13.07.2015 Views

Annotated List of Articles Published in the Journal of Dam Safety ...

Annotated List of Articles Published in the Journal of Dam Safety ...

Annotated List of Articles Published in the Journal of Dam Safety ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Subject terms: roller-compacted concrete, quality control, concrete, design, construction, test<strong>in</strong>g, gravitydams, embankment dams, rehabilitationL<strong>in</strong>don, Mat<strong>the</strong>w. The Little Deer Creek <strong>Dam</strong> Failure - A Forensic Review <strong>of</strong> a Fatality. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - W<strong>in</strong>ter 2004 (V. 2 N. 1)The comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> several deficiencies - <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>al design and exploratory test<strong>in</strong>g, m<strong>in</strong>imal sitepreparation, questionable construction quality, <strong>in</strong>sufficient bedrock preparation, poor conditions dur<strong>in</strong>gconstruction - likely caused <strong>the</strong> June 16, 1963 failure <strong>of</strong> Little Deer Creek <strong>Dam</strong>. On this date, a four-yearoldboy became <strong>the</strong> first dam failure casualty <strong>in</strong> Utah history.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: UtahSubject terms: failures, <strong>in</strong>cidents, legal aspects, seepage, design, foundations, construction, sitepreparation, site selection, embankment damsBruce, Donald A. Crisis management: deal<strong>in</strong>g with massive underflows <strong>in</strong> karstic limestone.<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2004 (V. 2 N. 2)<strong>Dam</strong>s must <strong>of</strong>ten be founded on karstic limestone terra<strong>in</strong>, or on o<strong>the</strong>r soluble rock types. Whereas it istypical practice to <strong>in</strong>stall a grout curta<strong>in</strong> under a new dam, such an operation cannot be guaranteed tocomprehensively treat a karstic rock mass to a degree that seepage under long term service conditionsmay not – eventually – result <strong>in</strong> channels be<strong>in</strong>g opened through features <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> karst filled with residualclay or o<strong>the</strong>r erodible or wea<strong>the</strong>red materials. This long term deterioration may be superimposed on anyshort term disturbance to <strong>the</strong> karstic terra<strong>in</strong> created by construction activities, such as blast<strong>in</strong>g,excavation, and <strong>the</strong> local alteration <strong>of</strong> piezometric levels. Grout curta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> virg<strong>in</strong> karst have a f<strong>in</strong>iteeffective life – <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> which depends on <strong>the</strong> rock mass characteristics, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity and quality <strong>of</strong>any grout<strong>in</strong>g conducted, and <strong>the</strong> prevail<strong>in</strong>g hydraulic gradients. Unfortunately, this life expectancy cannotbe reliably or precisely predicted.In recent years, major rehabilitations have been funded to a number <strong>of</strong> large and vital exist<strong>in</strong>g structuresowned by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Beaver <strong>Dam</strong>, AR; Walter F. George <strong>Dam</strong>, GA; andMississenewa <strong>Dam</strong>, IN. All have been protected by construct<strong>in</strong>g “positive” concrete cut <strong>of</strong>f walls –overlapp<strong>in</strong>g large diameter piles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Beaver <strong>Dam</strong>, diaphragm walls <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter <strong>in</strong>stances. Anotable exception to this pattern has been <strong>the</strong> repair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> Patoka Lake <strong>Dam</strong>, IN, where arelatively <strong>in</strong>novative grout curta<strong>in</strong> was selected on overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g cost reasons over a concrete wall.Similarly, <strong>the</strong> recent karst related seepage problem <strong>of</strong> a major TVA structure was also resolved by <strong>the</strong> use<strong>of</strong> contemporary grout<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples.Subject terms: grout<strong>in</strong>g, geology, seepage, <strong>in</strong>strumentation, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, design, rehabilitation, concrete,foundationsCaldwell, Larry. Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Ag<strong>in</strong>g Watershed <strong>Dam</strong>s: The 21st Century Challenge forWatershed Project Sponsors. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2004 (V. 2 N. 2)Watershed project sponsors spent <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20th century construct<strong>in</strong>g dams and apply<strong>in</strong>gconservation practices to protect people and reduce flood<strong>in</strong>g and erosion. Today, <strong>the</strong>y are challenged toassure <strong>the</strong>se ag<strong>in</strong>g dams cont<strong>in</strong>ue to function effectively while protect<strong>in</strong>g public health and safety through<strong>the</strong> 21st century. Congress authorized <strong>the</strong> USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) toassist communities <strong>in</strong> rehabilitat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir ag<strong>in</strong>g watershed dams when it enacted <strong>the</strong> WatershedRehabilitation Amendments <strong>of</strong> 2000. Considerable progress has been made <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g this newauthority. This is a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>of</strong> watershed project sponsors and <strong>the</strong> excellent partnershipbetween <strong>the</strong> sponsors, community leaders, NRCS, state conservation agencies, and state dam safety


agencies. As <strong>of</strong> March 2004, 118 watershed rehabilitation projects have been <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 20 states.Watershed rehabilitation efforts will not only ensure that watershed dams are safe and protect people <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> community, but that <strong>the</strong>y will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to provide flood control, recreation, and wildlife habitat forano<strong>the</strong>r 50 to 100 years. This report provides background on watershed rehabilitation, summarizesprogress on projects funded to date, estimates <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> requests for assistance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future andshares lessons learned on completed projects.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: federal programs, rehabilitation, age factors, embankment dams, legislation, benefitsRizzo, Paul C., Bair, Jeffrey M., Osterle, John P. and Gault, Howard W. Construction Dewater<strong>in</strong>g AtSaluda <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2004 (V. 2 N. 2)Saluda <strong>Dam</strong> (<strong>Dam</strong>), owned and operated by South Carol<strong>in</strong>a Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G),impounds Lake Murray, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> largest man-made lakes <strong>in</strong> North America. The <strong>Dam</strong> is a semihydraulicfill structure constructed <strong>in</strong> 1930 follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> typical "puddle dam" construction technology.This type <strong>of</strong> construction resulted <strong>in</strong> significant seepage through <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> upon fill<strong>in</strong>g, which requiredplacement <strong>of</strong> riprap benches and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>of</strong> an extensive network <strong>of</strong> seepage collection dra<strong>in</strong>s on<strong>the</strong> downstream slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> to control seepage after <strong>in</strong>itial construction.The <strong>Dam</strong> is be<strong>in</strong>g remediated to meet changes <strong>in</strong> earthquake safety criteria as directed by <strong>the</strong> FederalEnergy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The remediation consists <strong>of</strong> a 5,500-foot-long Rockfill Berm anda 2,200-foot-long Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) Berm on <strong>the</strong> downstream slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Dam</strong>.Both <strong>the</strong> RCC Berm and <strong>the</strong> Rockfill Berm will serve as <strong>the</strong> primary water retention barrier <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong>an earthquake <strong>in</strong>duced failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Dam</strong>. Both require a highly competent foundation with <strong>the</strong>RCC Berm founded on rock. Therefore, extensive foundation excavations <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> residual soil orbedrock encountered at <strong>the</strong> toe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Dam</strong> are required to facilitate construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Berms.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: South Carol<strong>in</strong>aSubject terms: dewater<strong>in</strong>g, case studies, slope stability, design, roller-compacted concrete, seismicanalysis, seismic behavior, rehabilitationF<strong>in</strong>dlay, R. Craig and Rabasca, Steve. Diversion dam: seismic stability and seepageassessment/rehabilitation. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2004 (V. 2 N. 3)Diversion <strong>Dam</strong>, located <strong>in</strong> Croghan New York is an embankment dam that is a component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>of</strong>tMaple Hydroelectric development. The development is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Beaver River Project, owned andoperated by Reliant Energy. At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> this writ<strong>in</strong>g, Brascan is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> purchas<strong>in</strong>g this and<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r New York State hydro assets <strong>of</strong> Reliant Energy. The dam is under <strong>the</strong> regulatory jurisdiction <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The dam is approximately 900 feet long at <strong>the</strong> crestand is about 70 feet high, and has a high hazard classification under FERC Guidel<strong>in</strong>es. The dam wasconstructed between 1924 and 1925 us<strong>in</strong>g hydraulic fill techniques. The hydraulic fill method <strong>of</strong>embankment construction, commonly used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20th century, generally results <strong>in</strong> looserdensity fill than would o<strong>the</strong>rwise be achieved by modern compacted lift-fill placement methods. Because<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loose character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fill, saturated portions <strong>of</strong> hydraulic fill dams may be susceptible toliquefaction triggered by seismic shak<strong>in</strong>g. This paper reviews <strong>the</strong> most recent seismic stabilityassessment <strong>of</strong> Diversion dam and discusses <strong>the</strong> seismic rehabilitation that was completed <strong>in</strong> late 2002.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: New YorkSubject terms: seepage analysis, seepage control, seismic analysis, seismic behavior, dra<strong>in</strong>age systems,rehabilitation, embankment dams


Jamieson, Stephen L., France, John W. and Perri, Peter P. CM/GC construction <strong>of</strong> Guanella <strong>Dam</strong>.<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2004 (V. 2 N. 3)Paper describes <strong>the</strong> fast-track design, permitt<strong>in</strong>g, and construction approach that was utilized to developa new water supply reservoir for <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Golden, Colorado. The fast-track approach resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire project <strong>in</strong> a little more than one year, which was two years ahead <strong>of</strong> schedule.Innovative approaches and <strong>the</strong> cooperation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SEO, contractor, eng<strong>in</strong>eer, and owner were requiredbecause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g drought <strong>in</strong> Colorado, which essentially shut down Golden's water supply at itsmost severe period dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> late summer <strong>of</strong> 2002. Guanella <strong>Dam</strong> is a high hazard potential, <strong>of</strong>fchannel,zoned-embankment dam with a maximum vertical height <strong>of</strong> 34'.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: ColoradoSubject terms: design, construction, permits, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigations, seepage control, case studies,embankment damsSchultz, Mark. <strong>Dam</strong> performance dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> San Simeon earthquake. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -Summer 2004 (V. 2 N. 3)On December 22, 2003, a M6.5 earthquake occurred near California's central coast, seven milesnor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> San Simeon. This was <strong>the</strong> largest earthquake <strong>in</strong> California s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 1999 M7.1 Hector M<strong>in</strong>eearthquake. Only four o<strong>the</strong>r earthquakes, s<strong>in</strong>ce 1906, caused more expensive damage. Shak<strong>in</strong>g was feltup and down <strong>the</strong> California coast, from <strong>the</strong> Bay Area to Los Angeles, with cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g moderateaftershocks as large as M4.9. <strong>Dam</strong>s, roads, bridges, and o<strong>the</strong>r modern <strong>in</strong>frastructure generallyperformed very well <strong>in</strong> this seismic event. The majority <strong>of</strong> damage occurred <strong>in</strong> Paso Robles, where 40build<strong>in</strong>gs collapsed, or were severely damaged, and two fatalities tragically resulted. Federal, state, andlocal disasters were declared. Approximately 1,500 homes suffered m<strong>in</strong>or damage, and approximately500 homes and bus<strong>in</strong>esses were seriously damaged. About 60,000 homes lost power. Twelve stateregulateddams, one Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers (ACOE) dam, and seven small military dams experiencedstrong shak<strong>in</strong>g with an estimated peak ground acceleration greater than 0.10g. Paper summarizes damperformance and damages to various structures.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: CaliforniaSubject terms: earthquakes, seismic analysis, seismic behaviorJohnson, Brian S. Performance-based design <strong>of</strong> an urban spillway. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall2004 (V. 2 N. 4)The Standley Lake <strong>Dam</strong> Improvement Project began <strong>in</strong> 1999 to help ensure that <strong>the</strong> dam successfullytransitions to address <strong>the</strong> changes that have occurred over its 96 years <strong>of</strong> operation. A significantembankment raise <strong>in</strong> 1965, suburban development, advances <strong>in</strong> dam eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g technology, and<strong>in</strong>creased local, state, and federal regulations have all contributed to <strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>facility as a critical regional resource for ano<strong>the</strong>r 50 to 100 years. This paper describes <strong>the</strong> project, whichwas completed <strong>in</strong> October 2004.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: ColoradoSubject terms: spillways, design, spillway capacity, hydrology, design flood, developmentSchellhammer, Chris, Roberts, Thomas I. and McClellan, Phillip. Prepar<strong>in</strong>g EAPs for <strong>the</strong> 21stCentury: How <strong>Dam</strong> Owners are rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bar for EAPs by <strong>in</strong>stitut<strong>in</strong>g technological growth.<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2004 (V. 2 N. 4)


Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g practices and regulatory enforcement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam safety arena have significantly evolved over<strong>the</strong> last 25 years. The methods, technologies, and capabilities for design<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g dams are farahead <strong>of</strong> where <strong>the</strong>y were 25 years ago. With <strong>in</strong>novative technologies, dam owners can now utilizecomputers for real time monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir dams. These technological systems can also be used as aresource for Emergency Action Plans (EAPs). However, it can be argued that <strong>the</strong>se technologicaladvances are underutilized. For example, <strong>in</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong>ia less than 10 percent <strong>of</strong> dams are equipped withmonitor<strong>in</strong>g electronics.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, U.S.Subject terms: EAPs, emergency management, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>strumentationToml<strong>in</strong>son, Ed, Jarrett, Robert D. , Parzybok, Tye and Trieste, Doug. Reanalysis <strong>of</strong> a ColoradoExtreme Ra<strong>in</strong>storm Us<strong>in</strong>g GIS, Pale<strong>of</strong>lood, and Ra<strong>in</strong>fall-Run<strong>of</strong>f Analyses. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -Fall 2004 (V. 2 N. 4)Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) studies are based primarily on analyses <strong>of</strong> extreme ra<strong>in</strong>stormswhere <strong>the</strong> largest historic ra<strong>in</strong>fall observations are used to determ<strong>in</strong>e PMP values for <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>gregions. The October 4-6, 1911, ra<strong>in</strong>storm over <strong>the</strong> southwestern US produced large ra<strong>in</strong>fall amountsand significant flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Colorado. The daily ra<strong>in</strong>fall observation <strong>of</strong> 8.05 <strong>in</strong>ches at Gladstone, Colorado,was significantly larger than o<strong>the</strong>r ra<strong>in</strong>fall observations for <strong>the</strong> storm, especially consider<strong>in</strong>g Gladstone isat an elevation <strong>of</strong> 10,400 feet. Previous site-specific PMP studies for dra<strong>in</strong>age bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> southwesternColorado have considered this storm and consistently concluded that, although widespreadmoderate/heavy ra<strong>in</strong>s occurred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong> maximum daily precipitation value <strong>of</strong> 8.05 <strong>in</strong>chesreported at Gladstone is most likely <strong>in</strong> error, although <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> error is not known (McKee andDoeskens, 1997). Because <strong>of</strong> its <strong>in</strong>fluence on several site-specific PMP studies currently be<strong>in</strong>gcompleted for dra<strong>in</strong>age bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> western Colorado, a re-analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gladstone ra<strong>in</strong>fall observationwas performed us<strong>in</strong>g detailed storm ra<strong>in</strong>fall analyses, pale<strong>of</strong>lood analysis, and ra<strong>in</strong>fall-run<strong>of</strong>f model<strong>in</strong>gresults. The ma<strong>in</strong> conclusion is that <strong>the</strong> 1911 Gladstone observation is an error and should not to beused <strong>in</strong> subsequent hydrometeorological studies. After extensive review, <strong>the</strong> Colorado State Eng<strong>in</strong>eer'sOffice has accepted this conclusion (Colorado SEO, written communication, September 23, 2004). Thesignificance <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1911 Gladstone ra<strong>in</strong>fall observation is that it causes <strong>the</strong> PMP values <strong>of</strong>southwestern Colorado bas<strong>in</strong>s to be overestimated by about 25 percent.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: ColoradoSubject terms: geographic <strong>in</strong>formation systems, PMP, PMF, hydrologyBliss, Mark. Jet Grout<strong>in</strong>g for Seismic Remediation <strong>of</strong> Wickiup <strong>Dam</strong>, Oregon. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2005 (V. 3 N. 1)To prevent failure due to strong ground shak<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g a seismic event, <strong>the</strong> U.S. Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamationundertook a three-year project to modify Wickiup <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>in</strong> west-central Oregon. Analyses showed thatlow-density materials, susceptible to liquefaction under strong ground shak<strong>in</strong>g, were present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> left abutment dike. A multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary team composed <strong>of</strong> geotechnical eng<strong>in</strong>eers,geologists, construction eng<strong>in</strong>eers, and experts <strong>in</strong> value eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g completed a Corrective ActionAlternatives scop<strong>in</strong>g study <strong>in</strong> January 1999. This study <strong>in</strong>dicated that jet grout<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundationmaterials could be <strong>the</strong> least-cost alternative to stabilize <strong>the</strong> soils and prevent failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam understrong ground shak<strong>in</strong>g. Because <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> historical <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential cost andeffectiveness <strong>of</strong> jet grout<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> weak materials <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam, a jet grout<strong>in</strong>g testsection was constructed. The test section proved <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> jet grout<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> treat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> requiredzones and answered Reclamation's questions about potential costs; thus, jet grout<strong>in</strong>g was selected as <strong>the</strong>preferred alternative. Follow<strong>in</strong>g preparation <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al designs and a two-step negotiated contract process,a construction contract was awarded to Hayward-Baker Inc. <strong>in</strong> July 2001.


Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: OregonSubject terms: research, overtopp<strong>in</strong>g, embankment dams, erosion, vegetation, test<strong>in</strong>gDewoolkar, Mandar M. , Huzjak, Robert J. and Castro, Gonzalo. Application <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ite elementanalysis <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> geotechnical design aspects <strong>of</strong> a new earth dam. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g2005 (V. 3 N. 1)Construction is underway for a new, zoned earthfill dam designed by GEI Consultants, Inc. The project isknown as Rueter-Hess <strong>Dam</strong> and Reservoir, and is be<strong>in</strong>g developed by <strong>the</strong> Parker Water & SanitationDistrict (PWSD). The new dam will have a height above <strong>the</strong> streambed <strong>of</strong> 135 feet and a crest length <strong>of</strong>approximately 5,000 feet. The project will provide raw water storage to meet current and future municipaland <strong>in</strong>dustrial water needs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> PWSD service area. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Colorado State Eng<strong>in</strong>eer’s Office(SEO 1988), <strong>the</strong> dam is classified as a Large, Class I (high hazard potential) dam based on its size andrelative risk to population and <strong>in</strong>frastructure downstream. The dam and reservoir will be located east <strong>of</strong>Interstate Highway 25 <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern Douglas County, Colorado, approximately 3.4 miles southwest <strong>of</strong>downtown Parker on Newl<strong>in</strong> Gulch, which is a tributary <strong>of</strong> Cherry Creek.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: ColoradoSubject terms: federal programs, seismic analysis, seismic behavior, earthquakes, rehabilitation, casestudies, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigations, geology, grout<strong>in</strong>gHanson, Greg, Morris, Mark, Vask<strong>in</strong>n, Kjetil, Temple, Darrel, Hassan, Mohamed and Hunt, Sherry.Research Activities on <strong>the</strong> Erosion Mechanics <strong>of</strong> Overtopped Embankment <strong>Dam</strong>s. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2005 (V. 3 N. 1)The asset value <strong>of</strong> dams and flood defense structures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US, EU, and around <strong>the</strong> world amounts tobillions <strong>of</strong> dollars. Many dams are located close to centers <strong>of</strong> population and <strong>in</strong>dustry, and <strong>the</strong>consequences <strong>of</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se structures <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> both loss <strong>of</strong> life and property. Erosion as aresult <strong>of</strong> overtopp<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g flood events has been identified as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key causes <strong>of</strong> embankmentdam failure. This report presents a discussion <strong>of</strong> small-scale and prototype research experiments thathave recently been, or are be<strong>in</strong>g, conducted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US, <strong>the</strong> United K<strong>in</strong>gdom (UK), and Norway on ear<strong>the</strong>nembankment overtopp<strong>in</strong>g. The objective <strong>of</strong> this research is to advance <strong>the</strong> scientific knowledge andunderstand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> breach<strong>in</strong>g by: (1) evaluat<strong>in</strong>g erosion processes; (2) determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g breach erosion rates;and (3) collect<strong>in</strong>g data for breach model development and verification.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S., Norway, United K<strong>in</strong>gdomSubject terms: research, overtopp<strong>in</strong>g, embankment dams, erosion, vegetation, test<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>ternationalprogramsKuperman, Selmo C., Moretti, M. Reg<strong>in</strong>a, Cifu, Sergio, Celest<strong>in</strong>o, Tarcisio B., Re, Giacomo,Zoellner, Klaus, P<strong>in</strong>fari, Julio, Rossetto, Serfio L.G., Carneiro, Edvaldo F. and Reigada, Ruitter P.Criteria to establish limit values <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>strumentation read<strong>in</strong>gs for old embankment and concretedams. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2005 (V. 3 N. 2)Hydropower plants and facilities owned by CESP- (Companhia Energética de São Paulo, Brazil) are morethan 30 years old. They are <strong>the</strong> Ilha Solteira, Jaguari, Eng . Souza Dias (Jupia) and Paraibuna powerplants as well as <strong>the</strong> Parait<strong>in</strong>ga dam. The history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir behavior has been compiled and recorded bymeans <strong>of</strong> periodic <strong>in</strong>spections and read<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong>strumentation. As is <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> case with olddams, and even with new ones, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struments did not have limit values established forevaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir read<strong>in</strong>gs, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> piezometers <strong>in</strong>stalled to check <strong>the</strong> uplift pressures at <strong>the</strong>


foundations <strong>of</strong> concrete structures. This paper presents a method developed to establish "limit values" for<strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> almost 2300 monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>in</strong>stalled at <strong>the</strong>se five large concrete, earthfill androckfill dams and how <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>struments relate to <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structures. The criteria, based on ablend <strong>of</strong> statistics and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g judgment <strong>in</strong>dicates that "attention" or "alert" conditions are reachedwhen calculated reference values for read<strong>in</strong>gs are exceeded, or when measurements start to <strong>in</strong>dicate atrend different from a pattern established throughout <strong>the</strong> years. Basic statistics pr<strong>in</strong>cipals were applied.Easy to use, <strong>the</strong> methodology was developed after a thorough reevaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>strumentation andstructural safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se dams. Establish<strong>in</strong>g limit values made <strong>the</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g process more reliable andhelped CESP to change <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>gs and to reduce costs.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: BrazilSubject terms: <strong>in</strong>strumentation, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>ternational programs, concrete dams, embankment dams,rockfill dams, stability analysisMayfield, Sarah M. Public Efforts for <strong>the</strong> Public Good. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2005 (V. 3N. 2)"The state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> states" -- a look at state dam safety programs, policies, and events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past year.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: state programs, emergency management, rehabilitation, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects, failures,<strong>in</strong>cidents, legislation, floodsToms, Ed, Poulter, Don, Erthal, Norman B., Koopman, Henry and Laudeman, Steve. Concrete archdam post-tension<strong>in</strong>g - Tarryall <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2005 (V. 3 N. 2)Tarryall <strong>Dam</strong> - located approximately eighteen miles sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> Jefferson, Colorado - is a highhazard,70-foot high, concrete arch dam, with a right concrete gravity abutment. The dam wasconstructed <strong>in</strong> 1929 and is owned and operated by <strong>the</strong> Colorado Division <strong>of</strong> Wildlife. The reservoir coversapproximately 160 acres at <strong>the</strong> normal water surface elevation <strong>of</strong> 8,860 feet. The dam has a 270-footlong crest at elevation <strong>of</strong> 8867.2 feet, two 42-<strong>in</strong>ch steel outlet pipes, and a 25-foot wide uncontrolled rockcutspillway located along <strong>the</strong> left abutment. The dam has experienced seepage at <strong>the</strong> right abutment for<strong>the</strong> last 40 years. Cracks along horizontal cold jo<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> concrete and prelim<strong>in</strong>ary stability calculations<strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> dam, from right <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam maximum section to <strong>the</strong> right abutment, was not stable.This right section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam was also exhibit<strong>in</strong>g downstream displacement at <strong>the</strong> lift jo<strong>in</strong>ts. BoyleEng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Corporation performed an <strong>in</strong>itial dam and site evaluation, prepared an alternatives study,developed f<strong>in</strong>al design for remediation, and provided construction quality assurance services for <strong>the</strong>project. The follow<strong>in</strong>g presents a summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stability, design, and construction issues for <strong>the</strong>remediation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam and how Boyle addressed <strong>the</strong>se issues through collaboration and teamwork with<strong>the</strong> Colorado Division <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and <strong>the</strong> Colorado State Eng<strong>in</strong>eer’s Office.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: ColoradoSubject terms: concrete dams, arch dams, design, rehabilitation, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects, crack<strong>in</strong>g, stabilityanalysis, jo<strong>in</strong>ts, foundations, geology, test<strong>in</strong>g, anchor<strong>in</strong>g, seepageGlenn, Mark, Boland, Thomas E. and Orner, Mat<strong>the</strong>w R. Waterpro<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a gravity masonry dam.<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2005 (V. 3 N. 3)Located <strong>in</strong> central Pennsylvania, <strong>the</strong> Tipton <strong>Dam</strong> is a gravity masonry dam used for water supply andowned by <strong>the</strong> Altoona City Authority. Orig<strong>in</strong>ally constructed <strong>in</strong> 1924 by <strong>the</strong> Pennsylvania Railroad, <strong>the</strong>dam is 515 feet long and 71 feet high with a storage capacity <strong>of</strong> 320 million gallons. Inspections revealed


