13.07.2015 Views

Part C - Byron Shire Council

Part C - Byron Shire Council

Part C - Byron Shire Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This page intentionally left blankDraft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical Information


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationContentsList of appendicesAppendix Title BSC Doc NoABCoastal Hazard Lines and Planning Precincts<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolutions that relate to coastal hazardmanagement#993555#999313(AmendedFigures)#999356 (FiguresA1-A4)#983771C Updated climate change issues #986652DTerms Of Reference For <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal And EstuaryProject Reference Group#993574E Plans of Management (PB Analysis) #993600F Raw data from consultation #983775Background Information on Native Title Claims and#983776GIndigenous Land Use Agreements#983777H Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Marine Park Zoning Plan #983778I Legislation and Policy framework #993605J Consideration of planned retreat in case law #993606Technical Report, Options for Upgrading Jonson Street #983781K Protection Works, <strong>Byron</strong> Bay NSW, Draft - investigation intothe potential modification of the Jonson St worksL Coastal policy Checklist #993607MExample of Planning Certificate pursuant to Section 149 (2)& 149 (5) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979(for a property located in LEP 7(f2) zone#995967


This page intentionally left blankDraft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical Information


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix ACoastal Hazard Lines andPlanning Precincts


Appendix A – Coastal hazard lines andplanning precinctsDCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J Coastal Erosion Lands planning precinctsreview1. Introduction1.1 Purpose of this appendixThis appendix provides background information to a series of the CZMPrecommendations with respect to review of the coastal planning precinctsand associated provisions, as documented in <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>Development Control Plan 2002, <strong>Part</strong> J Coastal Erosion Lands (DCP2002, <strong>Part</strong> J). These provisions operate in lands affected by coastlinehazards and these extend from the erosion escarpment to the 100 yearplanning line.DCP 2002, <strong>Part</strong> J is the current planning instrument dealing withdevelopment control in coastal areas in <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>; it also establishesthe coastal planning precincts. The purpose of the coastal planningprecincts is to ensure development on lands deemed at risk fromcoastline hazards is managed in accordance with the level of riskidentified.The location and extent of the coastal planning precincts is delineated bythe coastal planning lines. The location of coastal planning lines isprincipally determined by the coastal hazard lines and also takes intoconsideration factors, such as safety and conservation buffers.Coastal hazard lines delineate the extent of the potential coastal erosion,based on scientific projections for immediate, 50 and 100 year horizons.1.2 Need for review of the DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J coastal planning linesCoastal hazard lines for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> coastline were first determined onthe basis of the Hastings Point Erosion Study (PWD, 1978).In 1988, the PWD (1978) hazard lines were translated into coastalplanning lines and documented in the DCP 1 (later to become DCP 2002,<strong>Part</strong> J), part of the 1988 <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Local Environmental Plan (LEP).There were two major reviews of the coastal hazard lines since 1978(WBM, 2000; WRL 2009a). However, there was no revision to the coastalplanning lines as a result of these reviews and the original planning linesdating from 1988 are still in force.As part of the CZMP preparation, the following aspects of the DCP 2002<strong>Part</strong> J provisions have been reviewed:The adequacy of the planning lines, in light of the StateGovernment policy direction on climate change and recentreviews of the coastal hazard lines for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>


The adequacy of the development control provisions for achievingthe CZMP policy of planned retreat.2. Coastal planning precincts2.1 PurposeThe purpose of the coastal planning precincts is to:2.2 Current provisions Fully accommodate the assessed coastline hazards under a 0.9msea level rise by 2100 assumption, endorsed by the Departmentof Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW) in the SeaLevel Rise Policy Statement 2009.Include a buffer zone for safety and uncertainty around future sealevel rise.Include a zone of reduced foundation capacity.Current DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J provisions identify three coastal planningprecincts, based on the immediate, 50-year and 100-year coastal erosionhazard.Current DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J coastal planning precincts are based on:the PWD 1978 Hastings Point Erosion Studydata that does not include sea level rise assumptionsdata that delineates the zone of possible wave impact but doesnot include a zone of reduced foundation capacity relative to thestability of development adjacent to an erosion escarpment.DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J identifies development control provisions specific toeach coastal planning precinct. These provisions aim to ensure protectionof life and adequate management of the property in the event of coastalhazard eventuating.Specifically, these provisions include a prescribed trigger distance for relocation and/or demolition ofdevelopment prescribed building standards (e.g. relocatable or permanentdevelopment).As illustrated in Table A1 (below), these provisions vary in each coastalplanning precinct.


Table A1: DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J coastal planning provisionsDCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J planningprecinctsCurrent DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J planning precinct provisionsPlanning precinct 1Immediate coastal hazardPlanning precinct 250-year coastal hazardPlanning precinct 3100-year coastal hazardTrigger distance for relocation of development – 20 m fromthe erosion escarpmentNo buildings to be located within 20 m of escarpmentBuildings to be entirely modular and relocatableTrigger distance for relocation and/or demolition ofdevelopment – 50 m from the erosion escarpmentAll Class 1 buildings – (house residential) must berelocatableTrigger distance for relocation and/or demolition ofdevelopment – 50 m from the erosion escarpment2.3 Methodology for reviewThe following aspects of the DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J coastal planning precinctswere reviewed: The adequacy of current location of the planning lines forachieving the purpose of the coastal planning precincts (asindicated above).The adequacy of current development control provisions in eachcoastal planning precinct for efficient implementation the CZMPpolicy of the planned retreat> the trigger distance requirements in each precinct> other aspects of current provisions.3. DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J planning lines review – implications of thecoastal hazard lines reviews3.1 WBM (2000) Hazard lines reviewWBM made a study of coastline hazards (<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline HazardDefinition Study) in 2000. The WBM (2000) hazard lines were based onthe then most current analysis of long-term coastal recession and thethen current ‘mid-range’ sea level rise projections (0.2 m rise by 2050 and0.5 m rise by 2100, relative to 1990 levels).The WBM (2000) hazard lines show the immediate impact hazard line,and hazard lines for the 50-year and 100-year planning horizons. TheWBM (2000) hazard lines only account for the coastal erosion and do notinclude a zone of reduced foundation capacity relative to the stability ofdevelopment adjacent to an erosion escarpment.


3.2 WRL (2009) Hazard lines reviewIn response to the DECCW draft Sea Level Rise Policy Statement 2009,and to inform preparation of this draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline (CZMP), <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> commissioned acontemporary assessment of coastal hazard lines (WRL 2009a).The WRL (2009a) assessment used the same parameters as WBM(2000) assessment with updated sea level rise projections based on thebenchmarks provided in the DECCW Sea Level Rise Policy Statement2009 (0.4 m rise by 2050 and 0.9 m rise by 2100, relative to 1990 levels).The WRL (2009a) hazard lines show the predicted immediate impacthazard line, the 2050 and 2100 hazard lines (refer to Figures A18 toA30).3.3 Zone of reduced foundation capacitySimilar to WBM (2000) hazard lines, the WRL (2009a) hazard linesdelineate the zone of wave impact and do not include a zone of reducedfoundation capacity relative to the stability of development adjacent to anerosion escarpment (refer Diagram A1, below).Diagram A1: Diagram demonstrating location of zone of reducedfoundation capacityTable A2 (below) shows the extra width required to be added to the WRL(2009a) hazard lines to reach the stable foundation zone for differentbeach compartments characterised by different dune heights.It can be seen that for dunes in the range of 5–8 m AHD (the approximateheight of dunes throughout the developed beach compartments of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong>), the required extra width to account for the zone of reducedfoundation capacity is 11 m to 15 m. Therefore, to determine the actualimmediate hazard area for development planning purposes, 11 m to 15 mof landward distance is required to be added to the WRL (2009a)Immediate Hazard Line.


Table A2: Width of zone of reduced foundation capacity (source: WRL,2009, Table 2.4)PrecinctAssumed Average DuneHeight (m AHD)Indicative width ofzone of reducedfoundation capacity(m)Beaches south of Cape<strong>Byron</strong>7 13.6Cape <strong>Byron</strong> to the Pass 5 10.7The Pass to Memorial Pool 5 10.7Memorial Pool to Border St 8 15.0Beach resort 6.5 13.6Border St to Belongil Creek 5 10.7Belongil Creek to CrabbesCreek5 10.73.4 Summary findingsA review of DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J planning lines against the updated coastalhazard lines (WRL 2009a) shows that even if the WRL (2009a)Immediate Hazard line is to be moved landward by 11–15 m toaccommodate the zone of reduced foundation capacity, the area ofcoastal hazard would be fully accommodated within the Precinct 1 inDCP 2002, <strong>Part</strong> J (refer to Figures A18 to A30).This review confirms that the DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J planning lines:accommodate the assessed coastline hazards under a 0.9 m sealevel rise by 2100 assumptionaccommodate a zone of reduced foundation capacity.However, should there be a further review of the sea level riseprojections, as determined by the Intra-Governmental Panel on ClimateChange (IPCC); a further review of the DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J planning lineswill be required.4. DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J coastal precinct boundaries review –operational issuesThe following considerations with respect to the DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> Jplanning precinct boundaries should also be highlighted: Coastal planning precinct boundaries are not aligned with theproperty boundaries, resulting in situations where differentplanning provisions apply to different sections of one property.Realignment of the planning lines to coincide with a property’scadastral boundary may resolve this confusion.


Development control provisions in Planning Precinct 2 andPlanning Precinct 3 are quite similar. Consolidating PlanningPrecinct 2 and Planning Precinct 3 into one precinct wouldsimplify application and enforcement of development consentconditions (refer to Figures A5 to A17 for a comparision of DCP2002 <strong>Part</strong> J Planning Precincts and CZMP Coastal PlanningPrecincts).5. DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J trigger distances reviewThe following outlines considerations for the DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J triggerdistances review.5.1 A 20-metre development free bufferMaintaining a buffer of 20 m from the erosion escarpment is critical forimplementation of the planned retreat.The development free buffer distance of 20 m is adopted in this CZMPbased on the following: accommodates a significant storm bite 1 its historical application in development consents allows maintenance of natural processes.Whilst the 20m buffer does not include a full allowance for the zone ofreduced foundation capacity and associated potential for undermining ofbuilding foundations, it does accommodate a significant storm bite, beingthe primary risk.5.2 Trigger distance for relocatable developmentCurrently, a distance 50 m from the erosion escarpment is used as atrigger to relocate development in Planning Precincts 2 and 3.This distance is considered overly conservative for development thatcould be relocated in a short period of time. As such, a trigger distance of20 m is considered more appropriate for relocatable development and isproposed to apply uniformly to all relocatable development in PlanningPrecinct 1, Planning Precinct 2 and Planning Precinct 3.Introducing a uniform trigger distance of 20 m for relocation of relocatabledevelopment is associated with a number of benefits: The reduced trigger distance would allow owners of land in thePlanning Precinct 2 and Planning Precinct 3 to occupy theirproperty for a longer period of time. The reduced trigger distance for relocatable development wouldencourage construction of modular buildings as opposed to nonrelocatable(subject to demolition) structures, which are lesspreferable in the coastal hazard areas.1Whilst not a design storm bite, the maximum measured storm bite on the open coast of NSW is 18m at <strong>Byron</strong> Bay in1989 (WRL, 2009).


6. Proposed changes to the DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J coastal planningprecinct provisionsIt is recommended that the current DCP 2002, <strong>Part</strong> J provisions bemodified as follows:Maintain existing coastal planning lines, subject to regular reviewof the IPCC projections for Sea Level Rise. Retain DCP 2002, <strong>Part</strong> J Planning Precinct 1 with some minormodifications to accommodate the cadastral boundaries whereallotments are small. This precinct is hereafter referred to as‘Coastal Planning Precinct 1’ (refer to Figures A5 to A17). Combine DCP 2002, <strong>Part</strong> J Planning Precincts 2 and 3 into asingle Costal Planning Precinct. This precinct is hereafter referredto as ‘Coastal Planning Precinct 2’(refer to Figures A5 to A17).Introduce a 20-metre buffer from the erosion scarp as the triggerfor implementation of planned retreat in Coastal PlanningPrecinct 1 and Coastal Planning Precinct 2 for relocatabledevelopment.Maintain a distance 50 m from the erosion scarp as the trigger forimplementing planned retreat in Coastal Planning Precinct 2 fornon-relocatable (subject to demolition) development. Develop uniform standards for relocatable development. Thestandards are to ensure that the scale, bulk, and density ofdwellings are such that relocation of the dwelling is achievable, ascertified by a structural engineer.The following figures depict proposed Coastal Planning Precinct 1 and 2(Figure A1, Figure A2, Figure A3 and Figure A4), the <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002Planning Precincts 1, 2 & 3 and Coastal Planning Precinct 1 and 2(Figures A5 to A17) based on current coastal planning lines. The WRL(2009a) hazard lines are shown on Figures A18 to A30.


South Golden BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality100±14144562171615144911312111078 79977768075818157482173141683713726667658468669212716457087881138960524902077 207810918620689259192079420763585195861 5020698 7 6208047207530555762207019208630562085466320745622081 2082 208320843057 3054305820713059454030603052 305320731 2 306141305120724439288304942209020893047 30484332102303730461205621032091303820 4210423 22 2121052092303930362107 2106210138 2620553045520933040304118210030353761302054210824209430443042361720993043303427720532109252095162098303335205221102097 209628341592051208730623032 3329 14102049205020323213 11302031203330211213730203031311730222024 20233025 3026 302720343028 3030512030 2029 202820253023302430292027 20263019109 10820222035300514 151071031102036202130181330041063007 3006 3003 3002 30013013 3012 3011 3010 3009 30083000203720133017 3016 3015 30141131052014 2015 2016 2017 2018 202020194120382012112 11416221301113232392321795 62039201110333131152048326235 233177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 1633222383302341618 32433220472311782040201032123771211023202366123204120094122Gloria St5101204620421220081268 71203072062102043132045207 208 209146 148 149 150 152 153 155 157 158 159 1602007306205147151 154 1561 1319125230520431162111441920 192191411920063042033291922 12812414315118212303141 139 138 137 135 134 132 130 12910 11219141919202140136 133 131 128 1271915127117216 215 2141231619231916315 313 311 310 309 3081918317 316 314 3122011262133021924200191119171251925Robin St1242005199221937881910192622018 1713713119382771071936198 23217 219111 112119292 294 295 296 297 298 299 301218108 110114 115 116 117 118 120 12119271091131223002218719091935293132 106192819 2427619719392004325 33122232819348619292513319610599 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 891908194020 2119411933101227 225223103 102 1008526134291 290 289 287 285 284 283 282 280 2782261942 1932288 286281 2791951041907224194319311960135194190619441930Peter St19051945136193271961501190418328194624519269190322870 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 1 2 82 83 84441962229 230291902268273491952260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 269 270 271 27243 3018268190124419142 311900196332741 32195324319048401816733189965 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 5139 342421891970186 185 184382003473521898258 255 253 251 249 246259 257 256 254 252 250 248 2472411881806637 3618971969240187195019711968Helen St1972194819491967119474 1 2 3 4 5 689 10 1119761973184119661801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1844 1843 1842 1840 18391 2 31977 19754197451964 196531846184761814 1813 1812 1811 1810 1809 1808 184518384 214 16711848156184918375118361850181661817182318241825465452181518181835172198185110012453139181918261834101PT40618521858116 18201827 18331 111001853182118321854 18591828 1829 18301831Sharra BvdElizabeth AveKallarroo CctRangal RdRedgate RdBeach Ave464±0462200 400MetresCoastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A5Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:Layout Size:1:7,500A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A5


South Golden Beach to New Brighton BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard Lines2051292032141013020503032 33 322049306213 11Section 1 locality3020332031302130203031 31121730222024 20233025 3026 3027 3028 30302034512030 2029 202820253023302430292027 202611373019109 10820222035300514 151071101032036202130183004131063007 30063003 3002 30013013 3012 3011 3010 3009 30083000203720133017 3016 3015 30141131052014 2015 2016 2017 2018 202020194120382012112 114162211132323923217920392011177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 1635 6103204832223833033138115326235 234 2333242047231178332161204020103212371217130102320236612320412009Gloria St41225101204620421220081268 71203072062102043132045207 208 209146 148 149 150 152 153 155 157 158 159 1602007306205147151 154 1561 131912523052049143119 1162111441920 192120063042033291922 12812414315118212303141 139 138 137 135 134 132 130 12910 1119141919202140136 133 131 128 12721915127117216 215 2141231619231916317 315 314 313 312 311 310 309 30819183162012131263021924200191119171252005Robin St1925124199221937881910192622018 1713713119382771071936198 23217 219292 294 295299 301218110 111 112 114 117 119296 297 298 300221108115 116 118 120 12119271091131228719091935132 2004±293106192827619719 241939325 33122232819348619292513319610599 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 891908194020 2119411933227 225223103 102 101 1008526134291 290 289 287 285 284 283 282 280 2782261942 1932288 286281 2791951041907224194319311960135194190619441930Peter St19051945136193271961501190418328194624519269190322870 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 1 2 82 83 84441962229 230291902268273491952260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 269 270 271 27243 3018268190124419142 311900196332741 32195319048402431816733189965 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 5139 342421891970186 185 184382003473521898255251246259 258 257 256 254 253 252 250 249 248 2472411881806637 3618971969240187195019711968Helen St19721948194919671194741 3 4 5 689 10 1119761973184119661801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1844 1843 1842 1840 183921 2 31977 19754197451964 196518473184661814 1813 1812 1811 1810 1809 1808 184518384 214 167118481561849183751183618501816 181718231824181518251818183545281851100 182612183413918191852101185818201827 1833111853182118321745318281854183110018591829 183018551860111861185618621868185718631864186961881 1880186521918701882 18791187118661883 18781867187218864651884 18771873118871885 1876PT40618741888Sharra BvdElizabeth AveRdRedgate RdBeachAve464456121875188910143118911890100541945919474304164294282701470137012418376517011461458767768769770771772757773756755774796754797775798753776802 799752777800 751778801750779746749780747 7489949951722988270102334222982993003023033013043483053493063501235133524353354355365366 367364356363362361360357<strong>Byron</strong> St3354232 1 1 2311317312318313319314320315321440322325326327328329330331462784785786359441 442121Ocean Ave3322 1787233947119 20211224501512River St5678AB1391210111570082361122DCAB1650649700925 86486 7ABC131±2450550123133410 200 400Metres5105515445456798Coastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A6Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A6


New Brighton BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality9471212245678950 511 2AB131210111523370082316122DCAB125 8679477009ABC±450550312341131254455154354254154554654754856716171819202110981314152223241154054932153945143943843745245353370058712134364544354554562 3 3 2 11457433124324583243110643075 5 4 3 2 145910842994609974289339 34046133834185 10 5 4 3 2 13374273424627336343610344132733454631 233234614333331335 33434742634846422152973493302963503514256044652116150295352294201715132929335315229842446619182923284121532992911116530029035463272894673014232791663022883032167272 32630435541546828042251543253324305 2783234104692093223562814163214094211553064259311420470156320357277408 41725830726028331241947123101681 319358261530407472176284313418257309262308 276359473170524285314406177268399474171263317385178315400 375475523286476525172 267 264398477401 374386316522179287366478269 266265510535 397 479526402 373180387 365480441521380481511186270379396403 3725274824997006181364442536520185271381388483512404 3713955005281824435193784845015133824053701844851834985183764444503945025293693775143684863834454975173935031588367158949151515875044465161563 1562 1561983488 487492489447211590 15869821357448 98114931591156449450615671349495215851113523 5081584156515681350 13515381 538250915661347 12135313561583415811569157013461333158213451337161915771571132411471267134413401332157212701618126415801341 13391343133813231271 1269132912687007125913311578132713421330126016281579 1576 1575 1574 157313351629132613341235 1236 123713251320127213171246 1247 12481630161712381321 13221616 1615 16141273 12341316 13191311124513181239124911274 123321310 1312131516881314131311244 1250136113091275 123216121306127621243 1251130812313130713051277124216111278125211491230116751304127912291216 121512531214130112801228121712131673 16741303121812541672130212271671130012811219129112551226 12201212129912921282129012211204125612831223121112931222120312981289122412021205121012011209129512251297 12961200129412841199120622128812871286 1285120811981197118711961207117714541195 11931178119411881186 11851179 11761156 11541184119114531183 1182 11801175119211811190 118911744117311531172145211711164 116311521170116211482 110721165148311691479107311501480 1481148210741086116614843411111075116810871167114851114 2107110851500108811131501148610761499108211051070108914871077108415021083109014881069181614981078110215031091218151489181410681150414971490107911011092110310671505 14961080 108118171492 1435 1436 106611001495 149310991494106410651093321063109410981807180910621097103410371440 1441106110511096103214391060105210951031180218051053143814431059103918032918041448102618011444102410301040110541055 11800144510271041102210292102821057 1020 102110582Warranbool Rd21817Rajah RdOrana RdStrand Ave4 3 2 1516871112314251211110294857612384 5 620119218317416515614713812911102 1345678910111213141516171867462±0 200 400MetresCoastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A7Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A7


Pacific HwyBrunswick Heads to Bayside BrunswickCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality15 1 2 1349 348 3471013462 13501375 3511 1 1463353365358359 3574366360354417361356355367368 362 363 364 290 289 288 287 7001286 285 3243691370A B371C 1 4 5A6 7 A5B4 31C B2 1C6 5 2D1 233 4 5 6 7118 1 A121222111112321011±431 293104 5 6 758149 10811912165781167B C C B2A 211 A B C AA BPT2 PT2 PT2PT22135162A1B2C1Pacific Hwy121123Fawcett St21 2 3 1 1 6 5 4361 2 3 4Mullumbimbi St1 21 1 3 2 1 A1 1 21 1 6 5 4Fingal St17 3 2 1 14 13 12 11 101 1 114523 11 22321AB40813121 13 1 1 12 1 13412 211111 2 11 2 1 1 2A40134023A63994718 9403423425341224424 1227228229230231232A B1 21238239240246247437336South Beach Rd427PT2A B C 1 2 3 A B C A B CAB23134361C10 9 8 7 6 5 413 2 A B11A B1 1 2 1C2 311122CBA AB B C 1 1 2 A B 1CC121 1 2 1111123 2 1 126241 1 1 27BC12 BADA3B44 C321 1F11211437232345 A B C A B C 10428141119 18217 16A15 14 13 12 BPT41637913122 11 A B1C A B21D24 5 6 1321B2A1Pacific Hwy21422434135831434333941439632639828432732513292802643311395231713971122279400111112 34 56341162728 172629253018Bayside Way7 8910 321514 11311230132924 3121272010023 32 1926 2822 33252434212322 33201911836216 178 768396155684 310561413574458 59552114135564060671425411 67 13 12122396112843667145316210389446511 105281563937 45641620 19 17136 46 5118692135 47 507110014051±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Coastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A9Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A9


Belongil BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard Lines12Section 1 locality449445114074472322448101115Bayshore Dr225447137408Childe StBelongil Beach101102105441353643103444643104142452511491334444524443910338151261322371415227464503545398130 131 132 133 134 1351361003502141Border St86 878855 89149056965785131983 82 818476124110236124352812534591024616100333047101321151033110148311141279049301138920120643363502962882151282287275223861011025342108525107548426551064983951327568656656105746767825710473645268795976103 102 101 100 99501013226318192021531516176269 706025617574274173629745442863729354 55 56 576171266072434292597346383940582971706498143794749847304876759591807978773332353411168100101119112113114115116117118102122120103104121105106107108109110129219920126191817127 12816151497 1134847101246454443114241401011121314151617181920393837363534332122232425262728293031326968676665646362616059701358575655545352515049484746454443424140393837363534333231 30292827262524232221201917181615141312114 52538393736100464748495051525322111035343332122928272623222120195618575859606110181716151423Coastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission.Anyrelianceplacedonsuchinformationshallbeatthesoleriskoftheuser.Pleaseverifytheaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of Lands401DCZMP396±0 200 400Metres1322212324252627192018 17161514 13121011Title:323341342Coastal PlanningPrecincts and DCP 2002<strong>Part</strong> J Precincts Figure A10Data Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle Figures10Scale:Layout Size:1:7,500A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A10921314121343256754893121221161221789911112234578912345678911234567892312321213761B2111111122162112121123511121219876542321


<strong>Byron</strong> BayCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality1918172316 4081514131211102143233413423501918173291433713328113272371110326338103252351010010201918163961514131211108 38750Memorial Pool and50Car Park113885A5B33139539238939145639338939038939345739423044017161514383131218111015142063991112434 1110444101150386123842111201218519 185117 16101115 1416101±Title:Coastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 30 200 400MetresBorder StBelongil Beach414Cavvanbah StEwingsdale Rd413Dryden StClarks BeachShirley St"Milton StMain BeachBay St<strong>Byron</strong> St410Lawson St15942522Lawson St4524274154245Massinger StMarvell St45441145318Jonson StDisclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission.Anyrelianceplacedonsuchinformationshallbeatthesoleriskoftheuser.Pleaseverifytheaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of Lands1819210 2222120192221181710DCZMP Coastal PlanningPrecincts and DCP 2002<strong>Part</strong> J Precincts Figure A11Data Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle Figures121110412222342711Scale:122021Layout Size:141516171:7,500A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010416426Fig. No.368400A11339876543211122132432241136546519627A9B1121 11114811521232743851462175112869117121A2112113 1211B98921817111121213111463562151A62B2131712B1A13771X 1 Y712DCB12192234145111C364526145 31243311111211A7212A34516BA1BBAABB1BB112836129198571C122112872171892217124788719567281225612345672142875612


Clarks Beach, Wategoes Beach and Cosy CornerCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality±Wategos Beach1415414416400417418212334567870164928364419510534615216 141119131712711883 4 700992141101511312 11764 89135101121 14034048 569102342247812421420Palm Valley Dr91161012711 131214310Clarks Beach4104114124132187654321Lighthouse Rd22 238 117 181961412 12151620 2117Lighthouse Rd54123684241314423Cape <strong>Byron</strong>SCA1615425961592138322 567819102021 1817 2122452221011125453427426Cosy Corner7821012122231MN17161152R141819201121102292872365254 2726321011A145171454427ArakwalNP±0 200 400MetresCoastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A12Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A12


Tallow Beach north of Suffolk ParkCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesB16 15 14 1321Section12111 10locality6722 543966670171517365333464 32352632318762161301661529156028361418127593726 9572738 8558261 14542 4573971225111065612498401123552325 A699544111469126272222842 97253113142214396324 1 5211223 C20442210171 141421951951451021115189472 14010311099373104139181086 19742891389210720±757149 48105106501361690 9176 135281577 13498814131251338752817912498101018013263131239710 1 4118682122138962130511383129621517420781992 951811711811791194685116900102932190193103 1012832192891046115841051138111 11485871062 369780368861071870 7922108571 786610971106073768744575 11191 1214811101431059226447949128 7236 5584544435750241245613151422514 15 162554317 185219 20 115131354112 111101692871739612233816184113717252218 19 20102136213222392620354 524682734141672833156 29325303198 7 17418 19203104 5140428614171829 101141324Scott StCooper StBeachcomber Dr12100427Tallow Beach15421610421562103948720 191817292816151413122ArakwalNP4362TallowCreek437±0 200 400Metres110Coastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A13Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A13


