13.07.2015 Views

the saddleback familyof pig breeds - Rare Breeds Survival Trust

the saddleback familyof pig breeds - Rare Breeds Survival Trust

the saddleback familyof pig breeds - Rare Breeds Survival Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ark|FeatureTHE SADDLEBACK FAMILY OF PIG BREEDSBy Lawrence Alderson, chairman of <strong>the</strong> RBST.Wessex sow from <strong>the</strong> midtwentiethcentury.The earliest referencesto belted <strong>pig</strong>s are foundin Italy with <strong>the</strong> Cintasenese first noted in <strong>the</strong>14th century, but <strong>the</strong>re isno evidence this was <strong>the</strong> origin of<strong>the</strong> colour pattern in Britain. In bo<strong>the</strong>astern and sou<strong>the</strong>rn counties ofEngland <strong>the</strong>re were old-fashioned,parti-coloured <strong>pig</strong>s that provided <strong>the</strong>foundation for <strong>the</strong> emergence ofbelted <strong>breeds</strong>. There are illustrationsof <strong>pig</strong>s with a white belt in Britainin <strong>the</strong> 18th century, but it was fixedfirst in a breed when a society wasfounded for <strong>the</strong> Wessex <strong>pig</strong> in 1918.The British Saddleback is arelatively young breed, having beenformed in 1967 by <strong>the</strong> amalgamationof <strong>the</strong> Essex and Wessex <strong>breeds</strong>,but <strong>the</strong> origins of <strong>the</strong>se parent<strong>breeds</strong> can be traced much deeperinto <strong>the</strong> early evolution of organisedlivestock breeding in Britain. It wasa union based almost exclusivelyon a common colour – a white belt.The two <strong>breeds</strong> were significantlydifferent in character (Davidson,1948), and many breeders of Wessex<strong>pig</strong>s regretted <strong>the</strong> move. It probablywas unnecessary from <strong>the</strong> Wessexpoint of view, as <strong>the</strong> Essex at thatstage was almost a redundant breed.Originally both <strong>the</strong>se belted<strong>breeds</strong>/types in <strong>the</strong> early 19thcentury were parti-coloured, largeand coarse. The type of <strong>the</strong> Essexwas altered radically by crosses withNeapolitan (Asian) <strong>pig</strong>s, and laterwith Berkshire and Large White, sothat it became a fatter early-maturingbreed. The Wessex originated from<strong>the</strong> Sussex and Hampshire (<strong>the</strong>latter was <strong>the</strong> origin of <strong>the</strong> AmericanHampshire through exports in <strong>the</strong>1820s), and its range stretched fromHampshire to Devon. It remaineda bigger, rangier type of <strong>pig</strong>, andprobably was influenced less byAsian <strong>pig</strong>s than any o<strong>the</strong>r breed. Ithad a significant influence on <strong>the</strong>development of several o<strong>the</strong>r belted<strong>breeds</strong> in Europe.Wessex influenceThe Angler Sattelschwein (Germany)originated from local Schleswigpied <strong>pig</strong>s crossed with <strong>the</strong> Wessex,but also with Landrace and Pietraininfluence. The Rotbuntes Schweinoriginated from red sports of AnglerSattelschwein circa 1900 plussome Tamworth influence. LocalWurttemburg <strong>pig</strong>s were crossed withBerkshire, Essex and Wessex in <strong>the</strong>late 19th and early 20th centuriesto form <strong>the</strong> Schwabisch-Hallisches(Germany). The Presticke, nowfound in <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic, wasdeveloped originally in <strong>the</strong> late 19thcentury involving some importsfrom Britain. However, <strong>the</strong> breedbecame relict and was regeneratedin <strong>the</strong> 1950s using mainly Wessexon local Bohemian <strong>saddleback</strong> <strong>pig</strong>s.There has been exchange of geneticmaterial between <strong>the</strong> <strong>saddleback</strong><strong>breeds</strong> in central Europe, with <strong>the</strong>strongest flow from Presticke toAngler Sattelschwien (as much as40%) and Schwabisch-Hallisches.The Krskopolje Saddleback, alocal type with some influence