spall<strong>in</strong>g concrete (crest and spillway caps), exposed re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g steel, deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g jo<strong>in</strong>ts, masonry jo<strong>in</strong>tleakage, <strong>in</strong>operable sluice gates and clogged screens. An underwater <strong>in</strong>spection was performed on <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>take structure; 24-<strong>in</strong>ch diameter <strong>in</strong>take l<strong>in</strong>e; 36-<strong>in</strong>ch diameter blow-<strong>of</strong>f pipe; associated valves andsluice gates and upstream dam face/masonry jo<strong>in</strong>ts. Videography showed that <strong>the</strong> sluice gates (two 24-<strong>in</strong>ch diameter and one 36-<strong>in</strong>ch diameter) and operators, although deteriorated, could be refurbished.Crest and spillway caps were repaired, reset and covered with a cementitious coat<strong>in</strong>g system. Thedeteriorated concrete was removed and new pressure mortar surfac<strong>in</strong>g ("shotcrete") placed to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al cap shape. Cap construction jo<strong>in</strong>ts were cleaned and recaulked with new seal<strong>in</strong>gcompounds. Exposed concrete surfaces were coated with a cementitious waterpro<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>g system. Thiswork also improved <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tics and overall appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam. The upstream dam face wascovered with a two-<strong>in</strong>ch thick, fiber-re<strong>in</strong>forced, air-entra<strong>in</strong>ed, shotcrete to seal all jo<strong>in</strong>ts and protect <strong>the</strong>stone masonry blocks. The surfac<strong>in</strong>g was applied by equipment mounted on barges. By this seal<strong>in</strong>gmethod, <strong>the</strong> seepage through <strong>the</strong> downstream mortar jo<strong>in</strong>ts was effectively abated.The gates were removed, shop cleaned, coated and re<strong>in</strong>stalled by divers. The operator stems, stemguides and trash racks were replaced with sta<strong>in</strong>less steel material. Underwater clean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gatebodies was performed <strong>in</strong> place by high pressure water and pneumatic clean<strong>in</strong>g tools. To ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> waterstorage levels, <strong>the</strong> work to correct <strong>the</strong>se deficiencies was done by underwater and float<strong>in</strong>g platformmethods.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: PennsylvaniaSubject terms: gravity dams, seepage, rehabilitation, concrete dams, design, construction, case studies,gates, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspectsHorn, Richard. Cut-earth cradle method for <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g conduits through earth dams. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2005 (V. 3 N. 3)A method <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g pipe conduits <strong>in</strong> earth embankment dams, without use <strong>of</strong> concrete cradles or o<strong>the</strong>rdevices, has been successfully used on three dams <strong>in</strong> West Virg<strong>in</strong>ia s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994 (Anawalt Lake, SouthSand Branch, and Chatham Lake dams). Compaction was achieved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth material surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>pipe prior to plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pipe. Each pipe was <strong>in</strong>stalled on a yield<strong>in</strong>g foundation that can move with <strong>the</strong>normal settlement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam embankment. The pipe materials used at <strong>the</strong> three dams <strong>in</strong>clude DuctileIron (DIP), High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) and re<strong>in</strong>forced concrete pipe (RCP). A fourth dam iscurrently under construction us<strong>in</strong>g this technique. This method may be considered as an alternative<strong>in</strong>stallation method where conditions and construction methods are appropriate.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: West Virg<strong>in</strong>iaSubject terms: conduits, embankment dams, design, construction, case studiesNewhouse, Scott G. Can you build a dam on a permeable foundation? <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -Fall 2005 (V. 3 N. 3)This article presents <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> an earth dam <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast US built on a permeable foundation. Thearticle presents <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g aspects <strong>of</strong> design, construction, first-fill<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>the</strong> dam's performance <strong>in</strong>service. Early <strong>in</strong> first fill<strong>in</strong>g, before <strong>the</strong> lake was even half full, <strong>the</strong> dam showed significant seepage.Construction <strong>of</strong> dams on permeable soils is <strong>of</strong>ten necessary, and, <strong>the</strong>refore, relatively common. Avoid<strong>in</strong>gseepage- related problems generally depends upon <strong>the</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer recogniz<strong>in</strong>g a permeable foundationand design<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dam accord<strong>in</strong>gly. The dam's behavior-- good or bad- -depends on <strong>the</strong> measures takento accommodate seepage. A dam's behavior depends on <strong>the</strong> permeability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundation, andmeasures such as a seepage cut-<strong>of</strong>f and filter/-dra<strong>in</strong> protection. Higher foundation permeability generallymeans higher potential for problems at <strong>the</strong> downstream toe. This article presents a case historysupport<strong>in</strong>g and illustrat<strong>in</strong>g this contention, and exam<strong>in</strong>es o<strong>the</strong>r dams where design did and did notaccommodate permeable foundation conditions.


Subject terms: foundations, design, construction, seepage, case studies, failures, <strong>in</strong>cidents, geotechnical<strong>in</strong>vestigations, pip<strong>in</strong>gLarson, Eric, Wilkes, John and Dreese, Trent. Geomembrane Installation at Salt Spr<strong>in</strong>gs CFRD<strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - W<strong>in</strong>ter 2006 (V. 4 N. 1)Salt Spr<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>Dam</strong>, owned by Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) is <strong>the</strong> fifth oldest Concrete Faced Rockfill<strong>Dam</strong> (CFRD) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world and <strong>the</strong> first CFRD to reach 328 ft. (100 m) <strong>in</strong> height. It is located <strong>in</strong> California,south and east <strong>of</strong> Sacramento, high <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sierra Nevada Mounta<strong>in</strong> Range. In <strong>the</strong> 1930s, construction <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> dam was halted at about mid-height due to w<strong>in</strong>ter wea<strong>the</strong>r. When rock placement resumed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>spr<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> lift height was reduced and sluic<strong>in</strong>g techniques were improved to ga<strong>in</strong> better consolidation.These changes created a zone <strong>of</strong> differential settlement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam where <strong>the</strong> concrete face has requiredcont<strong>in</strong>ual repairs over its 70+ year history. In 2001, seepage <strong>in</strong> this zone <strong>in</strong>creased significantly,exceed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> limit set by <strong>the</strong> California Department <strong>of</strong> Water Resources, Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>s.Immediately, and at considerable expense, PG&E hired divers to make temporary repairs as it began to<strong>in</strong>vestigate how to permanently fix <strong>the</strong> upstream face at Salt Spr<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>Dam</strong>. The conclusion was to <strong>in</strong>stalla PVC geomembrane system over <strong>the</strong> upstream face with <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g seepage to 12 cfs (340l/s). The work was done <strong>in</strong> two phases. In <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 2004, Phase I repairs began with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stallation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CARPI geomembrane system over <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> face <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so called “transition zone” tomitigate <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> significant seepage <strong>in</strong>creases, as occurred <strong>in</strong> 2001.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: CaliforniaSubject terms: rockfill dams, concrete, design, construction, temperature, seepage, rehabilitation,underwater <strong>in</strong>vestigations, seepage analysis, geosyn<strong>the</strong>ticsSwaisgood, James R., Montgomery, Dr. Jerry and K<strong>of</strong>oed, Val O., P.E. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g Seepage through<strong>the</strong> River Reservoir <strong>Dam</strong> No. 3. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - W<strong>in</strong>ter 2006 (V. 4 N. 1)The first step <strong>in</strong> address<strong>in</strong>g a problem with seepage is p<strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g its source. In <strong>the</strong> past, procedures fordeterm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> exact location and nature <strong>of</strong> seepage flows have been both costly and time consum<strong>in</strong>g.The approach to an emergency situation at River Reservoir No. 3, an arched ear<strong>the</strong>n structure on <strong>the</strong>headwaters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Little Colorado River, proves that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> sound eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g consult<strong>in</strong>g andmodern technologies can save time and money <strong>in</strong> response to emergencies.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: ArizonaSubject terms: seepage, embankment dams, geophysical <strong>in</strong>vestigations, emergency management,rehabilitation, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects, design, constructionToms, Ed, Poulter, Don, Samandi, Sam and Yonikas, Pat. Overholser <strong>Dam</strong>-Ambursen StructureRehabilitation. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - W<strong>in</strong>ter 2006 (V. 4 N. 1)Overholser <strong>Dam</strong> is a 125-foot-high (38.1m), 1,200-foot-long (366m) Ambursen structure constructed <strong>in</strong>1916 used for flood control and water supply for Oklahoma City. <strong>Safety</strong> issues discovered dur<strong>in</strong>g rout<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>spection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spillway section <strong>in</strong>cluded: 1) buttress wall cont<strong>in</strong>uous cracks, 2) foundation seepage, 3)upstream shell seepage, 4) excessive upstream shell sediment load<strong>in</strong>g, and 5) concrete deterioration.Issues complicat<strong>in</strong>g project design and construction <strong>in</strong>cluded: 1) methods for dewater<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>dam to m<strong>in</strong>imize impacts to <strong>the</strong> City’s water supply, 2) <strong>in</strong>creased water supply treatment costs due todim<strong>in</strong>ished water quality directly related to <strong>the</strong> lower reservoir level, 3) construction schedul<strong>in</strong>g tom<strong>in</strong>imize water supply and potential flood<strong>in</strong>g impacts, 4) construction methods to enable competitive bidsfrom local contractors, 5) local, state, and federal environmental regulatory requirements to protectwetlands and aquatic habitats, and 6) preserv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> historical aes<strong>the</strong>tics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure.


Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: OklahomaSubject terms: concrete dams, crack<strong>in</strong>g, foundations, seepage, concrete, design, construction,dewater<strong>in</strong>g, environment, historical <strong>in</strong>terest, regulationsB<strong>in</strong>gham, William B., Kelly, Thomas A. and Sorrell, Susan A. The ASDSO Peer Review Program.<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2006 (V. 4 N. 2)In <strong>the</strong> mid-1980's, many adm<strong>in</strong>istrators <strong>of</strong> state dam safety programs were look<strong>in</strong>g for ways to improve<strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir programs, and raise awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se programs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irlarger state departments. At <strong>the</strong> time, state dam safety program budgets were fac<strong>in</strong>g severe competitionfor scarce state dollars. Many dam safety program adm<strong>in</strong>istrators believed that a rigorous method <strong>of</strong>assess<strong>in</strong>g and validat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir policies and practices, if performed by an outsideentity, would help accomplish three objectives: (1) Improve <strong>the</strong>ir programs; (2) Raise <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong>awareness and respect for <strong>the</strong> dam safety program among budget decision-makers, and (3) Help developstronger legislative authority. Through <strong>the</strong> cooperative efforts <strong>of</strong> ASDSO and <strong>the</strong> Interagency Committeeon <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>, a committee <strong>of</strong> six <strong>in</strong>dividuals from state dam safety programs, electric utilities, andeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g firms developed a program to assist <strong>the</strong> state dam safety regulators <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>seobjectives. The result<strong>in</strong>g program (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a manual to document <strong>the</strong> process) was presented toASDSO for adoption. The ASDSO Board <strong>of</strong> Directors adopted <strong>the</strong> proposed "Peer Review Program," andsought volunteer states to test it. In <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 1990, <strong>the</strong> states <strong>of</strong> New Mexico, Tennessee, andWiscons<strong>in</strong> signed up for peer reviews. Based on <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reviews <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three states, ASDSObegan <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g peer reviews as a regular service to states <strong>in</strong> 1992. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1990, ASDSO has completedpeer reviews <strong>in</strong> 25 states and Puerto Rico. Six <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se states have undergone <strong>the</strong> review process twice,which fur<strong>the</strong>r validated <strong>the</strong>ir progress and <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: state programs, federal programs, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programs, standards, permits, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance,construction, guidel<strong>in</strong>es, public awareness, emergency managementMcCann, Mart<strong>in</strong> W. National Performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>s Program: An Archive <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> Information andExperience. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2006 (V. 4 N. 2)The NPDP, founded <strong>in</strong> 1994 and located at Stanford University, is devoted to <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> current andhistorical <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> dams for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g dam eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g andsafety. The archive, coupled with an ongo<strong>in</strong>g evaluation <strong>of</strong> dam performance data, provides a nationalcapability to monitor <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation's dams, contributes to <strong>the</strong> advancement <strong>of</strong> dam eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,and supports effective dam safety policy.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: research, failure analysis, failures, <strong>in</strong>cidents, <strong>in</strong>spection, historical <strong>in</strong>terest, gates, casestudies, federal programsNoble, Richard M., Dixon, Eric R. and Gerhart, Phil C. Piute <strong>Dam</strong> rehabilitation project. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2006 (V. 4 N. 2)Piute <strong>Dam</strong> rehabilitation is <strong>the</strong> largest dam modification project completed to date under jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>State <strong>of</strong> Utah <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> program regulations. The project was <strong>the</strong> ASDSO 2005 National RehabilitationProject <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Year. The dam located near Marysvale, Utah is owned and operated by <strong>the</strong> Piute Reservoir& Irrigation Company (PR&IC), <strong>of</strong> Richfield, Utah. Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1908 as acomb<strong>in</strong>ation rolled earth and hydraulic fill structure. Extensive analysis by various organizations over <strong>the</strong>past 25-plus years determ<strong>in</strong>ed that Piute <strong>Dam</strong> did not meet current dam safety standards. The follow<strong>in</strong>g