Tallow Beach at Suffolk ParkCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality4372196±11053110141015863019115 6929205 430521181272833116 27172 813121626 57582259 94 6023261 6215231326356 242991 9064928925952888 876586261262663034 35 36373150 386784683947816940 8348706468041 82717 45794257811272278943 137344105111614741475151541133167621258 11171011222 211112320 1892E2482019987732D31326274615C614 5554301PTB304452302PT13039412412296124963125394265311922 232624 251526302712829964721278282512100241416322791 920280 2812821312334PTA3533283101936 372781018123834290191161835287284118 76233 32431 30 2936217288 285275531374 3 2 31286292816381632 2715 142942123935 341130572962402971 1 217392513 4941300250 115 6295718146224229840 41 42 43 44 45813299111021 41354 55 56 5720 5217111 141323211 1511414673161215270 Suffolk43605051 52 16173541418176514122151518871232061911 Park8121720979132 1310 18700484 83 8292181 80 791011211078142311977 762275412224107411159 60 6675867236161687369125662 657222 1 5264131255 63743712 11154133494348151507021420514754 152162 154676543953 40150654518174196365173342 43 44219111811 10349983521 20121936 3712 110891211120616131110411157 6 5154111401414 23116203141711181219322 11161313 121141 133284 1227151415213161215326 14117168711654 4181231171 1821119118619287314202 19510 1921208PTA2625921122272411022PTB2823111292322123302132312111312543322015114136541191611514276511812171 161535876171816298716191 1811710010918111911810 1920191015201455013 12 1110 9 8 714 3 2 11643142234415 11445Broken Head RdBroken Head RdClifford StMcClean StAlcorn StJarman StWareham StAlcorn StAlcorn St769584312191811723145891011121314151617181912±0 200 400MetresCoastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A14Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A14


Broken HeadCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality512 10 115 14 13 12 1110 9 8 715020 9 191020Macgregor St4 3 2 131114100262153445141691013411121352±70041110110110Taylors Lake RdTi Tree Lake(Taylors lake)5005005311014103Broken Head Reserve Rd678539 1012 1 770148910121136937013564KingsBeach±0 200 400MetresCoastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A15Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A15


Kings Beach, Brays Beach and Whites BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality4KingsBeach6±1212BraysBeach1312343Snapper Rock124111345WhitesBeach3Seven Mile BeachRd12412411145Jews Point±0 200 400Metres4Coastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A16Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A16


Northern end of Seven Mile BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard Lines3Section 1 locality3111453WhitesBeach1244±Jews Point19121Seven Mile Beach Rd41111145Seven mile Beach±0 200 400MetresCoastal Planning PrecinctsPrecinct 1 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 1Precinct 2 <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 2<strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002 Precinct 3Title:DCZMP Coastal Planning Precinctsand DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J PrecinctsFigure A17Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A17


South Golden BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality100±14144562171611549141312111078 79977768075818157482173141683713726667658468669212716457087881138960524902077 207810918620689259192079420763585195861 5020698 7 6208047207530555762207019208630562085466320745622081 2082 208320843057 3054305820713059454030603052 305320731 2 306141305120724439288304942209020893047 30484332102303730461205621032091303820 4210423 22 2121052092303930362107 2106210138 2620553045520933040304118210030353761302054210824209430443042361720993043303427720532109252095162098303335205221102097 209628341592051208730623032 3329 14102049205020323213 11302031203330211213730203031311730222024 20233025 3026 302720343028 3030512030 2029 202820253023302430292027 20263019109 10820222035300514 151071031102036202130181330041063007 3006 3003 3002 30013013 3012 3011 3010 3009 30083000203720133017 3016 3015 30141131052014 2015 2016 2017 2018 202020194120382012112 11416221301113232392321795 62039201110333131152048326235 233177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 1633222383302341618 32433220472311782040201032123771211023202366123204120094122Gloria St5101204620421220081268 71203072062102043132045207 208 209146 148 149 150 152 153 155 157 158 159 1602007306205147151 154 1561 1319125230520431162111441920 192191411920063042033291922 12812414315118212303141 139 138 137 135 134 132 130 12910 11219141919202140136 133 131 128 1271915127117216 215 2141231619231916315 313 311 310 309 3081918317 316 314 3122011262133021924200191119171251925Robin St1242005199221937881910192622018 1713713119382771071936198 23217 219112292 294 295 296 297 298 299 301218108 110 111 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 12119271091131223002218719091935293132 106192819 2427619719392004325 33122232819348619292513319610599 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 891908194020 2119411933101227 225223103 102 1008526134291 290 289 287 285 284 283 282 280 2782261942 1932288 286281 2791951041907224194319311960135194190619441930Peter St19051945136193271961501190418328194624519269190322870 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 1 2 82 83 84441962229 230291902268273491952260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 269 270 271 27243 3018268190124419142 311900196332741 32195324319048401816733189965 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 5139 342421891970186 185 184382003473521898258 255 253 251 249 246259 257 256 254 252 250 248 2472411881806637 3618971969240187195019711968Helen St1972194819491967119474 1 2 3 4 5 689 10 1119761973184119661801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1844 1843 1842 1840 18391 2 34641977 19754197451964 196531846184761814 1813 1812 1811 1810 1809 1808 184518384 214 16711848156184918375118361850181661817465462182318241825452181518181835172198185110012453139181918261834101PT40618521858116 18201827 18331 111001853182118321854 18591828 1829 18301831Sharra BvdElizabeth AveKallarroo CctRangal RdRedgate RdBeach Ave! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard Lines Coastal Planning Precincts Planning Precinct andImmediatePrecinct 1Hazard Lines! !WRL 50yr worst Precinct 2Figure A18WRL 100yr worstTitle:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,5000Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A18


South Golden Beach to New Brighton BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard Linesal Rd2051292032141013020503032 33 322049306213 11Section 1 locality3020332031302130203031 31121730222024 20233025 3026 3027 3028 30302034512030 2029 202820253023302430292027 202611373019109 10820222035300514 151071101032036202130183004131063007 30063003 3002 30013013 3012 3011 3010 3009 30083000203720133017 3016 3015 30141131052014 2015 2016 2017 2018 202020194120382012112 114162211132323923217920392011177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 1635 6103204832223833033138115326235 234 2333242047231178332161204020103212371217130102320236612320412009Gloria St4122510120462042207 208 209 2101220081268 71203072062043146 148 149 150 152 153 155 157 158 159 160132007 2045306205147151 154 1561 1319125230520414491431920 1921119 11620063042033291922 128124South 14315118303141 139 138 137 135 134 132 130 12910 1119141919202140136 133 131 128 127219151271171231619231916317 315 314 313 312 311 310 309 30819183162011263021924200191119171252005Robin St1925124199Golden221937881910192618 1713713119382771071936198108 110 111 112 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121231927109113122292 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 3018719091935132 200427619 241939325862513399 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 891908194020 211941Beach±2931971061928193433132819291961051933103 102 101 1008526134291 290 289 287 285 284 283 282 281 280 279 2781942 1932288 2861951041907194319311960135194227 226 225 224190619441930Peter St19051945136193271961501190418328194624519269190322870 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 1 2 82 83 84441962229 230291902268273491952260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 269 270 271 27243 3018268190124419142 311900196332741 32195319048402431816733189965 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 5139 342421891970186 185 184382003473521898255251246259 258 257 256 254 253 252 250 249 248 2472411881806637 3618971969240187195019711968Helen St19721948194919671194741 3 4 5 689 10 1119761973184119661801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1844 1843 1842 1840 183921 2 34641977 19754197451964 196518473184661814 1813 1812 1811 1810 1809 1808 184518384 214 167118481561849183751183618501816 181718231824181518251818183545281851100 182612183413918191852101185818201827 1833111853182118321745318281854183110018591829 183018551860111861185618621868185718631864186961881 1880186521918701882 18791187118661883 18781867187218864651884 18771873118871885 1876PT406187418881875121889139477997229887847857869951100767768769770771772757773756755774796754797775798753776802801746747 748787650649648752800 751750749994780778779777276521012334314197014Sharra Bvd1891430189057013947429701141670107012Elizabeth Ave418450459357428359233Redgate RdMarshalls CreekNR2982993003023033013043483053493063501235133524353354355365366 367364356363362361360551544545550132458422<strong>Byron</strong> St335170091423441BeachAve2 1 1 2311317312318313319314320315321440322442Ocean Ave19River St7008202121145674613253263273283293303313322 1150 51221 245A6B78139121011152631 12D A2C B125 86 7AB3231C1111098! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !3456462New Brighton BeachSouth Golden Beach±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard LinesCoastal Planning PrecinctsImmediatePrecinct 1! !WRL 50yr worstWRL 100yr worstPrecinct 2Title:Planning Precinct andHazard LinesFigure A19Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A19


Brunswick HeadsCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard Lines1287 1286 128511981206 1208119711871454117711961193 12071195117811941188Section 1 locality1186 11851179 11761156 115411841183118011751192 11911182 11811190 118914531174117311531172145211711164116311521170116211482 110721165148311691073115010741086116614843411111075116810871167114851114 2107110851088111314861076108211051487107010891077108410831090148810691816107811021091218151489181410681149010791101 1103109210671080 1081110018171435 1436 10661099±10641065109310631098109418071809106210971034103714411061105110961032106010521095103118021805143910531443105910391803180414381448102618011444102410301040110541055 1180014451027104110221029210282 1057 1020 102110582270074! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !18172462368378369370! ! ! ! ! ! !379380381382383384385371372373375376377386387! ! ! !111! !305019328! !214409214!202501!4631524311373374 11 111 2 2 114375348 347349346350351101 2 111 1 1144175 4 3 2 1112211310495867PT2368 362 363 364 290 289 288 287 7001286 2853243691370A B371C 1 4 5A6 7 A B1C BC6 5 2D1 233 4 5 6 7118 1 A22111221131 2 3104 5 6 7 8149 10 119121581167B C C B2A 211 A B C AA BPT2 PT2PT2A BPT2C 1 2 3 A BAC A B C B11110 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2A B1 1 2 1C2 3 1CA AB B C 1 1 2 A B C12311923353365358359 357354 436636036135635536712 3 4 5 A B C A B C18 17 16 15 14 13 12112211 A B C1A B1 4D2C1A B111ABPacific Hwy Pacific Hwy2ABC12122 BAB3411 1FC1121023417321Fawcett St21352162123161Mullumbimbi St2 1 21 1 3 2 11A1 1 21 1 6 5 4Fingal St3 2 1 14 13 12 11 1033A647 821 1 2 1113 1 1 6 5 41 2 3 42 1 1262 1 1 1 27BCDABPT4164 C321 1 114523 11 2219211321AB40813121 13 1 1 12 1 13412 211111 2 11 2 1 1 2A401402399403313114234253412244241227228229230231232A B1 2South Beach Rd! ! ! ! ! !1238239240246247437336436437±379! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0 200 400Metres1:7,500427428Hazard Lines Coastal Planning Precincts Planning Precinct andImmediatePrecinct 1Hazard LinesPrecinct 2Figure A21! !WRL 50yr worstWRL 100yr worstTitle:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A21


Pacific HwyBrunswick Heads to Bayside BrunswickCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality15 1 2 1349 348 3471013462 13501375 3511 1 1463353365358359 3574366360354 214173613563553536721162 3 1 126 5368 362 363 364 290 2894288 287 7001286 285324A13691 B2C3370161 2 3 4A B371C 1 4 5A6 7 A5B4 31C B2 1C1 2 1 26 5 2D1 1 3 21112 3A1113415 6 7118 14A1125122221111 212111231 6 5 4323 11011±43112293104 5 6 758149 1081191216517738112 1 14 13612 117B C C B10A22211 A B C A3A B3A6471PT2 PT28 9PT2PT2A B C2PT21 2 3 A BAC A B C B21C1 11029 8117 615 413 2 A B111213 2 1 126241 1 1 27ABBC1 1 2 11C2 3112122 BCADAB3B44 CA A3B B C 1 1 2 A12B C1 1FC1121Pacific HwyFawcett StMullumbimbi StFingal St321AB40813121 13 1 1 12 1 13412 211111 2 11 2 1 1 2A40140239940331311423425341224424 1227228229230231232A B1 21238239240246247437336436437South Beach Rd! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !427232345 A B C A B C 10428141119 18217 16A15 14 13 12 BPT416379! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !13122 11 A B1C A B21D24 5 6 1321B2A1Pacific Hwy21422434135831434333941439632639828432732513292802643311395231713971122279400111112 34 56341162728 172629253018Bayside Way7 8910 321514 11311230132924 3121272010023 32 1926 2822 33252434212322 33201911836216 178 768396155684 310561413574458 59552114135564060671425411 67 13 12122396112843667145316210389446511 105281563937 45641620 19 17136 46 5118692135 47 507110014051±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard Lines Coastal Planning Precincts Planning Precinct andImmediatePrecinct 1Hazard LinesPrecinct 2Figure A22! !WRL 50yr worstWRL 100yr worstTitle:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A22


Belongil BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard Lines1115! ! ! !4494451211Section 1 locality407447232244810Bayshore Dr! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !408! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !225447137Childe StBelongil Beach101102105441353643103444643104142452511491334444524443910338151261322371415227464503545398130 131 132 133 134 1351361003502141Border St! ! ! ! ! ! ! !86 878855 89149056965785131983 82 818476124110236124352812534591024616100333047101321151033110148311141279049301138920120643363502962882151282287275223861011025342108525107548426551064983951327568656656105746767825710473645268795976103 102 101 100 99501013226318192021531516176269 706025617574274173629745442863729354 55 56 576171266072434292597346383940582971706498143794749847304876759591807978773332353411168100101119112113114115116117118102122120103104121105106107108109110129219920126191817127 12816151497 1134847101246454443114241401011121314151617181920393837363534332122232425262728293031326968676665646362616059701358575655545352515049484746454443424140393837363534333231 30292827262524232221201940117181615141312114 525383937361004647484950515253221110353433321229282726232221201956185758596061101817161514233961322212324252627192018 17161514 1312101132334134210Hazard Lines Coastal Planning PrecinctsImmediatePrecinct 1! !WRL 50yr worst WRL 100yr worstPrecinct 2Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission.Anyrelianceplacedonsuchinformationshallbeatthesoleriskoftheuser.Pleaseverifytheaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of Lands±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Title:Planning Precinct andHazard LinesFigure A23Data Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:Layout Size:1:7,500A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A23921314121343256754893121221161221789911112234578912345678911234567892312321213761B2111111122162112121123511121219876542321


!!<strong>Byron</strong> BayCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality19181723Border St!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Belongil BeachCavvanbah StEwingsdale RdDryden St! !Shirley StMilton St! ! !Clarks Beach"! !16 4081514131211102143233413423501918173291433713328113272371110326338103252351010010201918163961514131211108 38750Memorial Pool and50Car Park113885A5B33139539238939145639338939038939345739423044017161514383131218111015142063991112434 1110444101150386123842111201218519 185117 16101115 1416101±Title:Hazard Lines Coastal Planning PrecinctsImmediatePrecinct 1! !WRL 50yr worst Precinct 2WRL 100yr worst0 200 400Metres413414Bay St! !Main Beach<strong>Byron</strong> St! !! !410! ! !! !Lawson St! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! !15942522Lawson St4524274154245Massinger StMarvell St45441145318Jonson StDisclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission.Anyrelianceplacedonsuchinformationshallbeatthesoleriskoftheuser.Pleaseverifytheaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of Lands1819210 21:7,500222120192221181710Planning Precinct andHazard LinesFigure A24Data Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle Figures121110412222342711Scale:122021Layout Size:141516171:7,500A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010416426Fig. No.368400A24339876543211122132432241136546519627A9B1121 11114811521232743851462175112869117121A2112113 1211B98921817111121213111463562151A62B2131712B1A13771X 1 Y712DCB12192234145111C364526145 31243311111211A7212A34516BA1BBAABB1BB112836129198571C122112872171892217124788719567281225612345672142875612


! !Clarks Beach, Wategos Beach and Cosy CornerCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality±415Wateg o s Beach4191913 4 70092417114005418761928364510534615216 141113171271889141011312 114214204144162123370164456789824 839413510611271 18403404951061142212Palm Valley Dr1012711 131214310Clarks Beach410! !! !411! !412! ! !413! !432118765Lighthouse Rd22 23148 1112 1 157 1821916176 20 2154122Lighthouse Rd368Cape <strong>Byron</strong>SCA34642413141615! ! !4234259!2138322192021 1822!781210212223117MN1611521418R19201121102292872365254 2726321011A145171! !15956781017 21! !4544522101112265453ArakwalNP427427! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !426! !Cosy Corner±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard Lines Coastal Planning Precincts Planning Precinct andImmediate! !WRL 50yrPrecinct 1Precinct 2Hazard LinesFigure A25worstWRL 100yr worstTitle:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A25


Tallow Beach north of Suffolk ParkCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesB16 15 14 1321Section12111 10locality6722 543966670171517365333464 32352632318762161301661529156028361418127593726 9572738 8558261 14542 4573971225111065614272498401123552325 A699544111469126272222842 97253113142214396324 1 5211223 C20442210171 141421951951451021115189472 14010311099373104139181086 19742891389210720±757149 48105106501361690 9176 135281577 1349881413125113387528179124981010180132263131239710 1 4118682122138962130511001383129621517420781992 951811711811791194685116900102932190193103 1012832192891046115841051138111 11485871062 369780368861071870 7922108571 786610971106073768744575 11191 1214811101431059226447949128 7236 5584544435750241245613151422514 15 162554317 185219 20 115131354112 111101692871739612233816184113717252218 19 20102136213222392620354 524682734141672833156 29325303198 7 17418 19203104 5140428614171829 101141324115 42610421039142865720 1918Scott StCooper StBeachcomber DrTallow Beach! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !17292816151413122436ArakwalNP! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!1210TallowCreek437! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard Lines Coastal Planning Precincts Planning Precinct andImmediate! !WRL 50yrPrecinct 1Precinct 2Hazard LinesFigure A26worstWRL 100yr worstTitle:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A26


Tallow Beach at Suffolk ParkCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 localityBroken Head RdBroken Head Rd1296±153110141015863019115 6929205 430521181272833116 27172 813121626 57582259 94 6023261 6215231326356 242991 9064928925952888 876586261262663034 35 36373150 386784683947816940 8348706468041 82717 45794257811272278943 137344105111614741475151541133167621258 11171011222 211112320 1892E2482019987732D31326274615C614 5554301PTB304452302PT13039412412296124963125394265311922 232624 251526302712829964721278282512100241416322791 920280 2812821312334PTA3533283101936 372781018123834290191161835287284118 76233 32431 30 2936217288 285275531374 3 2 31286292816381632 2715 142942123935 341130572962402971 1 217392513 4941300544 45 46 22250 116295371814229840 41 42 438299111101354 55 5621157Suffolk14132321111511416743161215527043605051 52 1617365414Park181765141221515 848 718712363 111220191198112121720972109131318700484 83 8292181 80 791011211078142311977 762275412224107411159 60 6675867236161687369125662 657222 1 5264131255 63743712 11154133494348151507021420514754 152162 154676543953 40150654518174196365173342 43 44219111811 10349983521 20121936 3712 110891211120616131110411157 6 5154111401414 23116203141711181219322 11161313 121141 133284 1227151415213161215326 14117168711654 4181231171 1821119118619287314202 19510 1921208PTA2625921122272411022PTB2823111292322123302132312111312543322015114136541191611514276511812171 161535876171816298716191 1811710010918111911810 1920191015201455013 12 1110 9 8 714 3 2 11643142234415 11445Clifford StMcClean StAlcorn StJarman St! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Wareham St!Alcorn StAlcorn St1721811617181911915131421112310967584543121! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !9810437±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard Lines Coastal Planning Precincts Planning Precinct andImmediatePrecinct 1Hazard Lines! !WRL 50yr worst Precinct 2Figure A27WRL 100yr worstTitle:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A27


!Broken HeadCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality56142 10 115 14 13 12 1110 9 8 7150420 9 191020Macgregor St4 3 2 13211141511002345691! ! ! ! !1051213±11041312117004! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !110! ! !500110Taylors Lake RdTi Tree Lake(Taylors Lake)50053! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !1101! ! ! ! !4103Broken Head Reserve Rd678539 1012 1 770148910! ! !! ! !1211! !369!370!! !13564KingsBeach±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard Lines Coastal Planning Precincts Planning Precinct andImmediatePrecinct 1Hazard LinesPrecinct 2Figure A28! !WRL 50yr worstWRL 100yr worstTitle:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A28


Kings Beach, Brays Beach and Whites BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard LinesSection 1 locality4KingsBeach6±BrokenHeadNR1221BraysBeach1312343Snapper Rock141112345WhitesBeach3Seven Mile BeachRd12412411145Jews Point±0 200 400Metres41:7,500Planning Precinct andHazard Lines Coastal Planning PrecinctsImmediateHazard LinesFigure A29! !WRL 50yr worstWRL 100yr worstPrecinct 1Precinct 2Title:Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:1:7,500Layout Size:A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A29


Northern end of Seven Mile BeachCoastal Planning Precinctsand Hazard Lines3Section 1 locality11453WhitesBeach311244±Jews Point19121Seven Mile Beach Rd41111145Seven Mile Beach±0 200 400Metres1:7,500Hazard Lines Coastal Planning PrecinctsImmediatePrecinct 1! !WRL 50yr worstWRL 100yr worstPrecinct 2Title:Planning Precinct andHazard LinesFigure A30Disclaimer: While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information contained on this map is upto date and accurate, no warranty is given that the information contained on this map is free from error oromission. Any reliance placed on such information shall be at the sole risk of the user. Please verify theaccuracy of the information prior to using it.Note: The information shown on this map is a copyright of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and theNSW Department of LandsData Source:Parsons Brinckerhoff and modified by <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>File Location BSC (modified version):G:\EPS\GIS\CZMP FiguresFile Location PB (original):J:\A502-NCL\PROJ\2122798A_<strong>Byron</strong>_Coastline\10_GIS\GIS\Maps\Newcastle FiguresScale:Layout Size:1:7,500A3Last Updated:30th Aug 2010Fig. No.A30


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix B<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>resolutions that relate tocoastal hazardmanagement


<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolutions that relate to coastalhazard management2003, Res. 03-1047 - Report #41586303-1047 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> receive a report on the economic and environmentalimplications of resuming beach scraping for dune restoration and protection forSouth Golden, New Brighton and Suffolk park beaches.2004, Res. 04-1056 - Report #47583304-1056 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> adopt the Coastline Management Study.2004, Res. 04-1057 - Report #47583304-1057 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> select retreat under public and private ownership as itspreferred hazard management option for the Belongil/Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Beach andNew Brighton compartment.2005, Res. 05-12 - Report #49834905-12 Resolved1. That <strong>Council</strong> accept the funding from the Natural Disaster Mitigation Program for ascoping study on the feasibility of accessing the Cape <strong>Byron</strong> sand lobe for sandextraction and nourishment.2. That <strong>Council</strong> fund the $25,000 contribution from the following sources:Crown Reserves and/or the non-recurrent items from the 10% rate increasein the 2003/04 Budget that flow over into the 2005/06 Budget.2006, Res. 06-157 - Report #58841606-157 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> abandon any further consideration of sand nourishmentfrom the Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Sand Lobe.2006, Res. 06-249 - Report #63699206-249 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> provide a report on beach scraping to the Coastline ManagementCommittee.2. That the report above include advice of funding options that could be available ifbeach scraping is carried out.2006, Res. 06-721 - Report #63750706-721 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> confirm its commitment to the coastal erosion impact lines asidentified in DCP 2002 <strong>Part</strong> J as a basis for the Coastline Management Plan(CMP) in the interim until such time as the 2007 IPCC report and the StateGovernment and CSIRO study on the impacts of climate change and adaptation ofthe NSW Coastline.2. That <strong>Council</strong> commit to protecting the <strong>Byron</strong> Bay Town Centre through retention ofthe approved works and identify as a action in the plan to investigate the potentialfor modification to reduce the impact on Belongil Beach.3. That <strong>Council</strong> determine that the CMP be developed as a document that identifiesstrategies and actions that are required to implement planned retreat.