fromGerman Landrace and possiblyBerkshire and Large Black, is <strong>the</strong> onlynative <strong>pig</strong> breed in Slovenia. Despitegood litter size (c.11 born, 10 alive),it is severely endangered and isbeing displaced by white <strong>breeds</strong>. TheCinta senese (Tuscany) is ano<strong>the</strong>rold belted breed which is severelyendangered. It has been known formore than half a millennium, and isa rustic breed adapted to foragingboth on grassland and in woodland.There may have been some crossingwith Wessex <strong>pig</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> 1950s, but<strong>the</strong> Cinta senese remains a hardyunimproved breed.UsesThe hardiness and good breedingresults of <strong>the</strong> Wessex recommendedits use for crossing to producecommercial <strong>pig</strong>s for both pork andbacon, and <strong>the</strong> main use of <strong>the</strong>modern British Saddleback hasfollowed a similar pattern in <strong>the</strong>production of hybrid <strong>pig</strong>s. Sows,mated with a white breed, imparted<strong>the</strong>ir hardy foraging characteristicsto first-class blue crossbred sows foroutdoor systems. It was selected bymajor breeding companies as oneparent of commercial hybrid breedingsows (e.g. Camborough) becauseof its grazing ability, temperament,maternal qualities, and <strong>the</strong> levelof fatness which buffered <strong>the</strong>sow against outdoor conditions.Management questions are coveredin an interactive noticeboard on <strong>the</strong>website of <strong>the</strong> Breeders’ Club (BritishSaddleback Breeders’ Club, 2007)FecundityThe Wessex was noted for itsfecundity. Results from five native<strong>breeds</strong> in 1942 show it as <strong>the</strong> bestbreed (8.19 reared per litter) aheadof <strong>the</strong> Large White (7.85 rearedper litter) (Davidson, 1948). In thatyear <strong>the</strong> Large White notified 6182litters, and <strong>the</strong> Wessex 2347 litters.Thirty years later in <strong>the</strong> 1970s thissuperiority was maintained when<strong>the</strong> British Saddleback was a majorbreed. Its performance was on apar with that of <strong>the</strong> Large Blackand compared very favourably with<strong>breeds</strong> such as <strong>the</strong> Large Whiteand Hampshire (Table 1), partly asa result of larger litters and partlythrough better maternal qualities(Alderson, 1994). However,despite its undoubted qualities, itwas replaced in hybrid breedingsystems by <strong>the</strong> Duroc in 1991.Meat qualityThe British Saddleback is notedmore for <strong>the</strong> quality than <strong>the</strong>quantity of meat, and is fatter thanindustrial commercial <strong>pig</strong>s. Thisdistinction has been identified andaccentuated in <strong>the</strong> last fifty years,and is typical of <strong>the</strong> broader groupof minority <strong>pig</strong> <strong>breeds</strong> in <strong>the</strong> UK.However, fat from <strong>the</strong> Saddlebackand o<strong>the</strong>r native <strong>breeds</strong> is firmer,contains less waste, and is lesslikely to separate from <strong>the</strong> lean. Themost usual finished product for <strong>the</strong>quality market is a <strong>pig</strong> of 65-70 kgliveweight. Perhaps it is noteworthythat a comparative study takenat light bacon weight (62 kg)(Warriss et al, 1990) indicated that<strong>the</strong> carcase quality of <strong>the</strong> BritishSaddleback was less distinctivethan some o<strong>the</strong>r British rare<strong>breeds</strong> and was more similar to <strong>the</strong>Hampshire. The Hampshire has ahigher frequency than o<strong>the</strong>r belted<strong>breeds</strong> of <strong>the</strong> RN (‘acid meat’)gene, which affects meat quality(Enfalt et al, 1997), and it is hopedthis gene can be prevented fromentering <strong>the</strong> British Saddleback.Population and trendsAs noted above, <strong>the</strong> Wessex in<strong>the</strong> mid-20th century notifiedc.2500 litters each year. Even<strong>the</strong> year after <strong>the</strong> amalgamationwith <strong>the</strong> Essex (1968) <strong>the</strong>re were1342 registrations (218 boars,1124 gilts), but numbers wereTable 1: Comparative performance of four <strong>pig</strong> <strong>breeds</strong> 1972-1975 inclusive.BREED PIGS BORN PER LITTER PIGS REARED PER LITTERBritish Saddleback 10.53 9.20Large Black 10.49 9.18Large White 10.38 8.91Hampshire 9.20 8.07falling in <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong>20th century, and by 1975/6 only445 British Saddleback litters werenotified. Some of <strong>the</strong> reasons are notdifficult to find. The amalgamationof <strong>the</strong> Essex and Wessex knocked<strong>the</strong> enthusiasm and interest out ofmany breeders, and important herdswere dispersed. Swine VesicularDisease (SVD) in <strong>the</strong> early 1970scaused a ban on swill feeding onwhich many crossbred progeny of<strong>the</strong> British Saddleback were reared.The reputation of <strong>the</strong> breed wasbuilt on outdoor production systems,and suffered as <strong>the</strong> <strong>pig</strong> industrywas intensified, and eventually evenoutdoors it was replaced by <strong>the</strong>Duroc. Most rare <strong>pig</strong> <strong>breeds</strong> hit <strong>the</strong>irlow point in <strong>the</strong> 1970s, but <strong>the</strong> BritishSaddleback did not reach its nadiruntil <strong>the</strong> 1980s.RBST breed monitoringThe RBST began an annual surveyof native <strong>pig</strong> <strong>breeds</strong> in 1985, and<strong>the</strong> results show that <strong>the</strong> breedingpopulation of British Saddlebacksows had fallen to a low level and,despite a rally in <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s, <strong>the</strong>number of sows and replacementgilts apparently fell again <strong>the</strong>reafter(Figure 1). The causes of <strong>the</strong> dropin numbers from mid-1960s to early1990s were well understood, but itis more difficult to explain why <strong>the</strong>reshould have been a drop after 1997.A recovery should have coincidedwith <strong>the</strong> launch and development in1994 by RBST of <strong>the</strong> meat marketingscheme (TBMMS), as it did for o<strong>the</strong>rminority <strong>breeds</strong> such as <strong>the</strong> LargeBlack (Figure 1, over page).However, <strong>the</strong> reliability of resultsfrom breed surveys depends on <strong>the</strong>22 Autumn 2007 The Ark The Ark Autumn 200723


Ark|FeaturePhoto: Peter KingTable 2: Genetic distance between four European belted <strong>pig</strong> <strong>breeds</strong> derived from <strong>the</strong> Wessex.PR AS SH BSPR x .0782 .1543 .1003AS .0782 x .1705 .0936KEYPR = Presticke,AS = Angler SattelschweinSH = Schwabisch_HallischesBS = British Saddleback.SH .1543 .1705 x .1859BS .1003 .0936 .1859 xresponses received. The RBST nowuses annual female registrationsas <strong>the</strong> preferred indicator, and<strong>the</strong> results in 2003-2005 (average370 registrations pa) show thatsurvey numbers in <strong>the</strong> last fewyears probably have significantlyunderstated <strong>the</strong> true situation.The current population is c.600 sows.The RBST procedure of analysis ofannual female registrations will givean accurate picture in <strong>the</strong> future.Belted <strong>breeds</strong>The belted colour pattern is notexclusive to Europe, as it is seen onsome <strong>pig</strong>s in South-East Asia, andits origin is not clear. The genotypefor black belted <strong>pig</strong>s is E D i Be (E Dbeing <strong>the</strong> allele for dominant black,and i Be <strong>the</strong> allele for a white belt)(Alderson & Plastow, 2004), but<strong>the</strong> width of <strong>the</strong> belt is subject topolygenic and epistatic effects thatcan widen <strong>the</strong> belt to cover almost<strong>the</strong> whole body or eliminate italtoge<strong>the</strong>r. The history of <strong>the</strong> breedmight indicate that this shouldbe expected. Both <strong>the</strong> Sussexand Hampshire (ancestors of <strong>the</strong>Wessex) were variable in colour,The Traditional Pig Ark CompanySolidly built,galvanised metal,tanalised timber,polymer ends.Complete withfloor, skids andlifting hooks.Dry and cosy.8’ x 4’ - £325(suitable for 2 Kune Kune)8’ x 6’ - £3658’ x 8’ - £4258’ x 10’ - £475No VAT – Free Delivery(England and Wales)As supplied to River Cottage HQWe offer a personal delivery service on our own transportArks delivered ready for immediate occupation(no assembly required)Tel: 01884 860515Visit: www.