problems had been previously identified:--The toe dra<strong>in</strong> system-consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a rock dra<strong>in</strong> and wood stave pipes designed to <strong>in</strong>tercept waterseep<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> dam embankment and foundation-did not appear to meet critical filter criteria.Additionally, <strong>the</strong>re was no chimney dra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> embankment.--The spillway could pass only 32 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>flow design flood <strong>of</strong> 106,000 cu ft/s (3,000 m3/s)without overtopp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dam.--The exist<strong>in</strong>g outlet guard gate system was <strong>in</strong>operable; <strong>the</strong> gates were stuck <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> open position and <strong>the</strong>trash rack had been severely damaged by a rockslide. Also, <strong>the</strong> control gate structure was determ<strong>in</strong>ed tobe unstable under seismic events.--The steep embankment upstream slope also raised concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g rapid drawdown and potentialliquefaction <strong>of</strong> soil materials dur<strong>in</strong>g a seismic event.In 1992 PR&IC contracted with Franson Noble Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>of</strong> American Fork, Utah, to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dam <strong>in</strong>tocompliance with current dam safety standards. Gerhart Consultants, Inc., <strong>of</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>gville, Utah, wasFranson Noble's chief geotechnical subconsultant throughout <strong>the</strong> design and construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project.The construction portion was completed <strong>in</strong> two phases from 2002 through 2005 at a total project cost <strong>of</strong>$8.3 million. The unique and <strong>in</strong>novative eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g designs adopted for this project are estimated tohave saved as much as $6 million compared to more conventional designs and construction methods.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: UtahSubject terms: rehabilitation, design, construction, case studies, spillway capacity, spillways, dra<strong>in</strong>agesystems, gates, drawdown, seismic analysis, slope stabilityBellisle, J. Mat<strong>the</strong>w. Emergency Response at <strong>the</strong> Whittenton Mill <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -Summer 2006 (V. 4 N. 3)Between October 16 and October 23, 2005, Pare Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Corporation <strong>in</strong> cooperation with <strong>the</strong>Massachusetts Department <strong>of</strong> Conservation and Recreation Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>, local emergencyresponse personnel, and federal agencies, worked with <strong>the</strong> owners <strong>of</strong> a 173-year old timber dam toaddress significant concerns that had developed as a result <strong>of</strong> an unusual wea<strong>the</strong>r pattern that producedup to 16 <strong>in</strong>ches <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong> with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts area. This storm system produced 7 days <strong>of</strong>precipitation that culm<strong>in</strong>ated with more than 8-<strong>in</strong>ches <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong> fall<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> a 30-hour period <strong>of</strong> time. Theresponders worked with <strong>the</strong> dam owner to <strong>in</strong>itiate emergency measures necessary to prevent a potentialbreach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: MassachusettsSubject terms: failures, <strong>in</strong>cidents, public safety, emergency management, temporary structures, design,construction, hydrology, timbercrib damsKannik, Mia. Emergency Response at Salt Fork Lake <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2006(V. 4 N. 3)On February 15, 2005, a large seepage boil was discovered at <strong>the</strong> downstream toe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 61-foot-highstate-owned Salt Fork Lake <strong>Dam</strong>, <strong>in</strong> Salt Fork State Park. The boil was 4 feet <strong>in</strong> diameter and 18 to 24<strong>in</strong>ches deep. It was located 8 feet downstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> toe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam and about 75 feet to <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>orig<strong>in</strong>al stream channel. The location was very close to <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> Bor<strong>in</strong>g B-5 <strong>in</strong>stalled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>USACOE Phase II <strong>in</strong>vestigation performed by BBC&M Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1980. The flow measured about 50gallons per m<strong>in</strong>ute. Dur<strong>in</strong>g emergency operations, a second boil - about 6 <strong>in</strong>ches <strong>in</strong> diameter and 18<strong>in</strong>ches deep - was discovered. The flow measured about 3 gallons per m<strong>in</strong>ute. Ohio <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>Program staff <strong>in</strong>structed <strong>the</strong> Park staff that <strong>the</strong> situation was very serious and that regular monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> dam and boil must be performed through <strong>the</strong> night. By <strong>the</strong> next afternoon, <strong>the</strong> flow had <strong>in</strong>creased toabout 130 gallons per m<strong>in</strong>ute. Twenty-four hour surveillance was <strong>in</strong>itiated. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most potentiallyserious dam safety emergencies <strong>in</strong> DSEP history was underway.


Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: OhioSubject terms: emergency management, geology, design, embankment dams, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, dambreakanalysis, computer programs, flood analysis, mapp<strong>in</strong>g, filters, construction, outlet works, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gprograms, <strong>in</strong>spection, seepageSpencer, William D. Relief dra<strong>in</strong> hole clean<strong>in</strong>g and dam safety. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer2006 (V. 4 N. 3)Although <strong>of</strong>ten neglected, dra<strong>in</strong> hole clean<strong>in</strong>g is a necessary ma<strong>in</strong>tenance item for <strong>the</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong>excessive hydrostatic uplift pressure build-up under a concrete gravity dam. Uplift <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong>hydrostatic forces, act<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> a dam and its foundation, is a potential source <strong>of</strong> dam failure. In manyconcrete gravity dams, uplift pressure reduction is accomplished by a l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> cored, vertical holes thatextend <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> bedrock along <strong>the</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>age gallery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam. However, where dams are founded oncarbonate bedrock, <strong>the</strong> carbonates tend to precipitate sediment that can fill <strong>the</strong> dra<strong>in</strong> hole, or crystallizeand completely bridge <strong>the</strong> dra<strong>in</strong> hole even with<strong>in</strong> generally high flow zones. If not addressed, <strong>the</strong>result<strong>in</strong>g reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dra<strong>in</strong> holes can permit an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hydrostatic upliftpressures beneath <strong>the</strong> dam, <strong>the</strong>reby reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> factor <strong>of</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concrete structure. The highcosts associated with <strong>the</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g process, and <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> a quantitative method for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g processes, have caused many dam owners to put <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> process year afteryear, until <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>s may be highly impaired. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> year 2000, several methodshave been quantitatively evaluated by <strong>the</strong> author <strong>in</strong> an effort to identify a viable dra<strong>in</strong> hole clean<strong>in</strong>gsystem. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g processes has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed through programs <strong>of</strong> pre- andpost-test<strong>in</strong>g that have been customized for each dam and its unique dra<strong>in</strong>age system. Through <strong>the</strong>evaluation process, improved techniques for dra<strong>in</strong> hole clean<strong>in</strong>g have been developed.Subject terms: dra<strong>in</strong>age systems, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, concrete dams, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects, ownershipShewbridge, Scott, Costa, Ray Jr., Sills, George and Hess, John R. The evolv<strong>in</strong>g approach tolevees <strong>in</strong> California. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2006 (V. 4 N. 4)Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most expensive and populated land <strong>in</strong> California's Central Valley is protected by agriculturallevees that are over 100 years old. Over <strong>the</strong> last 20 years, <strong>the</strong> US Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers hasundertaken numerous projects to mitigate this threat, but post-construction performance <strong>in</strong> some areas<strong>in</strong>dicated that only part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seepage and stability problems were mitigated. A Blue-Ribbon Task Forcewas convened and determ<strong>in</strong>ed that new analytical and design approaches were necessary. This articledescribes <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> levee <strong>in</strong>vestigations, evaluations, design, construction, and performance <strong>in</strong>California, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g mitigation for through seepage and underseepage. The article <strong>the</strong>n reviews a number<strong>of</strong> converg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluences affect<strong>in</strong>g technical and policy changes, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Hurricane Katr<strong>in</strong>a, lawsuits,legislation, shift<strong>in</strong>g societal expectations, and FEMA's updated policies <strong>in</strong>stituted for <strong>the</strong> Flood InsuranceRat<strong>in</strong>g Map Modernization project. Flood control for <strong>the</strong> California Central Valley is a critical <strong>in</strong>frastructureconcern for <strong>the</strong> State and Nation. It is provided by an <strong>in</strong>terconnected system <strong>of</strong> dams, weirs, bypasses,and most importantly, ear<strong>the</strong>n levees, some <strong>of</strong> which are over 100 years old. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se levees werebuilt ei<strong>the</strong>r by farmers with light equipment us<strong>in</strong>g local, uncompacted, clean river sands and little to n<strong>of</strong>oundation preparation or clamshell dredges that excavated river/slough materials by <strong>the</strong> bucket load. At<strong>the</strong> time, occasional failures were expected, but what were once areas <strong>of</strong> croplands are now grow<strong>in</strong>gcities, <strong>in</strong>dustrial areas, and suburbs. Today, a major flood and levee failure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sacramento area alonewould put at risk over 400,000 people, 170,000 structures, 117 schools, and potential for damageestimated at 7 to 15 billion dollars. The flood control facilities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> levees, are cooperativelymanaged by a number <strong>of</strong> agencies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> California Department <strong>of</strong> Water Resources, <strong>the</strong>California State Reclamation Board, local levee and flood control districts, and <strong>the</strong> Sacramento District <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> USACE. This article describes <strong>the</strong> problems encountered by <strong>the</strong>se agencies and <strong>the</strong> experiencesand lessons learned <strong>in</strong> upgrad<strong>in</strong>g agricultural levees to provide protection for <strong>in</strong>tensively developedurban, <strong>in</strong>dustrial, and suburban areas. It <strong>the</strong>n looks at <strong>the</strong> convergence <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> different factors


