internet connectivity, and externalaccess to technology services.Implementation <strong>of</strong> statewide security policies and standards will help ensure the elimination<strong>of</strong> structural vulnerabilities from the <strong>State</strong>’s information technology architecture and systems,and enable more uniform and robust security measures.Actions1. By June 2007, the IT Council’s Security Committee will update the IT SecurityProgram Guidelines.2. By July 2007, the IT Council’s Security Committee will develop generalstandards or guidelines for remote access authenti<strong>ca</strong>tion implementation.19


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN3. By November 2007, the <strong>State</strong> Information Security Offi cer (SISO), incollaboration with the IT Council’s Security Committee and the Department<strong>of</strong> Personnel Administration, will develop a general Internet acceptable usagepolicy and a related best practice guideline for agencies.4. The SISO, in collaboration with the Offi ce <strong>of</strong> Privacy Protection, will providecontinuing edu<strong>ca</strong>tion and training for security and privacy protection awarenessfor state management and staff.Objective 2Assess and Mitigate Security and Privacy RisksThe <strong>State</strong> will provide tools to help departments conduct self-assessments <strong>of</strong> securityand privacy risks. These self-assessments will help agencies determine risks and properlymitigate them.Actions1. By March 2007, the IT Council’s Security Committee will survey departmentson existing and planned efforts in implementing data encryption.2. By April 2007, the SISO will implement a refi ned Information Security IncidentReporting and Notifi <strong>ca</strong>tion Process and ensure adequate training regardingincident reporting and notifi <strong>ca</strong>tion is provided to state employees.3. By August 2007, the SISO will develop a methodology and a set <strong>of</strong> tools thatdepartments <strong>ca</strong>n use to self-assess their IT security vulnerabilities.4. By August 2007, the <strong>State</strong> Privacy Offi cer, in consultation with the SISO, willdevelop a methodology and a set <strong>of</strong> tools that departments <strong>ca</strong>n use to selfassessthe privacy impact <strong>of</strong> proposed new and major modifi <strong>ca</strong>tions to existingIT systems that contain personal information.Objective 3Develop a Governance Structure for IT SecurityThe <strong>State</strong> will develop a <strong>gov</strong>ernance structure for IT security that is in alignment withthe <strong>State</strong>’s other IT <strong>gov</strong>ernance structures to help ensure that privacy protection,risk assessment, risk mitigation, and incident reporting policies and procedures areimplemented consistently and thoroughly statewide.A <strong>gov</strong>ernance structure is also needed to ensure the <strong>State</strong> implements a securityinfrastructure that meets the collective and individual security and privacy needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong>departments.20


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsThere are signifi <strong>ca</strong>nt interrelationships and dependencies between various departmentsregarding IT security—we are only as strong as our weakest link. Thus, it is criti<strong>ca</strong>l for ourcollective protection that we ensure that each department in the <strong>State</strong>’s infrastructureexercises due diligence in IT security infrastructure and processes. Further, bydeveloping consensus in implementing IT security best business practices and techni<strong>ca</strong>lconfi gurations, individual departments will benefi t from design and implementationeconomies <strong>of</strong> s<strong>ca</strong>le.Actions1. By February 2007, the IT Council’s Security Committee will identify allexisting IT security groups and committees, and document the charter andstakeholders <strong>of</strong> each group.2. By March 2007, the SISO will develop and publish a document that outlines thegeneral roles and responsibilities assigned to an agency’s Information SecurityOffi cer (ISO).3. By June 2007, the IT Council’s Security Committee, working with the SISOand Agency Information Offi cers, will develop a recommended approach tostatewide IT security <strong>gov</strong>ernance that covers executive, management, andtechni<strong>ca</strong>l roles.21


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN22


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsGOAL 4Lower Costs and Improve the Security,Reliability and Performance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’sIT Infrastructure.The <strong>State</strong> will develop an IT and telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions infrastructure that is secure,reliable and meets high performance standards by standardizing its infrastructurearound an Enterprise Architecture and consolidating the management <strong>of</strong> thatinfrastructure to support and enable a more customer-focused <strong>gov</strong>ernment.The <strong>State</strong> must use its limited technology dollars wisely. Enterprise Architecture is thedescription <strong>of</strong> the techni<strong>ca</strong>l framework that a business or enterprise uses to conductits business over computing and telephone networks. The <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> needs anEnterprise Architecture (EA) to assist departments in their efforts to create consistent,secure, and interoperable information technology systems. The architecture will be anintegral part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>gov</strong>ernance process for information technology. The EA team willuse the IT mission and the <strong>State</strong>’s key business drivers in order to build an architecturethat enhances information sharing, guides technology standards, reduces appli<strong>ca</strong>tiondevelopment costs and complexities, and better serves the needs <strong>of</strong> departments andthe people <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>.Through the use <strong>of</strong> Enterprise Architecture, infrastructure consolidation andenterprise-wide procurements, as well as the adoption <strong>of</strong> enterprise-wide standards,departments will be able to lower costs, and improve reliability and performance <strong>of</strong>the IT and telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions infrastructure.Objective 1Adopt a <strong>State</strong>wide Enterprise ArchitecturePursuant to the <strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture Framework, the <strong>State</strong> will adopt astatewide Enterprise Architecture to support business-driven, service-oriented IT solutionsthat facilitate the implementation <strong>of</strong> statewide technology standards in support <strong>of</strong>enterprise data sharing and statewide systems interoperability.The <strong>State</strong> will adopt and implement the <strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture as afoundation to support the business driven implementation <strong>of</strong> information technologyacross the enterprise. Enterprise Architecture provides the foundation for which severalother goals <strong>of</strong> the IT <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> may be delivered.23


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANActions1. By July 2007, the <strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture Program (CEAP) http://www.cio.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/ITCouncil/Committees/ArchStandards.html will be led by theDirector for Enterprise Architecture, who reports to the <strong>State</strong> CIO, and hasongoing responsibility for developing, maintaining, and publishing the <strong>State</strong>’sEnterprise Architecture. The Director will collaborate with the eServicesDirector, the Geospatial Services Director, the SISO, the <strong>State</strong> Privacy Offi cer,the Agency Information Offi cers (AIO’s) and CIO’s.2. By August 2007, the Director for Enterprise Architecture will partner withDTS and one or more departments to build a Services Oriented Architecture(SOA) environment to host multi-departmental shared business servicescriti<strong>ca</strong>l to the success <strong>of</strong> the <strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture Program.This partnership group will identify new roles, skills, processes, and trainingrequirements to support the SOA environment.3 The CEAP, using the <strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture Framework adopted by theIT Council in 2005, will continue to develop and maintain recommendationsand documentation in support <strong>of</strong> the following Enterprise ArchitectureInitiatives:a. <strong>California</strong> Service Centersb. Enterprise Business Systemsc. Identity and Authenti<strong>ca</strong>tiond. Geospatial Information Systemse. Health IT4. The CEAP will continue developing models and ongoing maintenance <strong>of</strong> thefollowing Enterprise Architecture Domain deliverables:a. Business – Business Reference Model (BRM)b. Data – Data Reference Model (DRM)c. Appli<strong>ca</strong>tion – Service Reference Model (SRM)d. Technology – Technology Reference Model (TRM)Objective 2Consolidate Technology Infrastructure and ServicesThe <strong>State</strong> will consolidate its technology infrastructure and services to leverage theeconomies <strong>of</strong> s<strong>ca</strong>le in the utilization <strong>of</strong> resources, eliminating unnecessary redundanciesand reducing support cost through standardization.24


