SAMUEL Y. EDGERTONhave thought to aim the instrument toward the sky? If one knewnothing a priori about the moon’s external topography, would itsgrayish blotches be seen immediately as shades <strong>and</strong> shadows ofmountain ridges? Especially if the observer, like all people before1610, was already certain such blotches had something to do withthe moon’s translucent internal composition?Perhaps Galileo surely made some illustrations right there onthe spot as he stared at the moon from atop the San GiorgioMaggiore campanile in Venice. While none of these have survived,we are in possession of seven finished sepia studies, which I believewere done later, based on his first ad hoc sketches. These smallfinished wash drawings, four of the waxing <strong>and</strong> three of the waningmoon, are still preserved on two sides of a sheet of artist’s water-colorpaper in the Biblioteca Nazionale in Florence (Figure 16). All werecertainly done by someone well-practiced in the manipulation ofFigure 16170 História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro
BRUNELLESCHI´S MIRROR, ALBERTI´S WINDOW, AND GALILEO´S `PERSPECTIVE TUBE´4 There is no wayGalileo could havemade such carefulpen-<strong>and</strong>-wash studiesduring his excitingfirst moments at thetelescope, as anyonewho has ever stood inthe cold, windswepttower of San GiorgioMaggiore (Galileo’sopen ‘observatory’)should quicklyunderst<strong>and</strong>. Like anyseventeenth-century‘l<strong>and</strong>scape painter,’Galileo returned to thestudio to finish hispictures, based onrememberedimpressions, verbalnotes, <strong>and</strong> hastydiagrams. Plein airpainting, after all, wasnot invented until thenineteenth century.ink washes, especially the rendering of chiaroscuro effects. They areby an experienced artist, <strong>and</strong> we have no reason to believe byanyone other than Galileo himself.Galileo no doubt prepared these washes as models for theengraver who would illustrate his book, Sidereus nuncius, which herushed to publication barely five months after he began looking atthe skies through his home-made telescope. Only five engravingsof the moon’s phases were printed in Sidereus nuncius, none exactlyreplicating the wash drawings. 4 Figure 17 indicates how two ofthese appeared in Galileo’s book.Figure 17Figure 18 is another Lick Observatory photograph showingthe same second-quarter waxing Moon as illustrated at left in Sidereusnuncius. Galileo’s accompanying matter-of-fact textual descriptionof these engravings belies both his own excitement <strong>and</strong> thestupendous impression they made upon an unsuspecting world:[I] have been led to the conclusion that … the surface of theMoon is not smooth, even, <strong>and</strong> perfectly spherical, as the greatcrowd of philosophers have believed about this <strong>and</strong> otherheavenly bodies, but, on the contrary, to be uneven, rough, <strong>and</strong>crowded with depressions <strong>and</strong> bulges. And it is like the face of theEarth itself, which is marked here <strong>and</strong> there with chains ofmountains <strong>and</strong> depths of valleys. (Galileo, 1989, p. 40)v. 13 (suplemento), p. 151-79, outubro 2006 171