forc<strong>in</strong>g evolution <strong>of</strong> our society's approach to levees.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: CaliforniaSubject terms: levees, legislation, public awareness, public safety, <strong>in</strong>surance, federal programs, floods,development, floodpla<strong>in</strong> management, legal aspects, social aspects, policy, partnerships, RiskassessmentTalbot, James R. and Pabst, Mark. Filters for earth dams. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2006 (V. 4N. 4)Between 1980 and 1985, <strong>the</strong> Soil Conservation Service, now known as <strong>the</strong> Natural ResourcesConservation Service, performed an extensive study to determ<strong>in</strong>e appropriate gradation criteria for sandfilters to be used for filter/dra<strong>in</strong>age zones <strong>in</strong> embankment dams. The study was performed at <strong>the</strong> NRCSSoil Mechanics Laboratory <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>coln, Nebraska with <strong>the</strong> assistance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late James L. Sherard,em<strong>in</strong>ent earth dam consultant. The study <strong>in</strong>cluded a large number <strong>of</strong> tests simulat<strong>in</strong>g cracks or o<strong>the</strong>ranomalies <strong>in</strong> dams with <strong>the</strong> potential for develop<strong>in</strong>g concentrated leaks under high water pressure.Filters with vary<strong>in</strong>g gradations were placed downstream <strong>of</strong> a simulated core material conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g simulatedcracks to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> gradation necessary to prevent movement <strong>of</strong> base materials through <strong>the</strong> filter andto provide a self-heal<strong>in</strong>g condition. A large variety <strong>of</strong> materials were used to simulate <strong>the</strong> base soil <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>dam upstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> filter/dra<strong>in</strong>age zone. Specific test<strong>in</strong>g was performed to verify <strong>the</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>filter that determ<strong>in</strong>e its ability to prevent <strong>the</strong> base or protected soil from pass<strong>in</strong>g through it for use <strong>in</strong>design<strong>in</strong>g filter gradations. These properties <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> particle size at 15 percent pass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> filter to <strong>the</strong> particle size at 85 percent pass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> base soil, uniformity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> filter gradation, ando<strong>the</strong>r factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g segregation, permeability, and grad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> filter. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> NRCS study, <strong>the</strong>US Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers and <strong>the</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation have revised <strong>the</strong>ir guidance for filter design.Their guidance generally conforms to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NRCS study. With fur<strong>the</strong>r experience, both <strong>the</strong>USACE and Reclamation have modified <strong>the</strong>ir guidance and added important useful <strong>in</strong>formation aboutplacement and construction techniques.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: filters, embankment dams, dra<strong>in</strong>age systems, research, guidel<strong>in</strong>es, federal programs,design, standards, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigationsWard, Craig F. and Levergood, Grace. Downhole seismic method for estimat<strong>in</strong>g structure depth.<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2006 (V. 4 N. 4)One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g dam eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>in</strong> conduct<strong>in</strong>g safety evaluations and design <strong>of</strong> remedialimprovements for exist<strong>in</strong>g dams with soil foundations is estimat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bear<strong>in</strong>g depths <strong>of</strong> concrete orstone masonry structures with soil foundations. Often, no design or as-built draw<strong>in</strong>gs are availableshow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> depths <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g structures with<strong>in</strong> a dam. For <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>the</strong> elevations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottoms <strong>of</strong>exist<strong>in</strong>g cut<strong>of</strong>f walls, spillway structures, and reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g walls must be estimated for use <strong>in</strong> stability andseepage analyses. The determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> structure depth us<strong>in</strong>g conventional explorations, such as drill<strong>in</strong>gthrough a structure or excavat<strong>in</strong>g test pits, is <strong>of</strong>ten not practical. Core drill<strong>in</strong>g through a concrete structureis expensive and time consum<strong>in</strong>g, and can weaken <strong>the</strong> structure. Excavation <strong>of</strong> test pits to determ<strong>in</strong>estructure depth can only be performed for small dams with relatively shallow structures. Also, it is usuallynecessary to dra<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> impoundment prior to test pit excavation. The authors used a less <strong>in</strong>trusivemeans for estimat<strong>in</strong>g structure depth with a down-hole seismic method. Vibrations <strong>in</strong>duced by strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>concrete structure are measured us<strong>in</strong>g a geophone at various depth <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>in</strong> a cased borehole drilledadjacent to <strong>the</strong> structure. This method was adapted from one used more commonly for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>depth <strong>of</strong> steel sheet pil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> soil; however, because <strong>the</strong> contrast <strong>in</strong> compression wave velocity betweenconcrete and soil is not as pronounced as it is between steel and soil, <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data todeterm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> a concrete structure requires <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a wave front model.


Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: New HampshireSubject terms: seismic analysis, foundations, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigations, test<strong>in</strong>g, case studies,embankment dams, design, rehabilitation, constructionHolderbaum, Rodney E., Warren, Gordon W. and Roarabaugh, Donald P. Design<strong>in</strong>g andConstruct<strong>in</strong>g Spillway and Stability Improvements for Loch Raven <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -W<strong>in</strong>ter 2007 (V. 5 N. 1)Loch Raven <strong>Dam</strong>, located just north <strong>of</strong> Baltimore, Maryland, is a 100-foot high, 650-foot long concretegravity dam with an ungated 288-foot wide spillway. The 93-year-old structure impounds Loch RavenReservoir, a primary water supply source owned and operated by <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Baltimore. The dam hasundergone several modifications dur<strong>in</strong>g its life; however, <strong>the</strong> structural height and configuration rema<strong>in</strong>edunchanged from 1922 until 2002 when <strong>the</strong> current modifications were <strong>in</strong>itiated. Inadequacies regard<strong>in</strong>gsafety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam were first noted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Phase I <strong>in</strong>spection report prepared <strong>in</strong> 1978. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1980sand 1990s, additional <strong>in</strong>spections and <strong>in</strong>vestigations were performed to evaluate <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> safetydeficiencies, which consisted primarily <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate spillway capacity and structural stability. Thestudies ultimately led to preparation <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al design documents and construction <strong>of</strong> a $30 millionrehabilitation project. Construction began <strong>in</strong> 2002 and was completed <strong>in</strong> mid-2005.A key requirement faced dur<strong>in</strong>g design and construction was <strong>the</strong> need to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a full pool throughout<strong>the</strong> project. This constra<strong>in</strong>t comb<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f from a 300 square mile dra<strong>in</strong>age area significantlyimpacted design and construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam rehabilitation. Two key features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> selectedrehabilitation measures were <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>of</strong> high-capacity post-tensioned anchors and placement <strong>of</strong>approximately 60,000 cubic yards <strong>of</strong> roller-compacted concrete. The anchors served primarily to stabilize<strong>the</strong> structure dur<strong>in</strong>g excavation, while <strong>the</strong> RCC was used to raise <strong>the</strong> non-overflow sections and provide apermanent buttress to improve stability. O<strong>the</strong>r key aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project <strong>in</strong>cluded sequenc<strong>in</strong>gconstruction to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> flow on half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spillway at all times, perform<strong>in</strong>g large-scale constructionactivities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g supply<strong>in</strong>g two concrete plants with very limited stag<strong>in</strong>g and work<strong>in</strong>g areas, andma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g public relations dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 3-year construction duration with <strong>the</strong> project embedded <strong>in</strong> asuburban location.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: MarylandSubject terms: concrete dams, gravity dams, rehabilitation, roller-compacted concrete, anchor<strong>in</strong>g, design,construction, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects, spillway capacity, stability analysis, social aspects, public awareness,concreteMcCook, Danny K. A Discussion <strong>of</strong> Uplift Computations for Embankments and Levees. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - W<strong>in</strong>ter 2007 (V. 5 N. 1)This paper discusses <strong>the</strong> two idealized foundation conditions most commonly analyzed for stabilityaga<strong>in</strong>st excessive seepage and uplift pressures us<strong>in</strong>g simplified models. It discusses acceptable safetyfactors as def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> total stress and effective stress method <strong>of</strong> comput<strong>in</strong>g safety factors. Readersare cautioned that simplified models seldom accurately model <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> natural horizons. Thesesimplified models are most useful for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relative value <strong>of</strong> alternative designs and forscreen<strong>in</strong>g type exam<strong>in</strong>ations. This article is a condensed version <strong>of</strong> a paper presented at <strong>the</strong> WesternRegional ASDSO meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Kansas City <strong>in</strong> 2006.Subject terms: foundations, seepage, stability analysis, models, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigationsNorris, Barry F. and Falk, John A. Summary Report and Lessons Learned Catastrophic LagoonFailure Near Hermiston, Oregon. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - W<strong>in</strong>ter 2007 (V. 5 N. 1)


On Tuesday afternoon, April 26, 2005 an <strong>of</strong>f-channel wastewater reservoir located 5 miles (8 km)southwest <strong>of</strong> Hermiston, Oregon failed catastrophically result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sudden and uncontrolled release<strong>of</strong> approximately 95 million gallons <strong>of</strong> water (360,000 M3). Impacts to downstream property <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong>breach <strong>of</strong> an exist<strong>in</strong>g flow<strong>in</strong>g canal result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> irrigation water, closure <strong>of</strong> a state highway dueto undercutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> pavement, water/mud damage to farm houses and outbuild<strong>in</strong>gs, and destruction <strong>of</strong>planted crops and agricultural lands. Fortunately, no <strong>in</strong>juries or loss <strong>of</strong> life occurred as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>failure. The results from laboratory analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discharge waters <strong>in</strong>dicated that additional evacuationor o<strong>the</strong>r special health precautions were not required.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: OregonSubject terms: failures, <strong>in</strong>cidents, floods, failure analysis, failure modes, embankment dams, geotechnical<strong>in</strong>vestigations, geosyn<strong>the</strong>ticsCharlton, John E. and Adk<strong>in</strong>s, H. Grady. RCC foundation preparation: how much is enough?<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2007 (V. 5 N. 2)The condition <strong>of</strong> a rock foundation that is acceptable for roller compacted concrete (RCC) placement is<strong>in</strong>fluenced by a number <strong>of</strong> factors that vary from one site to ano<strong>the</strong>r. Geologic conditions and dam sitelimitations are significant factors <strong>in</strong> RCC foundation preparation. In this paper, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong>, and <strong>the</strong>methods for deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong>se factors are discussed.Subject terms: roller-compacted concrete, concrete, design, construction, geology, site preparation,foundationsCooper, Chuck R. Conduits through embankment dams. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2007 (V. 5N. 2)A technical manual titled Conduits through Embankment <strong>Dam</strong>s -- Best Practices for Design, Construction,Problem Identification and Evaluation, Inspection, Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, Renovation, and Repair (FEMA 484) wasrecently published by <strong>the</strong> Federal Emergency Management Agency with support from <strong>the</strong> National <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> Program. The manual was developed by representatives from <strong>the</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> State <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> Officials, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Interior's Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation, Federal Energy RegulatoryCommission, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers. Themanual condenses and summarizes <strong>the</strong> vast body <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation, provides a clear and concisesynopsis <strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong>formation, and presents a recommended course <strong>of</strong> action. The manual is <strong>in</strong>tended foruse by personnel familiar with embankment dams and conduits, such as designers, <strong>in</strong>spectors,construction oversight personnel, and dam safety eng<strong>in</strong>eers. The free manual is available <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t copy(FEMA 484), CD-ROM (FEMA 484CD), and DVD (FEMA 484DVD) and conta<strong>in</strong>s more than 280illustrative figures, 34 cases histories, and an <strong>in</strong>-depth glossary. The CD-ROM and DVD have built-<strong>in</strong>Adobe Acrobat Reader s<strong>of</strong>tware, hyperl<strong>in</strong>k, and search capabilities. The CD-ROM and DVD also conta<strong>in</strong>PDF copies <strong>of</strong> all references cited with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> manual that were available <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public doma<strong>in</strong> or whererepr<strong>in</strong>t permission was obta<strong>in</strong>ed. In addition, <strong>the</strong> DVD has a collection <strong>of</strong> more than 150 "additionalread<strong>in</strong>g" references <strong>in</strong> PDF format. These references are <strong>in</strong>cluded to assist <strong>the</strong> user <strong>in</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>irunderstand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> conduits and embankments dams. Copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> manual may be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by call<strong>in</strong>gFEMA's Publication Distribution Center at 1-800-480-2520. The author served as chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiagencynational committee responsible for develop<strong>in</strong>g this technical manual. Highlights from <strong>the</strong>technical manual are presented <strong>in</strong> this paper.Geographic Interest: U.S.Subject terms: roller-compacted concrete, concrete, design, construction, geology, site preparation,foundations