4. That the project brief (#631512) be circulated to the Committee members to seekinput to allow for a revised project brief to be reported back to <strong>Council</strong> at the 5December meeting.2006, Res. 06–800 - Report #63699206-800 Resolved:1. That the project brief (Annexure 4(a) #638400) for the preparation of the CoastlineManagement Plan be endorsed and that <strong>Council</strong> undertake an open tenderselection process for not less than 42 days commencing in January 2007.2. That <strong>Council</strong> give written notice to WBM Oceanics Australia of the change to thescope of services.3. That an amendment be made to Clause 2.3 on page 13 of 49 – delete “current”replace with “approved”.2006, Res. 06-802 - Report #63699206-802 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> pursue a funding application with the EmergencyManagement Authority (EMA) for a research project to assess the impacts andpotential mitigation for Belongil Beach from the protection works at Main Beach.2007, Res. 07–164 - Report #66499007-164 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> accepts the funding.2. That <strong>Council</strong> continue to seek funding for environmental assessment of beachscraping for Suffolk Park and South Golden Beach or where else it may berequired.2007, Res. 07-308 - Report #67517607-308 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> endorse the project brief for development of the proposal andenvironmental assessment of beach scraping (Annexure 2(a) #670370).2. That the long term viability of work in light of climate change be included in theProject Brief under Clause 2.4 Objectives of the Engagement and Clause 3 Scopeof Works.3. That Clause 2.4 Objectives of the Engagement be relocated to the front of thedocument and become Clause 2.1.4. That the tender amount listed on Page 35 of 37 be removed.2007, Res. 07-570 - Report #71394107-570 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> receive a report regarding the determination of itsstrategic planning processes in regard to:1. As a minimum, apply and consider the following changes in climate parametersto account for identified consequences of climate change this century:(a) temperature increases of 0.7 to 5.6 degrees C until 2070;(b) sea-level rises of 18 - 91cm up until the end of this century;(c) increases in rainfall intensities of 5 - 40% by the end of this century;


(d) increase in cyclone intensities by 2050 of 10% to 20%, with peak wind speeds5% to 10 % faster, increases in maximum rainfall of 20% to 30% and stormsurges increases of 20cm to 50cm.2. Apply a range of scenarios of low, median and high (worst case scenario).3. Identify the period for planning with a preference for 100 year planning andinclude:(a) sea level rise(b) rainfall intensity(c) cyclone intensity(d) other storm intensity(e) temperature increase4. Apply the above parameters to planning processes for:(i) Coastline Management(ii) Floodplain Management(iii) Estuary Management(iv) Stormwater Management(v) Infrastructure(vi) Emergency Management(vii) LEP zoning and DCP guidelines(vii) and other relevant planning processes5. That <strong>Council</strong> receive a report on risk assessment for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> regarding theassessment of biophysical and socio-economic thresholds based on theapplication of climate change parameters.6. Advise the Government that these parameters are being applied to consider futureplanning under the principles of "Duty of Care", Risk Based Analysis and thePrecautionary Principle based on best available information and seek concurrenceand advice regarding technical and financial support to allow these parameters tobe considered.7. That <strong>Council</strong> explore opportunities to obtain State and Federal funding via grants,eg The Australian Greenhouse Office.2007, Res. 07-757 - Report #72559707-757 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> adopt the “BSC 100 year Climate Change Flood PlanningScenarios” (Annexure 17(a) #722339) for future flood studies and floodplainmanagement plan projects and endorse their application as follows:a) For the Tallow Creek Floodplain Management Plan, <strong>Council</strong> will considerthe results of modelling the Climate Change Flood Planning Scenarios[Annexure 17(a)] and adopt a new Flood Planning Level (FPL) for TallowCreek prior to adopting the final management plan.b) Future flood studies will model the 100 year event using the ClimateChange Flood Planning Scenarios [Annexure 17(a)].The results of thismodelling will be reported to <strong>Council</strong> prior to continuing with furthermodelling.2. That <strong>Council</strong> adopt the following Climate Change Parameters:a) temperature increases of 0.7 to 5.6 degrees C by 2070;b) sea-level rises of 18 - 91cm by the end of this century;c) increases in rainfall intensities of 5 - 40% by the end of this century;


d) increase in cyclone intensities by 2050 of 10% to 20%, with peak windspeeds 5% to 10 % faster, increases in maximum rainfall of 20% to 30%and storm surges increases of 20cm to 40cm.3. That <strong>Council</strong> endorse a 100 year planning period as the preferred planningperiod for any strategic study, document, policy or plan that may be affected byclimate change.4. That pending incorporation of the Climate Change Flood Planning Scenarios andthe Climate Change Parameters into all, or all relevant, flood studies andfloodplain management plans and subsequently into all, or all relevant, strategicplanning documents:a) Climate Change Flood Planning Scenario number 4 (#722339) be used forthe purpose of all <strong>Council</strong>’s land use planning and operationalresponsibilities.b) For all large scale developments, major infrastructure upgrades, new landreleases, rezonings and subdivisions in areas below 5m Australian HeightDatum (AHD), an additional 1.0m to the Flood Planning Level (FPL) beapplied and above 5m AHD, an additional of 0.5m to the Flood PlanningLevel be applied.c) For all large scale developments, major infrastructure upgrades, future landreleases, rezonings and subdivisions, which are subject to any requirementfor the completion of a new flood study, Climate Change Flood PlanningScenario number 4 (#722339) be used to prepare the flood study.d) For all infill development within existing residential and commercial/industrialzones, the surrounding floor levels, building flood protection requirementsand/or proposals and the existing Flood Planning Level be considered interms of adequacy and assessment of risk prior to consideration being givento adding any additional requirements resulting from the Climate ChangeParameters.5. That <strong>Council</strong>’s planning and strategic documents and infrastructure policies,where their content may be affected by climate change, be reviewed toincorporate the impacts of the Climate Change Flood Planning Scenarios andClimate Change Parameters, as funding and resources, including grants, permit.6. That <strong>Council</strong> lobby the Government and State authorities to examine biophysicaland socio-economic issues as they relate to New South Wales Planning andClimate Change.7. That <strong>Council</strong> advise the federal Minister for Climate Change and stateDepartment of Environment and Climate Change and Department of Planning ofthis resolution and seek their advice on and/or concurrence to the actionscontained in the resolution.8. That <strong>Council</strong> pursue grant opportunities to further examine climate changeissues as they affect planning and infrastructure provisions.9. That <strong>Council</strong> note that Climate Change Flood Planning Scenarios and ClimateChange Parameters will need to be reviewed and/or updated upon receipt offurther Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and/orCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) orDepartment of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) recommendations.2008, Res. 08-700 - Report #82755608-700 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> adapt Resolution 07-757 into a draft policy titled “<strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Climate Change Strategic Planning Policy” and that it be reportedto <strong>Council</strong>.


2009, Res. 09-599 - Report #86081409-599 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> refer the Coastal Zone Management Plan to the Coastal andEstuary PRG with clarification and amendments as below:a) correction of technical errors, spelling and page and figure naming andnumbering, including:i) Page 31 of 289 of Annexure 22d (#862695) - Section 2.1 last paragraph- South Golden Beach and New Brighton be added to the list of “smallerpockets of development.”ii) Broken Heads be amended to Broken Head throughout the document.iii) Page 53 of 289 of Annexure 22(d) - Figure 3-1 be enlarged to A3 size.iv) Page 59 of 289 of Annexure 22(d) - Figure 4-1 - line item Year 2008 -Amend year 2008 to 2009 and state 'Draft Proposal and EnvironmentalAssessment'v) Page 59 of 289 of Annexure 22(d) - Figure 4-1 - line item Year 2009 -Amend to 'Draft <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal Zone Management Plan nearingcompletion.'vi)Pages 106 to 108 of 289 of Annexure 22(d) - Table 5-10 form the basisfor an Executive Summary.b) correction of management unit definition and descriptionsc) clarification of goals and actions in accordance with the Coastal Policy anda checklist of Strategic Actions as defined in the Coastal Policyd) inclusion of relevant issues relating to adopted BSC plans and strategies eg.Bikeway Plan, Disability and Access Plan and Public lands Plans ofManagemente) inclusion of an executive summaryf) inclusion of information relating to urban design eg LEP and DCP builtenvironment standards and Affordable Housingg) inclusion of information relating to Commercial Activities on CrownReserves and service provision eg. Surf Lifesavingh) an explanation about the translation of DCP <strong>Part</strong> J into the 2 Precinct modelwith uniform standards for demountability and buffer distance.i) that the document be delivered in a format that will allow for electronicdisplay to include hyperlinks.2. That a revised draft be reported to the Ordinary Meeting in August.2009, Res. 09-736 - Report #87906809-736 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> note that the NSW Department of Environment, Climate Changeand Water (DECCW) have requested input into the draft Coastal ZoneManagement Plan (CZMP) prior to the draft being presented to <strong>Council</strong> forconsideration of public exhibition.2. That <strong>Council</strong> does not refer the draft CZMP to the Coastal Estuary PRG forcomment prior to public exhibition.3. That <strong>Council</strong> receive a report on the implications of:a) <strong>Council</strong>'s resolution 09-599 of 2 July 2009b) comments/recommendations from the DECCW review.4. That <strong>Council</strong> confirm resolution 09-599 was for the purpose of ensuring theCZMP complied with the consultant brief and NSW Coastal Policy.


2009, Res. 09-766 - Report #85838409-766 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> proceed with a ground truth survey to determine the proximity of theseaward row(s) of development along Belongil Beach to the erosion escarpment,as confirmed by an expert able to identify the erosion escarpment, withrelevance to development consent provisions in <strong>Part</strong> J DCP 2002, and this willbe the subject of a further report to <strong>Council</strong>.2. That <strong>Council</strong> continue to monitor the position of the erosion escarpment and theassociated structural integrity of coastal structures for the purpose of informinglandholders, where applicable, the restrictions on title/development consentconditions.3. That should any structures be deemed by qualified engineers to be at immediaterisk due to further coastal erosion then <strong>Council</strong> is to inform landowners ofa) compliance with their conditions of consent; orb) identified risks (in the absence of a DA)4. That <strong>Council</strong> fund the cost of surveying the remaining developed beach precinctsSouth Golden, New Brighton, <strong>Byron</strong> Bay and Suffolk Park from the $20,000allocated for coastal and estuary management plan actions within theEnvironmental Levy.2009, Res. 09-812 - Report #87686909-812 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> note the amendments made to the draft <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal ZoneManagement Plan (CZMP) [Annexure 20(b) #891106] in accordance withresolution 09-599 and the requirements of the NSW Coastal Policy and theproject brief.2. That <strong>Council</strong> respond to the letter received from the NSW Department ofEnvironment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW) on 15 September 2009[Page 1, Annexure 20(c) #889675] outlining where it supports or objects to therecommendations contained in the letter.3. That prior to public exhibition of the draft CZMP <strong>Council</strong> amend the draft CZMPas follows:a) In accordance with advice received from DECCW via email [Page 2,Annexure 20(c)]b) That the ‘History of <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> planning in the Coastal Zone’ [Annexure20(d) #890565] be included as a preface to the draft CZMP [refer Annexure20(b)].c) That the 'History of <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> planning in the Coastal Zone' [Annexure20(d)] be updated to include the recommendation arising from the 8 October2009 <strong>Council</strong> meeting.d) page ix - number the Coastal Policy Goals - 1-9.e) amend the document to consistently refer to LEP and DCP as genericterms not to specify particular documents when referring to future actions.f) amend the document to ensure capitals for National Park and NatureReserve.


g) page 43, 3.2.1 include a reference to the Far North Coast RegionalStrategy in Table 3-3 Relationship of <strong>Byron</strong> CZMP to key managementdocuments - with reference to section 6 Natural Hazards -requirement foradequate setback in areas at risk from coastal erosion.h) 1.4.2 - Management of coastal hazards - include dot point re RES 06-721 'To investigate the potential for modification of Jonson Street works toreduce the impact on Belongil Beach' and create a specific action in Table5-2 in 2.2 Structures section and include in Table E-1 as a PriorityManagement Action.i) 2.2.3 - change reference to groyne at Main Beach not Clarkes Beach, addresidential to <strong>Byron</strong> Bay area, correct title to Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Headland Reserveand Cape <strong>Byron</strong> State Conservation Area and add at end 'and communityrepresentatives'.j) 2.2.4 - Map 2.4 to extend to the Cape and to mark division between Cape<strong>Byron</strong> SCA and Arakwal National Park and amend reference to land to'near' not at and ensure that the title is Ti Tree Lake (Taylors Lake) is dualtitled throughout the document. Add that the 'area was gazetted as anAboriginal Place (NPWS Act) in 2000'.k) 2.3.4 - Values - delete 'major' and delete SOE reference and on page 37delete '<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> settlement strategies (ie. <strong>Byron</strong> Bay and Suffolk ParkSettlement Strategy 2002, and Brunswick Heads Settlement Strategy 2004)and'.l) 2.3.5 - Values - page 37 - delete 'total consumer surplus' and replace with'expenditure'.m) 2.3.6 - Recreation and Tourism - Values - page 38 - delete dot pointreferring to lakes and add ' National Parks and ' to last dot point.n) Page 44 - Table 3-3 - delete 'once adopted' in relation to TourismManagement Plan.o) Page 49 - Fig 4.4 - Chronology - last point should read - 'Draft BS CZMPreported to <strong>Council</strong>'.p) 4.3.6 - delete second sentence and insert - 'A risk analysis of erosionprotection structures and works, both private and public in relation to publicsafety, structural integrity and impact on access, amenity and environmentalprocesses will be undertaken'.q) 4.3.7 - delete last paragraph and replace with 'Jonson Street Protectionworks will be investigated in relation to minimising down drift impacts andaddress safety concerns'.r) 4.4 Future Development - delete 'DCP 2002' and add the development ofDCP Guidelines for Coastal Precinct Planning'. Number each section -4.4.1 Coastal Planning Precinct 1 and 4.4.2 Coastal Planning Precinct 2.s) Add new Management Action - 'Develop DCP for Coastal Precinct Planningguidelines for Precinct 1 and 2 including provisions for renovations.t) Include overlay maps for <strong>Part</strong> J precincts and CZMP Planning Precincts asper #842425 and add to Section 4.u) 4.5.1 - page 55 add dot point relating to action 2.2.2.


v) 4.5.3 - Enforcement - last dot point - amend to state 'review of LEP andDCP'.w) 4.5.4 - Jonson Street Protection Works - add dot point - 'investigate thepotential for modification to reduce the impact on Belongil Beach'.x) 4.5.5. - amend to 'An action of this plan is to implement planninginstruments in accordance with this CZMP to provide for future developmentand management'.y) Table 5-9 Management Actions - amend 9.1.1 to 'Develop a MOU onCoastal Management 'and Table E-1.4. That <strong>Council</strong> endorse the draft CZMP (as amended in point 3 above) for thepurposes of public exhibition for a period of 60 days from 22 October to 22December, which will include:* Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)* fact sheets* online submission forms* a template submission form, as well as* a community information stand that will be staffed and available for at least twodays in each of the four management units* media releases, advertisements, e-news, website information, and radioannouncements to inform people of opportunities to view, attend or seek adviceand/or comment.5. That <strong>Council</strong> support the development of a policy for Coastal Stabilisation Workssubject to the finalisation of the management action 2.2.2 (to be initiatedimmediately) to undertake a risk analysis of erosion protection structures andworks, both private and public in relation to safety, integrity of the structures andthe impacts to surrounding environment (including beach access, beach amenityand environmental processes) which should be undertaken as a matter ofurgency.6. That <strong>Council</strong> adopt the amended constitution for the Coastal and Estuary ProjectReference Group [Annexure 20(f) #880962].7. That the public submissions on the draft CZMP be reported to the Coastal andEstuary Project Reference Group for advice before reporting to the StrategicPlanning Committee for their consideration.8. That a public meeting be organised if possible to coincide with the CoastalConference for the purpose of conducting a Facilitated Panel Discussion on thedraft CZMP and that the meeting be filmed with the intention of producing a DVDof the presentations that can be made available to the public.9. That an urgent report be received on the progress of the Memorandum ofUnderstanding (MOU) with other land management agencies for the integratedplanning and management of the coastal zone as per action 9.1.1.2009, Res. 09-917 - Report #89676409-917 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> endorse the proposed agenda (Table 1 in this report) for theFacilitated Panel Discussion on the draft Coastal Zone Management Plan to beheld on Friday 6 November 2009 from 4.00pm to 8.00pm at <strong>Council</strong> Chambers,Mullumbimby.2. That <strong>Council</strong> request the following organisations to provide a speaker:* BEACON


* Dunecare* Belongil Progress Association* <strong>Byron</strong> UnitedAnd a representative from each of the following areas who has previously been acommittee member from:* Brunswick Heads for the north of the <strong>Shire</strong>* South Golden Beach/New Brighton* Suffolk Park for the south of the <strong>Shire</strong>to provide a presentation (each) on their views of the draft Coastal ZoneManagement Plan at the Facilitated Panel Discussion.3. That staff send letters to the community groups formally inviting them to providea ten minute presentation at the Facilitated Panel Discussion on the DraftCoastal Zone Management Plan.4. That questions from the floor be extended to the conclusion of the meeting (timeremaining).5. That an independent, experienced facilitator be appointed.2009, Res. 09-968 - Report #88261909-968 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> adopt the Draft Climate Change Strategic Planning Policy[Annexure 12(a) #894194] with the following amendments:At 3.4, first dot point - insert after 'new land releases' the words 'subdivisioncreating more than 2 vacant lots...'At 3.4, second dot point – insert after 'future land releases' the words'subdivision creating more than 2 vacant lots...'At 4 - delete the reference relating to more than 2 vacant lots2. That <strong>Council</strong> amend 3.8 Emergency Management and Planning - a secondsentence be added '<strong>Council</strong> will undertaken emergency management educationfor the community to advise of potential risks and emergency planningassociated with climate change and extreme weather events'.3. That <strong>Council</strong> apply for funding from the EMA for funding for ongoing researchand education in relation to this policy and emergency management education.4. That <strong>Council</strong> apply for funding from the Federal Government Climate Changeprogram for Emergency Management Research Plan for investigation of thebiophysical and socio-economic thresholds and risks (3.7) and how these can bemanaged in an adaptive strategy to provide a community education andemergency management program.5. That <strong>Council</strong>, as a matter of urgency, require a review of figures used in theClimate Change Strategic Planning Policy to consider public submission inputfrom Mr Pugh, recent IPCC information, the NSW Draft Flood Risk ManagementGuide, the Draft Coastal Risk Management Guide and the Draft CoastalPlanning Guide (adapting for sea level rise) and be reported to <strong>Council</strong> as soonas possible.


2009, Res. 09-1069 - Report #91088509-1069 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> note the proposed new scenarios recommended in Annexure 21(#914806) and reconsider these when the State Government adopt their DraftFlood Risk Management Guide.2. That <strong>Council</strong> receive a further report once the State Government have adoptedtheir guidelines that also considers still ocean levels under climate change sealevel rise scenarios.2009, Res. 09-1158 - Report #91345409-1158 Resolved:1. That priority strategic works identified in 04-1059 be undertaken as per funding08-289 and 09-766 be commenced as a matter of urgency.2. That <strong>Council</strong> endorse the development of a Coastal Erosion EscarpmentMonitoring Program under guidance of the Environmental (Coastal and Estuary)Project Reference Group.3. That <strong>Council</strong> note a project plan for a coastal audit was provided in the report to<strong>Council</strong> 14 June 2005.2009, Res. 09-1159 - Report #85144509-1159 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> note the attached technical report “Development of a Proposal andEnvironmental Assessment of Beach Scraping - New Brighton and South GoldenBeach” [Annexure 5(a) #914162].2. That <strong>Council</strong> resolve to further the progression of a trial beach scraping episodefor the New Brighton Beach compartment (and note that <strong>Council</strong> has previouslyundertaken this work with a degree of success in the past) as proposed inSection 12.9 of Annexure 5(a) by:a) Undertaking Significance Assessments in accordance with Table 6.1 inAppendix A of Annexure 5(a), to be funded under existing Coastal andEstuary budget (#2606.012).b) Seeking relevant state government approvals for beach scraping works atNew Brighton and South Golden Beaches as per Section 1.3 in Appendix Aof Annexure 5(a) by:i) Developing and lodging a Preliminary Project Application report forsubmission to the Minister for Planning to decide whether the projectwould be assessed under <strong>Part</strong> 3A of the Environmental Planning andAssessment Act, 1979.ii) Subject to the advice of the Minister for Planning, that <strong>Council</strong> proceedwith seeking relevant approvals for the undertaking of beach scrapingworks.3. That subject to completing relevant environmental assessments and gainingapprovals for beach scraping works, <strong>Council</strong> resolve to consider a report on thefindings of the required environmental assessment(s) and status of approvals forundertaking beach scraping.4. That <strong>Council</strong> consider allocating the full funding for a trial beach scrapingepisode at New Brighton Beach of $130,800 from the 2010/11 budget, with afunding application to DECCW Coastal Program to recover half the costs, inaccordance with the recommendation under Section 12.9 of Annexure 5(a).


5. That <strong>Council</strong> provide a report on the potential for cost sharing for the beachscraping strategy.6. That <strong>Council</strong> receive further information on the historical reports on beachscraping and evidence of positive or negative impacts.2010, Res. 10-97 - Report #93426210-97 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> liaise with Dean Patterson to investigate the feasibility andsensitivity of his Shoreline Evolution Modelling Software Package as able tomodel the impacts of the Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Headland and any man made structureson the <strong>Byron</strong> Bay embayment as per Resolution 06-721 (part 2).2. That <strong>Council</strong> also identify research opportunities to clarify historical storm eventsfor the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coast.3. That <strong>Council</strong> investigate the costs, timeframe and availability of consultant DeanPatterson to undertake such modelling.4. That <strong>Council</strong> investigate making applications under the NSW EmergencyManagement, Natural Disaster Resilience Grant Scheme and under any FederalGovernment funding under the Dept of Climate Change and/or EmergencyManagement (Resolution 06-802).2010, Res. 10-203 - Report #94705310-203 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> endorse staff to prepare and lodge a funding application with theNSW Natural Disaster Resilience Grants Scheme by 16 April 2010 to seekfunding to undertake a trial beach scraping episode at New Brighton Beach inaccordance with Resolution 09-1159 and Section 12.9 of the technical report'Development of a Proposal and Environmental assessment of Beach Scraping -New Brighton and South Golden Beach', as previously reported to <strong>Council</strong>.2. That in progressing towards a trial beach scraping episode for New BrightonBeach in accordance with resolution 09-1159, staff provide a report to <strong>Council</strong>prior to June 2010 on the approval status of the proposed beach scraping activityin accordance with <strong>Part</strong> 3 of Resolution 09-1159, so that <strong>Council</strong> may withdrawor maintain its funding application with NDRGS under consideration of theapproval status and/or other project complexities.3. That subject to the success of the funding application lodged in accordance with<strong>Part</strong> 1 above, and completion of <strong>Part</strong> 2 above, <strong>Council</strong> allocate their required1/3rd funding of $43,600 from the 2010/11 Local Growth Management Strategybudget (job no. 2605.062) to undertake the trial beach scraping project.4. That should <strong>Council</strong> be unsuccessful in its funding application to the NaturalDisaster Resilience Grants Scheme, <strong>Council</strong> continue to seek funding throughany other relevant state or federal funding programs in accordance withResolution 09-1159.2010, Res. 10-250 - Report #94291610-250 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> engage consultant Dean Patterson to undertake the modellingexercise in accordance with the proposal in Confidential Annexure 15(b)(#946028) with funds that derive from Environmental Levy, Coastal Zone and


Estuary Management Plan budget (job no. 2606.012) and General Fund Surplusup to an amount of $18,000.2. That <strong>Council</strong> staff prepare and lodge a funding application with the NSW NaturalDisaster Resilience Grants Scheme by 16 April 2010 to seek additional fundingto undertake a research and modelling exercise to determine any effects of Cape<strong>Byron</strong>, Jonson Street Protection Works and Belongil Beach protection works onthe <strong>Byron</strong> Bay Embayment in accordance with Resolution 06-721 and 10-97 andconsideration of future construction. (Barham/Richardson)2010, Res. 10-285 - Report #94999410-285 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> engage Dr Peter Helman from the Griffith University Centre forCoastal Management to prepare a report on the history of coastal storms in the<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> in accordance with the proposal in confidential Annexure 8(#950603).2. That <strong>Council</strong> consider the allocation of $9,400 funding for the project identified in<strong>Part</strong> 1 above from the 2010/2011 Coastal and Estuary budget (#2602.12) as partof Draft Budget deliberations.2010, Res. 10-376 - Report #96229910-376 Resolved that the Strategic Planning Committee Meeting resolve underdelegated authority to:1. Adopt the Draft <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal Zone Management Plan [Annexure 2(a)#900138], incorporating the revised Draft Emergency Action Plan as <strong>Part</strong> B[Annexure 2(b) #962507], in accordance with:a) The amendments as detailed in Appendices 4 to 9 of the Draft Coastal ZoneManagement Plan Public Exhibition Report [Annexure 2(c) #965976].b) Any further required amendments as provided to <strong>Council</strong> by the NSW StateEmergency Service, DECCW and/or NSW Police on the Draft EmergencyAction Plan [Annexure 2(b)] under recognition that this is a technicaldocument which may require some further technical amendment as requiredby those agencies.2. Expeditiously finalise 'in-house' the Draft <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal Zone Managementby engaging a temporary Coastal Officer, to assist the Coastal and EstuaryOfficer and to engage a GIS officer to finalise the maps, using grant fundingallocated for the development of the Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan(#2605.005).3. Authorise the General Manager to send the amended Draft <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> CoastalZone Management Plan to the Minister for approval under Section 55G of theCoastal Protection Act 1979.4. Receive a further report after the Draft <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal Zone ManagementPlan has been finalised and sent to the Minister that details the PriorityManagement Actions contained in the Draft CZMP and which considers<strong>Council</strong>'s ability to implement these actions against existing available resources.2010, Res. 10-502 - Report #96968210-502 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> amend the adopted Coastal Zone Management Plan for<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline, <strong>Part</strong> B - Emergency Action Plan in Annexure 28(#974793) to clarify Table 2-1 Roles and responsibilities during the coastal


erosion event before or in the absence of a combat agency managing the eventas follows.Agency Trigger for action Scope of actions and limitationsNSW PoliceRequest for assistance fromLEOCONWhilst Police have statutory powers totake action any such action would beas per LEOCON request2010, Res. 10-612 - Report #98642610-612 Resolved:1. That <strong>Council</strong> note the Summary Report (Annexure 14) and endorse the Reviewof Environmental Factors [Appendix C, Annexure 14 #990879].2. That <strong>Council</strong> proceed with undertaking a trial beach scraping episode at NewBrighton Beach subject to <strong>Council</strong> receiving by the 19 August 2010:a) final approval from NSW Department of Industry and Investment.b) offer of funding from the Natural Disaster Resilience Grants Scheme(NDRGS).3. That if <strong>Council</strong> is successful with the NDRGS funding application, <strong>Council</strong>allocate an additional $29,700 from the 2010/11 Local Growth ManagementStrategy Budget (job no. 2605.062), in addition to $43,600 allocated inaccordance with resolution 10-203 <strong>Part</strong> 3 (subject to success of NDGRS funding)for the trial beach scraping episode at New Brighton Beach.4. That subject to <strong>Part</strong> 1, 2 and 3 above, <strong>Council</strong> implement the trial beach scrapingepisode at New Brighton Beach as per Table 3 of this report [further described inAnnexure 14] and as itemised as follows:a) Implement the biological monitoring program.b) Inform community of works via media release and notices.c) Engage ecologist to undertake daily inspections of works site to assesspresence/absence of bird and/or turtle species.d) Engage coastal engineer to supervise first 2 days of scraping.e) Scrape the designated work site to a depth of approximately 0.2m to placeapproximately 8m3/m to 16m3/m of sand against the erosion escarpment atNew Brighton Beach.f) Implement the physical survey program to assess dune volume change andbeach profile change and response.g) Implement dune rehabilitation5. That trial beach scraping works do not proceed beyond 30 September 2010under recognition of potential for impact to migratory species.6. That <strong>Council</strong> receive a further report following any trial beach scraping episodeat New Brighton Beach, analysing the biological and physical impacts, and thecost and logistic issues associated with the works.2010, Res. 10-613 - Report #98642610-613 Resolved that <strong>Council</strong> hold discussions with either Southern Cross University orGriffith University to provide for partnering on academic reporting on the processof assessment monitoring and results of the trial beach scraping.