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsThese efforts will align with the development <strong>of</strong> the enterprise technology architectureand implement the strategic direction for the use and deployment <strong>of</strong> informationtechnology solutions statewide. Technology consolidation by the departments and theDepartment <strong>of</strong> Technology Services, after consulting with its customers, will increase thesecurity, robustness and reliability <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s technology infrastructure and improvebudget allo<strong>ca</strong>tion and performance management, cross-agency collaboration, informationsharing and e-<strong>gov</strong>ernment solutions.Actions1. By March 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO and the DTS will establish a business-oriented,statewide telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions strategy that will address the full range <strong>of</strong>telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions services used by state agencies, ranging from basic phoneservice to video conferencing, telecommuting, long-distance learning, <strong>ca</strong>llcenters and other functions made possible by modern telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tionstechnologies. These strategies will complement activities undertaken pursuantto the Governor’s Executive Order, S-21-06 (Oct. 27, 2006), which encouragesdeployment <strong>of</strong> ubiquitous broadband throughout the <strong>State</strong> by increasingadoption rates, promotes accessibility and improve appli<strong>ca</strong>tions to better serve<strong>California</strong> and its economy.2. By April 2007, the Director <strong>of</strong> the DTS will submit the Network InfrastructureConsolidation Business Case to the <strong>State</strong> CIO and the Technology ServicesBoard. Working in conjunction with the Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation (DOT),the business <strong>ca</strong>se will include business model recommendations and plans totransform DTS into a statewide enterprise network service provider.3. By June 2007, the Director <strong>of</strong> the DTS jointly with the IT Council TechnologyServices Committee will submit a Server Consolidation <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> to the<strong>State</strong> CIO and the Technology Services Board.Objective 3Modernize Legacy SystemsLegacy systems that are outdated, ineffective and labor intensive to maintain should beconsidered for modernization or replacement since they expose <strong>gov</strong>ernment to higheroverall operational costs, increased vulnerabilities to security threats and architecturalbreakdowns.The <strong>State</strong> has many mission criti<strong>ca</strong>l IT appli<strong>ca</strong>tion systems <strong>of</strong> various ages. Many <strong>of</strong>these systems were developed with <strong>ca</strong>reful design and planning and continue to be highperforming systems, even today. Such systems should be leveraged and modernized byextending their functionality with new presentation and access methods to their businessrules. However, other systems have outlived their usefulness and should be replaced ormodernized.25


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANThe objective <strong>of</strong> legacy system modernization is to build upon and extend existingappli<strong>ca</strong>tion systems where it makes sense to do so, from a cost/benefi t, customerservice, business value and <strong>gov</strong>ernmental services perspective.Actions1. By January 2007, to reduce the <strong>State</strong>’s reliance upon unsustainable legacyappli<strong>ca</strong>tion systems, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will designate one or more demonstrationprojects to modernize outdated and ineffective legacy appli<strong>ca</strong>tion systems.2. By April 2007, to leverage some <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s high performing mission criti<strong>ca</strong>llegacy appli<strong>ca</strong>tion systems, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will partner with one or moredepartments to develop and demonstrate rapid development <strong>of</strong> web servicesaccessibility and service delivery via the existing business rules in those legacyappli<strong>ca</strong>tion systems.Objective 4Pursue Enterprise-Wide ProcurementsThe <strong>State</strong> will pursue the enterprise-wide procurement <strong>of</strong> technology using EnterpriseArchitecture and standards as a framework to leverage buying power and support theimplementation <strong>of</strong> standards and consolidation.Enterprise-wide procurements <strong>ca</strong>n achieve lower overall pricing, reinforce procurementbest practices and responsiveness to business needs, improve systems security andfacilitate the integration <strong>of</strong> systems and support <strong>of</strong> procurements across agencyboundaries. The DGS <strong>Strategic</strong> Sourcing Initiative was implemented in 2005 and hasbeen expanded over the past year. The <strong>State</strong> will implement strategies to assess theexisting enterprise-wide procurement program to improve benefi ts to the <strong>State</strong> andrecommend expansion where appropriate.Actions:1. By March 2007, the IT Council’s Acquisitions Committee in collaboration withthe DGS will assess and report on the overall programmatic benefi ts <strong>of</strong> theexisting <strong>Strategic</strong> Sourcing Initiative and identify areas for improvement in theadministration and operation <strong>of</strong> the program.2. By August 2007, the IT Council’s Acquisitions Committee in collaboration withthe DGS will assess and report on the economic benefi ts to the <strong>State</strong> resultingfrom the existing <strong>Strategic</strong> Sourcing Initiative, as measured by the overallestimated savings to the <strong>State</strong> from reduced procurement costs for itemscovered under the initiative.3. By November 2007, based on the results <strong>of</strong> the completed assessments, theDGS will develop a revised <strong>Plan</strong> for <strong>Strategic</strong> Sourcing to extend the program26


Goals, Objectives, and Actionsto areas with probable justifi able savings, and to revise or suspend the programin those areas where anticipated savings have not been realized.Objective 5Ensure IT Disaster Recovery <strong>Plan</strong>s, Processes, and CapabilitiesSupport Continuity <strong>of</strong> Governmental ServicesDisaster preparedness includes business resumption planning and information technologyrestoration, among other components. IT plays a signifi <strong>ca</strong>nt and criti<strong>ca</strong>l role in thedelivery <strong>of</strong> state services.<strong>State</strong> services are increasingly the result <strong>of</strong> collaboration across organizationalboundaries. This collaboration has recently been embodied in such efforts as theOffi ce <strong>of</strong> Emergency Services’ (OES) development <strong>of</strong> Continuity <strong>of</strong> Operations (COOP)/ Continuity <strong>of</strong> Government (COG) guidelines, as well as on-going agency IT operationalrecovery efforts.Actions1. By June 2007, the DTS will have identifi ed and proposed comprehensivedisaster recovery solutions for all IT infrastructure components that it supports.2. By July 2007, OES and the <strong>State</strong> CIO will work with Agency Secretaries todevelop criteria for setting priorities to re-establish <strong>gov</strong>ernmental operationsin the event <strong>of</strong> a large-s<strong>ca</strong>le disaster and to identify criti<strong>ca</strong>l interdependenciesbetween different <strong>gov</strong>ernment entities.3. By August 2007, the SISO and the IT Council’s Security Committee willwork with OES to establish consistency between Operational Recovery andCOOP/COG planning efforts to align processes, terminology, and reportingrequirements.4. By December 2007, the SISO and the IT Council’s Security Committeewill establish a workgroup to develop and publish a process for agency IToperational recovery reviews.Objective 6Standardize <strong>State</strong> Document Management SystemsThe <strong>State</strong> will align the architecture and standards <strong>of</strong> its large document managementsystems in order for these systems to become <strong>ca</strong>pable <strong>of</strong> sharing peak workloads,provide mutual aid in a disaster scenario, and better leverage expensive equipment andIT hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware licenses.27


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANThe <strong>State</strong> maintains a number <strong>of</strong> large document management systems including largemail processing centers that conduct document imaging, Opti<strong>ca</strong>l Character Recognition(OCR) and check processing, as well as all large printing and mail distribution centersthat produce high-volume mailings, benefi t checks printing, various state formsand publi<strong>ca</strong>tions, and custom dupli<strong>ca</strong>ting services. Standardization <strong>of</strong> architecturesand processes across these document management systems has many benefi ts.Standardization would allow these unique paper processing environments to share peakworkloads, provide mutual aid in a disaster scenario, and better leverage expensiveelectro-mechani<strong>ca</strong>l equipment, technology hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware licenses.Many large agencies rely heavily on the use <strong>of</strong> paper-based channels <strong>of</strong> documentintake and printing. Document intake management includes sophisti<strong>ca</strong>ted mail openingequipment that <strong>ca</strong>n detect checks, various high-volume s<strong>ca</strong>nners for both standard sizeand coupon size documents, imaging services for automated workfl ow, and key dataoperations for data purifi <strong>ca</strong>tion and quality. Document printing centers include expensivehigh-volume printers and copiers, specialized check printers with built-in monetaryintegrity, envelope stuffi ng and mail sorting machines that mimic the US Postal Serviceto obtain maximum postage discounts. The <strong>California</strong> Performance Review reported thateffi ciencies <strong>ca</strong>n be gained by standardization and consolidation <strong>of</strong> these large documentprocessing centers including better disaster recovery provisions and increased security <strong>of</strong>information.Actions1. By May 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will sponsor a statewide Document ManagementSystems Committee to analyze the current document intake management anddocument printing environments throughout the <strong>State</strong>.2. By December 2007, the Document Management Systems Committee willgather the baseline information for document intake management anddocument printing environments throughout the <strong>State</strong>.3. By July 2008, the Document Management Systems Committee in collaborationwith the <strong>State</strong> CIO and one or more departments will issue a requestfor solution proposal to the vendor community on how document intakemanagement and document printing centers within the <strong>State</strong> could beconsolidated or leveraged for economies, disaster recovery and increasedsecurity.4. By January 2009, the Document Management Systems Committee incollaboration with one or more departments will complete and publish theiranalysis <strong>of</strong> document intake management and document printing centers anddetermine recommended course <strong>of</strong> action.285. By July 2009, the Document Management Systems Committee in collaborationwith one or more departments may propose legislation to begin theconsolidation for both document intake management centers and / ordocument printing centers.