Halp<strong>in</strong>, Eric C. and Ferguson, Keith A. US Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers dam safety: Program statusand lessons <strong>in</strong> transition<strong>in</strong>g to risk <strong>in</strong>formed approaches. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2007 (V.5 N. 2)USACE is work<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>corporate risk concepts <strong>in</strong>to dam safety management, rout<strong>in</strong>e activities, andprogramm<strong>in</strong>g decisions. A number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiatives are ongo<strong>in</strong>g to achieve this objective. These <strong>in</strong>cludedevelop<strong>in</strong>g new policy based on risk concepts, a new more detailed methodology, and a plan tocommunicate <strong>the</strong>se strategies. The total program <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g risk <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> USACE <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>Program is be<strong>in</strong>g accomplished <strong>in</strong> three phases: (I) Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Portfolio Risk Analysis (SPRA); (II)Portfolio Risk Assessment methodology (PRA); and (III) Site Specific Risk Assessments.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: federal programs, risk assessment, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, public safetyBritton, Jeremy P. , Talbot, James R. and Walberg, Francke C. The Seepage Problem andRemediation at Fern Ridge <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2007 (V. 5 N. 3)Fern Ridge <strong>Dam</strong>, near Eugene, Oregon, was constructed <strong>in</strong> 1940, <strong>the</strong> first <strong>of</strong> thirteen earth dams <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Portland District <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers. The embankment dam is over 60 years old andwas built without <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> modern filter criteria. There were <strong>in</strong>dications that <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g filter was toocoarse and that <strong>the</strong> corrugated metal dra<strong>in</strong>pipe may have been deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g. From 2002 to 2004, a series<strong>of</strong> observations and <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong> seepage conditions <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>in</strong>ternal erosion (pip<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>dam's dra<strong>in</strong>age system was occurr<strong>in</strong>g. In addition to turbid flows dur<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong> events, silts and sands wereobserved <strong>in</strong> seepage flow dur<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>ed pool levels with no ra<strong>in</strong>. The worst-case scenario was thaterosion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundation could lead to ei<strong>the</strong>r a pip<strong>in</strong>g failure or clogg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>. With <strong>the</strong> dam <strong>in</strong> anactive state <strong>of</strong> pip<strong>in</strong>g failure, a pool restriction with monitor<strong>in</strong>g was implemented. In February 2005, <strong>the</strong>Corps decided to start an expedited repair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam's dra<strong>in</strong>age system <strong>in</strong> order to return <strong>the</strong> project t<strong>of</strong>ull operation by <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g fall. Preparation <strong>of</strong> plans and specifications began immediately and <strong>the</strong> damwas repaired and fully operational by November 2005. This paper describes <strong>the</strong> observations and<strong>in</strong>vestigations lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> repair, <strong>the</strong> decision to repair <strong>the</strong> dam, <strong>the</strong> repair itself, <strong>the</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong>erosion found dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> repair, and <strong>the</strong> post-repair performance to date. The case history may be usefulto eng<strong>in</strong>eers and dam owners fac<strong>in</strong>g difficult repair decisions.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: OregonSubject terms: case studies, seepage, rehabilitation, dra<strong>in</strong>age systems, pip<strong>in</strong>g, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, federalprograms, embankment dams, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, filtersNance, David. <strong>Dam</strong>s on <strong>the</strong> Arch: Paleokarst, An Often Under Evaluated Geohazard AssociatedWith <strong>the</strong> C<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>nati Arch. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2007 (V. 5 N. 3)Many exist<strong>in</strong>g reservoirs are located <strong>in</strong> areas where karst or karstic conditions are known to exist. Someare located <strong>in</strong> areas where karstic conditions may exist but have not yet been identified or found to beproblematic to <strong>the</strong> dam and outlet works. In <strong>the</strong> past, karstic conditions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bedrock were <strong>of</strong>ten notidentified as a potential issue dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> design or dur<strong>in</strong>g construction. This is especially true when <strong>the</strong>karstic conditions have been altered and buried by glacial action, as is <strong>the</strong> case for <strong>the</strong> region associatedwith <strong>the</strong> C<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>nati Arch. As we undertake <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> reevaluat<strong>in</strong>g reservoirs, dams, and outlet worksfor extended use we will need to reconsider <strong>the</strong> foundation conditions. At many sites, it will be importantto note that <strong>the</strong> most problematic paleokarst conditions may exist <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bedrock associated with <strong>the</strong> walls<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> valley ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> valley floor. In addition, seepage prevention will be very problematic, and"seepage management" will become <strong>the</strong> best option. In many cases, extended use will requiremodification to outlet works, embankments, and <strong>in</strong> some situations sediment removal. If <strong>the</strong> potential forkarstic conditions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundation is recognized dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reevaluation, modifications can be designedto not only avoid caus<strong>in</strong>g a problem to develop, but possibly identify and manage karstic seepage, or


decrease <strong>the</strong> risk associated with potentially karstic foundations for <strong>the</strong> structure and reservoir.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: IndianaSubject terms: geology, foundations, seepage, design, construction, grout<strong>in</strong>gStoessel, John and Wilkes, John. Sabr<strong>in</strong>a Lake <strong>Dam</strong> Geomembrane System Replaces 100 YearOld Redwood Membrane. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Summer 2007 (V. 5 N. 3)Remediation <strong>of</strong> Sabr<strong>in</strong>a Lake <strong>Dam</strong>, a 70-foot (21.4 m) high, 900-foot long timber-faced rockfill dam.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: OregonSubject terms: case studies, seepage, rehabilitation, timbercrib dams, rockfill dams, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects,design, construction, geosyn<strong>the</strong>ticsAbdo, Fares Y. and Adaska, Wayne S. Performance Review <strong>of</strong> RCC Spillways and Overtopp<strong>in</strong>gProtection. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2007 (V. 5 N. 4)Roller-compacted concrete (RCC) has become a popular method for provid<strong>in</strong>g spillway and overtopp<strong>in</strong>gprotection for ear<strong>the</strong>n dams. Over <strong>the</strong> past 27 years, RCC has been used for spillway or overtopp<strong>in</strong>gprotection on more than 130 dams. In addition to provid<strong>in</strong>g protection from erosive forces <strong>of</strong> flow<strong>in</strong>gwater, several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se projects are located <strong>in</strong> areas exposed to numerous freeze-thaw cycles. For lessthan <strong>the</strong> 500-year flood event, RCC spillways and overtopp<strong>in</strong>g protection projects can serve as pr<strong>in</strong>cipalspillways; however, most RCC overtopp<strong>in</strong>g protection structures are emergency spillways designed tooperate at a frequency not exceed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 100-year storm. RCC is popular with designers and owners forits simplicity, speed <strong>of</strong> construction, strength and durability, and economic advantages over alternativemethods. Because RCC emergency spillway and overtopp<strong>in</strong>g protection projects are designed to operate<strong>in</strong>frequently dur<strong>in</strong>g major flood events, limited <strong>in</strong>formation is available on <strong>the</strong> actual performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>setypes <strong>of</strong> structures. However, RCC projects that have been put to <strong>the</strong> test performed satisfactorily, with noevidence <strong>of</strong> excessive wear or structural distress. Several research projects have confirmed <strong>the</strong>excellent abrasion resistance and durability <strong>of</strong> RCC. Comparative tests on soil-cement, RCC andconventional concrete showed RCC to have a greater abrasion resistance than conventional concrete <strong>of</strong>higher strength. This was primarily due to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a larger percentage <strong>of</strong> aggregate and lesspaste <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> RCC mixture. In underwater abrasion tests us<strong>in</strong>g ASTM C1138, it was determ<strong>in</strong>ed thatabrasion resistance was a function <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> aggregate hardness and <strong>the</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paste. Despite<strong>the</strong> research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong>re is still <strong>the</strong> need to evaluate <strong>the</strong> reliability and performance <strong>of</strong> RCC underactual field conditions when subjected to debris-laden flows and hydraulic forces. The article <strong>in</strong>cludesexamples <strong>of</strong> projects that have experienced multiple flows dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir service lives.Subject terms: research, roller-compacted concrete, design, RCC, concrete, overtopp<strong>in</strong>g, spillways,erosion, embankment dams, case studiesCapone, Edward J. The National Wea<strong>the</strong>r Service Forecast Responsibility on <strong>the</strong> Nation's Rivers.<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2007 (V. 5 N. 4)Throughout <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S., certa<strong>in</strong> events have provided a catalyst for <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> today'sHydrologic Services Program (HSP). The HSP has expanded <strong>in</strong>to 13 separate River Forecast Centers<strong>of</strong>fices with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adm<strong>in</strong>istration (NOAA) National Wea<strong>the</strong>r Service(NWS). The mission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se river forecast centers is to save lives and decrease property damage by <strong>the</strong>issuance <strong>of</strong> flood warn<strong>in</strong>gs and river stage forecasts, to provide basic hydrologic forecast <strong>in</strong>formation for<strong>the</strong> Nation's economic well be<strong>in</strong>g and to provide extended forecast <strong>in</strong>formation for water resourcesmanagement. This article summarizes <strong>the</strong> history and work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HSP.


Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: federal programs, hydrology, historical <strong>in</strong>terest, flood forecast<strong>in</strong>g, floods, warn<strong>in</strong>g systems,operationLevergood, Grace and Bjarngard, Anders. New Hampshire's Innovative Approach to <strong>Dam</strong>Removals. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2007 (V. 5 N. 4)The Champl<strong>in</strong> Pond <strong>Dam</strong> and Champl<strong>in</strong> Farm Pond <strong>Dam</strong> were constructed <strong>in</strong> Rochester, New Hampshireby a private owner for recreational purposes <strong>in</strong> 1955 and 1967, respectively. The New HampshireDepartment <strong>of</strong> Environmental Services (DES) <strong>Dam</strong> Bureau had classified both structures as low hazarddams. A breach <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r dam would cause damage to downstream roads. Regular dam safety<strong>in</strong>spections had identified numerous deficiencies which <strong>the</strong> dam owner had failed to address. The City <strong>of</strong>Rochester and <strong>the</strong> Society for Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Hampshire Forest Society were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong>obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> property but not <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> liability for <strong>the</strong> two earth dams which were both<strong>in</strong> poor condition. In 2005, <strong>the</strong> New Hampshire Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation Bureau <strong>of</strong> Aeronautics wasexpand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> adjacent Skyhaven Airport and was required to mitigate wetland impacts. Through somecreative <strong>in</strong>ter-agency discussions championed by <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Rochester and <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> newcompensatory mitigation DES Wetlands rules, <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> both dams and transfer <strong>of</strong> adjacent propertywas used as mitigation for airport expansion impacts. The dam removals were added to <strong>the</strong> airportexpansion project and <strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 184 acre (74.5 ha) parcel to conservation status was madepossible. The Champl<strong>in</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> was <strong>in</strong>itially to be repaired while <strong>the</strong> Champl<strong>in</strong> Farm Pond <strong>Dam</strong>,approximately 2,000 feet (56.6 m) downstream, was to be removed. However, test bor<strong>in</strong>gs revealedweak embankment and foundation soils at Champl<strong>in</strong> Pond <strong>Dam</strong>, mak<strong>in</strong>g any potential repair <strong>of</strong> thatstructure more complicated and expensive;, thus partial breach<strong>in</strong>g was selected. The dam removal andpartial dam breach <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> bioeng<strong>in</strong>eered and on-site materials for channel restoration andstabilization. The measures <strong>in</strong>cluded stone and log weirs, coir logs, boulder clusters, and plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> livestakes and wetland seed mix. Dur<strong>in</strong>g construction, real-time design modifications were implemented as<strong>the</strong> dynamic process <strong>of</strong> dam breach<strong>in</strong>g and channel restoration was occurr<strong>in</strong>g. The project alleviateddam safety concerns, enabled <strong>the</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> land to conservation purposes, and restored <strong>the</strong> streamchannel to a natural and stable condition. Lessons learned are summarized at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: New HampshireSubject terms: removal, case studies, state programs, legal aspects, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, environment,design, construction, weirs, partnerships, rehabilitationSchultz, Mark , Huynh, Phu and Jones, Shawn. Summary <strong>of</strong> California Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>s'Ta<strong>in</strong>ter Gate Reevaluation Program. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - Fall 2007 (V. 5 N. 4)The State <strong>of</strong> California, Department <strong>of</strong> Water Resources, Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>s (DSOD) regulatesapproximately 1,250 non-federal dams <strong>of</strong> all types and sizes. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se dams are considered tohave a high hazard potential due to <strong>the</strong>ir size and proximity to major population centers. Additionally,many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se dams are located near faults capable <strong>of</strong> generat<strong>in</strong>g major earthquakes. By necessity,DSOD performs a large number <strong>of</strong> both l<strong>in</strong>ear and nonl<strong>in</strong>ear dynamic analyses <strong>of</strong> all types <strong>of</strong> dams andappurtenant structures us<strong>in</strong>g site-specific ground motions. Of <strong>the</strong> 1,250 dams that fall under DSODjurisdiction, 206 (17%) are also regulated by <strong>the</strong> Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Theta<strong>in</strong>ter gate failure <strong>of</strong> Gate 3 at Folsom <strong>Dam</strong> on July 17, 1995 resulted <strong>in</strong> long-term wide-rang<strong>in</strong>gramifications for dam safety <strong>in</strong> California. Folsom <strong>Dam</strong> is a 340-foot high (104 m) concrete gravity dam,located on <strong>the</strong> American River just upstream <strong>of</strong> Sacramento, California. It was designed and built by <strong>the</strong>U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers (USACE) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1950s, but is owned and operated by <strong>the</strong> U.S.Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation (BOR). Folsom <strong>Dam</strong> is a federal facility, and <strong>the</strong>refore not under state jurisdiction;however, DSOD played an active role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> gate failure. Then Chief <strong>of</strong> DSOD, Vernon H.Persson, S.E., G.E., was a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forensic team formed to <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> failure. The