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix CUpdated climate changeissues


Appendix C - Updated climate change issuesEffect of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007revisions on hazard linesThe <strong>Part</strong> J erosion lines were calculated before global sea level rise was understood,widely accepted and subsequently incorporated into coastal hazard planning.However, conservative, (high) long-term recession rates were incorporated into thecalculations following a stormy period. The hazard definition study (WBM, 2000) usedmore recent coastal engineering techniques and the Intergovernmental Panel onClimate Change (IPCC) sea level rise projections from 1996. The IPCC projectionshave been modified in 2001 and 2007 since the WBM (2000) study was done.Hennessy et al (2004) gave the following commentary on climate change, risk anduncertainty:The tool used to explore future climate is the climate scenario. Ascenario is a coherent, internally consistent and plausibledescription of a possible future state of the world. A scenario isnot a prediction, and has no likelihood attached beyond beingplausible. However, it is the basic building block of riskassessment approaches under climate change that usescenarios, ranges of uncertainty and probability distributionfunctions.A summary of various global sea level rise scenarios from IPCC Climate Change2007: Synthesis Report (IPCC 2007) is shown in Table C.1.Table C.1: IPCC (2007) global average sea level rise scenarios for 2090-2099.IPCC scenario or component Lower limit Upper limit Central valueStarting year 1980 1999 1990Final year 2090 2099 2095(m) (m) (m)B1 scenario 0.18 0.38 0.280A1T scenario 0.20 0.45 0.325B2 scenario 0.20 0.43 0.315A1B scenario 0.21 0.48 0.345A2 scenario 0.23 0.51 0.370A1FI scenario 0.26 0.59 0.425The IPCC publications represent the current international consensus position.Although the headline (IPCC, 2007) values appear lower, they do not include an


additional allowance for ice flow contribution. If ice flow contribution were to growlinearly with global average temperature change, IPCC (2007) suggest that the upperrange of sea level rise for the emissions scenarios shown in Table C.1 wouldincrease by 0.1–0.2 m for 2090 to 2100.Simplified engineering estimates (WRL, 2009) for global sea level rise developedfrom the IPCC (2007), as compared to NSW DECCW sea level rise benchmarks, areshown in Table C.2. The values include the (IPCC, 2007) possible additional ice meltcontribution of 0.2 m by 2090 to 2100. The IPCC (2007) publications to date onlyprovide estimates for 2100. The 2050 values are engineering estimates based oncomparable previous IPCC curves and National Committee on Coastal and OceanEngineering (NCCOE) (2004) with similar 2100 values.Table C.2: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW) (2009)sea level rise benchmarks and simplified engineering estimates of globalsea level rise (by WRL) based on IPCC (2007)ScenarioYear*2050 2100Sea level rise benchmark (DECCW, 2009) 0.4 0.9Adopted ‘mid’ range scenario (WRL,2009) 0.2 0.5Adopted ‘high’ range scenario (WRL, 2009) 0.3 0.9Note: * The IPCC 2007 publications to date only provided estimates for 2100.A comparison of simplified estimates of global sea level rise from the last three IPCCreports is shown in Table C.3. It can be seen that, to one decimal place, there hasbeen virtually no change in sea level rise projections by IPCC since between 1996and 2007, meaning that the best estimate or mid-range values used by WBM (2000)of 0.2m by 2050 and 0.5m by 2100 (relative to 1990 levels) are still valid. However,scenarios more severe than the mid are also possible.It should be noted that the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> hazard lines were revised in 2009 usinghigher sea level rise projections than WBM (2000) in accordance with the NSW SeaLevel Rise Policy Statement (DECCW, 2009) sea level rise benchmarks. The <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> hazard lines provide the best estimate of future coastal hazards, but are notproposed to be used as a trigger for planned retreat (refer Appendix A, <strong>Part</strong> C –Coastal Hazard Lines and Planning Precincts).Table C.3: Simplified engineering estimates of global sea level rise from each of thelast three IPCC assessment reportsScenarioIPCC publication2 nd AssessmentReport 19953 rd AssessmentReport 20014 th AssessmentReport 20072050 2100 2050 2100 2050* 2100


‘Mid’ range scenario 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5‘High’ range scenario 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9Note: * The IPCC 2007 publications to date only provided estimates for 2100.Effect of the NSW Department of Environment, Climate Changeand Water Sea Level Rise Policy Statement on hazard linesIn October 2009 the NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water(DECCW) released the NSW Sea Level Rise Policy Statement (DECCW, 2009) thatincludes planning benchmarks for sea level rise. The benchmarks can be used forsea level rise adaptation and also for consideration when land-use planning anddevelopment decisions are made for coastal areas. The policy statement’s planningbenchmarks for sea level rise are an increase above 1990 mean sea levels of 0.4 mby 2050 and 0.9 m by 2100 (DECCW, 2009).The NSW Government will periodically review this planning benchmark, based onupdated information, such as the release of future IPCC assessment reports.The adoption of the policy and benchmarks will provide an adaptive risk-basedapproach to managing sea level rise impacts. It will provide guidance to localcouncils tosupport planningencourage appropriate development of land projected to be at risk from sealevel risecontinue to provide emergency management support to coastal communitiesduring times of flood and stormcontinue to provide updated information to the public about sea level rise andits impacts (DECCW 2009).The sea level rise planning benchmarks adopted by DECCW (2009) are based onprojections developed by Australian and International experts. A full description onthe derivation of the benchmarks is provided for in a technical note titled “Derivationof the NSW Government’s sea level rise planning benchmarks” (DECCW 2009).These benchmarks were used to determine the revised coastal hazard lines for<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> coastal precincts, as discussed in Appendix A, <strong>Part</strong> C – Coastal hazardlines and planning precincts.Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation2007 - report on storminess and local sea level riseThe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) (2007)report provided coastal climate change projections for Wooli in northern NSW (andBatemans Bay in the south). The scenarios presented by CSIRO were for 2030 and2070, which differ from the 2050 and 2100 dates used in most coastal planningstudies.Storm surge levelCSIRO (2007) predicted 100 year ARI storm surges (actual water level minuspredicted tide) for Wooli and Batemans Bay. The assessment does not, however,include the barometric effects of cyclones which may elevate ocean water level in the


<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> beyond that predicted for the more southern locations. Predicted 100year ARI storm surges for Wooli are shown below:Present day: 0.67 ±0.16 m2030: 0.66 ± 0.16 m with CCM2 model0.68 ± 0.17 m with CCM3 model2070: 0.65 ± 0.15 m with CCM2 model0.70 ± 0.19 m with CCM3 modelThese values show only minor (or no) increase over present levels. The WBM (2000,p108) study used a value of 0.53 m, versus 0.67 m (CSIRO 2007) for stormsurge, but WBM added this to highest astronomical tide rather than a mean springtide, so that the present day, extreme still water level of 1.63 m AHD from WBM(excluding wave set-up) is conservative. The addition of CSIRO’s storm surge of0.67 m to a mean high water spring tide (of 0.6 m AHD) would give a design extremewater level of only 1.27 m AHD. The accepted present day, 100 year ARI water levelfor the NSW coast (excluding wave set-up) is 1.5 m AHD (Haradasa et al 1990).Sea level rise and local sea levelCSIRO (2007) quoted global sea level rise of 0.18–0.59 m by 2095 (relative to 1990)with additional allowance for ice melt of 0.1–0.2 m, giving an upper limit value of0.79 m by 2095.CSIRO (2007) predicted the following local sea level changes (relative to global sealevel change) for Wooli:2030: 0–0.04 m with Mark 2 GCM model0.04–0.08 m with Mark 3 GCM model2070: 0–0.04 m with Mark 2 GCM model0.08–0.12 m with Mark 3 GCM modelIt is noted from Figure 9 of CSIRO (2007) that a decreasing trend in local sea levelnorthward of Wooli was predicted with the Mark 3 GCM model, with values around<strong>Byron</strong> Bay in the range 0 to 0.08 m. These values are for 2070, not 2100.WRL’s simplified engineering estimate (Table C.2) is consistent with NCCOE (2004)and was derived from a slightly different interpretation of IPCC (2007) to CSIRO’sglobal values. For the high range scenario 2100, CSIRO’s upper limit of 0.79 m witha maximum local variation of 0.12 m added to give 0.91 m is virtually identical toWRL’s estimate of 0.9 m.Effects of climate change on design ocean still water levels anddesign ocean boundary (tailwater) levels for planning purposesDECCW Coastal Risk Management Guide (2009)The NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water has prepared aDraft Coastal Risk Management Guide (DECCW 2009a) that provides guidance onincorporating the NSW Government’s sea level rise benchmarks in coastal hazardassessment. The guideline includes design ocean still water levels for NSW coastal


locations subject to full ocean tidal regime as derived from extreme value analysis ofFort Dennison (Sydney) tide gauge data from 1914 to December 2008.The DECCW (2009a) design ocean water levels are presented for various annualrecurrence intervals for current day (2009), 2050 and 2100, and incorporateallowance for all components of elevated ocean water levels including tides,meteorological influences (wind and barometric pressure), and other water levelanomalies. They do not include wave set-up and wave run-up influences, or thebarometric effects of tropical cyclones which may elevate ocean water levels in the<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> beyond that observed from low pressure systems impacting the Sydneyregion.DECCW (2009a) design still ocean water levels do not include wave set-up due tothe potential variability in wave height and set-up dynamics between NSW coastallocations. As such, wave set-up needs to be considered on a site specific basis(Pers. comm. DECCW, 6 August 2010).DECCW Flood Risk Management Guide (2009)DECCW have prepared a Draft Flood Risk Management Guide (DECCW 2009b).The flood risk management guideline is intended to guide floodplain riskmanagement planning and flood risk assessments for new development in NSW. Theguideline recommends that for the purpose of current day hydraulic flood modelling,a 100 year ARI ocean level of 2.6m AHD be adopted (for 2009). For 2050 and 2100flood modelling and planning scenarios, the corresponding NSW sea level risebenchmark should be added to the 100 year ARI ocean boundary level (e.g. Sealevel rise of 0.4m by 2050 and 0.9m by 2100). The ocean boundary level comprisescomponents related to elevated ocean water levels, tidal anomalies and wave setup.BSC Climate Change Strategic Planning Policy 2009<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has developed a Climate Change Strategic Planning Policy(BSC, 2009) which includes climate change flood planning scenarios for current day,2050, and 2100. The BSC climate change flood planning scenarios were developedto guide floodplain risk management planning and flood risk assessments in the<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>. The scenarios project 100 year ARI ocean boundary (tailwater) levelsfor current day, 2050 and 2100, and incorporate sea level rise benchmarks asendorsed by DECCW (2009) of 0.4m (by 2050) and 0.9m (by 2100) respectively.BSC (2009) 100 year ARI ocean boundary (tailwater) level is 2.29m AHD andcomprises components of; elevated ocean water levels (storm surge); projected tideheight of 0.94m AHD (HHWSS); and wave setup. The parameters used in the BSCflood planning scenarios are to be reviewed in accordance with IPCC and DECCWrevisions of climate change parameters (refer Res 09-968, and 09-1069 Appendix B,<strong>Part</strong> C – <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolutions that relate to coastal hazard management).The intent of the DECCW (2009a) design ocean still water level analysis is to provideindicative still water levels, over varying annual recurrence intervals, for the purposeof coastline hazards risk assessment (e.g. erosion and inundation). The DECCW


(2009b) and BSC (2009) design ocean boundary (tailwater) levels are intended foruse in floodplain risk management planning and assessment.A comparison of DECCW (2009a) 100 year ARI still ocean water levels for NSW, andthe BSC flood planning 100 year ARI tail-water levels are shown in Table C.4.Table C.4:100 year ARI still ocean water level estimates and calculated 100 year ARItail water condition (BSC) for current day, 2050 and 2100 planninghorizons incorporating DECCW (2009) sea level rise benchmarks.DECCW design stillocean water level(DECCW. 2009a)<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>Flood PlanningScenarios (BSC,2009)100 yearARI designstill oceanwater level -2009(m AHD)100 year ARIdesign stillocean waterlevel - 2050(m AHD)100 year ARIdesign stillocean waterlevel - 2100(m AHD)Waveset-up(m)1.435 1.775 2.275 n/a n/a100 year ARIdesign tailwater level(m AHD)1.84 2.44 3.04 0.45 2010 = 2.292050 = 2.892100 = 3.49A comparison of DECCW (2009b) 100 year ARI ocean boundary condition (tailwaterlevel) and the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (2009) 100 year ARI tailwater condition isprovided in Table C.5.Table C.5: 100 year ARI ocean boundary (tail water) conditions for current day, 2050and 2100 planning horizons incorporating DECCW (2009) sea level risebenchmarks.DECCW 100 year ARI ocean boundarylevel (2009b)BSC 100 year ARI ocean boundary(tailwater) level (2010)2009(m AHD)2050(m AHD)2100(m AHD)2.6 3.0 3.52.29 2.89 3.49DECCW design still ocean water levels (2009a), design ocean boundary conditions(2009b) and any revisions from CSIRO 100 year ARI storm surge predictions (forWooli) should be considered when reviewing both the adopted <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>Climate Change Flood Planning Scenarios (BSC 2009) and the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>Coastline Hazard Definition Study (WBM 2000). This recommendation is inaccordance with Management Action 2.1.4 and 8.5.1 (<strong>Part</strong> A, Section 5) of thisCZMP.


Climate Change Risks to Australia’s Coast – A first pass nationalassessmentOn 14 November 2009 the Australian Government Department of Climate Changereleased a report on the findings of the first national assessment of the risks ofclimate change for the whole of Australia’s coastal zone. The first pass nationalassessment of Climate Change Risks to Australia’s Coast (DCC, 2009) focuses onrisks to settlements and infrastructure, ecosystems and industries in the coastalzone.The assessment adopts a 2100 sea level rise scenario (relative to 1990 levels) of1.1m for the purpose of risk assessment. The report notes that the purpose of therisk assessment is to provide an indication of the magnitude and spread of risk froma plausible ‘worst case’ scenario over the longer term.The NSW Governments Sea Level Rise Policy Statement (DECCW, 2009) endorsesa sea level rise benchmark of 0.9m (relative to 1990 levels) by 2100. Whilst this is20cm below the 1.1m sea level rise value used by DCC (2009) in its first passnational assessment, the objectives for use of both the state and federal benchmarksare differing. The DCC (2009) 2100 sea level rise benchmark of 1.1m is considered aplausible worst case scenario for risk assessment, not an endorsed benchmark foruse in planning based risk assessment, as is the case for the NSW sea level riseplanning benchmark.Effect of local sea level increase on hazard linesWRL (2009a) provides an update of the hazard lines determined from the <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> Coastline Hazard Definition Study (WBM, 2000, 2002). This update adopted allassumptions used by WBM but utilised the sea level rise benchmarks from the NSWGovernment’s Sea Level Rise Policy Statement.The WRL (2009a) work confirmed that if the assumptions of WBM are applied withthe NSW Government’s sea level rise benchmarks, then the WBM hazard lineswould move landward by the distances shown in Table C.6.Table C.6:Landward transgression of the WBM (2000, 2002) hazard linesYear Sea Level Rise(m)Landward Transgression of the WBM HazardLines(m)Tallow Beach Belongil New Brighton2050 0.4 10 14 112100 0.9 20 28 22The revised coastal hazard lines are shown in Appendix A, <strong>Part</strong> C (Figures A1, A2and A3 and larger scale Figures A4 to A16).


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix DTerms of Reference for<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal andEstuary Project ReferenceGroup


Appendix D – Terms of Reference for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastal andEstuary Project Reference GroupOn 28 May 2009, <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved on the constitution for the formationof a Coastal and Estuary Project Reference group (CEPRG). The group wasestablished to assist <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in developing and implementing the CZMPonce completed. A extract of CEPRG constitution is as follows:PreambleThe Project Reference Group is a Group formed by the <strong>Council</strong> or Strategic PlanningCommittee of the <strong>Council</strong> and does not have executive power or authority toimplement actions.The role of the Project Reference Group is to carry out specific objectives as statedin this Constitution.Objectives1. The purpose of the Environmental (Coastal and Estuary) Project ReferenceGroup is to:a) Provide strategic advice and support in the implementation of the: Belongil Estuary Management Plan; Brunswick Estuary Management Plan;b) Provide strategic advice and support in the development andimplementation of the: Coastal Zone Management Planc) To consider the development of a policy for Coastal Stabilisation Works -subject to the finalisation of the Coastal Zone Management Plan action2.2.2 (to be initiated immediately) to undertake a risk analysis of erosionprotection structures and works, both private and public in relation tosafety, integrity and structures and the impacts to surroundingenvironment (including beach access, beach amenity and environmentalprocesses) which should be undertaken as a matter of urgency.d) Provide strategic advice and support in the development of aMemorandum of Understanding (MoU) with other land managementagencies for the integrated planning and management of the coastal zoneas per the Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan action 9.1.1.e) Provide strategic advice and support in the development and finalisationof research projects currently being undertaken, e.g. <strong>Byron</strong> BayEmbayment Sand Transport Modelling study and History of Storms in<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> study.2. The Group shall work strictly in accordance with the Coastline ManagementManual and the Estuary Management ManualThe objectives have been confirmed by <strong>Council</strong> on 8 October 2009, objectives 1(c),(d) and (e) resolved on 10 June 2010 Res 10-403.


Timeframe for GroupThe Project Reference Group has 6 months to complete its objectives.This group will be disbanded in September 2010The <strong>Council</strong> or Strategic Planning committee may dissolve the Group at any time.


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix EPlans of Management(PB Analysis)


Appendix E: Plans of Management – Parsons Brinckerhoff analysisFigure 1 Plans of management summary tablePlan of management Author Date Managers CommentsPlans of managementArakwal National ParkPlan of ManagementMarshall’s CreekNature Reserve DraftPlan of ManagementBillinudgel NatureReserve Plan ofManagementThe <strong>Byron</strong> CoastGroup of NatureReserves Plan ofManagement(IncorporatingNSW National Parksand Wildlife ServiceDepartment ofEnvironment, ClimateChange and WaterNSW National Parksand Wildlife ServiceNSW National Parksand Wildlife ServiceFebruary 2007 Arakwal Aboriginal Arakwal POM was the first national park inCorporationAustralia to be created under an Indigenous Land NPWS Use Agreement (ILUA) with the traditional owners,the <strong>Byron</strong> Bay Arakwal people, as joint managerswith the National Parks and Wildlife Service(NPWS)August 2009 NPWSNote: Tweed <strong>Byron</strong> LocalAboriginal Land <strong>Council</strong>and the Bundjalung<strong>Council</strong> of Elders are themain consultative groupsrepresenting theAboriginal community oncultural heritagemanagement issues withinthe reserve.Marshall’s Creek NR was traditionally occupied bythe Minjungbal people of the Bundjalung nation.The POM extends to the mean low watermark andincludes much of the lower estuarine section andfloodplains of Marshalls Creek, which is the northarm of the Brunswick River and areas includedwithin the Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Marine Park.November 2000 NPWS The reserve includes the beach to the mean lowwater mark.75% of the reserve is within <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>, with theremainder in Tweed <strong>Shire</strong> (therefore, cooperationwith Tweed <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is required).February 2008 NPWS The POM incorporates Brunswick Heads NR,Tyagarah NR and Broken Heads NR. They containremnant communities of littoral rainforest, wet anddry heathland, eucalypt forests and woodlands, aswell as areas of undisturbed freshwater and


Brunswick Heads,Tyagarah and BrokenHeads NatureReserves)Cape <strong>Byron</strong> HeadlandReserve Plan ofManagementCape <strong>Byron</strong> MarinePark Zoneestuarine wetlands.Broken Heads Nature Reserve is also listed on theNational Estate Register.Prepared by NPWSfor the Cape <strong>Byron</strong>TrustOctober 2002 Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Trust Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Headland Reserve is a StateConservation Area and covers an area of 98.5 ha,including the most easterly point of the Australianmainland.Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Headland Reserve is part of the NewSouth Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service(NPWS) estate. The reserve is distinctive amongNational Park and Wildlife Service areas, as it ismanaged by a community-based Trust.The Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Trust has a membershipconsisting of representatives of the community,local and state governments and the ArakwalAboriginal Corporation.This plan of management establishes the schemeof operations for the Cape <strong>Byron</strong> State RecreationArea.Marine Parks Authority November 2002 Marine Parks Authority The Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Marine Park covers approximately22,000 ha, extending from Brunswick Heads in thenorth to Lennox Head in the south.The Marine Park includes the entire seabed andextends seaward from the mean high water markto the three nautical mile limit of State waters. (Ittherefore fits within the seaward limits of the <strong>Byron</strong>CZMP.)Types of zones indicated on the Marine Park Zonemapping:1. Sanctuary Zones2. Habitat Protection Zones3. General Use Zones


4. Special Purpose ZonesFire management strategiesFire ManagementStrategy for ArakwalNational Park (andstudy area)Billinudgel NR,Marshall’s Creek NRand Brunswick HeadsNR Fire ManagementStrategy (Type 2)Fire ManagementStrategy for Cape<strong>Byron</strong> HeadlandReserveCumbebin Swamp NRFire ManagementStrategy (Type 2)Tyagarah NR FireManagement Strategy(Type 2)Developed inpartnership betweenthe Arakwal NationalPark ManagementCommittee, <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, NPWS,and Land and PropertyManagementAuthority.2004 Arakwal National ParkManagementCommittee <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> NPWS Land and PropertyManagement AuthorityThis FMS recommends actions to taken by otherkey stakeholders be referenced to the Far NorthCoast Bushfire Management CommitteeNPWS December 2005 NPWS One page poster no detailed information.NPWS January 2005 NPWS (Departmentwithin DECCW)FMS for Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Headland details fire risk andmanagement for the Cape <strong>Byron</strong> StateConservation Area.NPWS December 2005 NPWS One page poster no detailed information.NPWS September2008 NPWS One page poster no detailed information.Estuary management plansBrunswick EstuaryManagement PlanPatterson Britton and<strong>Part</strong>ners, and <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>November 2008 <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Estuary Management Plan identifies and prioritisesstrategies for the future management of theBrunswick Estuary.Brunswick Estuary exists within the <strong>Byron</strong> MarinePark Zone


Belongil Estuary Studyand Management PlanPeter ParkerEnvironmentalConsultants Pty LtdNovember 2001 <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Recent updates: Belongil Creek Climate ChangeAssessment 2007 identified the need to update theflood hazard from low level to high level forsections of the Belongil Creek estuary.Management principle for this NR includes:‘maintenance of a hydrological regime that allowsnatural erosion, accretion and hydrologicalprocesses to continue’.Floodplain management plansDraft Tallow CreekFloodplainManagement PlanMarshalls CreekFloodplainManagement Plan<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> UrbanStormwaterManagement PlanSKM July 2007 <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> The three creeks of the Tallow catchment drain toTallow Lake, which drains to the ocean at TallowBeach. A significant feature of the lower TallowCreek catchment is the Arakwal National Park,which includes the Tallow Creek mouth.Patterson ConsultantsPty LimitedPPK Environment andInfrastructure Pty Ltd(Therefore this plan overlaps with the Arakwal NPPlan of Management.)November 1997 <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Flooding in the area can be affected by areas northof the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> boundary.September2000<strong>Council</strong> resolved to join with Tweed <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>to conduct a flood study (1 March 2007). <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Stormwater Management Plan applies to urbanareas, towns and villages within BSC.


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix FRaw data fromconsultation


7 June 2007TEAM 1 – WORKSHEET 1What do you value or like about the Coastline and why?What do you value about theCoastline?Why is this important to you?1. Tallow Beach Natural appearance (no humanstructures visible)2. <strong>Byron</strong> Bay Northern aspect, hinterland backdrop,sweep of bay culminating in <strong>Byron</strong>Bay3. Coastline defines community as abeach, water loving peopleMakes us idiosyncratically coastal4. Beach Amenity it offers, it’s joyful – anatural place that is not overcrowded5. Residential limited developmentpotential(no comment)6. Low rise of structures Adds to natural light, breezes andviews7. Meeting place nature of coast allowsfor gathering of various people(eclectic make up of visitors andresidents)8. Cultural significance – Arakwal,Buntalung, European heritage, shipwrecks, etc9. Beachside, traditional camping andlow cost holidays (caravan parks)(no comment)Helps define usDiversity, creates healthy community,low impact structures results in lowemission activities10. So much coastal recreation is free! Because so much is not free!11. Range of activities – fishing, surfing,etc12. Connection to marine fauna – flora(eg. marine park)Recreation and amusementsSpiritual, educational link. Good to beat interface between land and sea(primal desire). Rich in biodiversity.Connects us to true nature reflected ingeometry.


7 June 200713. Natural art forms (practical designs)


7 June 2007TEAM 1 – WORKSHEET 2What do you see as the key issues and pressures?What are the key issues and pressures?Why is this an issue or key pressure?1. Disturbance of amenity Disconnect from nature, beach andbeauty2. Coastline erosion Can be seen as part of natural cycle orcan be seen as conflict betweenproperty rights and natural disasters3. Lack of organisation, management forpeople, beach interfacePopulation leads to lack ofenjoyment, access, peaceful use ofcoast4. Lack of access Especially widening tracks, etc to fitto beach easily5. Stormwater pollution into beach,creeks, etc6. Random beach access from privatehouse/public7. Conflicting issues:- fishing- dog walkers (lack of rangersurveillance)- kite surfers- boats of divers in surf- fires on beach- firecrackers on beach8. Parking, walkways, cycle ways – lackof managementHealth issues, ecological, visualimpactsMore dune damage if only one accessCompliance is difficultDifferent interest groups, eg. ecologyvs fishing vs recreationNot formalised for beach accessNeeded to and from Main Beachespecially with Belongil9. Tourism pressures Conflicts with needs of residents Lack of toilets Holiday behaviours10. Clearing of dune vegetation for waterviewsEcological damage, dune erosion,visual impact


7 June 200711. Outcome of this process has alreadybeen definedFeel ripped off (retreatpredetermined)


7 June 2007TEAM 1 – WORKSHEET 3Issue PrioritisationPlease list three issues for the CoastlineIssuePossible solutions1. Tourism pressure Management and resources improved.Possible funding from government,industry, user pay (eg. bed tax)Promote awareness by tourists2. Coastline erosion A range of solutions include:9. sand nourishment10. planned retreat11. structures (eg. offshore reefs)12. Beach scraping13. Dune maintenance (seeattachment ‘Policy 15’)3. Process (‘retreat’) has beenpredeterminedChange <strong>Council</strong> policy whichpredetermines planned retreat4. Conflicting uses of coastal amenity Promote public awareness andeducation, fostering community goodwill, enforcing compliance andregulations5. Clearing dune vegetation Enforcing compliance and regulation,education and informingresident/visitors of dangers ofclearing and misuse of dunal zone.


