Architectural Heritage Protection Guidelines for Planning Authorities6.8.13 Caution should be used when consideringproposals to demolish parts of protected andproposed protected structures as these parts maybe of importance to the cumulative historic interestof a building. Where partial demolition of aprotected structure is proposed, the onus should beon the applicant to make a case that the part –whether or not it is original to the structure – doesnot contribute to the special interest of the whole,or that the demolition is essential to the proposeddevelopment and will allow for the properconservation of the whole structure.6.8.15 Where a protected structure has suffered fire orother accidental damage and substantial demolitionis necessary, the elements that contribute to itsspecial interest that have survived should beretained in any reconstruction or repair. 266.8.16 The demolition of a protected structure or aproposed protected structure may be permitted if ithas become a dangerous structure. However, if aprotected structure has become dangerous, everyeffort should be made to retain its special interestby specifying works that limit, as far as possible,material damage or alteration to the character ofthe structure.CHAPTER 6 DEVELOPMENT CONTROLThe demolition of a building’s return can impact onneighbouring buildings alsoFaçade retention6.8.17 Façade retention, or the demolition of thesubstantive fabric of a protected structure behindthe principal elevation, is rarely an acceptablecompromise, as only in exceptional cases would thefull special interest of the structure be retained.Such cases may occur if the building had previouslybeen redeveloped behind the façade, in whichevent proposals for new redevelopment behind thefaçade could be favourably assessed, subject toreceiving adequate assurances on how the historicfabric would be protected during the works.Later extensions of littleinterest can be carefullydemolished withoutadverse impact on theprotected structure as withthis later stair tower addedto the rear of aneighteenth-century villa6.8.14 There may be cases where an existing addition is oflittle architectural quality, or is even damaging, tothe original architectural design. This may arise, forexample, where a porch addition has obscured afine entrance doorway or where a poor-qualityextension has unbalanced a good symmetricalfaçade. Partial demolition may be permitted in suchcases, providing it can be achieved without anyadverse structural or architectural impact on theprotected structure.The preservation of a façade, while permitting the demolitionof the remainder of the building, is rarely an acceptableapproach to conserving the architectural heritage6.8.18 Any such permitted redevelopment should relatefloor levels and room sizes to the fenestration of thefaçade, for example to avoid having open-plan officespace behind a Georgian façade that would bevisibly discordant seen from the exterior.26 See also <strong>Chapter</strong> 1695
Architectural Heritage Protection Guidelines for Planning AuthoritiesCHAPTER 6 DEVELOPMENT CONTROLOutline planning permission6.8.19 Outline planning permission cannot be granted forworks to a protected structure or proposedprotected structure . . 27 This does not preclude anoutline application for change of use, so long assuch change of use does not require anyconsequential works or otherwise have a materialeffect on the character of the structure.6.8.20 If outline planning permission was granted prior to1 January 2000 for works that would have a materialeffect on the character of a protected structure, theplanning authority should, in so far as possible,conform with the current legislative requirements toprotect the special interest of the structure when asubsequent application for approval is beingconsidered.Permission previously granted6.8.21 If full planning permission was granted fordevelopment relating to a structure that became aprotected structure on 1 January 2000, and it is stillvalid and all other relevant permissions, certificatesor licenses have been secured, the developer hasthe right to proceed with development. In caseswhere such development has not beencommenced, but would have an adverse effect onthe character of a structure that has become aprotected structure, and the developer is preparedto consider it, the planning authority could facilitatedevising alternative development proposals thatwould have a less negative effect. This may requirea further application for planning permission.on the impact of the proposed development on thestructure is included in the information available tothe public and the prescribed bodies 30 . It should benoted that planning authorities cannot carry outworks that would contravene their developmentplans, including objectives to protect thearchitectural heritage. 316.9.2 Works of maintenance and repair are not subject tothe public consultation requirements under Part 8of the Regulations, providing they would notmaterially affect the character of a protectedstructure or proposed protected structure. 32However, planning authorities should ensure thatwhere such works are being carried out to aprotected structure or a proposed protectedstructure, they are done in a sensitive andappropriate way. In such cases the detailedguidance given in Part 2 of these guidelines may beof assistance, or the planning authority could seekthe advice of the prescribed bodies, for example theHeritage Council. The Heritage Council has aparticular role in this regard by virtue of Section 10of the Heritage Act 1995.6.9 <strong>Development</strong> by a Planning Authoritywithin its own Functional Area(Part 8 <strong>Development</strong>s) 286.9.1 Where a planning authority proposes to carryout works to a protected structure or proposedprotected structure in its ownership and within itsown functional area, it must take the sameconsiderations into account as those expected ofprivate developers. Regard should be had to theseguidelines when preparing proposals for Part 8developments and other works. In addition toindicating on the site notice and the developmentproposal document that the development is to aprotected structure or proposed protected structureor the exterior of a building in an ACA, 29 theplanning authority should ensure that informationA planning authority should promote good standards of conservation indevelopment works to the protected structures in their ownership. Thisexample shows the junction between a successful modern addition andthe original local authority building96 27 Article 21 (b), 2001 Regulations29 Article 81 (2) (c), 2001 Regulations28 Section 179, 2000 Act and Part 8,2001 Regulations30 Article 82 (2), 2001 Regulations31 Section 178, 2000 Act32 Section 179 (6) (a), 2000 Act