13.07.2015 Views

Risk-Based Approach – Guidance for Money Service Businesses

Risk-Based Approach – Guidance for Money Service Businesses

Risk-Based Approach – Guidance for Money Service Businesses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Risk</strong>-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Approach</strong> – <strong>Guidance</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Money</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Businesses</strong> - July 2009 Agents that are unwilling to follow compliance program review recommendations, and there<strong>for</strong>esubject to probation, suspension or termination.Agents who fail to provide required originator in<strong>for</strong>mation upon request.Agents whose data collection is lax, sloppy or inconsistent.Agents willing to accept false identification.Agents willing to enter identification into records that contains false in<strong>for</strong>mation, non-existentaddresses that would be known to be non-existent to a person in that area, or phone numbers thatare used as fillers.Agents with a send-to-receive ratio that is not consistent with other agents in the locale or isconsistent with participation in a criminal transaction corridor.Agents whose seasonal business fluctuation is not consistent with other agents in the locale or isconsistent with participation in a criminal transaction corridor.Agents whose ratio of questionable or anomalous customers to customers who are not in suchgroups is out of the norm <strong>for</strong> comparable locations.Agents whose ratio of questionable or anomalous transactions to transactions that are not in suchsets is out of the norm <strong>for</strong> comparable locations.Variables That May Impact <strong>Risk</strong>115. A MSB‟s risk-based approach methodology may take into account risk variables specific tocertain categories of customers or transactions. These variables may increase or decrease the perceived riskposed by a particular customer or transaction and may include:The purpose of the transaction: transactions conducted primarily to facilitate traditional, lowdenominated consumer transactions may pose a lower risk than transactions conducted tofacilitate the movement of large quantities of cash.The type of transaction: a transaction sent by an individual <strong>for</strong> a commercial bill payment maypose a lower risk than a retail transaction conducted between two individuals.The method of sending or receiving the transaction: a non face-to-face transaction may pose ahigher risk than a transaction conducted in a face-to-face environment.The type of customer: a walk-in customer may pose a higher risk than a known customer withestablished transaction history and a long-standing relationship with the MSB and/or the agentlocation.The level of cooperation from the customer when asked to provide personal in<strong>for</strong>mation relatingto the nature of the transaction: customers who are <strong>for</strong>thcoming and readily provide crediblein<strong>for</strong>mation regarding the nature of the transaction when asked may pose a lower risk thancustomers who become irate or defensive or are unaware of in<strong>for</strong>mation that they would beexpected to know in the circumstances as they present them (such as the phone number of theperson to whom they are sending thousands of dollars).© 2009 FATF/OECD - 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!