forensic team attributed <strong>the</strong> primary cause <strong>of</strong> failure to brace failure lead<strong>in</strong>g to strut buckl<strong>in</strong>g due to weakaxisbend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duced by trunnion friction dur<strong>in</strong>g lift<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gate. Ineffective lubrication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unusuallylarge diameter trunnion p<strong>in</strong>s also played a role. Trunnion friction was not normally accounted for <strong>in</strong> earlygate designs, and was based on a relatively low coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction (typically 0.1) when it was <strong>in</strong>cluded.Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> gate failure, DSOD directed dam owners under state jurisdiction to fully <strong>in</strong>spect, <strong>in</strong>vestigateand evaluate <strong>the</strong> structural <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>of</strong> all ta<strong>in</strong>ter gates under all phases <strong>of</strong> planned operation. FERC, <strong>in</strong>coord<strong>in</strong>ation with state dam safety <strong>of</strong>ficials, launched a similar reevaluation effort on a nationwide scale.The USACE and BOR also embarked on reevaluations <strong>of</strong> ta<strong>in</strong>ter gates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>ventories.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: CaliforniaSubject terms: gates, <strong>in</strong>spection, state programs, failure analysis, case studies, concrete dams, gravitydams, federal programs, <strong>in</strong>cidents, historical <strong>in</strong>terestAmos, Peter D , Bruce, Donald A. , Lucchi, Marco, Watk<strong>in</strong>s, Neil and Wharmby, Nick. Design andconstruction <strong>of</strong> seepage cut-<strong>of</strong>f walls under a concrete dam with a full reservoir. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2008 (V. 6 N. 1)A series <strong>of</strong> foundation leakage events have occurred at Arapuni <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>in</strong> New Zealand from <strong>the</strong> time waterwas first impounded <strong>in</strong> 1927. Past foundation leakage <strong>in</strong>cidents at <strong>the</strong> 64m (210ft) high curved concretegravity dam were related to erosion and pip<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> weak clay <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>g jo<strong>in</strong>ts with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> volcanic ignimbritefoundation bedrock. Seepage changes <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>volved sudden and significant <strong>in</strong>creases, and could notusually be related to external events, such as earthquakes. The most recent seepage <strong>in</strong>cident developedfrom 1995 and required grout<strong>in</strong>g (completed <strong>in</strong> December 2001) to fill an open void with<strong>in</strong> a foundationjo<strong>in</strong>t. This grout<strong>in</strong>g program successfully controlled <strong>the</strong> deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g condition. With <strong>the</strong> deteriorat<strong>in</strong>gcondition arrested, <strong>the</strong> owner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam, Mighty River Power Ltd., decided that a high quality andverifiable cut-<strong>of</strong>f solution was to be constructed while <strong>the</strong> reservoir rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> service. A comprehensive<strong>in</strong>vestigation program was completed to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> foundation features requir<strong>in</strong>g treatment toprevent fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>cidents from develop<strong>in</strong>g. Four zones beneath <strong>the</strong> dam were identified as requir<strong>in</strong>gpermanent cut-<strong>of</strong>f walls. An <strong>in</strong>ternational Alliance between <strong>the</strong> dam owner (assisted by <strong>the</strong>ir designer)and a consortium <strong>of</strong> specialist foundation contractors was formed to identify cut-<strong>of</strong>f options, develop <strong>the</strong>mand implement <strong>the</strong> selected methodology. A cost-effective preferred approach was selected <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>gdrill<strong>in</strong>g and concret<strong>in</strong>g overlapp<strong>in</strong>g vertical piles from <strong>the</strong> dam crest through <strong>the</strong> dam and underly<strong>in</strong>g rockformation. The overlapp<strong>in</strong>g piles extend to a total depth <strong>of</strong> 90m (295ft) to form four separate cut-<strong>of</strong>f walls.Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cut-<strong>of</strong>f walls commenced <strong>in</strong> September 2005 and was completed <strong>in</strong> September 2007.Operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reservoir was not affected and electricity generation cont<strong>in</strong>ued throughout <strong>the</strong> projectworks. The project successfully formed a robust and verifiable cut-<strong>of</strong>f wall remediation. With fewprecedents for this type <strong>of</strong> work, and none constructed <strong>in</strong> weak rock or to 90m (295ft) depth, <strong>the</strong> Arapuni<strong>Dam</strong> seepage cut-<strong>of</strong>f project significantlyGeographic <strong>in</strong>terest: New ZealandSubject terms: seepage, foundations, geology, case studies, hydropower, operation, reservoirsDurst, Sherry Ann, Pacheco, Ela<strong>in</strong>e C. and Haynes, Mark B. Time for a change - or two: Updat<strong>in</strong>gRules and Regulations. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2008 (V. 6 N. 1)New Mexico, Colorado, and Kansas have recently revised <strong>the</strong>ir respective Rules and Regulationsperta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> permitt<strong>in</strong>g, construction, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, restoration, and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> new and exist<strong>in</strong>gdams. Everyone <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> changes walked through fire, sat through countless meet<strong>in</strong>gs - moremeet<strong>in</strong>gs than should be required <strong>of</strong> any person <strong>in</strong> a lifetime, and reviewed and suggested changes until<strong>the</strong> mere thought <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r revision had <strong>the</strong> ability to reduce one to tears. Change is costly. Change isgood. Change is a must. It's worth <strong>the</strong> time and effort to get it done. Article <strong>in</strong> three parts:1) Kansas <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>: Upgrad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Rules, Tighten<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Regulations, by Sherry Ann Durst, P.E.,


Water Structures Eng<strong>in</strong>eer, Kansas <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Team2) New Mexico <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>: There's New Regulations <strong>in</strong> Town, by Ela<strong>in</strong>e C. Pacheco, P.E., <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>Bureau Chief3) Colorado <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>s Program: Process <strong>of</strong> Revis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Rules and Regulations, by Mark Haynes,P.E., Chief, <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>s ProgramGeographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Colorado, Kansas, New MexicoSubject terms: regulations, state programs, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects, rehabilitation, designFrank, Andrew. Emergency response at Lake Needwood <strong>Dam</strong>: An owner's perspective follow<strong>in</strong>g asevere event. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2008 (V. 6 N. 1)This paper provides a personal account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emergency at Lake Needwood <strong>Dam</strong>, <strong>in</strong> MontgomeryCounty, Maryland. In June 2006, discovery <strong>of</strong> uncontrolled seepage through <strong>the</strong> dam required activation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project's Emergency Action Plan (EAP) while efforts were undertaken to control <strong>the</strong> seepage.Follow<strong>in</strong>g a brief description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> event, <strong>the</strong> paper presents results <strong>of</strong> a post-event review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EAPand <strong>the</strong> owner's project management program and result<strong>in</strong>g improvements to both.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: MarylandSubject terms: seepage, emergency action plan, emergency management, ownership, embankmentdams, case studies , EAPsHunt, Sherry L., Reep, Dennis W. and Kadavy, Kern C. RCC Stepped Spillway for Renwick <strong>Dam</strong> - APartnership <strong>in</strong> Research and Design. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2008 (V. 6 N. 2)The Small Watershed Program <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS, formerly<strong>the</strong> Soil Conservation Service) orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1940s with <strong>the</strong> passage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Flood Control Act <strong>of</strong> 1944(PL 78-534). This statute was soon followed by <strong>the</strong> passage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1952 Appropriations Act thatauthorized <strong>the</strong> Pilot Watershed Program <strong>in</strong> 1953 and 1954, which paved <strong>the</strong> road to <strong>the</strong> WatershedProtection and Flood Prevention Act <strong>of</strong> 1954 (PL 83-566). These three federal authorizations have given<strong>the</strong> NRCS <strong>the</strong> authority to provide technical and f<strong>in</strong>ancial assistance for <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> nearly 11,000embankment dams across <strong>the</strong> U.S. The construction peak for <strong>the</strong>se structures occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1960swith many structures <strong>in</strong>itially designed to protect agricultural land. Many years <strong>of</strong> development have ledto changes <strong>in</strong> hazard classification <strong>of</strong> many structures. Increased urbanization upstream anddownstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> immediate vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> embankments have caused manyspillways to no longer meet hydrologic criteria. To meet dam safety standards, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se structuresare <strong>in</strong> need <strong>of</strong> immediate attention. Alter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g spillway(s) to <strong>in</strong>crease spillwaycapacity is <strong>of</strong>ten limited by <strong>the</strong> landscape and/or unobta<strong>in</strong>able land rights. These constra<strong>in</strong>ts have leddesign eng<strong>in</strong>eers to select roller compacted concrete (RCC) stepped spillways as a design alternative to<strong>in</strong>crease spillway capacity. These may <strong>of</strong>ten be placed over exist<strong>in</strong>g embankments <strong>the</strong>reby hav<strong>in</strong>gm<strong>in</strong>imal impact on <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g area. Nearly 10% <strong>of</strong> NRCS structures are expected to use steppedspillways as a design solution for rehabilitation. One advantage <strong>of</strong> stepped spillways is <strong>the</strong> significantenergy dissipation created <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spillway chute. The energy dissipation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> stepped spillways <strong>in</strong> turnallows <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> shorter energy dissipat<strong>in</strong>g still<strong>in</strong>g bas<strong>in</strong>s as compared to conventional smooth concretespillways. Yet, little <strong>in</strong>formation is provided on <strong>the</strong> energy dissipation that occurs <strong>in</strong> stepped spillwayswith slopes less than or equal to 22° (slopes commonly found among NRCS constructed spillways).Renwick <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>in</strong> North Dakota falls <strong>in</strong> this unique class <strong>of</strong> planned rehabilitation sites for which a steppedspillway hav<strong>in</strong>g a ra<strong>the</strong>r flat (4H:1V) slope is planned. To assist <strong>the</strong> NRCS <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> this spillway, ahydraulic model study was conducted at <strong>the</strong> USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS) HydraulicEng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Research Unit (HERU) <strong>in</strong> Stillwater, Oklahoma. This paper reports <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> that studyand may be used to provide design eng<strong>in</strong>eers with <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g stepped spillways designed on a4(H):1(V) slope.


Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: North DakotaSubject terms: spillways, RCC, roller-compacted concrete, design, federal programs, rehabilitation,models, research, hydraulics, development, historical <strong>in</strong>terest, spillway capacity, constructionMills, George E. and Spragens, Lori C. Eight Years <strong>of</strong> Outreach to <strong>Dam</strong> Owners ThroughEducation and Involvement. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2008 (V. 6 N. 2)One <strong>of</strong> ASDSO's goals is to provide resources and educational opportunities to owners and cont<strong>in</strong>ue totry to engage as many owners as possible to jo<strong>in</strong> ASDSO and work with regulators to improve dam safetynationwide. In 2000, ASDSO created a dam owner outreach committee. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first projects <strong>the</strong> teamproduced was a program <strong>of</strong> workshops developed to <strong>in</strong>crease dam owner/operator education <strong>in</strong> keyareas. It was recognized that this could be a great benefit to many states that do not have <strong>the</strong> staff ortime to implement and run <strong>the</strong>se types <strong>of</strong> programs for owners.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S., Missouri, Pennsylvania, Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, TexasSubject terms: ownership, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gSchwalbach, Teresa A. Plann<strong>in</strong>g for Emergencies: Lessons Learned from Silver Lake. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2008 (V. 6 N. 2)In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> a dam failure, emergency responders play a vital role. The author-EmergencyManagement Coord<strong>in</strong>ator for Marquette County-recounts how an updated emergency action plan andongo<strong>in</strong>g communications between responders and dam owners contributed to a successful response byemergency personnel dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2003 Silver Lake dam failure <strong>in</strong> Marquette County, Michigan.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: MichiganSubject terms: emergency action plan, failures, EAPs, emergency management, ownership, public safetyBaston, Conrad R. and Hibbs, David O. A Case History for <strong>the</strong> Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lake ForestEstates <strong>Dam</strong>s. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2008 (V. 6 N. 3)The Lake Forest Estate dams <strong>in</strong> West Virg<strong>in</strong>ia <strong>in</strong>clude primary and secondary earth fill dams located <strong>in</strong>adjacent valleys. The dams are connected by an open channel orig<strong>in</strong>ally thought to be <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipalspillway for <strong>the</strong> primary dam. The dams were rehabilitated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2006-2007 construction season tocomply with current state dam safety requirements. Three unusual conditions were encountered dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> rehabilitation: (1) a "bucket pipe" pr<strong>in</strong>cipal spillway buried <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary dam embankment, (2)occurrence <strong>of</strong> an upstream slope failure dur<strong>in</strong>g drawdown <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary dam reservoir, and (3) runn<strong>in</strong>gclear seeps beneath <strong>the</strong> toe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondary embankment. This case history reflects some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> designand construction issues faced by owners, dam safety eng<strong>in</strong>eers, regulators and contractors, particularly<strong>the</strong> differences between <strong>in</strong>itial assumptions used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> design phase and actual conditions discovereddur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> construction phase. As unforeseen obstacles arose throughout <strong>the</strong> project, each party had torespond promptly and effectively to address each issue. Cooperative efforts between <strong>the</strong> ownercontractor,design eng<strong>in</strong>eer, and regulatory eng<strong>in</strong>eer led to <strong>the</strong> project's successful completion.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: West Virg<strong>in</strong>iaSubject terms: case studies, design, construction, embankment dams, rehabilitation, spillways, slopestability, seepage, partner<strong>in</strong>gHampton, Neill J. and Constant<strong>in</strong>o, James. Innovative Rehabilitation at Cobble Mounta<strong>in</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>