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsGOAL 5Strengthen our Technology Workforce.The <strong>State</strong> will strengthen its information technology workforce to meet the needsand challenges <strong>of</strong> supporting a large and complex public-sector organization in the21st Century.The structure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s technology workforce has not kept pace with the changingtechnology environment. The <strong>State</strong>’s move to a more customer-centric servicedelivery approach requires different skill sets not readily available today. Similarly, skillsneeded to sustain criti<strong>ca</strong>l legacy systems are being lost due to retirements. The <strong>State</strong>has not been able to acquire suffi cient skills or <strong>ca</strong>pacity to easily develop, operate and/or maintain some <strong>of</strong> the newer technologies and systems that will form the foundationfor the next generation <strong>of</strong> IT. With this in mind, we must prioritize appropriatesuccession and workforce planning activities over the next three to fi ve years, whichinclude building an effective and comprehensive training program for IT staff andmanagers.Objective 1Lead Succession and Workforce <strong>Plan</strong>ningThe <strong>State</strong> will engage in IT succession and workforce planning to assist in the transition <strong>of</strong>the <strong>State</strong>’s IT workforce to the future generation <strong>of</strong> IT leaders and workers.The <strong>State</strong> faces a workforce crisis in the next several years with a large number <strong>of</strong>impending retirements. We must have strategies in place to ensure an effectivetransition. The <strong>State</strong> will recognize and plan for the replacement <strong>of</strong> IT employees whowill likely leave state service within the next three to fi ve years. This plan will accountfor the unprecedented number <strong>of</strong> impending retirements, a focus on increasing diversity,increasing skills gap, and preparation to address newer, and changing technologies.Actions:1. By January 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will establish a framework to address statewideIT succession and workforce planning needs.2. By February 2007, the IT Council’s Human Resources (HR) Committee willidentify comprehensive training and recruitment strategies to reduce the risks<strong>of</strong> the 15 identifi ed skills in jeopardy as identifi ed in the Information TechnologyManagers A<strong>ca</strong>demy XIII (ITMA XIII) Skills Gap Report.29


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN3. By May 2007, the IT Succession and Workforce workgroup will complete theSuccession & Workforce <strong>Plan</strong>ning Tool Kit that includes templates, recruitmentand retention strategies, defi nitions, and instructions.4. By June 2007, the IT Council’s Human Resources (HR) Committee incollaboration with the Department <strong>of</strong> Personnel Administration will enable thescheduling <strong>of</strong> training workshops for CIOs and their staff, and HR staff whereappropriate, on how to utilize the Succession & Workforce <strong>Plan</strong>ning Tool Kit anddevelop and implement succession and workforce plans.5. By September 2007, the IT Council’s Human Resources (HR) Committee incollaboration with the <strong>State</strong> CIO’s Offi ce will identify implementation successmeasurements for the completed training and the Succession & Workforce<strong>Plan</strong>ning Tool Kit use.6. By October 2007, the IT Council’s Human Resources (HR) Committeein collaboration with the <strong>State</strong> Personnel Board (SPB) will facilitate thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> a plan to maintain and update the statewide va<strong>ca</strong>ncy data byclassifi <strong>ca</strong>tion verti<strong>ca</strong>ls developed by the Classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion Work Group for examand recruitment planning.Objective 2Modernize the Information Technology Classifi<strong>ca</strong>tion Structure andSelection Tools and MethodsThe <strong>State</strong> will modernize the classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion structure and selection tools for its technologyworkforce.The <strong>State</strong> must continue to support the IT Human Resources Project objectives <strong>of</strong>modernizing the IT classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion structure. This will more accurately refl ect the workfunctions and skills needed to develop, operate and maintain the <strong>State</strong>’s dynamictechnology infrastructure, including programs, systems, services and features, and futuretechnology changes. The classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion structure must be fl exible to match today’sworking environment; be easily adapted to changes in technology; and incorporateinformation developed by the DPA during the 1998-99 study, Service EmployeesInternational Union (SEIU)/DPA Labor Management Committee, relevant reports,and subsequent Information Technology Managers A<strong>ca</strong>demy XII (ITMA XII) surveydata. Additionally, new selection tools will be available to enable the <strong>State</strong> to moreaccurately assess knowledge, skills and abilities needed to perform in today’s technologyenvironments. The selection tools will provide for a skills-based certifi <strong>ca</strong>tion processauthorized by enabling legislation, AB 2241.30


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsActions1. By September 2007, the DPA will prepare an IT Classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>Plan</strong> for reviewand adoption by the 5-Member <strong>State</strong> Personnel Board. This <strong>Plan</strong> will serveas the basis for recruitment and exam planning for the new classifi <strong>ca</strong>tionsand selection systems, and as a training tool for the <strong>State</strong>’s Chief InformationOffi cers, IT staff and HR communities.2. By September 2007, the <strong>State</strong> Personnel Board in collaboration with theDepartment <strong>of</strong> Personnel Administration and the <strong>State</strong> CIO’s Offi ce willdevelop Recruitment and Exam <strong>Plan</strong>s for use with the new IT Classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>Plan</strong>and Selection System.3. By September 2007, the Training Workgroup in collaboration with the <strong>State</strong>Personnel Board will develop and publish a list <strong>of</strong> common competencies anda staff development strategy for the <strong>State</strong>’s Human Resources practitionersso that they may be better equipped to help improve the IT workforce. Thestrategy will include: development <strong>of</strong> IT environment tools which will assistHR practitioners to understand the multi-dimensional environment that ITemployees work in, and training for HR practitioners and IT managers andsupervisors.Objective 3Expand Recruiting Efforts for Technology Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalsThe <strong>State</strong> will develop a modern, ongoing recruitment program for IT classifi <strong>ca</strong>tions. Thisprogram will include recruitment <strong>of</strong> technology employees from colleges and universities,the public and private sectors, and the state workforce.Actions1. By July 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO, in partnership with the SPB and departmentstakeholders, will implement a Student Internship that facilitates the movement<strong>of</strong> students from a formal training and edu<strong>ca</strong>tion status to permanentemployment with the <strong>State</strong>.2. By August 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO, in partnership with the SPB and departmentstakeholders, will develop a recruitment strategy for the new IT classifi <strong>ca</strong>tionsand selection systems. The strategy will take into account, among otherstrategies, the lessons learned from the November 2005 AssociateProgrammer Analyst open exam and subsequent statewide open IT exams.The recruitment strategy will focus on attracting well-qualifi ed individualswith technology degrees and/or experience from colleges, universities, tradeschools, and the private sector.31


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANObjective 4Provide Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development for Technology PersonnelThe <strong>State</strong> will support and maintain a robust technology training program focusedon leadership and communi<strong>ca</strong>tion for all levels <strong>of</strong> IT management, supervisors,and pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff. This training program proposes to consolidate resourcesstatewide where feasible to address IT statewide needs. Training will address the corecompetencies and s<strong>of</strong>t skills articulated in the new IT Classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>Plan</strong> functional areas,such as project management, network and infrastructure management, appli<strong>ca</strong>tionsdevelopment and other skills necessary to support current and new technologies.Actions1. By February 2007, the IT Council’s HR Committee Training Workgroup willprovide two additional Leadership for the Government Executive sessions hostedby <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> University Sacramento, College <strong>of</strong> Continuing Edu<strong>ca</strong>tion.The program will address required competencies, including s<strong>of</strong>t skills needed tomanage and lead in today’s IT environments.2. By June 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO, in partnership with stakeholder departments,DPA and SPB, will sponsor implementation <strong>of</strong> a basic supervision program forIT supervisors. This program will address both core competencies as well ass<strong>of</strong>t skills needed to supervise in today’s IT environments.3. By September 2007, the HR Committee Training Workgroup will facilitateestablishment <strong>of</strong> a process to update and maintain a Pr<strong>of</strong>essional DevelopmentCurriculum & Catalog, similar to that produced by ITMA XII, but refl ective <strong>of</strong> theIT Classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>Plan</strong> being readied for adoption by the SPB. The new <strong>ca</strong>talogwill be web-enabled and electroni<strong>ca</strong>lly available to improve the ability <strong>of</strong> stateIT employees to meet the IT strategic goals <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>.32