7 June 2007TEAM 2 – WORKSHEET 1What do you value and like about the Coastline and why?What do you value about theCoastline?1. Nature and aesthetic qualities2. Areas: Tallows and Broken Head,north end of 7 mile Litteral rainforest3. Shore and bird areas:Belongil/Tallows/MarshallsCreek/Brunswick4. Surf and recreational facilities:swimming, snorkelling, walking,paddling, kayaks, sea, boating5. (Residential) amenity: Belongil,Sufolk, Main Beach,6. Natural cultural heritage: BrokenHead, Cape <strong>Byron</strong>Why is this important to you?Because of natural topographyOnly area that these species utilizeGreat surf, clean conditions, exercise,peaceful, parks, social issues,economyBecause of the sea/coastline oceanviewLighthouse:Cape/Julians/Watego’s/pass MainBeach – jetty Wollombar


7 June 2007TEAM 2 – WORKSHEET 2What do you see as the key issues and pressures?What are the key issues and pressures?1. Erosion:- Clarks Beach and Belongil Beach- Suffolk Beach and in the corner atBroken Head- South Golden BeachWhy is this an issue or key pressure? Effects on housing, publicinfrastructure, access are issuesbecause they form impediments ofland and migration of sand dunes2. Conservation – seabirds, shorebirds Recreational pressure on the survivalof shorebirds3. Conservation – coastal vegetation Invasion of weeds and habitat loss4. Dog walking Disturbance to wildlifeImpacts on amenity5. Tourism and recreational impacts Impacts on environment and amenity– competition with localsIncreased access due to bike wayupgradesPopulation growth in SEQ Rd


7 June 2007TEAM 2 – WORKSHEET 3Issues PrioritisationPlease list three issues for the CoastlineIssue1. Erosion (eg. erosion of publiclands/parks etc outside residentialareas)Possible solutionsDifferent groups prefer/favourdifferent approaches:- Option 1 = planned retreat- Option 2 = protection works: sandpumping or vegetation walls andgroynes, etc. Key areas will beBelongil, New Brighton, SuffolkPark, South Golden Beach, towncentre- Option 3 = Mix of approaches –sacrificial and protection- Option 4 = compensation forretreat/purchase of private landonce eroded- Option 5 = State Government totake responsibility2. Conservation Manage shorebird areas intensivelyControl dogs on beachesControl weeds actively (eg. in dunes)Maintain natural ecosystem processes(eg. in response to climate change/sealevel rise)3. Tourism Encourage higher-yield tourists intoupmarket accommodationManage tourist access points andactivities – information, hardening,etcDiversify tourist opportunities (eg.spread tourists out to recreationalareas)


7 June 2007TEAM 3 – WORKSHEET 1What do you value or like about the Coastline and why?What do you value about theCoastline?1. Clark’s Beach – access, easy to get to,car parking, toilets, showers, beachcafé, safe beach, leisure time,swimming, exercising (walking)2. Belongil Beach – dogs allowed, goodcar access (compared to Becton) formy disable dog (3 legs), safeswimming, unpolluted water, usuallybeach can be sat on3. All beaches are special and needprotection. Beaches should beaccessible by the general public withgood amenities (toilets, showers,rubbish bins, car park)4.- Dunes - ideally vegetated with nativeplants- No high rise buildings- Not divided- Not weed infested4. Belongil Beach:- not many people at the moment- new developments to bring morepeople- less space, crowded, threaten dogaccessWhy is this important to you?Intergenerational connection,familiarity, part of my daily routineeach morningFor beach walking – sometimes nobeach in front of rock wallsGeneral heatlhToilets important so people do notdefecate on the beachHealth (mental, physical) ofcommunity – opportunity forsocialising, exercise, leisure.Health of environmentHabitatLocals enjoy the quiet beach wherethey can walk their dogsSense of community – chat to otherregular dog walkers


7 June 2007TEAM 3 – WORKSHEET 2What do you see as the key issues and pressures?What are the key issues and pressures?Why is this an issue or key pressure?1. Beach erosion Clark’s Beach lost 3 sand dunes in the1954 cyclone ‘never to return’Drain from Clark’s Caravan Parkcauses beach erosion2. Disabled wheelchair access at Clark’sBeachWheelchair shed demolishedWheelchair now at <strong>Council</strong> chambersat Mullum – needs to be addressed3. Lake <strong>Byron</strong> smells at Clark’s Beach Needs beach skimming to fill hollow.There is an abundance of sand at themoment because tide levels are lowand unlikely to be big seas.4. Captain Cook Cottage and road worksabove it – ugly retaining structure5. Use of State Emergency and RescueManagement Act to subvert PlanningAct to do works on dunes/beaches6. Public amenities/development of oldjetty site, see #2088827. Clark’s Beach:Shift the cottage as it is going to getexpensive- drain (stormwater) lack of signage Putrid, smelly, disturbing to watchchildren play in the drain- over development of Beach Café(concrete slabs on dunes)Not removable- toilets are disgusting Loathe to use toilets- car park used for camping bybackpackers- popular beach – human pressure,littering8. Belongil Beach:- erosion of rock walls leads to lossof beachFree loading – not contributing tocostsMarine animal health, spoils amenity,turtles impacts by plasticsNo sand to walk on


7 June 2007- beach access for SES vehicles- no toilets, showers, rubbish binsat the end of Don Street9. All beaches:- smokers and littering of theircigarette buttsPeople go to the toilet on the beachMarine animal health, amenity10. Main Beach car park Ill or elderly can park to look at theoceanRock wall to stay/remove grain11. Beach skimming at Main Beach andClarks BeachMakes beach erosion worseNeed to fill pond but timing isimportant re tides


7 June 2007Please list three issues for the CoastlineIssueTEAM 3 – WORKSHEET 3Issue PrioritisationPossible solutions1. Clark’s Beach drain and lake Move drain, clean the drain – work ondrainage through town (increased)2. State Government vs <strong>Council</strong>discussions3. Beach accessKeep <strong>Council</strong>’s policy of plannedretreat – review the State Emergencyand Rescue Management ActWrite to State Government re theBelongil Beach Old Jetty Sitedevelopment requesting funding and<strong>Council</strong> controlWrite to State Government requestingplanning and management controlsback to <strong>Council</strong> for Beach Café(Clarks Beach) and caravan parks- Belongil Beach Emergency access at Belongil BeachRock wall means loss of beach (richresidents wanting to keep propertiesat Belongil Beach, community paythe price). Therefore ban rock wallsand implement council planning laws- Clark’s Beach Wheelchair shed and wheelchairreturn to Clark’s Beach- Main Beach Retain car park, remove groin


7 June 2007TEAM 4 – WORKSHEET 1What do you value or like about the Coastline and why?What do you value about theCoastline?Why is this important to you?Beach amenity (BelongilBeach/Estuary)Natural, what the public observe,values biodiversityWant the beachscape to remain in itscurrent formPreservation of the natural dunesystem for environmental purposesand to limit oceanic inundationOpportunity to live within a coastallandscapeAmenity around the pool/town centrelooks tired and requires to besignificantly upgradedUnique environment – <strong>Byron</strong>Centre/CapeCurrently offers a diversity of coastalamenitiesProvides opportunity for a range ofwater activitiesClean sand and water (current litterproblems include broken glass, cans,cigarette butts on beach, etc)


7 June 2007TEAM 4 – WORKSHEET 2What do you see as the key issues and pressures?What are the key issues and pressures?1. Erosion:- loss of vegetation- loss of dune systemWhy is this an issue or key pressure?Biodiversity, bring back nativevegetationInundation inlandThreat tohouses/infrastructure/industrialestate/CBD2. Education about hazard threats3. How much professionaladvice/information passed ontocommunity groups (dune care)4. Can beach scraping be successfulalong Main Beach (BeachManagement)5. Dogs6. Pollution from stormwater dischargeonto Main Beach7. Carparking around Beach Hotel/Pool8. Piecemeal addressing of issues due tointervention by pressure groupsPeople require a better understandingof the mapped threats over planninghorizons


7 June 2007Please list three issues for the CoastlineIssueTEAM 4 – WORKSHEET 3Issue PrioritisationPossible solutions1. Erosion/loss of dune system Investigate world’s best practicesolutions2. Re-engineering of the CBD carparkarea to maximise the amenitypotential of the areaInvestigate all options to considerimproving amenity of the area3. Education Production of material informing thepublic about hazards/managementoptions


7 June 2007TEAM 5 – WORKSHEET 1What do you value or like about the Coastline and why?What do you value about theCoastline?1. Peaceful and beauty, all aspects ofvegetation, sand, sea, views, salt airWhy is this important to you?Sense of ownership/belonging/will toprotect2. Culturally coastal people/gravitate Intrinsic instinct (uplifting positiveenergy)3. Recreational, swim, surf, walking,exercising, bird watching, hanggliding, dogsPositive health, community/socialmeeting place4. Environmental natural Sense of freedom/in touch with nature5. Awesome wonder of organicchanging nature (tides, skies, water,birdlife)6. Variety – estuaries, seas, lagoons,moving sands, whales, birds, turtles,built environment (lifestyle)Tides are cleansingDynamic7. Lifestyle offered Health8. Diverse holidaying possibilities No comment9. Fish Food10. Reduction in recreational amenity No comment


7 June 2007TEAM 5 – WORKSHEET 2What do you see as the key issues and pressures?What are the key issues and pressures?1. Main Beach- tourism, people, inundation- town drainage, stormwater,flooding- access/car park at Main Beach- everyone wants a bit of foreshore2. Belongil- erosion and a policy- discriminating against protectingcoastal owners- want equitable treatment for allratepayersWhy is this an issue or key pressure? 1.7 million tourists, pressure/overloadon infrastructure, trafficmovement/congestion, car parking,rubbish, toilet amenities,shower/water abuse and useInadequate public transport/railRubbishCar parking – 4 hourly is too longIncreased car movementsDemand exceeding natural land,which is a wildlife corridor3. Suffolk Park- erosion sandmining (history)- public education needed ignorance harms environment(informed people needed)- lack of respect from visitors andresident- destruction of vegetation andfauna4. Recreational activities – dog walking,fishing, bullying in Maurine Parkno commentdestroys natural environment ownedby everyoneBad for communityDestroys social capitalBad for health of community


7 June 2007TEAM 5 – WORKSHEET 3Issue PrioritisationPlease list issues for the CoastlineIssuePossible solutions1. Main Beach- tourism/inundation of people andinfrastructure not coping- community threatened and nosense of belonging- ugly vegetation2. Reduction and over regulation ofamenities (recreational – dog walking,fishing)user pays, car parking, water, toilets,bbq’s, shorter car parking hoursreturn car park to natural vegetationtargeted advertising, tourism types(eg. environmental tourism)Dealing with homeless people,alcohol abuse and illegal campers (invans)Improve native species plantingsMore rangers requiredBetter planning, renegotiation withauthorities and community, signage,education appropriate3. Erosion Sand scrapingBuy everyone out at 20% abovemarket priceCan we really hold back the naturalmovements of nature and the powerof the oceans and the weather?


8 June 2007TEAM 1 – WORKSHEET 1What do you value or like about the Coastline and why?What do you value about Coastline?1. Climate – stable and agreeable2. Uncrowded, especially on beach3. Natural – cannot see buildings frombeach4. low-impact development (no highrises)5. Affordable for retired people andpart-time workers6. Wildlife in natural habitat7. Village ownership of towns8. Ownership of property and living onowned property is high (few rentals)9. Easy access to beach (for all)10. Clean beaches11. No resorts in area12. No patrolled beachesWhy is this important to you?Quality of lifeWant to be able to live here (do notwant rates to sky rocket)Quality of life


8 June 2007TEAM 1 – WORKSHEET 2Why do you see as the key issues and pressures?What are the key issues and pressures?1. Houses on dunes have illegal accessto beach (on crown lands) and alsoput up own walkways and plant ownvegetationWhy is this an issue or key pressure?Contributes to erosion, affectsvegetation2. Limited parking along esplanade inNew Brighton and also to some extentin Brunswick HeadsDanger to traffic, inconvenience toresidents3. Beach scraping Would be useful to enhance dunes4. Need for walkway or barrier of somesort between dunes and houses (seeBill’s typed statement about this)5. Water quality of ocean (dogs andhorses defecating on beach)Protect dunes to clearly mark‘property’ from ‘dunes’Health and aesthetic issues (feceseverywhere)6. Lack of control of animals on beachesand lack of control of motorbikes andother vehicles on Fern Beach andSouth Golden Beach.7. Lack of policing on beaches (tocontrol dogs, horses and vehicles)8. Signage on beaches is not clear orvisible enough (specifically theentrance to Fern Beach at Mia Court)9. Marine College proposed forBrunswick Heads10. Bushfire issues:- fires break out on Fern Beach andSouth Golden Beach at nightDogs in nature reserves (Billinudgel)Encourages people to ignore calls,reduces control of dogsDog walkers, horse owners do not seesigns readily (and thus are notreminded of regulations)Has potential effects – should beinvestigated before approvingFire danger to dwellings andvegetation (large fires at Fern Beachlast summer is an example)


8 June 2007TEAM 1 – WORKSHEET 3Issues prioritisationPlease list three issues for the CoastlineIssue1. Houses on dunes have illegal accessto dunes (on crown lands) and arebuilding own walkways and plantingown vegetation on crown landsPossible solutions1. Survey of where crown propertystarts to make boundaries clear2. Create walkway between CrownLands and private property to keepthe two separate from one another3. Explore existing laws that restrictaccess and activities on Crown lands,e.g. fine for people who haveencroached on the land or force themto remove structures2. Lack of control of animals on beach(dogs and horses) and of gas-poweredvehicles on beach (motorbikes, jetskis)3. Lack of policing on beaches to ensureproper use and keep dogs, horses, andgas powered vehicles off restrictedareas<strong>Council</strong> needs to understand that thisis really a problem at South GoldenBeach and Fern Beach and needs toprovide proper enforcementImprove signage on entering beaches,making it clear where animals andvehicles are allowed and where theyare not allowedImprove education of dog owners sothat they realise why they need toobey the lawsGet dog owners to educate each otherand exert control over their ownbehaviour, that is, get them to ‘policethemselves’Improve location of signs (FernBeach and South Golden) and size ofsignsIncrease patrols on beachesObtain funding for policing


8 June 2007TEAM 2 – WORKSHEET 1What do you value or like about the Coastline and why?What do you value about theCoastline?Why is this important to you?The natural environmentHealth and well beingValue the solitudeSupports natureSmall community feelProtects against population pressureUnique area – natural environmenthas been maintainedGreat for familySurfing and swimmingDefined dog areasDiversity of natural and culturalelementsQuietRecreational activity is bird watching,particularly on beaches (resting andnesting)Well being (concerned about theplanes)Low security riskDo no want to be paranoidNice and clean waterHealth and well beingRecreational opportunitiesHealth and lifestyleLow impact activitiesLike the ‘old funky’ houses ratherthan ‘McMansions’


8 June 2007TEAM 2 – WORKSHEET 2What do you see as the key issues and pressures?What are the key issues and pressures?TourismAffordabilityYelgun proposal for large festivalsNot enough bird and native animalprotectionPlanned retreatWhy is this an issue or key pressure?Population – lack of neighboursDestroys community – deters fromnatural aestheticPressure on infrastructure – illegalcamping, partying, creates socialproblemsInsecurity and stress – devaluesproperty and nowhere to move toLack of education on all importantissuesNotices not sent out to informresidents Acceptable dog areas to all Protect natural environment – safe forpeople and arrange a balance viewwith dog owners Noise pollution – intrusive Jet skis, low flying small planes,motorbikes (esp. north end), vehiclesExplore sporting field and soccerfield extensionLarge block of land near the presentsoccer field Beach scrapping (is divided) Some are concerned with the damageto beach ecologyDune maintenance at Golden Beachand Fern BeachFern beach requires second beachaccess Shower replacement are not aesthetic Efficiency of water is fine butaesthetics uglyGarden fencing on dunes


8 June 2007Please list three issues for the CoastlineIssueTEAM 2 – WORKSHEET 3Issue PrioritisationPossible solutions1. Planned retreat Referendum of <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> or justbeach front ownersTake responsibility and risk by ownerBeach scrapping to repair dune until itis no longer practicalMore education/landowners on beachfrontBeach nourishment – clean out creekby dredging itComplete study for beachnourishment/artificial reefClarification of legal position if notsubject to 1988 LEP/DCP2. Tourism Cap on bed numbersNew LEP that does not supporttourismHoliday rental not wanted. Absentowners not allowed to short term rentZoning to exclude holiday lettings3. Yelgun proposal Current owners to donate land to<strong>Council</strong>Refer to ICACLimit festival to one a year4. Sporting fields Extend New Brighton Fields to north5. Beach scrapping EIS to decideNo fences, no plantingNo access interference


Beach Scraping at New Brighton and South Golden BeachCommunity Meeting MinutesOn the 4 th September 2007 <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in collaboration with the projectconsultants Parsons Brinkerhoff, held community meetings at Ocean ShoresCommunity Centre and at South Golden Beach Community Hall. The purpose ofthe meetings was to inform the community about beach scraping, to find out from thecommunity about the project area, and to address any questions the community mayhave about beach scraping.The meetings were run as a general discussion and several questions (Q) wereraised, for which answers (A) were provided from the project consultants (ParsonsBrinkerhoff): please see below.Ocean Shores Community Centre Meeting- 4 th September 2007Q: I remember that in the past beach scraping was unsuccessful and we don’t wantthe dune vegetation to be damaged.A: Our study will look at cost benefit analysis and the amount of sand available, alsobeach scraping will not destroy the vegetation.A: It was successful (public response).A: Spinifex which is on the fore dune can be covered and it will reappear (publicresponse).Q: Is there enough sand already on the beach to be able to continue beach scrapingin the future?A: The study will look at this.Q: What about sand drift? Will the removal of sand from the beach prevent sand fromdepositing on the beach in the future?A: Beach scraping will affect the near shore and offshore processes because beachscraping will accelerate the natural sand deposit process, but there shouldn’t be anylong term effects.Q: During a storm how big does the dune need to be to protect development?A: At least 50 metres for a 100 yr storm event.Q: Doesn’t the vegetation help trap the sand and stabilise the dunes?A: It does but during storm events the vegetation cannot protect the dunes.Q: What about the illegal beach accesses?A: This is not really the scope of this project, the <strong>Byron</strong> Coastline Management Planthat is currently being prepared will cover this issue.Q: What is the environmental assessment?A: It looks at this stage to be a Review of Environmental Factors (REF) as opposedto an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). We think that there will not be asignificant impact, however, it will also depend on who will be the determiningauthority. It may be a joint approval process with <strong>Council</strong> and other governmentdepartments. An EIA is more costly than a REF because an EIA involves more indepth information and therefore, takes longer to prepare than an REF.


A (from State Government representative): In about 2002 <strong>Council</strong> used beachscraping at Belongil Beach to make new Geotextile sand bags. The assessment wasan REF.General comments from community members: It has been noticed that south of the rocks the dunes are in fairly goodcondition, but up north the dunes are bad. People are making the sand dunes their own private space and are clearingthe dune vegetation for ocean views, erecting fences, placing tables andchairs on the dunes and making their own illegal tracks to the beach. Dune Care does not work on the mentioned above areas because theresidents don’t care and just pull out, or tread on, the new plants, and removelarge old trees and shrubs.South Golden Beach Community Hall Meeting- 4 th September 2007Q: Will the sand smother the present dune vegetation?A: This study will look at how the vegetation might cope, and will identify the bestway to carryout the beach scraping without causing significant damage to the floraand fauna. For example, determine how much sand can be put onto the vegetationwithout significantly harming it, or if it is best to put the sand near the dunes and letthe wind slowly blow it on to the dunes in a more natural process etc.Q: What about the marine fauna? Because in the past all living on the beach gotpushed onto the new dune and there was no pipes or worm etc. left on the beach.A: The study will look at the potential impacts on marine fauna and we will try andwork out what is the best depth of sand that can be taken without causing asignificant impact, e.g. 100-200mm off the beach as apposed to 0.5 – 1m.Q: Will beach scraping occur at South Golden Beach just because it will occur atNew Brighton? South Golden Beach seems to have its own natural cycle of thedunes washing away and then recovering again by its self.A: South Golden Beach will be assessed on its own. It will not be done only if NewBrighton is, it will be done if it is required. From the preliminary investigations there iscurrently enough of a dune system to protect dwellings and the road from short termstorm damage.Q: If you take the sand from below the water won’t it leave a big hole and then thenatural sand process will result in sand from the beach filling in the hole?A: Yes, this is a natural process, but the sand being put onto the dunes will not betaken from below the water, and the sand should only disappear if a big stormoccurs. But it is natural for some sand to get washed back into the ocean during astorm.Q: How often would beach scraping need to be conducted?A: It depends on natural processes. It may be whenever it is needed. How often cannot be predicted because the frequency of storms can not be predicted.Q: Are you going to assess the short term variation of the beach? For example, thebeach can change from being 5m of beach to 20m of beach, in a short space of time.A: Data is collected and assessed every 2 years by taking new aerial photographs.So there is already substantial data of the present conditions and their will be for afterthe beach scraping.Q: What kind of recovery period for marine fauna would you be looking for?


A: We will put in a monitoring program after doing an environmental assessment.However, the most recent studies on the impact of beach scraping on marine faunashow that beach scraping does not have a significant impact on marine fauna. Theyare already so adapted to living in conditions where they are moved around all thetime and often violently during storms and big seas. If we need to cover somevegetation we will revegetate the dunes.Q: We have a huge pipi population and nesting turtles, will they be affected?A: The studies indicate that beach scraping should not significantly impact marinefauna and we will ensure that it doesn’t, this may mean only taking small depths ofsand off the beach or trying to do it when pipis are not around. We will not beaffecting turtle or Little Tern nesting areas, we will be contacting National Parks andWildlife Service to find out what areas on the beach are important for marine fauna.We also will not being carrying out the beach scraping during nesting seasons andbreeding seasons, or during storm seasons.Q: Once this environmental assessment and beach scraping has been completed,does this mean that this process is locked in and <strong>Council</strong> can carry out beachscraping whenever they want in the future?A: No, each time <strong>Council</strong> wants to do beach scraping on this beach they need to gothrough the whole environmental assessment and approval process.Q: Does <strong>Council</strong> have to do a DA to conduct the beach scraping?A: They have to go through an environmental assessment and approval process.Depending on the impacts and stakeholders they may need to get approval frominternal at <strong>Council</strong> and other Government Departments. A Review of EnvironmentalFactors is not public exhibited because an REF means that there will be nosignificant impacts. But it still needs approval. If an Environmental ImpactAssessment is required then this document will be publicly exhibited and you will beable to send in a submission.Q: Can you suggest in your environmental assessment for <strong>Council</strong> to remove someof the rock wall?A: <strong>Council</strong> currently has a coastline management plan being prepared, it will coverthose type of issues.Q: In your handout in the background notes it says that beach scraping isn’t a longterm solution, beach nourishment is.A: Beach scraping is moving existing sand on the beach to form the dunes. Beachnourishment is bringing sand onto the beach from somewhere else to form thedunes; it is adding sand onto the beach.Q: If you remove the sand won’t you be making the beach steeper and thereforecreating bigger waves and more erosion?A: We are not going to be taking a metre depth of sand off the beach. It will beapproximately 0.5m at the most. So it will be a very small increase in incline and itwill not be taken from the water so there will be no impact on wave formation andintensity. Beach Scraping will most likely flatten the beach (depending on the currentformation of the beach).Q: Where will you be creating the new dunes? On the existing dune systems or infront?A: Traditionally it is on or near the existing dunes to create a gradual incline. We willnot be creating big steep dunes or covering all the dune vegetation.


Q: Isn’t this (beach scraping) creating a false sense of security for the community?A: No, it is giving more protection to the community’s houses. It may not be a longterm solution, depending on climate change and sea level rise, you may need toretreat, but it may give you more time.General comments from community members: Last time beach scraping was done, it was done in a way that made thebeach wider and there was no real impact on the beach, the beach evenappeared to cope better in storms. In the past beach scraping at New Brighton has worked really well. The sanddid get pushed onto the grass, but it always grew back. The sand mining in the past took the original dunes, it was completelyflattened. This project is just trying to put the dunes back to their originalstate.