<strong>pig</strong>-arks.comand crossing with <strong>the</strong> Neapolitaneliminated <strong>the</strong> belt of <strong>the</strong> Essex in<strong>the</strong> early stages of improvement.DNA analysesSeveral belted <strong>breeds</strong> were includedin a European project (PigBioDiv1),and most of <strong>the</strong>m are related tosome degree. Five <strong>breeds</strong> wereinfluenced to a varying degreeby <strong>the</strong> Wessex, namely BritishSaddleback (BS: UK), Hampshire(USA), Presticke (PR: Czech), AnglerSattelschwein (AS: Germany)and Schwabisch-Hallisches (SH:Germany), and genetic distancesderived from DNA analyses tendedto confirm <strong>the</strong> degree and recencyof this influence (Table 2). The leastrelated were <strong>the</strong> British Saddlebackand Schwabisch-Hallisches.The distances to <strong>the</strong> Cinta seneseand <strong>the</strong> Hampshire were greatestfor all o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>breeds</strong>. This was notunexpected for <strong>the</strong> Cinta senese, avery small isolated population whichstands out as <strong>the</strong> most distinctivebreed, but perhaps it was surprisingto find such a large genetic distancebetween <strong>the</strong> British Saddleback andHampshire and must be explained60050040030020010 00by <strong>the</strong>ir separation for manygenerations.Apart from its expected closerelationship to <strong>the</strong> Presticke andAngler Sattelschwein, <strong>the</strong>re wereinteresting indications of closerelationship of <strong>the</strong> British Saddlebackto particular Pietrain and Landracelines, and it was significantly moreclosely linked to <strong>the</strong> Duroc thanany o<strong>the</strong>r native British breed. Itpossesses several alleles whichare not found in o<strong>the</strong>r Britishminority <strong>breeds</strong>, but are found in <strong>the</strong>Duroc. It had <strong>the</strong> lowest betweenbreeddiversity (ie, <strong>the</strong> leastdistinctiveness) of all <strong>the</strong> minorityBritish <strong>breeds</strong> (Alderson, 2004), andgrading-up programmes will havebeen a significant causal factor.Despite a good spread of bloodlinesin <strong>the</strong> breed, attempts have beenmade to ‘improve’ <strong>the</strong> Saddlebackthrough grading-up. Several femalefamilies (Bountiful, Choice, Charm,Diana, Edloma, Electra, Hea<strong>the</strong>r,Hermione, Hilda, Joyful, Lassie,Lucina, Molly and Twinkle) and sirelines were involved, and this hasdetracted from <strong>the</strong> founder integrityof <strong>the</strong> breed.Figure 1: Population trend for BS and LB <strong>pig</strong>s 1988-2004breed survey three year rolling average for number of giltsretained per annum.BritishSaddlebackLargeBlack1988 1989 1990 19 91 1992 1993 199 4 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004As part of a broader study, relationshipswithin <strong>the</strong> British Saddleback wereanalysed more closely. Small numbersof Wessex and Essex <strong>pig</strong>s wereincluded. The Wessex results wereclearly distinctive from <strong>the</strong> main group,and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> conservation of <strong>the</strong>Wessex as a separate breed in Australiais an important programme. The Essexwas scattered randomly through <strong>the</strong>phylogenetic tree, suggesting that it hasnot survived as a distinct type within <strong>the</strong>current population. A by-product of thisstudy has been <strong>the</strong> development by RBSTof a breed DNA profile which enables <strong>the</strong>assignment of individual animals to <strong>the</strong>breed to be verified.ExportsThe influence of Wessex exports on <strong>the</strong>development of belted <strong>breeds</strong> in o<strong>the</strong>rcountries has been noted above. Whilethis trade expanded <strong>the</strong> ‘belted’ family, italso had a detrimental effect on <strong>the</strong> nativegenetic resources in those countries.A recent renewal of interest in exportscarries <strong>the</strong> same dangers. What effectwill <strong>the</strong> export of British Saddleback toBhutan in 2003 have on <strong>the</strong> native <strong>breeds</strong>?Similarly, it can be considered that <strong>the</strong>recent import of British Saddleback bybreeders of Schwabisch-Hallishes inGermany will change <strong>the</strong> native breed asit is not closely related to <strong>the</strong> British breed(Table 2). The desire to import rare <strong>breeds</strong>should be tempered with knowledge of<strong>the</strong> dangers, and exporting countries thathave ratified <strong>the</strong> CBD must ensure that<strong>breeds</strong> would not impact negatively onnative <strong>breeds</strong> in <strong>the</strong> receiving country(Strauss, 1994).Can lessons be learned?The creation and development of <strong>the</strong>British Saddleback provides many lessonsfrom which we can profit. In particular:1. Breed amalgamation. Unless <strong>the</strong> <strong>breeds</strong>concerned are very closely related <strong>the</strong>result may be <strong>the</strong> loss of one or bothgenotypes ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>ir preservation.The Essex/Wessex amalgamation probablywas an example.2. DNA profiling can help to identify<strong>breeds</strong>, and groups within a breed.The British Saddleback is less distinctivegenetically than some o<strong>the</strong>r native British<strong>breeds</strong>, and this might result from itsformation by amalgamation, or fromgrading-up programmes, or from illicitintrogression. However, <strong>the</strong> DNA results(albeit numerically small) show that <strong>the</strong>Wessex is a distinct breed currentlyconserved in Australia, whereas <strong>the</strong> Essexresults show no clear distinction from <strong>the</strong>main breed.3. Introgression, whe<strong>the</strong>r by gradingupor o<strong>the</strong>rwise, is unnecessary exceptin rare circumstances and potentiallydamaging for a native endangered breed.It compromises genetic integrity. RBSThas software to help <strong>the</strong> breeders’ club toidentify introgression by DNA profiling.4. Loss of popularity. Is it possible toidentify in advance factors which maylead to loss of popularity? The Essex/Wessex breed amalgamation was adeliberate policy, but could SVD and <strong>the</strong>intensification of <strong>pig</strong> production have beenanticipated and circumvented?5. Exporting a rare breed may endangernative <strong>breeds</strong> in <strong>the</strong> receiving country.The Schwabisch-Hallishes project is anexample of this danger.REFERENCESAlderson L. 1994.The Chance to Survive (3rdedition). 117.Alderson L. 2004.Diversity in European Pigs. ArkXXXII, 4, 28-33.Alderson GLH and PlastowGS. 2004.Use of DNA markers to assistwith product traceability andpedigree and <strong>the</strong>ir role in breedconservation. AGRI 35, 1-7.British SaddlebackBreeders’ Club.Website www.<strong>saddleback</strong>s.org.uk.Davidson HR. 1948.The Production and Marketing ofPigs. 332.Enfalt AC et al. 1997.Estimated frequency of <strong>the</strong> RNallelein Swedish Hampshire <strong>pig</strong>s.J. of An. Sci. 75, 11, 2924-2935.Strauss MS. 1994.Implications of <strong>the</strong> Convention onBiological Diversity. FAO workinggroup report.Warriss PD et al. 1990.The thickness and quality ofbackfat in various <strong>pig</strong> <strong>breeds</strong> and<strong>the</strong>ir relationship to intramuscularfat and <strong>the</strong> setting of joints from<strong>the</strong> carcase. Meat Science,28, 21-29.24 Autumn 2007 The Ark The Ark Autumn 200725

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!