Goals, Objectives, and ActionsGOAL 6Establish a Technology Governance Structure.The <strong>State</strong> will ensure its decision-making structures and processes improve theappli<strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> technology to support <strong>gov</strong>ernment programs and solve businessproblems.The overall <strong>gov</strong>ernance structure and decision-making processes will ensure:• Business and program performance and responsiveness,• Successful and relevant strategic planning and decision-making in support <strong>of</strong>business goals,• Oversight and alignment <strong>of</strong> information technology projects and operationsto ensure consistency with strategic plans, and• Operational implementation by those most directly responsible for programperformance.Objective 1Establish a Layered Technology Governance StructureThe <strong>State</strong> will establish a layered <strong>gov</strong>ernance structure that clearly assigns authority andresponsibility at appropriate levels throughout the life-cycle <strong>of</strong> information technologyprojects and systems.Actions1. By January 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO and the Department <strong>of</strong> Finance will haveagreed upon the necessary staffi ng and funding for the newly-created Offi ce<strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> Chief Information Offi cer. See Government Code § 11545 inAppendix A.2. For project initiation, development, review, approval and oversight, the <strong>State</strong>CIO will work collaboratively with agencies, the Department <strong>of</strong> Financeand the Department <strong>of</strong> General Services to ensure that decisions aboutinformation technology projects are timely, consistent with enterprise-widestrategic directions, standards and architecture, and cost-effectively supportclearly defi ned business needs and goals.3. The <strong>State</strong> CIO will conduct regular meetings <strong>of</strong> Agency Information Offi cersand the Director <strong>of</strong> Technology Services to promote integration <strong>of</strong> statewidetechnology initiatives, ensure compliance with IT policies and standards, andencourage alignment <strong>of</strong> IT resources and effective management <strong>of</strong> IT portfolios.33


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANObjective 2Improve Alignment <strong>of</strong> Technology Governance with Business<strong>Plan</strong>ningFor enterprise-wide initiatives, the <strong>State</strong> will establish executive <strong>gov</strong>ernance structuresthat ensure criti<strong>ca</strong>l planning and implementation decisions are brought to the attention<strong>of</strong> the appropriate state <strong>of</strong>fi cials for discussion and resolution.It is not enough to have enterprise-wide technology <strong>gov</strong>ernance and collaboration.Decisions about <strong>gov</strong>ernment operations ultimately belong to executive leadersthroughout <strong>gov</strong>ernment. The <strong>State</strong> must increase its <strong>ca</strong>pacity for cross-agency businessplanning, <strong>gov</strong>ernance and implementation.Actions1. Enterprise-wide and cross-agency projects will establish cross-agency steeringcommittees <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders and control agencies to ensure that key projectdecisions are made by agency chief executives and that technology decisionsremain well aligned with business and program directions. These steeringcommittees will report to the Enterprise Leadership Council and refer to theEnterprise Leadership Council any issues requiring enterprise-wide review anddecision.Objective 3Implement Performance MeasuresThe <strong>State</strong> will develop performance measures and methodologies to assist in managingits technology systems and services.While comprehensive performance measures depend on more robust enterprise fi nancialand resource management systems than exist today in state <strong>gov</strong>ernment and on morecomplete defi nitions <strong>of</strong> business needs, steps will be taken to improve performancereview, prepare for more rigorous performance evaluation tools in the future, establishbaselines, and encourage better performance from technology systems.Actions1. By April 2007, the <strong>State</strong> CIO will establish a high-level cross-departmentalPerformance Measurement Advisory Committee to adopt standardmethodologies for information technology service delivery (such as InformationTechnology Service Management – ITSM) and project management (such asProject Management Institute - PMI).34


Goals, Objectives, and Actions2. By July 2007, the Director <strong>of</strong> the DTS will implement a pilot project at theDepartment to measure key metrics for managing day-to-day IT operations,and measure service level metrics, for the specifi c business needs <strong>of</strong> selectedclients.3. By October 2007, the Performance Measurement Advisory Committee willrecommend to the <strong>State</strong> CIO standard model(s) for defi ning and measuringperformance, such as the Balanced Score<strong>ca</strong>rd, Economic Value Added, ServiceLevel Agreements, or Benchmarking, and provide support to state Agenciesand departments in developing baselines and ongoing plans for reportingperformance to their management.35


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN36


AppendixAPPENDIXAppendix AGovernment Code § 11545 - Senate Bill 834 (Statutes <strong>of</strong> 2006)11545. (a) There is in state <strong>gov</strong>ernment the <strong>of</strong>fi ce <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> Chief InformationOffi cer. The <strong>State</strong> Chief Information Offi cer shall be appointed by, and serve atthe pleasure <strong>of</strong>, the Governor, subject to Senate confi rmation. The <strong>State</strong> ChiefInformation Offi cer shall be a member <strong>of</strong> the Governor’s <strong>ca</strong>binet.(b) The duties <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> Chief Information Offi cer shall include, but not belimited to, all <strong>of</strong> the following:(1) Advising the Governor on the strategic management and direction <strong>of</strong>the <strong>State</strong>’s information technology resources.(2) Minimizing overlap, redundancy, and cost in state operations bypromoting the effi cient and effective use <strong>of</strong> information technology.(3) Coordinating the activities <strong>of</strong> agency information <strong>of</strong>fi cers, agency chiefinformation <strong>of</strong>fi cers, and the Director <strong>of</strong> Technology Services for purposes<strong>of</strong> integrating statewide technology initiatives, ensuring compliance withinformation technology policies and standards, and promoting alignment<strong>of</strong> information technology resources and effective management <strong>of</strong>information technology portfolios.(4) Working to improve organizational maturity and <strong>ca</strong>pacity in theeffective management <strong>of</strong> information technology.(5) Establishing performance management and improvement processes toensure state information technology systems and services are effi cient andeffective.The <strong>California</strong> Executive Branch Technology Governance StructureThe IT <strong>gov</strong>ernance structure will be comprised <strong>of</strong> the following component layers:A. A <strong>State</strong> Chief Information Offi cer (<strong>State</strong> CIO) who is a senior advisorto the Governor with full responsibility and authority for statewidetechnology vision, strategic planning and coordination, technology policiesand standards for secure technology solutions, technology architecture,project management and defi ning a streamlined technology project reviewand approval process. The <strong>State</strong> CIO will lead an Offi ce that includes,among other functions, <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Governance, <strong>State</strong>wide Policy,37


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANPortfolio Management, Enterprise Initiatives, Enterprise Architecture andWorkforce <strong>Plan</strong>ning.B. Agency Chief Information Offi cers (Agency CIOs) who are responsible foroverseeing departmental management <strong>of</strong> assets, projects, data systems,and IT services, through a reporting oversight <strong>of</strong> departmental CIO’s. EachAgency CIO shall develop a 3-year plan to rationalize and standardize withintheir respective Agency, the IT infrastructure, data, and procedures for alldepartments within the Agency.C. A strengthened Departmental CIO function, with Department CIOs directlyresponsible for all IT activities within the department and accountableto their department director and Agency CIO for purposes <strong>of</strong> reportingdepartmental IT performance. All employees in IT classifi <strong>ca</strong>tions and all ITsystems, assets, projects, purchases, and contracts will be accountable tothe Department CIO, who will, under the direction <strong>of</strong> the department’s<strong>gov</strong>ernance authority, establish standards and procedures to promoteeffi cient and effective use <strong>of</strong> IT resources throughout the department. EachDepartment CIO will develop a 3-year plan to rationalize and standardizethe department’s infrastructure, data, and procedures, consistent with theAgency plan developed by the Agency CIO and will report IT performance,accomplishments and issues to the Agency CIO.38