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix GBackground Informationon Native Title Claims andIndigenous Land UseAgreements


Background to Native Title claim and Indigenous LandUse AgreementsThe following documents a timeline with respect to key agreementsbetween the Bundjalung of <strong>Byron</strong> Bay (Arakwal) people, New SouthWales Government and <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.Native Title claims lodged, 1995, 1997, 2001The Bundjalung People of <strong>Byron</strong> Bay lodged three Native Title claims(1995, 1997 and 2001) seeking recognition of their native title rights andinterests in various areas of Crown land, beaches and coastal waters inand around <strong>Byron</strong> Bay, as far north as Brunswick Heads, as far south asBroken Head, westward to Mullumbimby and Bangalow andapproximately three nautical miles east of the mean high water mark.Native Title Agreement, 1997In April 1997, a Native Title agreement between the State Governmentand the Bundjalung of <strong>Byron</strong> Bay (Arakwal) people created the Cape<strong>Byron</strong> Trust and a State Recreational Area. The Trust includesrepresentatives from the Bundjalung People of <strong>Byron</strong> Bay to ensureAboriginal people play a role in decision making on the care, control andmanagement of Cape <strong>Byron</strong> State Recreation Area.The Heads of Agreement, 1998The Heads of Agreement signed in 1998 between the Bundjalung of<strong>Byron</strong> Bay (Arakwal) and the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, set out a frameworkfor ongoing consultation. It formalised the role of the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>Aboriginal Advisory Committee, which made recommendations onstrategic plans for the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>. The committee also ensured theBundjalung of <strong>Byron</strong> Bay was involved in the management and protectionof culturally significant places within the <strong>Shire</strong>.The Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA), 2001The Indigenous Land Use Agreement registered with National NativeTitle Tribunal in 2001 saw the creation of the Arakwal National Parkwhich is a joint managed Park between the State Government and theBundjalung (Arakwal) People, with employment, training and comanagementopportunities created for the native title claimants (referMap1–ILUAmap).ILUA 2, 2003ILUA 2 was registered in 2003 and the parties agreed to:a Native Title claim by the Bundjalung (Arakwal ) People over land inthe Sandhills Estate <strong>Byron</strong> Baythe transfer of a parcel of land in the Sandhills Estate to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong><strong>Council</strong> for a new library in exchange for land at Taylors Lake<strong>Council</strong> handing over the management of Broken Head CrownCaravan Park to the Arakwal Bundjalung people


the Minister agreeing to transfer the title of the Broken Head Crowncaravan park to the Bundjalung (Arakwal) People.ILUA 3, 2006ILUA 3 was registered in 2006 being a former section of the ILUA 2agreement:that <strong>Council</strong> owned Land at Taylors Lake be acquired by the Ministerfor reserving under the National Parks and Wildlife Act in recognitionof cultural importance to the Bundjalung (Arakwal) people as a sacredarea for women (refer Map 2 – ILUA 2 map (Taylors Lake)).In November 2008, <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved (resolution 08-726)that <strong>Council</strong> authorise the General Manager to attach the <strong>Council</strong> seal toall documents necessary to effect the transfer of Lot 4 in DP830202 from<strong>Council</strong> to Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife, and assuch to effect the ILUA 3.Source: National Native Title Tribunal Media Release 20 March 2008http://www.nntt.gov.au/media/1170898567_6180.html


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix HCape <strong>Byron</strong> Marine ParkZoning Plan


153°41.690’E153°41.207’E153°40.683’E153°38.877’E153°38.589’E153°37.708’E153°37.093’E153°36.833’E153°36.296’E153°36.104’E153°34.045’E153˚33.601E153°33.538’E1. Marshalls Creek Sanctuary ZoneIncorporates waters and tidal areas ofMarshalls Creek with the exception ofa section between Casons Lane and apoint approximately 250m south of theNew Brighton Post Office. The watersof Capricornia Canal/Billinudgel Creekupstream of the New Brighton RoadBridge are not within this sanctuary zone.2. Brunswick River Boat Harbour SpecialPurpose ZoneEncompasses the area of the BrunswickRiver Boat Harbour that occurs below themean high water mark. This zone allows foractivities associated with the operation ofthe boat harbour to continue. Recreationalfishing and collecting are allowed in thiszone.1.2.3.5.5. <strong>Byron</strong> Bay Sanctuary ZoneIncludes: the <strong>Byron</strong> Bay embayment;approximately 3.6km of TyagarahBeach; offshore waters of TyagarahBeach; Julian Rocks; Cape <strong>Byron</strong>; anda transect east of Cape <strong>Byron</strong> to theouter boundary of the Marine Park.7. Mackerel Boulder HabitatProtection ZoneIncorporates Mackerel Boulderand Spot X reefs within a triangulararea which adjoins the <strong>Byron</strong> BaySanctuary Zone to the north of JulianRocks. The northern tip of the zoneis approximately 1.5 km due north ofthe trigonometrical station on JulianRocks. The zone helps to protect theendangered grey nurse shark whenit is most abundant in the area. Allfishing is prohibited within this zonebetween 1 May and 31 Decembereach year.28°32.251’SDog exercise area: access from a point 20msouth of the Surf Club extending in a southerlydirection to the northern boundary of theTyagarah Nature Reserve.Habitat ProtectionZone extends for100m from meanhigh water mark28˚33.376’S3. Marshalls Creek Oyster Leases Special Purpose ZoneEncompasses the oyster lease areas within Marshalls Creek. Thiszone allows for aquaculture only, fishing or collecting activities arenot permitted.4.CAPE4. Simpsons Creek Sanctuary ZoneIncorporates the waters and tidal areas of Simpsons Creek,upstream from the Brunswick Heads Bowling Club.5.BYRON9. Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Habitat ProtectionZoneIncludes all of Little Wategos Beach,and rocky shore habitat around theheadland south to the “Matterhorn”,extending 100m offshore from themean high water mark. Recreationalfishing and collecting are allowedwithin this zone.28°35.900’S7.ACTIVITYRecreatiional FishingLine fishingTrapping (including crab, fish, eel and lobster)SpearfishingNettingGeneralUseZonesHabitatProtectionZones*(a)(b) (c)(d)(e)SanctuaryZonesXXXX6. Grays Lane Habitat ProtectionZoneExtends along Tyagarah Beach forapproximately 2km north and 2.3kmsouth of the Grays Lane beach accesspoint, and for 100m offshore from themean high water mark along this entirelength.6.Habitat ProtectionZone extends for100m from meanhigh water mark5.8.28°36.337’SGrey nurse shark critical habitat applies to the waters below and within a 200m radius from the mean high water mark of JulianRocks. Under the provisions of the Fisheries Management (General) Regulation 2002, restrictions for diving and snorkelling inthe grey nurse shark critical habitat area are: no scuba diving between sunset and sunrise; no blocking entrances to caves orgutters when the sharks are there; no feeding or touching the sharks; no chasing or harassing the sharks; no electronic sharkrepelling devices; and no underwater scooters. The critical habitat applies from 1 May to 31 October each year.28°37.516’S5.CollectingRecreational (bait/food)X(b) (e)Scientific/educational P P PFor private aquariums P P XFor commercial aquariums X X XRecreational Boating, Scuba Diving / SnorkellingRecreational boatingRecreational scuba diving/snorkellingAnchoring(f)Personal watercraft (jetskis) & hovercraft P (f) P (f) P (f)Commercial fishingLine fishingX(a)Spanner crab nettingX(b)Lift netting for bait (non-saleable only)X(b)Trapping (including crab, fish, eel and lobster)X(b) (c)Hand gathering (pipis & beachworms)X(g)Beach haulingX(h)Trawling X XSetline/dropline, longlining X X XEstuary mesh netting X X XCommercial tourismCommercial tour operators (non-extractive) P (f) P (f) P (f)Charter fishing P P XOther activitiesAquacultureX(i)(i)Organised events P P PResearch P P P8. Wilsons Reef and Bait Reef HabitatProtection ZoneIncorporates Wilsons Reef and Bait Reefwithin a rectangular area 1.3km long by 580mwide (76.5 Ha). Only the species listed in Table2 overleaf may be taken.Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Detail11. Belongil Creekand Tallow CreekSpecial PurposeZonesInclude the watersand tidal wetlandsof Belongil Creekand Tallow Creekand provide forthe protection andrehabilitation of thecreeks. A permit fromthe Marine ParksAuthority is requiredfor any harvestingactivity and willonly be issued forAboriginal ceremonialand cultural events.Permits are alsorequired forrehabilitation worksand for scientificresearch.11.Broken HeadDetail11.10.12.9.MARINE10. Belongil Beach, Main Beach &Clarkes Beach Habitat ProtectionZoneExtends south from a pointapproximately 520m south ofthe mouth of Belongil Creek,incorporating Belongil Beach, MainBeach and part of Clarkes Beachand the area offshore from thesebeaches extending seawards for100m from the mean high watermark. The eastern boundaryoccurs at the northern boundary ofthe Cape <strong>Byron</strong> State ConservationArea at Clarkes Beach HolidayPark . Most forms of recreationalfishing and collecting are permitted,spearfishing and commercialnetting are prohibited in this zone.12. Broken Head Sanctuary ZoneIncludes habitats between the northern end of Kings Beach and the eastern-mostpoint on the rocky headland at the southern end of Brays Beach (approx 100m northof Snapper Rock). It incorporates “Cocked Hat Rocks” below mean high water markand the surrounding reef to the eastern boundary, which is situated approximately1.1km offshore. The “Channel”, “Jews Point” and “Snapper Rock” are not included.PARK28°43.621’S28°37.783’S28°38.313’S,28°38.780’S28°39.576’S28°42.181’S,28°42.528’S28°43.315’SActivities TableActivities permitted in each zone and restrictions governing their undertakingare listed in the table above. Other regulations on some activities and for speciesprotection also apply under the zoning plan. Provisions of the Fisheries Management Act1994 (such as bag limits and size limits for fish), the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974(such as approach distances to whales and dolphins), and other legislation continue toapply in addition to the zoning plan.Note: Commercial and recreational vessels may transit a sanctuary zone. If fishinggear is on board it must not be in use or capable of use.Symbols used in Activities Table.Activity is permitted in the zone.X Activity is not permitted in the zone.P Permits required from the relevant Authorities (MPA, DPI, DECC, NSWMaritime). Any activities that are inconsistent with marine park zoning will not bepermitted in that particular zone.* Refer to Table 1 and Table 2 for species that may be taken from habitat protectionzones.(a) See Table 1. Additional restrictions apply at Mackerel Boulder (see descriptive textfor point 7 on the map) and at Wilsons Reef and Bait Reef habitat protection zones(see Table 2).(b) Activity not permitted in the Mackerel Boulder, Wilsons Reef and Bait Reef, orLennox Head Boulder Foreshore habitat protection zones.(c) Use of traps not permitted in Marshalls Creek or Simpsons Creek.(d) Spearfishing is not permitted in the following habitat protection zones: BrunswickRiver (including Simpsons and Marshalls creeks); Belongil Beach, Main Beach andClarkes Beach; and Lennox Head Boulder Foreshore. Under the provisions of theFisheries Management Act 1994, spearfishing is not permitted adjacent to an oceanbeach at a distance greater than 20m from a headland. All fishing is restricted in theMackerel Boulder and Wilsons Reef and Bait Reef habitat protection zones.(e) Scoop, landing, hoop (lift) or scissor (push) nets are the only recreational net typespermitted for the taking of prawns or crabs within habitat protection zones.(f) Restrictions apply – see over.15. Lennox Head Boulder Foreshore HabitatProtection ZoneCommences on the southern side of the boat channeland extends generally along the reef edge of theoceanic lagoon for 400m and then for a further 500malong the boulder foreshore to the south of The Moat/ Bream Hole. The zone extends for 100m offshorefrom the reef edge of The Moat / Bream Hole andfrom the boulder foreshore immediately to the southof the lagoon. Rocky shore invertebrates and plantsare protected in this zone and no hand collecting ispermitted. Line fishing for finfish (vertebrate fish) isthe only fishing method permitted.16. Lennox Head Special Purpose ZoneIncludes the waters directly adjacent to andwithin 50m of the Lennox Head board-walk.A permit from the Marine Parks Authority isrequired to fish off the board-walk and willonly be issued to persons with a disabilitywho would qualify for a mobility parkingscheme card with the NSW Roads andTraffic Authority.Lennox HeadDetail14.16.15.13.13. Lennox Head Sanctuary ZoneThe eastern margin of this sanctuaryzone commences at mean high watermark at the southern boundary ofthe Marine Park and continues ina generally north north-easterlydirection to join the eastern boundaryof the Seven Mile Beach HabitatProtection Zone. The northernboundary of the sanctuary zone alignswith <strong>Byron</strong> Street, Lennox Head.14. The Moat / Bream HoleSanctuary ZoneIncludes the waters of the Moat/Bream Hole that are bounded by thesouthern side of the Lennox HeadBoat Channel, the reef edge of theMoat/ Bream Hole, the beach adjacentto the Moat/ Bream Hole at meanhigh water mark, and the boulderforeshore which occurs adjacent toLennox Head.28°47.622’S28°47.932’S28°48.116’S28°48.264’S28°48.571’S(g) Hand gathering is permitted only in the Grays Lane and Seven Mile Beach habitatprotection zones.14.13.(h) Beach hauling is permitted only on Seven Mile Beach (applicable to haul, garfish,pilchard, anchovy and bait nets) from <strong>Byron</strong> St at Lennox Head, north to Jews Point.(i) Intensive aquaculture is not permitted in the Marine Park.16.15.153°35.830’E153°35.924’E153°35.974’E153°36.129’E153°36.598’E153°36.997’E153°37.177’E153°37.184’E153°37.578’E153°37.923’EDisclaimer: This map should not be used for navigation purposes. This brochureprovides a plain English guide to the zoning plan for the Cape <strong>Byron</strong> MarinePark and should not be used for formal legal interpretation


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix ILegislation and Policyframework


Appendix E – Legislation and Policy FrameworkSubject to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s policy regarding Planned RetreatAppendix I – Legislation and policy framework1. LegislationNative Vegetation Conservation Act 1997The Native Vegetation Conservation Act 1997 provides a management frameworkfor the conservation of native vegetation on a regional basis. The Act encouragesthe improvement in condition of existing native vegetation, and preventsinappropriate clearing of vegetation.Marine Parks Act 1997 and Fisheries Management Act 1994The Marine Parks Act 1997 provides a management framework for the conservationof marine biological diversity and marine habitats by declaring and providing for themanagement of a comprehensive system of marine parks.The Fisheries Management Act 1994 provides a management framework toconserve, develop and share the fishery resources of the New South Wales for thebenefit of present and future generationsEnvironmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979Planning and development in New South Wales is carried out under theEnvironmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and EnvironmentalPlanning and Assessment Regulation 2000.The EP&A Act 1979 sets objectives thatencourage appropriate management, development and conservation of theenvironment through principles for Ecological Sustainable Development (ESD). Itfosters shared responsibility for environmental planning between the different levelsof government in the State, and aims to provide increased opportunity for publicinvolvement and participation.Coastal Protection Act 1979The Coastal Protection Act 1979 regulates the use and occupation within, as well asthe protection of, the NSW Coastal Zone.The Coastal Protection Act 1979 sets objectives that encourage the protection of theNSW coastal environment through ESD principles. It aims to recognise and fosterthe significant social and economic benefits of a healthy coastal zone to the State,and ensure public pedestrian access to foreshore areas. The Act facilitates theintegration of management activities between different levels of, and departmentswithin, Government.The Act contains provisions with respect to CZMP preparation, approval by theMinister, and enforcement of CZMP provisions (<strong>Part</strong> A, Divisions 1 and 2).Local Government Act 1993The Local Government Act 1993 provides a legal framework for an effective,efficient, environmentally responsible and open system, of local government in NewSouth Wales.Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995The Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 provides a legislative framework forthe conservation of biological diversity and promotion of ecologically sustainabledevelopment. The Act seeks to prevent the extinction and promote the recovery ofthreatened species, populations, habitat and ecological communities.


Appendix E – Legislation and Policy FrameworkSubject to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s policy regarding Planned Retreat2. State policyCoastal Hazards Policy 1979The primary objective of the Coastline Hazard Policy is to reduce the impact ofcoastline hazards on individual owners and occupiers of coastal lands, and toreduce private and public losses resulting from such hazards.Coastal Policy 1997The Coastal Policy has as its central focus the ecologically sustainable development(ESD) of the NSW coastline. The Coastal Policy is based on four principles of ESD:conservation of biological diversity and ecological integrityinter-generational equityimproved valuation, pricing and incentive mechanisms for environmental andsocial equity considerationsthe precautionary principle.Based on these principles, the Coastal Policy establishes nine goals for planningand management of the coastline.The Coastal Policy is a prescribed matter pursuant to Section 90(1)(s) of theEnvironment Planning and Assessment Act. This means that local governmentsneed to have regard to relevant provisions in the policy when assessingdevelopment applications.In addition, the Coastal Policy, through Section 117 Direction, has a requirement forlocal environmental plans (LEPs) to include provisions that give effect to, and areconsistent with, the Coastal Policy.As such, provisions of a CZMP prepared in accordance with the Coastal Policy arerequired to be reflected in the LEP.State Environmental Planning Policy 14 (SEPP14) – Coastal wetlandsSEPP14 protects mapped wetlands in the NSW coastal zone (outside of the Sydneymetropolitan region) for environmental and economic interests of the state. It is arequirement under this SEPP that development consent be sought for the clearing,draining or filling of wetlands or levee construction.State Environmental Planning Policy 71 (SEPP 71) – Coastal protectionSEPP71 protects and manages the natural, cultural, recreational and economicattributes of the New South Wales coast. The policy encourages a strategicapproach to coastal planning.State Environmental Policy 26 (SEPP 26) – Littoral rainforestsSEPP26 protects littoral rainforest areas within NSW. It provides a mechanism forthe consideration of applicable development that is likely to damage or destroylittoral rainforest areas.North Coast Regional Environmental PlanThe SEPP aims to protect natural areas, wildlife corridors and habitats, and scenicareas.The SEPP objectives in relation to coastal environment are to:enhance the visual quality of the coastal environmentprovide for the appropriate recreational use of beaches


Appendix E – Legislation and Policy FrameworkSubject to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s policy regarding Planned Retreatprotect the water quality of the coastal environmentminimise risks to people and property resulting from coastal processesminimise changes to coastal processes resulting from developmentencourage retention of natural areas and regeneration of those natural areaswhich are already degraded.The SEPP requires that any LEP that applies to land adjoining or adjacent to acoastal foreshore area should include provisions that:restrict development so as to minimise long-term risk to life and property and itsimpact on the coastal processesminimise the visual impacts of development near the shorerequire that the impact of engineering works on coastal processes be assessedprohibit development landward from the back beach erosion scarp that is atimmediate risk from coastal processes.3. Management framework3.1 National frameworkThis CZMP is required to be consistent with the framework provided by the followingplans.The National Cooperative Approach to Integrated Coastline ZoneManagement, Framework and Implementation Plan 2006The National Cooperative Approach to Integrated Coastline Zone Managementinitiates a nationally cooperative focus on achieving ecologically sustainabledevelopment through integrated coastal zone management.It identifies the following coastal issues for national collaboration: land and marine-based sources of pollution managing climate change introduced pest plants and animals allocation and use of coastal resources capacity building.The Implementation Plan identifies a number of actions with respect tounderstanding, managing and adapting to climate change, with specific reference tocoastal zone management.


Figure I-1: Legislative and policy frameworkAppendix E – Legislation and Policy FrameworkSubject to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s policy regarding Planned Retreat


Appendix E – Legislation and Policy FrameworkSubject to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s policy regarding Planned Retreat3.2 State frameworkNorthern Rivers Catchment Action Plan 2004The Northern Rivers Catchment Action Plan (CAP) is a 10-year statutory,non-regulatory, plan developed by the community and the NorthernRivers CMA that was approved for implementation by the NSWGovernment in 2004.The Coastal Management program is one of five natural resource themescontained in the Northern Rivers CAP. The theme focuses on a single,aspirational, Resource Condition Target (RCT):“By 2016 there is an improvement in the condition of Coastal Zonenatural resources.”The intent of the Coastal Management Program is to deliver on this targetby improving the condition of coastal zone natural resources. Theprogram focuses on the land-sea interface, incorporating three mainlandscapes: the coastal fringe, including beaches, coastal dunes, andheadlands; estuaries, including coastal creeks, lakes and lagoons; andislands.The program supports the preparation of natural resource managementplans, and implementation of on-ground works priorities within theseplans, which contribute to this intent.The program provides financial assistance through investment intoprojects conducted by various land use managers.3.3 Local framework<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s operations rely on a number of managementdocuments and land-use planning instruments. The CZMP should link tothese documents in order to ensure the coastline management isconsistent with BSC’s major planning instruments and is supportedthrough all its management operations.<strong>Council</strong>’s major planning instruments are outlined below.<strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988The <strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan (<strong>Byron</strong> LEP) aims to promotesustainable development in <strong>Byron</strong> by furthering the objectives of theEnvironmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The objectives of the<strong>Byron</strong> LEP are: to enhance individual and community social and economic well-beingin the context of economic development that safeguards the welfareof future generations to facilitate equity within and between generations to protect biodiversity and re-establish and enhance essentialecological processes.As mentioned above, the LEP is required to be consistent with theobjectives and policy direction of the REP and the NSW Coastal Policy1997.


Appendix E – Legislation and Policy FrameworkSubject to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s policy regarding Planned Retreat<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Development Control Plan 2002The <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Development Control Plan 2002 (DCP 2002)<strong>Part</strong> J applies to Coastal Erosion Lands and relates to the assessment ofdevelopment along the <strong>Byron</strong> coastline.Objectives of DCP 2002– <strong>Part</strong> J include: to make provisions for the orderly and economic development of landwithin the coastal erosion zones to ensure that such development is carried out in a manner whichdoes not adversely affect coastal processes and which will not beadversely affected by coastal processes to provide guidelines for determination of the merits of developmenton coastal lands.The DCP <strong>Part</strong> J identifies specific requirements in relation to anyproposed new development and extensions to existing development onland subject to coastal erosion (identified as Precincts 1, 2 and 3).Management plans<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s management plans and policies with relevance tothis CZMP include: <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Emergency Action Plan <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Local Flood Plan Interim Mooring/Boating Management Plan for Cape <strong>Byron</strong>Embayment <strong>Byron</strong> Local Disaster Plan (DISPLAN) <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Cultural Plan (2008-2013) Belongil Estuary Management Plan (2001) Brunswick Estuary Management Plan (2008)3.4 Plans of managementThis CZMP is required to be consistent with the following plans ofmanagement that apply to certain sections of the management area.These include:plans of management for national park estates and Crown land: Billinudgel Nature Reserve Plan of Management – November 2000 Marshalls Creek Nature Reserve Draft Plan of Management – August2008 The <strong>Byron</strong> Coast Group of Nature Reserves Plan of Management(includes Brunswick Heads Nature Reserve, Tyagarah Nature Reserveand Broken Heads Nature Reserve) – February 1998 Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Headland Reserve State Conservation Area Plan ofManagement – October 2002 Arakwal National Park Plan of Management – February 2007 Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Marine Park Plan of Management – November 2002. Cape <strong>Byron</strong> Marine Park Zoning Plan


Appendix E – Legislation and Policy FrameworkSubject to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s policy regarding Planned Retreatflood management plans: Tallow Creek Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan – July 2009 Marshall Creek Floodplain Management Plan <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Urban Stormwater Management Plan – September 2000.other:Crown Caravan Parks Plans of Management.


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix JConsideration of plannedretreat in case law


CASE LAW PRECEDENTSYEAR LEGALS1985-86 Court upholds <strong>Council</strong> refusals and of condition of approval lapsingsubject to proximity to escarpment – 54 m, 80 m, (Hogan, Belongilby the Sea, Cooper & Greaves)1988 Demolition orders upheld – Bolens. Trainor1990 Court upholds refusal of large demountable dwelling – Vaughan1991 Challenge s88E Restriction on Use – Court upheld as valid – Veila1996 Court upholds <strong>Council</strong> refusal of a seawall DA to protect severalhouses – Scott1999 <strong>Council</strong> unsuccessful in application for injunction to stop emergencyrock works by residents under State Emergency and RescueManagement Act 1999 – Vaughan & others1999 Consent orders – works installed under police emergency noticeonly ‘interim protection works’2003 Appeal against DA refusal for a rock wall dismissed on grounds thatthe application was ‘unclear’ as to what effect the construction of theproposed wall would have on adjoining properties and the DA wasdeemed to be invalid – Parkes2004 Court upholds <strong>Council</strong> refusal of application for change of use ofhouse to bed and breakfast dismissed – Parkes2004 Application seeking declaration that property has “existing userights” refused by the Court. The realisation of the coastal erosiontrigger in the s88E Restriction of Use rendered the developmentunlawful and it had no ‘existing use rights’. – Kendall St2006 Court upholds refusal of application to replace a previously existingbuilding in the same location dismissed – Van Haandel


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix KTechnical Report, Optionsfor Upgrading JonsonStreet Protection Works,<strong>Byron</strong> Bay NSW, DraftNote:ThisTechnicalreportincludespossibleoptionsforthemanagementof Main Beach. <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved in 2006 (Res06721 referAppendixB)toinvestigatethepotentialformodificationoftheJonsonStworkstoreducetheimpactonBelongilBeach.AnyworkassociatedwiththemanagementoftheMainBeachareaandtheJonsonStworksmustbedesignedunderconsiderationofResolution06721andinaccordancewithManagementAction2.2.3ofthisCZMP(referTable5.2<strong>Part</strong>A).


OPTIONS FOR UPGRADING JONSON STREETPROTECTION WORKS, BYRON BAY NSWbyJ T Carley and R J CoxTechnical Report 2009/13June 2009--------------------------------D R A F TRevision 1


THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALESSCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGWATER RESEARCH LABORATORYOPTIONS FOR UPGRADING JONSON STREET PROTECTIONWORKS, BYRON BAY NSWWRL Technical Report 2009/13 June 2009byJ T Carley and R J Cox


Water Research LaboratorySchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Technical Report No 2009/13University of New South Wales ABN 57 195 873 179 Report Status Draft Revision 1King Street Date of Issue 12 June 2009Manly Vale NSW 2093 AustraliaTelephone: +61 (2) 9949 4488 WRL Project No. 07018Facsimile: +61 (2) 9949 4188 Project Manager James Carleycarley: Document1 (30208)TitleAuthor(s)Options for Upgrading Jonson Street Protection Works, <strong>Byron</strong> BayNSWJ T Carley and R J CoxClient NameParsons Brinckerhoff and <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>Client Address PB: Level 3, 51-55 Bolton Street, Newcastle NSW 2300BSC: PO Box 219, Mullumbimby NSW 2482Client Contact Michelle Collins-Roe (PB) and Ben Fitzgibbon (BSC)Client ReferenceThe work reported herein was carried out at the Water Research Laboratory, School ofCivil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, acting on behalfof the client.Information published in this report is available for general release only with permissionof the Director, Water Research Laboratory, and the client.