AppendixAppendix B—Graphi<strong>ca</strong>l <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Summary ChartsCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN SUMMARYMission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong>Government will operate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective,reliable, accessible and secure services that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public andprivate customers, including the People <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>, its business communities and itspublic sector agencies.OBJECTIVE 1Develop a Foundation forTransforming GovernmentOBJECTIVE 2Leverage Services between<strong>State</strong>, Federal and Lo<strong>ca</strong>lGovernment and PromoteInteragency andInter<strong>gov</strong>ernmental DataSharingOBJECTIVE 3Leverage andsecure the <strong>State</strong>’sGIS AssetsOBJECTIVE 4Support <strong>State</strong>wide Efforts todevelop Health IT Solutionsand Promote HealthInformation ExchangeOBJECTIVE 12Adopt a <strong>State</strong>wideEnterpriseArchitectureOBJECTIVE 13ConsolidateTechnologyInfrastructure andServicesOBJECTIVE 14Modernize LegacySystemsGOAL 1MakeGovernmentServices MoreAccessibleOBJECTIVE 5Support<strong>State</strong>wide Effortsto expandBroadband Accessand Usage in<strong>California</strong>GOAL 4Lower Costs andImprove theSecurity,Reliability andPerformance <strong>of</strong>the <strong>State</strong>'s ITInfrastructureOBJECTIVE 6DevelopIntegratedadministrative andfinancialmanagementsystem for allagencies andLegislatureGOAL 2Implement CommonBusiness Appli<strong>ca</strong>tionsand Systems toImprove Efficiencyand Cost-EffectivenessGOAL 5StrengthenourTechnologyWorkforceOBJECTIVE 7Establish Executive Governance forProjects with Signifi<strong>ca</strong>nt <strong>State</strong>wideImpli<strong>ca</strong>tionsGOAL 3Ensure <strong>State</strong>InformationAssets areSecured andPrivacy ProtectedGOAL 6Better AlignEnterpriseBusiness<strong>Plan</strong>ning withTechnologyGovernanceOBJECTIVE 8Create Coherent <strong>State</strong> Processes forAccess, Management andPreservation <strong>of</strong> Digital MaterialOBJECTIVE 9Adopt statewideSecurity and PrivacyProtection StandardsOBJECTIVE 10Assess andMitigate SecurityRisksOBJECTIVE 11Develop aGovernancestructure for ITSecurityOBJECTIVE 22Establish a LayeredTechnologyGovernance StructureOBJECTIVE 23Improve Alignment <strong>of</strong>TechnologyGovernance withBusiness <strong>Plan</strong>ningOBJECTIVE 15Pursue Enterprise-Wide ProcurementsOBJECTIVE 16Ensure IT DisasterRecovery <strong>Plan</strong>s,Processes, andCapabilities SupportContinuity <strong>of</strong>GovernmentalServicesOBJECTIVE 18Lead Succession andWorkforce <strong>Plan</strong>ningOBJECTIVE 20Expand RecruitingEfforts for TechnologyPr<strong>of</strong>essionalsOBJECTIVE 17Standardize <strong>State</strong>Document ManagementSystemsOBJECTIVE 19Modernize the ITClassifi<strong>ca</strong>tion Structure andSelection Tools and MethodsOBJECTIVE 21Provide Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalDevelopment forTechnology PersonnelOBJECTIVE 24ImplementPerformance Measures39


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 1Mission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.1.1.1 Provide a comprehensive set <strong>of</strong> policies,standards, web templates and toolkits to assistagencies in the transformation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s portalsand web pages.1.1.3 Initiate ongoing discussions withcommunities <strong>of</strong> interest across Agenciesand Departments to develop policies andmethodologies for the preservation <strong>of</strong>information on <strong>State</strong> portals and webpages.1.1.2 Adopt a <strong>California</strong> In-TouchInitiative Charter and a modelCharter for the development <strong>of</strong>Service Centers for various lines<strong>of</strong> business.1.1.4 Take steps to provide guidance forthe DTS, <strong>State</strong> and Consumer ServicesAgency and <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Library to traininternal resources in various webdevelopment disciplines.1.1.5 Implement a contract to re-architectthe current <strong>State</strong> portal and provideadvanced technology resources for optionaluse by <strong>State</strong> agencies to upgrade theirInternet services.1.2.1 Establish aFederated IdentifyManagementSteering Committeeresponsible forestablishing a <strong>State</strong>vision, policies andstandards regardingidentifi<strong>ca</strong>tion andauthenti<strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong><strong>State</strong> system usersand data.1.2.2 Identify selected<strong>State</strong> agencies as theowners <strong>of</strong> identify datafor persons, businessesand other entitiesconsistent with the intentto maximize secure andreliable collaborative datacollection, managementand data sharing.OBJECTIVE 2Leverage ServicesBetween <strong>State</strong>,Federal and Lo<strong>ca</strong>lGovernment andPromoteInteragency andInter<strong>gov</strong>ernmentalData Sharing1.2.3 Develop policy,privacy and data sharingrules recommendationsto support statewidebusiness needs foridentity management.OBJECTIVE 1Develop aFoundation forTransformingGovernmentGOAL 1MakeGovernmentServices MoreAccessible1.2.5 Work with AIO’s and CIO’sto identify other opportunities forexpanding interagency datasharing consistent with privacyinterests and fair informationpractices.1.2.4 Work with the Social SecurityAdministration to develop data sharing<strong>ca</strong>pabilities using s<strong>ca</strong>lable enterprisetechnologies.1.1.6 Complete a refresh <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> agencyweb pages consistent with the policies,standards and web templates available onthe eServices website or report to theDirector <strong>of</strong> eServices on plans forcompleting the refresh.1.3.1 Sponsorthe GeospatialInformationExecutiveCommittee tooversee theplanning,acquisition,implementationand support <strong>of</strong>geospatial dataassets, systemsand solutions.1.3.2 Provide strongstatewide leadership forthe review <strong>of</strong> businessprocesses that lendthemselves to betterleverage Geospatial dataassets and related webservices for businessdecisions.OBJECTIVE 3Leverage andSecure the <strong>State</strong>’sGIS Assets1.3.3 Work with the<strong>California</strong> GIS Council toplan and beginimplementation <strong>of</strong> the CSDIwhich will define the dataarchitecture, systems,standards, processes andcoordinate the availability <strong>of</strong>geospatial data and webservices used by stateagencies and partnerentities.40


AppendixCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 1cont’dMission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.1.4.1 Deliver tothe Governor aroadmap for ahealth IT program.OBJECTIVE 4Support <strong>State</strong>wideEfforts to DevelopHealth IT Solutionsand PromoteHealth InformationExchange1.4.4 Identify current or newstate projects and resources that<strong>ca</strong>n be leveraged to support HITadoption and/or improve <strong>State</strong>health services and operations.1.4.2 Incorporate the existingCA Govt Committee on HIT intothe <strong>State</strong>’s IT <strong>gov</strong>ernancestructure.GOAL 1MakeGovernmentServices MoreAccessible1.4.3 Establish a HIT Liaisonwho coordinates HIT initiativeswith federal, state and lo<strong>ca</strong>l<strong>gov</strong>ernments.1.5.1 Deliver a preliminaryreport that identifiesadministrative actions that resultin immediate promotion <strong>of</strong>broadband access and usage inthe <strong>State</strong>.1.5.2 Deliver a comprehensivereport on broadband deploymentand usage.OBJECTIVE 5Support <strong>State</strong>wideEfforts to ExpandBroadband Accessand Usage in<strong>California</strong>1.5.3 Business, Transportationand Housing Agency shall be thelead agency.1.5.4 DTS and DGS shall takesteps to facilitate use <strong>of</strong> state-<strong>of</strong>the-arttechnologies.41


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 2Mission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.OBJECTIVE 1Develop an integrated financialmanagement system for use by allagencies and the Legislature initiallyencompassing budgeting, accountingand procurement functions, and continuedevelopment <strong>of</strong> the statewide payrollproject.2.1.1 Finish preparing an SPR to acquire a systemencompassing the areas <strong>of</strong> budgeting, accountingprocurement, <strong>ca</strong>sh management, financialmanagement, financial reporting, cost accounting,asset management, project accounting, grantmanagement and human resources management.2.1.2 Develop an RFP for FI$Cal Project andconduct a business-based procurement forstatewide s<strong>of</strong>tware and system integrator services.2.1.3 Continue development <strong>of</strong>the 21 st Century Project.2.2.2 ESGB will be chargedwith making final policydecisions <strong>of</strong> statewide importand impact in mattersreferred to it.GOAL 2ImplementCommon BusinessAppli<strong>ca</strong>tions andSystems toImprove Efficiencyand Cost-Effectiveness2.3.3 Adopt and publishpolicies and relatedprocedures to requirefull lifecyclemanagement <strong>of</strong> digitalmaterial.OBJECTIVE 2Establish ExecutiveGovernance for Projectswith Signifi<strong>ca</strong>nt <strong>State</strong>wideImpli<strong>ca</strong>tionsOBJECTIVE 3Create Coherent <strong>State</strong>Processes for Access,Management andPreservation <strong>of</strong> DigitalMaterial2.2.1 ELC will establish a forumand <strong>gov</strong>ernance structure forstakeholders <strong>of</strong> enterpriseprojects and initiatives indevelopment by <strong>State</strong> agencies.2.3.1 Initiate ongoing discussions withgroups or communities <strong>of</strong> interest acrossAgencies and Departments to developpolicies and methodologies for thepreservation <strong>of</strong> digitally formed staterecords and documents.2.3.2 Coordinate the sponsorship <strong>of</strong> oneor more projects to demonstrate anintegrated approach to transitioningdigital documents.42


AppendixCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 3Mission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.3.1.1 Update the IT SecurityProgram Guidelines.3.1.2 Develop general standards orguidelines for remote accessauthenti<strong>ca</strong>tion implementation.OBJECTIVE 1Adopt <strong>State</strong>wideSecurity and PrivacyProtection Standards3.1.3 Develop a generalInternet acceptable usage policyand a related best practiceguideline for agencies.3.1.4 Provide continuing edu<strong>ca</strong>tion andtraining for security and privacy protectionawareness for state management andstaff.3.2.1 Surveydepartments onexisting and plannedefforts inimplementing dataencryption.GOAL 3Ensure InformationAssets are Securedand PrivacyProtected3.3.1 Identify all existingIT security groups andcommittees,documenting the charterand stakeholders <strong>of</strong> eachgroup.OBJECTIVE 2Assess and MitigateSecurity andPrivacy RisksOBJECTIVE 3Develop a GovernanceStructure for ITSecurity3.2.2 Implement arefined InformationSecurity IncidentReporting andNotifi<strong>ca</strong>tion Processand ensure adequatetraining is providedto state employees.3.2.3 Develop amethodology and aset <strong>of</strong> tools thatdepartments <strong>ca</strong>n useto self-assess theirIT securityvulnerabilities.3.2.4 Develop a methodologyand a set <strong>of</strong> tools thatdepartments <strong>ca</strong>n use to selfassessthe privacy impact <strong>of</strong>proposed new and majormodifi<strong>ca</strong>tions to existing, ITsystems that contain personalinformation.3.3.2 Develop andpublish a documentoutlining the generalroles and responsibilitiesassigned to an agency’sISO.3.3.3 Develop arecommended approachto statewide IT security<strong>gov</strong>ernance.43


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 4Mission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.4.1.1 CEAP will be led by Directorfor Enterprise Architecture.OBJECTIVE 1Adopt a <strong>State</strong>wideEnterprise Architecture4.1.2 Partner with DTS and one or moredepartments to build a SOA-basedenvironment to host multi-departmentalshare business services.4.1.3 Continue to develop andmaintain recommendations anddocumentation in support <strong>of</strong> thefollowing Enterprise ArchitectureInitiatives:o <strong>California</strong> Service Centerso Enterprise Business Systemso Identity and Authenti<strong>ca</strong>tiono GISo Health IT.4.1.4 Continue developing models andonging maintenance <strong>of</strong> EnterpriseArchitecture Domain deliverables:o BRMo DRMo SRMo TRM.4.2.1 Establish abusiness-oriented,statewidetelecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tionsstrategy addressing thefull range <strong>of</strong>telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tionsservices used by stateagencies.GOAL 4Lower Costs andImprove the Security,Reliability andPerformance <strong>of</strong> the<strong>State</strong>'s ITInfrastructure4.3.1 Designate one ormore demonstrationprojects to modernizeoutdated and ineffectivelegacy appli<strong>ca</strong>tionsystems.OBJECTIVE 2Consolidate TechnologyInfrastructure andServicesOBJECTIVE 3Modernize Legacy Systems4.2.3 Submit aServer Consolidation<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.4.2.2 Submit theNetwork InfrastructureConsolidation BusinessCase.4.3.2 Partner with one or moredepartments to develop and demonstraterapid development <strong>of</strong> web servicesaccessibility and service delivery via theexisting business rules in those legacyappli<strong>ca</strong>tion systems.44


AppendixCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 4cont’dMission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.4.4.2 Assess and reporton the economic benefitsto the state resultingfrom the existing<strong>Strategic</strong> SourcingInitiative.4.5.1 Identify and proposecomprehensive disasterrecovery solutions for all ITinfrastructure componentsthat it supports.4.5.2 Develop criteriafor setting priorities tore-establish<strong>gov</strong>ernmentaloperations in the event<strong>of</strong> a large-s<strong>ca</strong>le disaster.OBJECTIVE 4Pursue Enterprise-WideProcurements4.4.1 Assess and reporton the overallprogrammatic benefits <strong>of</strong>the existing <strong>Strategic</strong>Sourcing Initiative.4.4.3 Develop a revised <strong>Plan</strong> for<strong>Strategic</strong> Sourcing to extend theprogram to areas with probablejustifiable savings, and to reviseor suspend the program in thoseareas where anticipated savingshave not been realized.OBJECTIVE 5Ensure IT DisasterRecovery <strong>Plan</strong>s, Processes,and Capabilities SupportContinuity <strong>of</strong>Governmental Services4.5.3 EstablishconsistencybetweenOperationalRecovery andCOOP/COGplanningefforts.4.5.4 Establish a workgroup todevelop and publish an agency IToperational recover reviewprocess.GOAL 4Lower Costs andImprove the Security,Reliability andPerformance <strong>of</strong> the<strong>State</strong>'s ITInfrastructure4.6.1 Sponsora statewideDocumentManagementSystemsCommittee.4.6.3 Issue a request for solutionproposal on how document intakemanagement and document printingcenters within the state could beconsolidated or leveraged.4.6.2 Gather documentintake management anddocument printingenvironments baselineinformation.OBJECTIVE 6Standardize <strong>State</strong>Document ManagementSystems4.6.5ProposeLegislation tobeginconsolidationfor DocumentIntakeManagementCenters and/orDocumentPrintingCenters.4.6.4 Complete and publishanalysis <strong>of</strong> Document IntakeManagement and DocumentPrinting Centers.45


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 5Mission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.5.1.1 Establish a frameworkto address statewide ITsuccession and workforceplanning needs.5.1.2 Identify comprehensivetraining and recruitment strategiesto reduce the risks <strong>of</strong> the 15identified skills in jeopardy asidentified in ITMA XIII Skills GapReport.5.1.3 Complete theSuccession &Workforce <strong>Plan</strong>ningTool Kit.5.2.1 An IT Classifi<strong>ca</strong>tion<strong>Plan</strong> will be vetted andreadied for adoption.5.2.2 DevelopRecruitmentand Exam<strong>Plan</strong>s.OBJECTIVE 1Lead Succession andWorkforce <strong>Plan</strong>ningOBJECTIVE 2Modernize the ITClassifi<strong>ca</strong>tion Structureand Selection Tools andMethods5.1.4 Enable 5.1.5 Identifytraining workshops implementationscheduling. successmeasures forcompletedtraining.5.1.6 Facilitate thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> aplan to maintainand update thestatewide va<strong>ca</strong>ncydata.GOAL 5StrengthenourTechnologyWorkforce5.2.3 Develop and publish a list<strong>of</strong> common competencies and astaff development strategy forthe <strong>State</strong>’s HR practitioners.5.3.1 ImplementStudent Internship.OBJECTIVE 3Expand RecruitingEfforts for TechnologyPr<strong>of</strong>essionalsOBJECTIVE 4Provide Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalDevelopment forTechnology Personnel5.3.2 Develop recruitmentstrategy for new ITclassifi<strong>ca</strong>tions and selectionsystems.5.4.1 Facilitate Leadership for theGovernment Executive sessions.5.4.2 Sponsor implementation <strong>of</strong>basic supervision program for ITsupervisors.5.4.3 Facilitateestablishment <strong>of</strong> aprocess to update andmaintain a Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalDevelopment Curriculum& Catalog.46


AppendixCALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLAN-GOAL 6Mission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> Government willoperate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective, reliable, accessible and secureservices that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public and private customers, including the People <strong>of</strong><strong>California</strong>, its business communities and its public sector agencies.6.1.1 Agree upon staffing and fundingfor Office <strong>of</strong> the SCIO.6.1.2 Ensure that decisions about ITprojects are timely, consistent withenterprise-wide strategic directions,standards and architecture, and costeffectivelysupport clearly definedbusiness needs and goals.OBJECTIVE 1Establish a LayeredTechnologyGovernance Structure6.1.3 Conductregularmeetings <strong>of</strong>AIOs and theDirector <strong>of</strong>DTS.6.2.1 Establish cross-agencysteering committees <strong>of</strong> keystakeholders and controlagencies.OBJECTIVE 2Improve Alignment <strong>of</strong>TechnologyGovernance withBusiness <strong>Plan</strong>ningGOAL 6Better AlignEnterpriseBusiness<strong>Plan</strong>ning withTechnologyGovernanceOBJECTIVE 3ImplementPerformance Measures6.3.1 Establish a high level crossdepartmental PerformanceMeasurement Advisory Committee.6.3.3 Make recommendationfor standard model(s) fordefining and measuringperformance.6.3.2 Implement apilot project tomeasure keymetrics formanaging day-todayIT operationsand measureservice levelmetrics.47


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN48


AppendixGlossary <strong>of</strong> Terms and AcronymsTermsBusiness Reference Model (BRM)A framework for describing business operations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> independently <strong>of</strong> theagencies performing them.<strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture Program (CEAP)CEAP develops, maintains and enables the implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>California</strong> EnterpriseArchitecture. The CEAP documents <strong>ca</strong>n be viewed at http://www.cio.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/ITCouncil/Committees/ArchStandards.html<strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture FrameworkThe IT Council’s Enterprise Architecture and Standards Committee developed thisframework document which describes <strong>California</strong>’s enterprise architecture at a highlevel. It <strong>ca</strong>n be viewed at http://www.cio.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/ITCouncil/Committees/<strong>PDF</strong>s/<strong>California</strong>_EA_Framework_Final.pdf<strong>California</strong> PortalThe <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> web page that provides links to the services <strong>of</strong>fered by itsorganizations.<strong>California</strong> Service Centers<strong>California</strong> Service Centers is the collection <strong>of</strong> the new <strong>State</strong> portal and its associatedfederated service centers. The federated service centers are individually maintainedby various state agencies, departments and boards. The <strong>California</strong> service centersare described in the <strong>State</strong> CIO’s “<strong>California</strong> In-Touch” document which <strong>ca</strong>n be viewedat http://www.cio.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/<strong>PDF</strong>s/<strong>California</strong>_In-Touch_Vision_5-10-06.pdf. The enterprisearchitecture for the <strong>California</strong> Service Centers <strong>ca</strong>n be viewed at http://www.cio.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/ITCouncil/Committees/ArchStandards.htmlClassifi <strong>ca</strong>tion TeamTeam <strong>of</strong> HR staff from <strong>State</strong> Personnel Board and Department <strong>of</strong> PersonnelAdministration along with IT representatives who are directing the IT classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion planchanges as part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>’s IT HR Project.Data Reference Model (DRM)The DRM describes the data and information that support the <strong>State</strong>’s businessoperations from a statewide perspective. The DRM must defi ne a structure that eachdata element must have in order for users to understand the element, must classifyeach data element into its business context using the BRM, and must specify how thisdata element should be exchanged between state agencies.49


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANGlossary <strong>of</strong> Terms and AcronymsTerms (Continued)DomainA collection <strong>of</strong> logi<strong>ca</strong>lly related entities (e.g., Business, Data, Appli<strong>ca</strong>tion, andTechnology) used to simplify analysis and to organize Enterprise Architecturedeliverables.Enterprise ArchitectureA description <strong>of</strong> the techni<strong>ca</strong>l framework that a business or enterprise uses to conductits business over computing and telephone networks.Enterprise Architecture DomainsThe <strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture Framework defi nes four EnterpriseArchitecture Domains: Business, Appli<strong>ca</strong>tions, Data, and Technology.Enterprise Business SystemsEnterprise Business Systems refer to the collection <strong>of</strong> internal systems that the<strong>State</strong> uses to manage its many lines <strong>of</strong> business as an enterprise. Systems typi<strong>ca</strong>llyinclude HR, Payroll, General Ledger, Cash Management, Accounts Payable, AccountsReceivable, Fixed Assets, Inventory, Budgeting, Procurement, and ContractsManagement.Geographic Information Systems (GIS)GIS creates stores, analyzes, and manages spatial data. They are typi<strong>ca</strong>lly used toprovide lo<strong>ca</strong>tion-based information in appli<strong>ca</strong>tions.Health ITGenerally, this is the collection <strong>of</strong> systems managed by the health related departmentswithin the <strong>State</strong> and counties. There is also a health IT group “CGCHIT” thatwas formed to address the issues <strong>of</strong> integrating the systems, making services moreavailable online, and interoperating with federal systems.HR PractitionersPersonnel analysts and supervisors/managers in departments who resolve hiringsupervisor requests for various classifi <strong>ca</strong>tion needs (i.e., fi lling positions, approvingallo<strong>ca</strong>tion levels and classifi <strong>ca</strong>tions, transferring employees, approving Hires aboveminimum)Identity and Authenti<strong>ca</strong>tion Management (IDM)Identity Management allows <strong>California</strong> to manage the end-to-end lifecycle <strong>of</strong> useridentities across all enterprise resources. Federated Identity Management established50


AppendixGlossary <strong>of</strong> Terms and AcronymsTerms (Continued)single authorities for certain types <strong>of</strong> identities that are trusted by members within atrusted domain.InfrastructureThe basic computing and telecommuni<strong>ca</strong>tions structure, support services, or features<strong>of</strong> a system or network.Legacy Appli<strong>ca</strong>tionAn appli<strong>ca</strong>tion in which a company or organization has already invested considerabletime and money. Typi<strong>ca</strong>lly, legacy appli<strong>ca</strong>tions are or use database managementsystems (DBMS) running on mainframes or minicomputers.Legacy systemA computer system that continues to be used be<strong>ca</strong>use <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> replacing orredesigning it. Generally the system is large, monolithic and diffi cult to modify.Offi ce <strong>of</strong> Technology Review Oversight and Security (OTROS)The OTROS organization is part <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Finance (DOF) and isresponsible for reviewing IT proposals to ensure IT expenditures represent a prudentinvestment <strong>of</strong> resources while meeting the <strong>State</strong>’s business needs. The Offi ce alsorecommends funding and expenditure authority for IT projects and assists DOF toensure approved IT expenditures are in alignment with statewide IT policies, prioritiesand strategies.Portfolio ManagementPortfolio Management is a system used to select a list or portfolio <strong>of</strong> technologyinvestments to achieve the following:• Support the strategy <strong>of</strong> the enterprise• Rank or prioritize projects• Manage resources effectively and effi ciently• Maximize the value <strong>of</strong> the portfolioSegmentA targeted line <strong>of</strong> business that typi<strong>ca</strong>lly slices through all four architecture domains:business, data, appli<strong>ca</strong>tions, technologies.Segment ApproachPromotes the incremental development <strong>of</strong> architecture products with a focus on lines<strong>of</strong> business (e.g., security or common fi nancial systems) that is more likely to succeedbe<strong>ca</strong>use the effort is more narrowly defi ned.51


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANGlossary <strong>of</strong> Terms and AcronymsTerms (Continued)Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)SOA is a framework for implementing web-services that provide reuse <strong>of</strong> existingbusiness services which facilitates rapid development <strong>of</strong> new business <strong>ca</strong>pabilities.Service Reference Model (SRM)SRM is a component-based framework that <strong>ca</strong>n provide, independent <strong>of</strong> businessfunction, a foundation for reuse <strong>of</strong> appli<strong>ca</strong>tions, components, and business services.Shared Business ServicesShared Business Services are built and managed with an “enterprise mentality”. Thatis, they are built once then reused by many systems across agencies, departments, andboards. They are based on a Service-Oriented Architecture environment.Technology Reference Model (TRM)TRM is a component-driven, techni<strong>ca</strong>l framework used to <strong>ca</strong>tegorize the standards,specifi <strong>ca</strong>tions, and technologies that support and enable the delivery <strong>of</strong> servicecomponents and <strong>ca</strong>pabilities. You <strong>ca</strong>n view <strong>California</strong>’s TRM at http://www.cio.<strong>ca</strong>.<strong>gov</strong>/ITCouncil/Committees/ArchStandards.html52


AppendixGlossary <strong>of</strong> Terms and AcronymsAcronymsAIOCEAPCIOCOOP/COGCRMCPRDGSDOTDTSEAEAPELCERPGIOGISHITISOITITCITMA XIIOESAgency Information Officer<strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture ProgramChief Information OfficerContinuity Of Operations / Continuity Of Government <strong>Plan</strong>Customer Relationship Management<strong>California</strong> Performance ReviewDepartment <strong>of</strong> General ServicesDepartment <strong>of</strong> TransportationDepartment <strong>of</strong> Technology ServicesEnterprise ArchitectureEnterprise Architecture ProgramEnterprise Level CouncilEnterprise Resource <strong>Plan</strong>ningGeospatial Information OfficerGeospatial Information SystemHealth Information TechnologyInformation Security OfficerInformation Technology<strong>California</strong> IT CouncilInformation Technology Managers A<strong>ca</strong>demy XIIOffice <strong>of</strong> Emergency Services53