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13CONTENTS1. INTRODUCTION 12. DESIGN CONDITIONS 23. CONCEPT DESIGNS 43.1 Options 43.2 Upgraded Seawall – with Rock or Concrete Armour 43.3 New Concrete Seawall 53.4 Comparison of Alternatives 53.5 Additional Studies Needed 74. IMPACTS OF PROTECTION WORKS 84.1 List of Physical Impacts 84.2 Beach Planform 84.3 Wave Overtopping 94.4 Performance Measures of Protection Works 95. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 116. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 12LIST OF TABLES2.1 Design Conditions used for Preliminary Design3.1 Costs, Advantages and Disadvantages of Jonson Street Town Centre SeawallOptionsLIST OF FIGURES1.1 Photos of Existing Structure3.1 Examples of Seawalls3.2 Example of Physical Modelling of Rubble Structure4.1 End Effects of Seawalls- i -


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 1.1. INTRODUCTIONThis report addresses options for the Jonson Street protection works as part of the <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> Coastline Management Plan.The present rock wall at the end of Jonson Street was built in the early 1960s (c1962,Figure 1.1) and provides protection to the memorial pool and car park. To the north-west, itprovides some protection to First Sun Caravan Park, however, its longshore extent(approximately 350 m) is insufficient to fully protect the caravan park. Furthermore, to thesouth-east there is some rock protection fronting the surf life saving club, however, it doesnot constitute a functioning seawall, and again, its longshore extent is insufficient to fullyprotect the surf club.<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (BSC) has committed to protecting the town centre by retention of theJonson Street rock works, however, BSC may not be responsible for funding such works.The present seawall is degraded and does not meet contemporary engineering standards.The present seawall needs to be upgraded to contemporary engineering standards andintegrated with landscaping upgrades involving the existing car park.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 2.2. DESIGN CONDITIONSTypical existing profiles obtained from the 2004 photogrammetry show that the existingseawall has a crest level in the car park of approximately 4.5 to 5 m AHD. Theembankment is much higher than this in First Sun Caravan Park (to approximately 9 mAHD). Ground levels around the memorial pool are typically 6 m AHD and drop againtowards the town centre. The upper portion of the existing seawall (crest down to +2 to +1m AHD) has a typical slope of 1V:1.5H to 1V:1.7H. The lower portion (from about +2 mAHD down to 0 to -1 m AHD) has a flatter gradient due to armour movement anddegradation, giving overall typical structure slopes between about +5 and -1 m AHD of1V:2.5H to 1V:3H. For preliminary design of an upgraded rock seawall, a gradient of1V:2H has been used.The conditions used for preliminary design are shown in Table 2.1. These are for theconcept design only and should be reviewed at detailed design stage. The detailed designshould be optimised with a physical model test.An engineering rule of thumb for seawalls at the back of beaches in NSW is to design for ascour level of -1 m AHD. However, the <strong>Byron</strong> town centre seawall protrudes furtherseaward than seawalls at the back of beaches (it is not at the “back” of a beach).Photogrammetry cannot extend out to levels below approximately 0 to -1 m AHD, socannot be used to determine extreme historical scour levels seaward of the existing seawall.The photogrammetry from 2004 indicates a toe level of approximately -1 m AHD. Asshown in Table 2.1, an estimate of -2 m AHD has been used for a design scour level, whichshould be refined with a review of historical bathymetric surveys and/or erosion modellingsuch as SBEACH.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 3.Table 2.1Design Conditions used for Preliminary DesignVariablePresent dayValue2050 MidrangeSLRvalue(wheredifferent)Sea level rise 0 0.4 mAdditional beach recession (1V:70H profile) due to SLR 0 28 mAdditional underlying beach recession (0.1 m/yr, WBM, 1999) 0 4 mAdditional lowering of toe (1V:70H profile due to recession of 28m) 0 0.4 mTypical ground level behind seawall6 m AHDTypical crest level of present seawall5 m AHDDesign still water level (tide plus storm surge, but excluding wave setup 1.5 m AHD 1.9 m AHDDesign offshore significant wave height (Hso)9 mDesign offshore root mean square wave height Hrms (for wave setup)6.4 mDesign spectral peak wave period Tp12 sInshore wave setup at -2 m AHD contour (Dally et al, 1984)0.7 mEroded toe depth of structure -2 m AHD -2.4 m AHDDesign nearshore water level 2.2 m AHD 2.6 m AHDPlunge length of breaking waveDesign nearshore water depth (ds) 4.2 m 5.0 mBreaker index (CEM 2002 Fig II-4-2) 1.05 1.05Depth limited nearshore breaking wave height (CEM 2002 Fig II-4-2) 4.4 m 5.2 mStructure slope1V:2HHudson stability coefficient K D (SPM, 1973; CEM, 2003, 0-5% damage) 3.5Hudson stability coefficient K D (SPM, 1984; CEM, 2003, 0-5% damage) 2.0D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 4.3. CONCEPT DESIGNS3.1 OptionsTwo options are presented below, namely:An upgraded seawall with rock or concrete armourA stepped concrete seawall.It is envisaged that the current 350 m crest length would be extended to approximately 450to 500 m in order to protect fully the surf life saving club and First Sun Caravan Park, and asmoother alignment be adopted. Both options would incorporate a high quality ramp fromthe surf club to allow access onto the beach for lifesaving equipment and disabled people.The design would need to integrate the seawall and ramp structures with the surroundinglandscape to provide a focal point for the town centre’s beach.3.2 Upgraded Seawall – with Rock or Concrete ArmourThe existing rock works would be regraded, a proper toe formed, and two layers of properlysized basalt (density of 2700 kg/m 3 ) rock armour would be placed over the existing wall (ornew underlayer where needed) as shown in Figure 3.1. Preliminary calculations indicatethe rock armour would need to be in the range 8 to 19 tonnes (1.4 to 1.9 m cube sideequivalent) subject to detailed design. Detailed design optimisation should involvephysical model testing (Figure 3.2). Rock of this size may not be economically attainable,so consideration should also be given to precast concrete units. Examples of possible unitsinclude Seabees (Figure 3.1) and Ecopodes® (Figure 3.1) should the rock design processfind that rock procurement is uneconomical. An alternative may be the use of smaller rockat flatter slopes.Rock or armour of this size and slope would be dangerous for the public to walk over, soconsideration should be given to restricting or discouraging access, or incorporatingsuitable warning signs. Costs, advantages and disadvantages for the rock seawall option incomparison with a stepped concrete seawall are summarised in Table 3.1.Preliminary calculations indicate that if the crest level of the new seawall is kept similar tothe present one, major overtopping would occur during large storm wave events. A wavereturn wall (Figure 3.2) would reduce this, but is unlikely to remove the risk altogether.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 5.The optimisation of the wave return wall would need to be undertaken using a physicalmodel study.3.3 New Concrete SeawallAn example of a stepped concrete seawall is shown in Figure 3.1. As with the rockseawall, preliminary calculations indicate that if the crest level of the new seawall is keptsimilar to the present one, major overtopping would occur during large storm wave events.Furthermore, the lower portions of the wall would be subject to regular wave impacts,should these areas be accessible to the public.A concrete wall has the advantages of occupying less space and providing additionalseating and useable public space.3.4 Comparison of AlternativesCosts, advantages and disadvantages for both seawall options are summarised in Table 3.1.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 6.Table 3.1Costs, Advantages and Disadvantages of Jonson Street Town Centre Seawall OptionsCostsIndicative capital cost permetreTotal indicative capital cost(500 m)Rock RubbleConcrete Stepped Seawall$12,000 $20,000$6,000,000 $10,000,000Structural maintenance $60,000 per year $10,000 per yearCleaning maintenance 10,000 per year $20,000 per yearNet present cost ofmaintenance over 20 years @7%$742,000 $318,000AdvantagesDisadvantagesOperational and SafetyIssuesCheaperEasier to repairAbsorbs more wave energyPotentially more naturallookingPotentially easier to alter toadapt to climate changeMore difficult to traverseOccupies more spaceRubbish and rodentsWave overtopping and personalsafety riskOccupies less spaceCan incorporate seatingLess maintenanceRigid – more prone tocatastrophic failureAbsorbs less wave energy(reflection and overtoppinghigher)More expensiveSlippery with algae in splashzoneWave overtopping andpersonal safety riskD R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 7.3.5 Additional Studies NeededThe following additional studies would be needed:Develop the design of the two options and integrate with a landscape plan.Investigate the effectiveness of the spur groyne(s) in considering their removal.Detailed investigation of alongshore impacts through modelling and data analysis.Selection of preferred option.Detailed design of preferred option including inundation potential and physical modeltesting.Some preliminary values for some of these factors are presented in the next section.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 8.4. IMPACTS OF PROTECTION WORKS4.1 List of Physical ImpactsThe following list summarises the main impacts of properly engineered future protectiveworks. The present protective works perform this to some extent, but do not have sufficientalongshore extent, and are not properly engineered to guarantee performance.Protection of the town centre, surf life saving club, memorial pool and First SunCaravan Park.Stabilisation of main beach to the south-east.Additional erosion of the beach to the north-west (see following Section).Overtopping and inundation during large storm events.4.2 Beach PlanformThe following techniques are available for assessing the downdrift effects of a structure onthe planform of a littoral drift coast: The desktop technique of Komar and McDougal (1988).An analysis of available survey data to examine this effect.Numerical modelling through programs such as GENESIS, LITPAK and UNIBEST.Physical modelling in a wave basin, though it is noted that sediment transport modellingis subject to scale effects.A combination of all four techniques would provide the best insight into this complexproblem. It is generally accepted that the Jonson Street protection works do have someimpact on the planform of the beach to the north-west, but it is not known what thenorthward extent of this is.WBM (2000) found increased long term recession to the north-west of the Jonson Streetworks. They noted the recession was higher for the area up to 1 km north-west of JonsonStreet and was lower in the area 1 to 2 km north-west of Jonson Street. Their main analysisinvolved averaging in these 1 km blocks and was not focussed on quantifying thealongshore extent of the effects of the Jonson Street works. They noted the complexity ofdefining shoreline recession rates with the presence of disjointed protection works.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 9.As stated above, the current seawall has an alongshore extent (L) of approximately 350 m.Application of the principles of Komar and McDougal (1988) indicates that the downdrifterosion effects (to the north-west) of the current seawall (ignoring the small spur groyne)extend for 0.7 L, that is, approximately 250 m (Figure 4.1).If the seawall was extended to a total length of 500 m, then the downdrift erosion effects aspredicted by Komar and McDougal (1988) would be 350 m, which is only approximatelyone third of the downdrift distance to the nearest direct beachfront property in BorderStreet. This answer is a first approximation using a single desktop technique and wouldrequire the additional studies listed above before it could be accepted. A more detailedstudy of the downdrift erosion would also be necessary if the risk to the railway corridorwas considered to be important.4.3 Wave OvertoppingIt is not considered feasible to raise ground levels behind the wall. Subject to the detaileddesign of the seawall, inundation of areas behind the wall needs to be considered in futureplanning. Similarly, the hazard due to wave overtopping for people and/or vehicles needsto be assessed. This could be managed through:Educational signage.Permanent exclusion of people from certain areas.Temporary exclusion of people from certain areas during major storm events (withforecasting or on a reactive basis).Engineering design of overtopping barriers.4.4 Performance Measures of Protection WorksThe following performance measures would apply to the protection works:Preservation of protected assets – that the protected assets are not damaged througherosion or wave impacts for the design condition. An annual condition index report (Oliver et al, 1998) would give a score (out of 100)for the upgraded seawall, so that its fitness for purpose could be confirmed, and anydeterioration over time could be tracked.Subject to a risk assessment and detailed design for allowable overtopping, aperformance measure should be the absence of injury to people or damage to vehiclesor property due to wave overtopping -or that where such incidents occur, individualsD R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 10.were in clear breach of the adopted management strategy (eg walking past warningsigns or barricades.)D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 11.5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has committed to protecting the town centre by retention of the JonsonStreet rock works, however, BSC may not be responsible for funding such works. Thepresent seawall is degraded and does not meet contemporary engineering standards. Thepresent seawall needs to be upgraded to contemporary engineering standards and integratedwith landscaping upgrades involving the existing car park.Two options are presented, namely:An upgraded seawall with rock or concrete armour.A stepped concrete seawall.Both options are technically feasible. There are advantages and disadvantages in each.An armour seawall has the advantages of greater flexibility and generally lower cost.A stepped concrete seawall has the advantages of occupying less space and potentiallyproviding useable public space subject to wave and water level conditions.The following additional studies would be needed:Develop the design of the two options and integrate with a landscape plan.Investigate the effectiveness of the spur groyne(s) in considering their removal.Detailed investigation of alongshore impacts through modelling and data analysis.Selection of preferred option.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


WRL TECHNICAL REPORT 2009/13 12.6. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (2002), “Development Control Plan 2002 - <strong>Part</strong> J - Coastal ErosionLands”.Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) (2009), Draft Sea Level RisePolicy Statement, NSW Government.Gordon, A D, Lord, D B & Nolan, M W (1978), <strong>Byron</strong> Bay- Hastings Point Erosion StudyReport # PWD 78026, Department of Public Works, NSW Government.Helman, P D (2007), “Two Hundred Years of Coastline Change and Projected FutureChange, Fraser Island to Coffs Harbour, East Coast, Australia”. Thesis submitted for thedegree of Doctor of Philosophy, Southern Cross University, Peter Helman B (App) Sc.Komar P D and McDougal W G (1988), “Coastal Erosion and Engineering Structures: TheOregon Experience”, Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue No 4, pp77-92.NSW Government (1990), NSW Coastline Management Manual.Oliver, John, John Lesnik, Don Plotkin and Doug Pirie (1998), “Condition andPerformance Rating Procedures for Coastal Structures”, technical Report REMR-OM-24,US Army Corps of Engineers.WBM (2000), “<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline Hazard Definition Study” – Final Report, Brisbane.WBM (2002), “<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline Hazard Definition Study (Addendum prepared forBECTON)” – Final Report, Brisbane.D R A F T R E V I S I O N 1 12/6/09


February 1974 (Helman, 2007, <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> News) September 1977 (Gordon et al, 1978)June 1978 (Gordon et al, 1978)September 2007September 2007June 2009WRLReport No. 2009/13FigurePHOTOS OF EXISTING STRUCTURE 1.1


Rock rubble - Santubong, Malaysia (designed by WRL)Concrete steps - Santubong, Malaysia (designed by WRL)Seabee concrete units - Rada Tilly, Argentina (design input from WRL)Ecopode armour units (source CLI)WRLReport No. 2009/13FigureEXAMPLES OF SEAWALLS 3.1


WRLReport No. 2009/13FigureEXAMPLE OF PHYSICAL MODELLING OF RUBBLE STRUCTURE 3.2


End Effects of Seawall (Adapted from Komar and McDougal, 1988)Gold Coast, 1967 (Source: Delft, 1970)ReportWRL2009/13FigureEND EFFECTS OF SEAWALLS 4.1


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix LCoastal policy Checklist


GOAL 1 TO PROTECT, REHABILITATE AND IMPROVE THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT1.1 To identify coastal lands and aquatic environments with conservation values and devise and implement acquisition policies, management strategies and controls toensure that those values are protected.Strategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference to relevantManagement Actions inCZMPAdditional Management Action or Explanatory NoteCP* 1.1.1 No N/A -CP 1.1.2 No N/A See Action CP 1.1.5 (below)CP 1.1.3 No N/A See Action CP 1.1.5CP 1.1.4 Yes Table 3-3Actions 1.1.4 – 1.1.11;1.3.1 – 1.3.3NOTE: Plans of management should continue to be prepared for foreshore and coastal lands.CP 1.1.5 Yes Table 3-3Actions 1.1.4 – 1.1.11;1.3.1 – 1.3.3Investigate open space and land with conservation value for potential as community land or greaterconservation classification e.g. National Park.CP 1.1.6 No N/A -CP 1.1.7 No Action 1.1.3; 1.1.5; 1.1.6;1.1.10NOTE: <strong>Council</strong> to review and incorporate principals into relevant plans and strategies to ensureappropriate conservation and management of seagrass, mangrove, saltmarsh and other wetlandassociated species in accordance with the objectives of the NSW Coastal Policy and relevant legislation.CP 1.1.8 No Table 3-3 NOTE: <strong>Council</strong> to continue to implement SEPP 14 and SEPP 26 approval processesCP 1.1.9 No Table 3-3 NOTE: <strong>Council</strong> to ensure LEP includes appropriate zonings and provisions for areas of conservationvalueCP 1.1.10 Yes Section 2.3Table 3-3<strong>Part</strong> C Appendix H<strong>Byron</strong> LEP 2002 to include provisions giving effect to the objectives and management provisions ofmarine park plans of managementCP 1.1.11 No N/A -1.2 To conserve the diversity of all native and animal species and to protect and assist the recovery of threatened and endangered speciesCP 1.2.1 Yes Action 1.1.5 – 1.1.11;2.1.1; 2.1.2; 8.4.2-CP 1.2.2 No Action CP 8.3.3 -CP 1.2.3 No N/A -CP 1.2.4 No N/A <strong>Council</strong> to contact and cooperate with NPWS and ORCA in the instance of whale/ dolphin stranding


CP 1.2.5 No N/A -CP 1.2.6 Yes Table 3-3Action 1.1.7Develop recovery and threat abatement plans for coastal threatened species in accordance with theThreatened Species Conservation Act 1995 to provide protection to said speciesCP 1.2.7 Yes Table 3-3 In accordance with NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 1.2.7, processes threatening for coastalspecies will be identified and controlled where possible1.3 To improve water quality in coastal and estuarine waters and coastal rivers where it is currently unsatisfactory and to maintain water quality where it is satisfactoryCP 1.3.1 No N/A NOTE: Comply with License limits imposed by EPA for sewage treatment works and point sources forcontaminant discharge.CP 1.3.2 No Table 3-3 -CP 1.3.3 Yes Actions 1.2.1 In cooperation with EPA, establish and/or continue water quality monitoring programs and environmentalstudies as a background for identification of areas of unsatisfactory water qualityCP 1.3.4 No See Action CP 1.3.3, CP8.3.1-CP 1.3.5 Yes See Action CP 1.3.3 Results of marine life and water quality monitoring to be published to ensure biodiversity and humanhealth not threatenedCP 1.3.6 No N/A -CP 1.3.7 Yes N/A Incorporate NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 1.3.6 to ensure highest possible water quality ofcoastal watersCP 1.3.8 Yes Table 3-3 <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Urban Stormwater Management Plan should aim to minimise discharge of contaminatedstormwater to coastal waters as per the objectives of the NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 1.3.8CP 1.3.9 No N/A -CP 1.3.10 No N/A NOTE: Where an investigation of fish kills or algal blooms is carried out, <strong>Council</strong> should familiarise itselfwith and act upon the findings and recommendations where relevantCP 1.3.11 No N/A -CP 1.3.12 No N/A <strong>Council</strong> to ensure support is provided to NSW Waterways Authority and NSW Land and PropertyManagement Authority for the appropriate management of vessel grey and black water in the BrunswickEstuary. <strong>Council</strong> to liaise with Waterways and LPMA to ensure regulation of vessel wastewater is beingupheld in accordance with strategy 1.3.12 of CPCP 1.3.13 No N/A -CP 1.3.14 Yes N/A State Groundwater Policy to be used to manage groundwater resources to ensure maintenance oflinkages between groundwater, surface water and the coastal environmentCP 1.3.15 No N/A -CP 1.3.16 No N/A -


CP 1.3.17 No N/A -1.4 To manage the coastline and estuarine environments in the public interest to ensure their health and safetyCP 1.4.1 No N/A -CP 1.4.2 No N/A -CP 1.4.3 Yes Table 3-3 NOTE: <strong>Council</strong> to continue to develop and implement management plans for the <strong>Byron</strong> coastline,floodplains and estuariesCP 1.4.4 No Entire CZMP document -CP 1.4.5 Yes Table 3-3Action 6.1.1 - 6.1.7-CP 1.4.6 Yes Table 3-3 -CP 1.4.7 Yes Table 3-3 Incorporate conditions of NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 1.4.7 into the <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 and<strong>Byron</strong> DCP 2002CP 1.4.8 Yes Action 1.1.3; 1.1.6; 1.1.8;1.1.11-1.5 To foster new initiatives and facilitate the continued involvement of the community in programs aimed at the restoration and rehabilitation of degraded coastal areasCP 1.5.1 Yes Actions 1.4.1; 1.4.2; 1.4.3 Involve the community, through programs such as Landcare and Coastcare, in implementing measures toprotect and rehabilitate natural areasCP 1.5.2 Yes Section 1.5.4 Provide opportunity for input from catchment management committees and trusts in coastal environmentsprotection and restorationGOAL 2 TO RECOGNISE AND ACCOMMODATE NATURAL PROCESSES AND CLIMATE CHANGE2.1 To give the impacts of natural processes and hazards a high priority in the planning and management of coastal areasStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference to relevantManagement Actions inCZMPAdditional Management Action or Explanatory NoteCP 2.1.1 Yes Table 3-3 See Note CP 1.4.3CP 2.1.2 No N/A NOTE: <strong>Council</strong> to communicate with Waterways Authority on existing river traffic controlsCP 2.1.3 Yes Section 4.4 & 4.5Table 5-6-CP 2.1.4 No N/A NOTE: ASS impacts continue to be managed through LEP


2.2 To recognise and consider the potential effects of climate change in the planning and management of coastal developmentCP 2.2.1 No N/A <strong>Council</strong> to stay informed of and incorporate updated studies relating to climate change and coastal areasCP 2.2.2 Yes Actions 2.1.4 Incorporate updated sea level change scenarios into planning mechanismsCP 2.2.3 No N/A -GOAL 3 TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE AESTHETIC QUALITIES OF THE COASTAL ZONE3.1 To identify and protect areas of high natural or built aesthetic qualityStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference to relevantManagement Actions inCZMPAdditional Management Action or Explanatory NoteCP 3.1.1 No N/A -CP 3.1.2 Yes Table 3-3Actions 3.1 and 3.4Action 6.1.2-3.2 To design and locate development to complement the surrounding environment and to recognise good aesthetic qualitiesCP 3.2.1 Yes Action 3.4 NOTE: North Coast Design Guidelines and Guidelines for Tourism Development along the NSW Coastencouraged by DoP and Tourism NSWCP 3.2.2 No N/A -CP 3.2.3 No N/A -CP 3.2.4 Yes Table 3-3Action 3.4Principles of Appendix C Table 3 of the NSW Coastal Policy to be incorporated in the <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988and <strong>Byron</strong> DCP 2002, as well as used in the development application assessment processCP 3.2.5 Yes Actions 3.1; 3.4 -3.3 To encourage towns to reinforce or establish their particular identities in a form which enhances the natural beauty of the coastal zoneCP 3.3.1 No N/A NOTE: Consideration of NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 3.3.1 should be made within <strong>Byron</strong>LEP 1988 and <strong>Byron</strong> DCP 2002CP 3.3.2 No N/A NOTE: Consideration of NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 3.3.2 should be made within <strong>Byron</strong>LEP 1988 and <strong>Byron</strong> DCP 2002


GOAL 4 TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE CULTURAL HERITAGE4.1 To effectively manage and conserve cultural heritage places, items and landscapesStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference to relevantManagement Actions inCZMPAdditional Management Action or Explanatory NoteCP 4.1.1 No N/A -CP 4.1.2 Yes Table 3-3Action 4.2.2-CP 4.1.3 No N/A -CP 4.1.4 No N/A NOTE: Consideration of NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 4.1.4 should be made within <strong>Byron</strong>LEP 1988 and <strong>Byron</strong> DCP 20024.2 To recognise the rights and needs of indigenous people and to ensure inputs by Aboriginal communities prior to making decisions affecting indigenous communitiesCP 4.2.1 No N/A -CP 4.2.2 No N/A -CP 4.2.3 No N/A -GOAL 5 TO PROMOTE ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF RESOURCES5.1 To identify and facilitate opportunities for the sustainable development and use of resourcesStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference to relevantManagement Actions inCZMPAdditional Management Action or Explanatory NoteCP 5.1.1 Yes Section 5.5 Use of land resource mapping should be used to assist in the assessment of suitability of proposed landusesCP 5.1.2 No N/A -CP 5.1.3 No N/A -CP 5.1.4 No N/A -CP 5.1.5 No N/A -CP 5.1.6 No N/A -CP 5.1.7 No N/A -CP 5.1.8 No N/A -


CP 5.1.9 No N/A -CP 5.1.10 No N/A -CP 5.1.11 Yes Section 5.5 Local tourism operators and tourism operators that undertake business within the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> should beinformed of the “Guidelines for Tourism Development Adjacent to Natural Areas”5.2 To develop land use and management plans which ensure the sustainable development and use of resourcesCP 5.2.1 No N/A NOTE: Relevant land use and management plans should be considered to ensure sustainabledevelopment and use of natural resources while adequately protecting the environmentCP 5.2.2 Yes Table 3.3 NOTE: The Goals, strategies and activities of <strong>Council</strong>s Management Plan are to ensure protection ofenvironmentally sensitive coastal areas and to promote ecological sustainable use of <strong>Council</strong>s coastalareaCP 5.2.3 Yes Table 3-3 -CP 5.2.4 No N/A -CP 5.2.5 No N/A NOTE: See Action for CP 1.1.7CP 5.2.6 No N/A -CP 5.2.7 No N/A -CP 5.2.8 No N/A -CP 5.2.9 No N/A -CP 5.2.10 No N/A -CP 5.2.11 No Table 3-3 -5.3 To develop and implement ‘best practice’ approached to achieving sustainable resource managementCP 5.3.1 No Table 3-3 -CP 5.3.2 No N/A -CP 5.3.3 No N/A -CP 5.3.4 No N/A -CP 5.3.5 No N/A -CP 5.3.6 No N/A -


GOAL 6 TO PROVIDE FOR ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE HUMAN SETTLEMENT6.1 To ensure that future expansion or redevelopment of urban and residential areas, including the provision of infrastructure, avoids or minimises impacts onenvironmentally sensitive areas and cultural heritageStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference in CZMPCP 6.1.1 No N/A -CP 6.1.2 No N/A NOTE: Regional settlement strategies should incorporate the principles of this document, in particularconsidering the planned retreat policy and coastal planning precincts.CP 6.1.3 No N/A -CP 6.1.4 No N/A -6.2 To promote compact and contained planned urban development in order to avoid ribbon development, unrelated cluster development and continuous urban areas onthe coastCP 6.2.1 No Table 3-3 -CP 6.2.2 No N/A -6.3 To ensure rural residential developments are located in areas where impacts on the natural environment or valuable agricultural resources are minimisedCP 6.3.1 No N/A -6.4 To provide for choice in both housing and lifestylesCP 6.4.1 No N/A NOTE: Local and regional housing strategies should consider Actions 6.1.1 - 6.1.8 and the principles ofthis CZMPCP 6.4.2 No N/A -GOAL 7 TO PROVIDE FOR APPROPRIATE PUBLIC ACCESS AND USE7.1 To increase public access to foreshores when feasible and environmentally sustainable options are availableStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference in CZMPCP 7.1.1 Yes Action 7.4.1 (also 8.2.1) NOTE: Action 7.4.1 may lead to the need to consider acquisition of significant sites to increase access toand along the foreshore.CP 7.1.2 Yes Action 7.3.1 Public amenities review should be undertaken for coastal areas and estuary foreshores within the <strong>Byron</strong>


<strong>Shire</strong> in accordance with NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 7.1.2.CP 7.1.3 Yes Table 3-3Action 7.4.1 – 7.4.6-CP 7.1.4 Yes N/A The need for recreational vehicle areas should be assessed in consideration of the potential to limitunauthorised motor vehicle access in environmentally sensitive areasCP 7.1.5 Yes N/A Where new tourist development is permissible and adjacent to foreshore areas, the <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 or<strong>Byron</strong> DCP 2002 when next reviewed should include a requirement for the provision of public access tothe foreshore7.2 To ensure risks to human safety from the use of coastal resources is minimisedCP 7.2.1 No Action 5.1.1; 8.3.3 -CP 7.2.2 No Action 7.6.2 -CP 7.2.3 Yes N/A <strong>Council</strong> to cooperate with DoP and Surf Life Saving NSW Inc to ensure a coastal safety assessment forany new coastal developments, in accordance with NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 7.2.3CP 7.2.4 No N/A -CP 7.2.5 Yes N/A <strong>Council</strong> to ensure beach signs and flags comply with Standards Association of Australia and any specificlegislationCP 7.2.6 Yes N/A <strong>Council</strong> to assess and upgrade where necessary relevant safety warning signs to ensure safe use of thecoast in conjunction with relevant state government departmentsGOAL 8 TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO ENABLE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT8.1 To coordinate and integrate data and information collection with management programs to ensure that it meets the needs of managementStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference in CZMPCP 8.1.1 No N/A -CP 8.1.2 Yes N/A Appropriate reporting mechanisms on implementation of coastal data/ information in coastal planning andmanagement will be determined based on the Comprehensive Coastal Assessment (DoP) and NSWCoastal Policy 1997 in lieu of the Coastal <strong>Council</strong> requirementsCP 8.1.3 Yes Section 5.8 Identify and address, where appropriate, gaps in coastal information8.2 To develop compatible data bases for coastal resource informationCP 8.2.1 No N/A NOTE: Consistent methodologies should be utilised for coastal resource information collection,description and exchange


CP 8.2.2 No N/A -8.3 To ensure that coastal information is made more accessible across all levels of government, the private sector and the communityCP 8.3.1 No N/A NOTE: <strong>Council</strong> to cooperate with DECCW, DoP and LPMA to develop and maintain inventories of coastalinformation for the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> coastlineCP 8.3.2 No N/A See Action CP 8.3.1CP 8.3.3 No N/A NOTE: <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> should include information in their state of the environment report inaccordance with NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 8.3.3CP 8.3.4 No N/A NOTE: <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> should include details of coastal environment programs in their annual reportsin accordance with NSW Coastal Policy 1997 Strategic Action 8.3.48.4 To develop adequate formal and informal education and awareness programs addressing coastal management issuesCP 8.4.1 Yes Action CP 8.3.3; CP 8.3.4 -CP 8.4.2 Yes N/A Encourage ongoing development of those involved in coastal management in the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> by sharingof information on progressions in coastal management including conferences, seminars, etc.GOAL 9 TO PROVIDE FOR INTEGRATED PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT9.1 To facilitate consistent and complementary decision making which recognises the three spheres of governmentStrategic Action Within Scope of <strong>Byron</strong><strong>Shire</strong> CZMPReference in CZMPCP 9.1.1 No N/A -CP 9.1.2 Yes CZMP document NOTE: Incorporation of goals of the NSW Coastal Policy into <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Council</strong> plans and policies isfacilitated through this document9.2To ensure Government agencies efficiently and effectively implement the Coastal Policy in a co-ordinated and collaborative mannerCP 9.2.1 Yes CZMP document See Action CP 9.1.2CP 9.2.2 No N/A -CP 9.2.3 No N/A NOTE: Future reviews of the CZMP should consider updates within the NSW Coastal Policy or equivalent9.3 To ensure local government coastal policy and management is integrated and involves community participation and information exchangeCP 9.3.1 Yes Action 1.4.1-1.4.3 <strong>Council</strong> and State Government Agencies to provide advice to community groups involved in localecosystem protection and rehabilitation to facilitate best practice management


CP 9.3.2 Yes Table 3-3 <strong>Council</strong> should ensure integrated policy and management in accordance with NSW Coastal Policy 1997Strategic Action 9.3.2CP 9.3.3 Yes CP 8.3.3; CP 8.3.4 -9.4 To give consideration to the development of a national coastal zone management strategyCP 9.4.1 No N/A NOTE: <strong>Council</strong> to offer input and advice on coastal planning and issue identification forums between stateand federal governmentsCP 9.4.2 No N/A -* CP – NSW Coastal Policy 1997NOTE: This table has been compiled to ensure compliance with the NSW Coastal Policy 1997 (<strong>Part</strong> B – Implementation). The additional management actionsthat have been identified are primarily specific to the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> coastline and are not the prime responsibility of a NSW or Commonwealth governmentagency. The scope of the CZMP for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline has also been assessed using this criteria.