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANGlossary <strong>of</strong> Terms and AcronymsAcronyms (Continued)PMI Project Management Institute ®RFPSCOSEIUSISOSPBRequest For Proposal<strong>State</strong> Controller’s OfficeService Employees International Union<strong>State</strong> Information Security Officer<strong>State</strong> Personnel Board54


AppendixContributorsThe <strong>State</strong> CIO extends his appreciation to all the people who contributed to the <strong>California</strong><strong>State</strong> Information Technology <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. Their dedi<strong>ca</strong>tion produced this plan chartingthe IT direction for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> for the next three years.The following groups and individuals contributed to bringing the <strong>Plan</strong> together:<strong>California</strong> IT Council’s IT <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Committee MembersCarlos Ramos, Committee Chair, Health and Human Services AgencyJohn Lane, Committee Vice-chair, Department <strong>of</strong> ConservationPK Agarwal, Department <strong>of</strong> Technology ServicesAndrew Armani, <strong>State</strong> and Consumer Services AgencyGary Arstein-Kerslake, Environment Protection AgencyTerri Bollinger, Department <strong>of</strong> Social ServicesCaroline Cabias, Board Of EqualizationJohn Ellison, Resources AgencyDavood Ghods, Food and Agriculture AgencyDale Jablonsky, Employment and Development DepartmentJoan Keegan, Department <strong>of</strong> Technology ServicesClark Kelso, <strong>State</strong> Chief Information Offi cerLee Kercher, Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong>Lee Macklin, <strong>California</strong> Enterprise Architecture ProgramClaudina Nevis, Offi ce <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> CIOArna Perry, Department <strong>of</strong> Social ServicesKelvin Pye, Offi ce <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> CIOChristy Quinlan, Department <strong>of</strong> Health ServicesCalvin Rogers, Department <strong>of</strong> Social ServicesColleen Pedroza, Department <strong>of</strong> FinanceBen Williams, Department <strong>of</strong> Water ResourcesOther <strong>California</strong> IT Council MembersAnn Barsotti, Department Of TransportationCathy Cleek, Franchise Tax BoardDave Dawson, <strong>State</strong> Controller’s Offi ceNick Dedier, Department <strong>of</strong> JusticeAlan Friedman, Department <strong>of</strong> Parks & RecreationTracy Fong, Legislative Data CenterDebra Gonzales, Victims Compensation BoardRita Hamilton, Department <strong>of</strong> General ServicesDelphin B. Kyubwa, Managed Risk Medi<strong>ca</strong>l Insurance BoardDebbie Leibrock, Department <strong>of</strong> FinanceKaren Lynch, Department <strong>of</strong> Personnel AdministrationScott MacGregor, <strong>California</strong> Highway PatrolChristine McCaleb, Housing Community Department55


CALIFORNIA STATE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLANStephen Monaghan, Nevada CountyLaura Peabody, City <strong>of</strong> Fairfi eldRon Ralph, Department <strong>of</strong> Forestry & FireRonald “Gene” Reich, Public Employees Retirement SystemGigi Smith, Department Of RehabilitationBernard Soriano, Department <strong>of</strong> Motor VehiclesDaryll Tsujihara, Department <strong>of</strong> Personnel AdministrationPat Yerian, Administrative Offi ce <strong>of</strong> the CourtsOther <strong>California</strong> IT Council Enterprise MembersPam Harris, Labor & Workforce AgencyMichael Liang, Business Transportation and Housing AgencyJamie Mangrum, <strong>California</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections and RehabilitationJoanne McNabb, Offi ce <strong>of</strong> Privacy Protection, Department <strong>of</strong> Consumer AffairsColleen Pedroza, <strong>State</strong> Information Security Offi cerMargarita Maldonado, SEIU 1000Additional ContributorsSandra Bierer, Department <strong>of</strong> Technology ServicesAnna Brannen, Department <strong>of</strong> Technology ServicesDennis Dearbaugh, Department <strong>of</strong> Technology ServicesBarbara Garrett, Department <strong>of</strong> Managed Health CareJohn Hamlin, Board <strong>of</strong> EqualizationJohn Jewell, <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> LibraryKim Malm, Public Employees Retirement SystemKris Ogilvie, <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> LibraryKathy Saito, Department <strong>of</strong> Technology ServicesFrank Werry, Board <strong>of</strong> EqualizationLynn Weydert, Board <strong>of</strong> EqualizationJulie Whitten, Department <strong>of</strong> Forestry and Fire<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Drafting StaffMark Renteria, DGS-Offi ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> PublishingClaudina Nevis, Offi ce <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> CIOSpecial ThanksDepartment <strong>of</strong> Technology Services for funding the publi<strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>Offi ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> Publishing in the Department <strong>of</strong> General Services for publishing this report56


NOTES


NOTES


NOTES


Arnold SchwarzeneggerGovernor<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>Clark KelsoChief Information Offi cer<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>OSP 06 99088


CALIFORNIA IT STRATEGIC PLANSUMMARYMission: Information technology support for the Executive Branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong>Government will operate as a seamless enterprise, delivering consistent, cost-effective,reliable, accessible and secure services that satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> its diverse public andprivate customers, including the People <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>, its business communities and itspublic sector agencies.OBJECTIVE 1Develop a Foundation forTransforming GovernmentOBJECTIVE 2Leverage Services between<strong>State</strong>, Federal and Lo<strong>ca</strong>lGovernment and PromoteInteragency andInter<strong>gov</strong>ernmental DataSharingOBJECTIVE 3Leverage andsecure the <strong>State</strong>’sGIS AssetsOBJECTIVE 4Support <strong>State</strong>wide Efforts todevelop Health IT Solutionsand Promote HealthInformation ExchangeOBJECTIVE 12Adopt a <strong>State</strong>wideEnterpriseArchitectureOBJECTIVE 13ConsolidateTechnologyInfrastructure andServicesOBJECTIVE 14Modernize LegacySystemsGOAL 1MakeGovernmentServices MoreAccessibleOBJECTIVE 5Support<strong>State</strong>wide Effortsto expandBroadband Accessand Usage in<strong>California</strong>GOAL 4Lower Costs andImprove theSecurity,Reliability andPerformance <strong>of</strong>the <strong>State</strong>'s ITInfrastructureOBJECTIVE 6DevelopIntegratedadministrative andfinancialmanagementsystem for allagencies andLegislatureGOAL 2Implement CommonBusiness Appli<strong>ca</strong>tionsand Systems toImprove Efficiencyand Cost-EffectivenessGOAL 5StrengthenourTechnologyWorkforceOBJECTIVE 7Establish Executive Governance forProjects with Signifi<strong>ca</strong>nt <strong>State</strong>wideImpli<strong>ca</strong>tionsGOAL 3Ensure <strong>State</strong>InformationAssets areSecured andPrivacy ProtectedGOAL 6Better AlignEnterpriseBusiness<strong>Plan</strong>ning withTechnologyGovernanceOBJECTIVE 8Create Coherent <strong>State</strong> Processes forAccess, Management andPreservation <strong>of</strong> Digital MaterialOBJECTIVE 9Adopt statewideSecurity and PrivacyProtection StandardsOBJECTIVE 10Assess andMitigate SecurityRisksOBJECTIVE 11Develop aGovernancestructure for ITSecurityOBJECTIVE 22Establish a LayeredTechnologyGovernance StructureOBJECTIVE 23Improve Alignment <strong>of</strong>TechnologyGovernance withBusiness <strong>Plan</strong>ningOBJECTIVE 15Pursue Enterprise-Wide ProcurementsOBJECTIVE 16Ensure IT DisasterRecovery <strong>Plan</strong>s,Processes, andCapabilities SupportContinuity <strong>of</strong>GovernmentalServicesOBJECTIVE 18Lead Succession andWorkforce <strong>Plan</strong>ningOBJECTIVE 20Expand RecruitingEfforts for TechnologyPr<strong>of</strong>essionalsOBJECTIVE 17Standardize <strong>State</strong>Document ManagementSystemsOBJECTIVE 19Modernize the ITClassifi<strong>ca</strong>tion Structure andSelection Tools and MethodsOBJECTIVE 21Provide Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalDevelopment forTechnology PersonnelOBJECTIVE 24ImplementPerformance Measures

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!