Draft Coastal Zone Management Plan for <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Coastline<strong>Part</strong> C – Supporting Technical InformationAppendix MExample of PlanningCertificate persuant toSection 149(2) & 149 (5)Environmental Planningand Assessment Act,1979(for a property located inLEP 7(f2) zone)


PO Box 219MULLUMBIMBY NSW 2482DX 20007(02) 6626 7000 (P)(02) 6684 3018 (F)council@byron.nsw.gov.auABN: 14 472 131 473PLANNING CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TOSECTION 149(2) & 149(5)ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNINGAND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979Applicant:Certificate No:Date:Receipt No:Reference:Owner (as recorded by <strong>Council</strong>)Property:Description:Parish:County:Zone:Parcel No:7(f2) - Urban Coastal Lands Zone------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. Names of relevant planning instruments and DCPs(1) The name of each environmental planning instrument that applies to thecarrying out of development on the land.(2) The name of each proposed environmental planning instrument that will apply tothe carrying out of development on the land and that is or has been the subject ofcommunity consultation or on public exhibition under the Act (unless theDirector-General has notified the council that the making of the proposedinstrument has been deferred indefinitely or has not been approved).(3) The name of each development control plan that applies to the carrying out ofdevelopment on the land.(4) In this clause, proposed environmental planning instrument includes a planningproposal for a LEP or a draft environmental planning instrument.(1) <strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988 and see State Environmental Planning PoliciesAnnexure 1Page 1


(2) see Annexure 2(3) DCP No. 2002DCP No. 16 Exempt and Complying DevelopmentDCP No. 21 – Social Impact Assessment2. Zoning and land use under relevant LEPsFor each environmental planning instrument or proposed instrument referred to inclause 1 (other than a SEPP or proposed SEPP) that includes the land in any zone(however described):(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)the identity of the zonethe purpose for which the instrument provides that development may be carriedout within the zone without the need for development consent,the purposes for which the instrument provides that development may not becarried out within the zone except with development consent,the purposes for which the instrument provides that development is prohibitedwithin the zone,whether any development standards applying to the land fix minimum landdimensions for the erection of a dwelling-house on the land and, if so, theminimum land dimensions fixed,whether the land includes or comprises critical habitat,whether the land is in a conservation area (however described),whether an item of environmental heritage (however described) is situated onthe land.2. BYRON LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN 1988(a) – (d)ZONE No. 7(f2)(URBAN COASTAL LAND ZONE)1. Objectives of zoneThe objectives of the zone are-(a)(b)(c)to identify urban land likely to be influenced by coastal processes;to permit urban development within the zone subject to the council having dueconsideration to the intensity of that development and the likelihood of suchdevelopment being adversely affected by, or adversely affecting, coastal processes;to permit urban development within the zone subject to the council having dueconsideration to-(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)the need to relocate buildings in the long term;the need for development consent to be limited to a particular period;the form, bulk, intensity and nature of the development; andcontinued safe public access to the site; and(d)to allow detailed provisions to be made, by means of a development control plan, to setaside specific areas within the zone for different land uses and intensities ofdevelopment.Page 2


2. Without development consentBushfire hazard reduction. om Amd.55 17/7/983. Only with development consentAny purpose other than a purpose specified in item 2 or 4.4. ProhibitedAbattoirs; aerodromes; brothels; bulk stores; car repair stations; cemeteries and crematoriums;drive-in banks; drive-in take-away food shops; extractive industries; forestry; generating works(including solar generating works); heliports; industries (other than light industries); institutions;junk yards; liquid fuel depots; mines; motor showrooms; recreation vehicle areas; roadside stalls;rural tourist facilities; sawmills; service stations; stock and sale yards; warehouses; waste recyclingcentres. ins Amd.8 2/11/90; ins Amd.55 17/7/98; ins Amd.65 11/12/98; ins Amd.90 22/3/02;om Amd.90 22/3/02; om Am.103 14/11/03All land within <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area is affected by a Tree Preservation Order adoptedunder clause 52 of <strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988. see Annexure 3Regard must be had for other clauses in <strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988, which mayrestrict the purpose for which development may be carried out.(e)(f)(g)(h)The dimensions of the land have no bearing as to whether or not a dwelling-house maybe erected on the land. Further information in regard to whether a dwelling-house ispermissible with consent of council is contained in Section 149(5) of this certificate(if applied for).NoNoNoNOTE:In addition to the controls contained in <strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988 clause 29 ofthe Environmental Planning & Assessment (Savings and Transitional) Regulation 1998 setsout further circumstances where development consent will be required for particulardevelopment. See Annexure 43. Complying Development(1) Whether or not the land is land on which complying development may be carriedout under each of the codes for complying development because of theprovisions of clause 1.19 of State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt andComplying Development Codes) 2008.General Housing CodeComplying development under the General Housing Code may not be carried out on the land.Housing Internal Alterations CodeComplying development under the Housing Internal Alterations Code may be carried out onthe land.General Commercial and Industrial CodeComplying development under the General Commercial and Industrial Code may be carriedPage 3


out on the land.Subdivisions CodeComplying development under the Subdivisions Code may be carried out on the land.(2) If complying development may not be carried out on that land because of theprovisions of clause 1.19 of that Policy, the reasons why it may not be carried outunder that clause.General Housing CodeThe land is within a zone which does not permit complying development under the GeneralHousing code section of State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and ComplyingDevelopment Codes) 2008.Housing Internal Alterations CodeNot applicable.General Commercial and Industrial CodeNot applicable.Subdivisions CodeNot applicable.4. Coastal protectionWhether or not the land is affected by the operation of section 38 or 39 of the CoastalProtection Act 1979, but only to the extent that the council has been notified by theDepartment of Services, Technology and Administration.No5. Mine subsidenceWhether or not the land is proclaimed to be mine subsidence district within themeaning of section 15 of the Mine Subsidence Compensation Act 1961.No6. Road widening and road realignmentWhether or not the land is affected by any road widening or road realignment under:(a)(b)(c)(a)(b)(c)Division 2 of <strong>Part</strong> 3 of the Roads Act 1993, orany environmental planning instrument, orany resolution of the councilNoNoNo7. <strong>Council</strong> and other public authority policies on hazard risk restrictionsWhether or not the land is affected by a policy:(a) adopted by the council, or(b) adopted by any other public authority and notified to the council for the expresspurpose of its authority being referred to in planning certificates issued by thePage 4


council,that restricts the development of the land because of the likelihood of land slip,inundation, subsidence, acid sulphate soils or any other risk (other than flooding).(a)The land is affected by a policy adopted by the council that restricts the development ofthe land because of the likelihood of land slip, bushfire, tidal inundation, subsidence,acid sulphate soil and any other risk (other than flooding) known as:Management of Contaminated Land Policy No 5.61.Acid Sulfate Soils - Refer to <strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988 (Amendment No101).Coastal Erosion Precinct 1 - Refer to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Development Control Plan 2002 <strong>Part</strong>J.Coastal Erosion Precinct 2 - Refer to <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Development Control Plan 2002 <strong>Part</strong>J.(b)The land is not affected by a policy adopted by another public authority and notified tothe council for the express purpose of its adoption by that authority being referred to inplanning certificates issued by the council that restricts the development of the landbecause of the likelihood of land slip, bushfire, tidal inundation, subsidence, acidsulphate soil and any other risk (other than flooding).7A. Flood related development controls information(1) Whether or not development on that land or part of the land for the purposes ofdwelling houses, dual occupancies, multiple dwelling housing or residential flatbuildings (not including development for the purposes of group homes or seniorshousing) is subject to flood related development controls.(2) Whether or not development on that land or part of the land for any other purposeis subject to flood related development controls.(3) Words and expressions in this clause have the same meanings as in theinstrument Set out in the Schedule to the Standard Instrument (LocalEnvironmental Plans) Order 2006.(1) No(2) No8. Land reserved for acquisitionWhether or not any environmental planning instrument or proposed environmentalplanning instrument referred to in clause 1 makes provision in relation to theacquisition of the land by a public authority, as referred to in section 27 of the Act.No9. Contributions plansThe name of each contributions plan applying to the land.Application lodged after 21 November, 2001 are subject to contributions levied inaccordance with the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Section 94 Development Contributions Plan 2005(incorporating Amendment No 1) for community facilities, open space, roads, car parking,Page 5


cycleways, civic and urban improvements, shire support facilities and administration.10. Biobanking agreementsIf the land is land to which a biobanking agreement under <strong>Part</strong> 7A of the TheatenedSpecies Conservation Act 1995 relates, a statement to that effect (but only if the councilhas been notified of the existence of the agreement by the Director-General of theDepartment of Environment, Climate Change and Water.No an agreement under <strong>Part</strong> 7A of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 does notapply.11. Bush fire prone landNo part of this parcel is bush fire prone land.12. Property vegetation plansNo a property vegetation plan under the Native Vegetation Act 2003 does not apply.13. Orders under Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006Whether an order has been made under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006to carry out work in relation to a tree on the land (but only if the council has been notified ofthe order).No an order under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 does not apply.14. Directions under <strong>Part</strong> 3ANo direction by the Minister pursuant to section 75P (2) (c1) of the Environmental Planning& Assessment Act is in force.15. Site compatibility certificates and conditions for Seniors Housing(a)(b)<strong>Council</strong> is not aware of any current site compatibility certificates (seniors housing) inrespect of proposed development on the land.No terms referred to in clause 18(2) of State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing forSeniors or People with a Disability) 2004 have been imposed as conditions ofconsent to a development application for the land granted after 11 October 2007.16. Site compatibility certificates for infrastructure<strong>Council</strong> is not aware of any valid site compatibility certificate (infrastructure) in respect ofproposed development on the land.17. Site compatibility certificates and conditions for affordable rental housing(1) <strong>Council</strong> is not aware of any current site compatibility certificate (affordable rentalhousing) in respect of proposed development on the land.(2) No terms referred to in clause 17(1) or 37(1) of State Environmental Planning Policy(Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 have been imposed as conditions of consent to adevelopment application in respect of the land.NOTE: The following matters are prescribed by section 59 (2) of the ContaminatedPage 6


Land Management Act 1997 as additional matters to be specified in a planningcertificate:(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)that the land to which the certificate relates is significantly contaminated – if theland (or part of the land) is significantly contaminated land at the date when thecertificate is issued,that the land to which the certificate relates is subject to a management order - ifit is subject to such an order at the date when the certificate is issued,that the land to which the certificate relates is the subject of an approvedvoluntary management proposal – if it is the subject of such an approvedproposal at the date when the certificate was issued,that the land to which the certificate relates is subject to an ongoing maintenanceorder – if it is subject to such an order at the date when the certificate is issued,that the land to which the certificate relates is the subject of a site auditstatement - if a copy of such a statement has been provided at any time to thelocal authority issuing the certificate.The land (or part of the land) is not significantly contaminated as at the date thiscertificate is issued.The land is not subject to a management order as at the date this certificate is issued.The land is not the subject of an approved voluntary management proposal as at thedate this certificate is issued.The land is not subject to an ongoing maintenance order as at the date this certificateis issued.The land is not the subject of a site audit statement as at the date this certificate isissued.NOTE: Section 26 of the Nation Building and Jobs Plan (State Infrastructure Delivery) Act2009 provides that a planning certificate must include advice about any exemption underSection 23 or authorisation under section 24 of that Act if the council is provided with a copyof the exemption or authorisation by the Co-ordinator General under that Act.In accordance with s149(5) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 asamended, <strong>Council</strong> provides the following additional advice on other relevant mattersthat it is aware.1. Is a dwelling-house permitted to be erected on the land with the developmentconsent of <strong>Council</strong> pursuant to <strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988.Yes2. <strong>Council</strong> records do not have sufficient information about previous use of theland subject of this certificate to determine whether or not the land iscontaminated as defined in <strong>Part</strong> 7A of the Environmental Planning &Assessment Act 1979. Restrictions imposed by State legislation and <strong>Council</strong>’sManagement of Contaminated Land Policy 5.61 will need to be considered inrespect of any proposal to develop, remediate or rezone the land.Page 7


Resolution 05-504 adopted on July 2005To receive and note the report on Sewage Treatment Plant Capacity Assessments thatconcluded (South <strong>Byron</strong> & West <strong>Byron</strong> superseded by resolution 06-420), (Bangalowsuperseded by resolution 07-678), Brunswick Heads and Mullumbimby STPs were alloverloaded and sewerage services to new developments in these catchments could not beprovided.Resolution 06-420 adopted on 27 June 2005That the West <strong>Byron</strong> STP has capacity to receive additional load.Resolution 07-678 adopted on 22 November 2007That the Bangalow STP has capacity to receive additional load.Any advice provided pursuant to S149(5) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979As amended, has been taken from <strong>Council</strong>’s records, after a search thereof, but <strong>Council</strong> cannotAccept responsibility for any omission or inaccuracy.Any statement made or information given in this certificate does not relieve the property owner ofobtaining <strong>Council</strong>’s approval required under the Local Government Act 1993, the EnvironmentalPlanning & Assessment Act 1979 as amended, or any other Act.……………………………..Graeme FaulknerGeneral ManagerPage 8


ANNEXURE 1State Environmental Planning Policies and Draft State Environmental Planning Policiesapplicable to land within <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>SEPPNO.TITLELAND AFFECTED1 Development Standards All zones - applies to the State.4 Development Without Consent and Miscellaneous ExemptAll zones - applies to the State -Complying Developmentexcept where SEPP No.26 applies.6 Number of Storeys in a Building All zones - applies to the State.14 Coastal Wetlands All zones - applies to the State -refer SEPP 14 maps. Exceptwhere SEPP No.26 applies21 Caravan Parks All zones - applies to the State.22 Shops and Commercial Premises Applies to the <strong>Shire</strong>26 Littoral Rainforests Refer SEPP No.26 maps. SeeClause 4(1)(b) of the policy30 Intensive Agriculture Applies to the <strong>Shire</strong>32 Urban Consolidation (Redevelopment of Urban Land) Zone Nos. 2(a) 2(t) 2(v) 3(a) 4(a)5(a) 6(a) 6(b)33 Hazardous and Offensive Development All zones - applies to the State.36 Manufactured Home Estates Applies to the <strong>Shire</strong>.44 Koala Habitat Protection Applies to the <strong>Shire</strong>.50 Canal Estate Development Applies to the <strong>Shire</strong>55 Remediation of Land Applies to the State62 Sustainable Aquaculture Applies to North Coast Region64 Advertising and Signage Applies to the State65 Design Quality of Residential Flat Development Applies to the State but only todevelopments of 3 storeys or more71 Coastal Protection Applies to the StateState Environmental Planning Policy(Major Development) 2005State Environmental Planning Policy(Building Sustainability Index: Basix) 2004State Environmental Planning Policy(Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007State Environmental Planning Policy(Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004State Environmental Planning Policy(Temporary Structures) 2007State Environmental Planning Policy(Infrastructure) 2007State Environmental Planning Policy(Rural Lands) 2008State Environmental Planning Policy(Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008North Coast Regional Environmental PlanState Environmental Planning Policy(Affordable Rental Housing) 2009Applies to the StateApplies to the StateApplies to the StateApplies to the State – See Clause4 of the PolicyApplies to the StateApplies to the StateApplies to the <strong>Shire</strong>Applies to the StateApplies to the <strong>Shire</strong>Applies to the StatePage 9


ANNEXURE 2DRAFT LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN/S No/S PLACED ON EXHIBITION PURSUANT TOSECTION 57 (2) OF THE ACTDraft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 (Amendment No 115) – this Planning Proposal proposes to amend the<strong>Byron</strong> Local Environmental Plan 1988 map by rezoning a number of allotments to 3(a)Commercial Zone at the southern end of Jonson Street, <strong>Byron</strong> Bay.Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 (Amendment No 137) – Planning Proposal to rezone specific land inBangalow to 2(a) residential.Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 (Amendment No 138) – Planning Proposal to change the date ofadoption of Development Control Plan No 16 Exempt and Complying Development. TheDevelopment Control Plan was amended to exempt certain uses of public road reserves fromthe need for development consent.Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 (Amendment No 139) – Planning Proposal to amend a drafting errorwithin Subclause 11(3).Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 (Amendment No 140) – Planning Proposal to rezone Lot 3 DP 706286 atEwingsdale for <strong>Byron</strong> Sport and Cultural Complex. It is proposed to rezone the land from1(d)(Investigation Zone) to part 6(a)(Open Space Zone) and part 7(k)(Habitat Zone).Additionally it is proposed to list the allotment within schedule 8 of the LEP in order to permituses associated with sport and cultural complex.Draft <strong>Byron</strong> LEP 1988 (Amendment No 141) – Planning Proposal to provide dwellingentitlements to various allotments (12) within <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>.Page 10


ANNEXURE 3<strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong>Tree Preservation Order1. <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Tree Preservation Order applies to:a) any species of tree, palm or fern exceeding three (3) metres in height,b) any species of native plant within a community described as heath, mangrove, saltmarsh orsedgeland (of any height).2. Notwithstanding Clause (1), this Order does not apply to:a) any tree grown for its edible fruit (other than species listed in the Threatened SpeciesConservation Act, 1995),b) minor pruning or lopping associated with regular garden maintenance,c) trees planted as part of a windbreak to an orchard,d) trees planted for commercial woodlots or farm forestry,e) trees within two (2) metres of the footprint of an existing building,f) trees under and within two (2) metres of the footprint of a building for which a constructioncertificate has been issued;g) trees listed in Attachment One as Undesirable Trees,h) trees in <strong>Council</strong> caravan parks where removal or lopping is consistent with an adoptedvegetation management plan.i) Up to six (6) regrowth trees of less than ten (10) years of age per holding in a twelve (12)month period on any rural zoned land.Page 11


Attachment OneBotanical NameUndesirable TreesAraucaria bidwillii** This species should be protected as a heritage item outside of remnant vegetation(ie large trees are exempt in remnant vegetation, but require consent in paddocks,parks and gardens)Syagrus romanzoffianumBuddleja madagascariensisCeltis sinensisCinnamomum camphora** Camphor Laurel trees greater than one (1) metre in diameter at breast height inurban and village zones are excluded from this list and protected under this Order.Citrus LimoniaCoffea ArabicaCorymbia torellianaCotoneaster glycophyllaDuranta repensEriobotrya japonicaErythrina crista-galliErythrina indicaErythrina nigraErythrina X sykesiiEugenia unifloraFicus elasticaFlindersia brayleyanaGleditsia TriacanthosKoelreuteria paniculataLeucaena leucocephalaLigustrum lucidumLigustrum sinenseMorus albaMurraya paniculataNerium oleanderOchna serrulataOlea africanaPaulownia tomentosaPinus spp. (Not Araucaria spp. Hoop Pine, Bunya Pine or Cypress Pine or NorfolkIsland Pine)Psidium cattleianumPsidium guajavaRaphiolepis indicaRaphiolepis umbrellata ‘Ovata’Robinia pseudocacaciaSalix subsp.Schefflera actinophyllaSchinus areiraSolanum hispidumSolanum torvumSpathodea campanulata, subsp. rotundataTabebuia chrysanthaTecoma stansToxicodendron succedaneaTriadica sebera (Sapium sebiferum)Common NameBunya PineCocos or Queen PalmBuddleja, Butterfly BushChinese Elm, HackleberryCamphor LaurelRough LemonCoffeeCadaghiCotoneasterDurantaLoquatIndian (or Cockscomb) Coral TreeCoral TreeOrange Coral TreeCoral TreeBrazilian CherryRubber TreeQueensland MapleHoney LocustGolden Rain TreeLeucaenaLarge-leaved PrivetSmall-leaved PrivetMulberryMurrayaOleanderOchnaWild OlivePaulowniaExotic PinesCherry GuavaGuavaIndian HawthornYeddo HawthornBlack LocustWillowUmbrella TreeBrazilian Pepper TreeGiant Devil’s FigDevil’s FigAfrican Tulip TreeGolden Trumpet TreeTecomaRhusChinese TallowPage 12


ANNEXURE 4<strong>Part</strong> 3 Division 3 Clause 29 Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings andTransitional) Regulation 1988Division 3 General29 Certain activities require development consent under amended EP&A Act 1979(1) This clause applies to development consisting of:(a)(b)a prescribed activity proposed to be carried out within the area of a council, orthe subdivision of land within the area of a council.,including development proposed to be carried out in connection with an existing use, butnot including development referred to in subclause (2)(2) This clause does not apply to development of the kind referred to in subclause (1) thatconsists of:(a): any activity that, immediately before the appointed day, was specifiedin item 6 of <strong>Part</strong> A of the Table to section 68 of the unamended LG Act1993 (relating to the use and occupation of uncompleted buildings), or(b) any prescribed activity (other than an activity referred to in paragraph(a)) that, immediately before the appointed day, was exempted,excluded or suspended from the requirement for approval under theunamended LG Act 1993:(i) by the Local Government (Approvals) Regulation 1993,as in force immediately before the appointed day, or(ii)(iii)by a local approvals policy in force under the unamendedLG Act 1993 (being a local approvals policy that is stillin force at the time the development application fordevelopment consent is made), orby or under the provisions of any Act, including theprovisions of an environmental planning instrument of akind referred to in section 28 of the unamended EP&A Act1979, or(c) any subdivision of land that, immediately before the appointed day,was exempted from requirements for approval under the repealedLG Act 1919 by or under the provisions of that or any other Act,including the provisions of an environmental planning instrumentof a kind referred to in section 28 of the unamended EP&A Act 1979,or(d) any development:(i)(ii)carried out by the Crown, orcarried out by any person prescribed by the amended EP&APage 13


Act Regulation 1994 for the purposes of section 115M of theAct (as referred to in section 115H (a) of that Act) in relationto Crown building work,being development that, immediately before the appointed day,constituted an activity within the meaning of <strong>Part</strong> 5 of theunamended EP&A Act 1979,(d1)(i)any development consisting of the demolition of a building or work:carried out by the Crown, or(ii)carried out by any person prescribed by the amended EP&ARegulation 1994 for the purposes of section 115M of that Act(as referred to in section 115H (a) of that Act) in relation toCrown building work,(d2)any development consisting of subdivision:(i) carried out by the Crown, or(ii)carried out by any person prescribed by the amended EP&ARegulation 1994 for the purposes of Section 115M of that Act(as referred to in section 115H (a) of that Act) in relation toCrown building work,(d3) any non-structural alterations to a building:(i)carried out by the Crown, or(ii)carried out by any person prescribed by the amended EP&ARegulation 1994 for the purposes of section 115M of that Act(as referred to in section 115H (a) of that Act) inrelation toCrown building work,(e)(f)any prohibited development, or(Repealed)(g) any activity within the meaning of <strong>Part</strong> 5 of the Act:(i)(ii)in respect of which an application for approval to a determiningauthority within the meaning of that <strong>Part</strong> has been made, butnot finally determined, immediately before the appointed day,orwhich was approved by a determining authority within themeaning of that <strong>Part</strong> before the appointed day and thatcommences pursuant to that approval not later than 3 yearsafter the appointed day.(3) Development to which this clause applies may not be carried out except with developmentconsent.(4) Development consent may not be granted in relation to development for aPage 14


prescribed activity that involves the erection of a building unless therequirements of Division 4 of <strong>Part</strong> 1 of Chapter 7 of the unamended LGAct 1993 have been complied with.(5) The requirements relating to the notification of proposed development underthe amended EP&A Act 1979 (including any requirements applied by clause32 (1)) do not apply to a development application for development for which therequirements referred to in subclause (4) are required to be complied with.(6) Subclauses (4) and (5) apply only if a local approvals policy (being a localapprovals policy with respect to the notification of applications for approvals) is in forceunder the unamended LG Act 1993 at the time the development application fordevelopment consent is made.(7) This clause has effect:(a)despite the existing provisions of any existing EPI, and(b) despite any rezoning of land (whether effected by existing new provisions ofan existing EPI or otherwise),but is otherwise subject to the provisions of any new EPI and to any newprovisions of an existing EPI(7A) Nothing in this clause requires development consent to be obtained for anydevelopment for which development consent is required to be obtained otherwise thanby operation of this clause.(8) The consent authority for the purposes of development to which this clauseapplies is the council unless, by or under the Act, some other person is the consentauthority for the purposes of that development.(9) Despite <strong>Part</strong> 9 of the amended EP&A Regulation 1994, the fee for anapplication to carry out development of the kind to which this clauseapplies, being the erection of a building within the meaning of theunamended LG Act 1993, is the fee determined in accordance with an orderunder clause 33.(10) (Repealed)(11)This clause ceases to have effect on 1 July 2001.Page 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!