Outlet Works. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2008 (V. 6 N. 3)In 2005 <strong>the</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield Water and Sewer Commission (SWSC) rehabilitated its diversion tunnel high-headoutlet works facility at Cobble Mounta<strong>in</strong> Reservoir <strong>Dam</strong>, which reta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> water supply for 250,000residents <strong>in</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, Massachusetts and surround<strong>in</strong>g communities. The work was prompted by <strong>the</strong>failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g water-operated differential needle valves, and numerous failures <strong>of</strong> needle valves,similar to those <strong>in</strong> operation at Cobble Mounta<strong>in</strong> and at dams across <strong>the</strong> U.S. These cases had resulted<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> deaths <strong>of</strong> several workers and millions <strong>of</strong> dollars <strong>in</strong> damages to hydraulic structures. Valve failureat Cobble Mounta<strong>in</strong> would have been similarly overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g: loss <strong>of</strong> redundancy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> system's entirewater supply-and thus dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water and fire protection. Over <strong>the</strong> past 15 years, however, no practical, oreven possible, solution had surfaced for rehabilitat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se valves that were more than 200 feet belowground <strong>in</strong> a conf<strong>in</strong>ed space and under high reservoir pressure. The valves would have to be worked on <strong>in</strong>place and "<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry," even though <strong>the</strong>re were no isolation gates upstream to allow dewater<strong>in</strong>g prior todisassembly. To address <strong>the</strong> problem, SWSC and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) developed anorig<strong>in</strong>al, affordable, and safe design. The solution was a first-<strong>of</strong>-its-k<strong>in</strong>d mechanical plugg<strong>in</strong>g system thatisolated <strong>the</strong> outlet valves <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry and resulted <strong>in</strong> a fully rehabilitated, reliable, and secure alternativewater supply, completed under budget and without one safety <strong>in</strong>cident or <strong>in</strong>terruption <strong>of</strong> service.Specifically, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>novative plugg<strong>in</strong>g system allowed for <strong>the</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> two 42- x 30-<strong>in</strong>ch Larner-Johnson differential needle valves with 30-<strong>in</strong>ch-diameter U.S. Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation (USBR)-style jetflowgates and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> two corroded 40-<strong>in</strong>ch Escher Wyss & Co. rotary (ball) style isolationvalves.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: MassachusettsSubject terms: rehabilitation, design, outlet works, spillway capacity, failures, construction, gates, test<strong>in</strong>gTatro, Stephen B., H<strong>in</strong>ds, James K. and West, Jana L. Properties <strong>of</strong> Grout Enriched RollerCompacted Concrete. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2008 (V. 6 N. 3)Grout enriched roller compacted concrete (GERCC) has ga<strong>in</strong>ed acceptance for construct<strong>in</strong>g vertical andsloped fac<strong>in</strong>gs for RCC dams, abutment contacts, <strong>in</strong>terior encasements, and o<strong>the</strong>r features thatpreviously used conventional concrete. Compared to <strong>the</strong> concurrent production and placement <strong>of</strong>conventional concrete for <strong>the</strong>se applications, GERCC provides an economical and less <strong>in</strong>trusive processresult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imal impact to RCC production operations. An <strong>in</strong>vestigation was done to evaluate <strong>the</strong>properties and performance characteristics <strong>of</strong> various factors <strong>of</strong> GERCC. Various properties <strong>of</strong> grout andmethods <strong>of</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g were <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g materials and mix<strong>in</strong>g methods for grout and RCC, groutdosages, grout locations, and compaction variations were exam<strong>in</strong>ed. This paper summarizes <strong>the</strong>GERCC field evaluations, reports <strong>the</strong> significant results, and provides conclusions and recommendationsfor GERCC use.Subject terms: grout<strong>in</strong>g, roller-compacted concrete, design, construction, concrete, guidel<strong>in</strong>es, test<strong>in</strong>g,<strong>in</strong>spection, federal programsFerentchak, James A. and Jamieson, Stephen L. Us<strong>in</strong>g Erosion Rate To Ref<strong>in</strong>e Earth <strong>Dam</strong> BreachParameters. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2008 (V. 6 N. 4)This article was developed from a paper that was presented at <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> 2008 and reflects more than50 years <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed experience by <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g breach parameters for <strong>the</strong> computersimulation <strong>of</strong> earth dam failures. Simulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> earth dams is a key analysis step <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> dam-failure flood <strong>in</strong>undation maps for dam emergency action plans, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g damhazard classifications, and perform<strong>in</strong>g risk assessments for dams. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important results from<strong>the</strong>se evaluations is an estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> peak breach discharge that can be expected if a dam were to faildur<strong>in</strong>g ei<strong>the</strong>r sunny-day or extreme flood events. The peak flow from a dam breach is very sensitive tobreach development time, f<strong>in</strong>al breach width, and breach <strong>in</strong>itiation elevation. The appropriate selection <strong>of</strong>


<strong>the</strong>se and o<strong>the</strong>r breach parameters requires considerable eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g judgment. This article describes afive-step process that relies on <strong>the</strong> erosion rate to m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>the</strong> subjective judgment that can occur whenselect<strong>in</strong>g breach parameters. This article also presents several case studies to illustrate how this processcan be used to develop realistic dam breach parameters for earth dams.Subject terms: erosion, dambreak analysis, case studies, embankment dams, models, test<strong>in</strong>g, failures,mapp<strong>in</strong>g, EAPs, risk assessment, failure analysis, flood analysis, floods, hazard classification, researchLemieux, Michele and Rob<strong>in</strong>son, Arthur. Evacuation Vs. Inundation: Which Map Should YourEmergency Action Plan Conta<strong>in</strong>? <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2008 (V. 6 N. 4)This article makes a case for us<strong>in</strong>g simple conservative evacuation maps <strong>in</strong> dam emergency action plans<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> detailed <strong>in</strong>undation maps that are commonly used. Six "lessons learned" from Montana'sexperiences with tabletop exercises and a survey <strong>of</strong> local emergency responders are used to make <strong>the</strong>case.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: MontanaSubject terms: EAPs, emergency action plan, mapp<strong>in</strong>g, emergency management, state programs,partner<strong>in</strong>g, public awareness, public safety, risk assessment, floodsTw<strong>in</strong>g, David R. and McMaster, Kev<strong>in</strong>. The Delaware <strong>Dam</strong> Inventory 2008: A ComprehensiveApproach To F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Regulated <strong>Dam</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> First State. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2008 (V. 6 N.4)In 2004 <strong>the</strong> Delaware legislature passed a dam safety law, authoriz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> NaturalResources and Environmental Control (DNREC) to implement a <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Program for <strong>the</strong> state.Delaware was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last states <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country to start a dam safety program, and <strong>the</strong> State had verylittle <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> location and nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dams that would be regulated. DNREC realized thata statewide dam <strong>in</strong>ventory update was needed, not only to locate dams, but to also determ<strong>in</strong>e whichdams would be regulated. The Delaware dam safety law limits regulatory authority to publicly owned, highand significant hazard potential dams. To establish a modern <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>of</strong> Delaware dams meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>law's criteria, DNREC reta<strong>in</strong>ed and worked with URS Corporation to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> allpotentially regulated dams with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> state, and to conduct a hazard potential and risk assessment foreach identified dam. <strong>Dam</strong> ownership, dam characteristics and reservoir size were used to prioritize <strong>the</strong>field <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> all potentially regulated dams. Because <strong>the</strong> Delaware law does not regulate lowhazard potential dams, it was necessary to conduct a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary hazard potential assessment todeterm<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r a dam would be regulated or not. Approximate methods were used for thisassessment (based on downstream impacts identified dur<strong>in</strong>g field <strong>in</strong>vestigations), because fund<strong>in</strong>g wasnot available to perform detailed studies for each dam. A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary risk assessment was alsoconducted based on dam and reservoir observations. The end goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk assessment was toprioritize <strong>the</strong> Delaware statewide dam <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>in</strong>to high, medium and low risk categories for <strong>the</strong> purpose<strong>of</strong> future resource allocation. Risk assessment tools and strategies were designed to be flexible <strong>in</strong> nature,so that more accurate data can be easily <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> process. Accurate data will be obta<strong>in</strong>edthrough future detailed hydraulic model<strong>in</strong>g and comprehensive field <strong>in</strong>spection <strong>of</strong> each dam.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: DelawareSubject terms: state programs, legislation, regulations, hazard classification, risk assessment, partner<strong>in</strong>gCahill, Scott P. Underwater Valve Replacement at Radnor Lake. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2009(V. 7 N. 1)Radnor <strong>Dam</strong> is a high-hazard-potential 54'-high ear<strong>the</strong>n dam <strong>in</strong> a state-designated "natural area." The


project <strong>in</strong>volved replac<strong>in</strong>g a failed upstream 36-<strong>in</strong>ch diameter butterfly valve with a new sta<strong>in</strong>less steelknife gate valve, a hydraulic actuation system, and a structure to support <strong>the</strong> valve and trash rack on <strong>the</strong>lake bottom, to be completed with no discernable impact to <strong>the</strong> lake and with disturbance to <strong>the</strong>surround<strong>in</strong>g area kept to a m<strong>in</strong>imum.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: TennesseeSubject terms: rehabilitation, conduits, environment, design, underwater <strong>in</strong>vestigations, jo<strong>in</strong>tsGraham, Wayne J. Get out - Get OUT - GET OUT! Gett<strong>in</strong>g People Out <strong>of</strong> Harm's Way. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2009 (V. 7 N. 1)Emergency action plann<strong>in</strong>g for dams started <strong>in</strong> earnest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s after a rash <strong>of</strong> lethal dam failures.Exclud<strong>in</strong>g failure <strong>of</strong> Teton <strong>Dam</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re were four dam failures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s with more than 25 fatalities.These failures, plus <strong>the</strong> Teton <strong>Dam</strong> failure, were a wake-up-call that someth<strong>in</strong>g needed to be done toimprove <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation's dams. Cited dam failures: Taum Sauk, Kelly Barnes (Toccoa Falls),Teton, Buffalo Creek, Laurel Run, Canyon Lake, Mill River (Williamsburg, MA), South Fork (Johnstown),Walnut Grove, Aust<strong>in</strong> (PA), Lower Otay, St. Francis.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S., Georgia, Idaho, Arizona, California, Pennsylvania, Missouri, South Dakota,West Virg<strong>in</strong>iaSubject terms: public awareness, public safety, failures, emergency action plan, EAPs, emergencymanagement, historical <strong>in</strong>terest, legislation, state programs, federal programs, case studiesO'Leary, Timothy M. Interim Risk Reduction Measures for <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -03/2009 (V. 7 N. 1)Interim Risk Reduction Measures (IRRM) are an <strong>in</strong>tegral part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk-<strong>in</strong>formed management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Program <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers (USACE). IRRM are an "<strong>in</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-meantimeplan" for dam operations to reduce <strong>the</strong> probability and consequences <strong>of</strong> catastrophic failure to <strong>the</strong>maximum extent reasonably practical while <strong>in</strong>spections, <strong>in</strong>vestigations, test<strong>in</strong>g, and studies take place,which could ultimately determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> project is a candidate for significant repairs. Thispaper provides a general overview <strong>of</strong> IRRM from USACE's EC 1110-2-6064 and <strong>the</strong> author's experiencewith development, implementation, and review <strong>of</strong> IRRM Plans.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: TennesseeSubject terms: risk assessment, federal programs, public safety, guidel<strong>in</strong>es, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>spection,mapp<strong>in</strong>g, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, EAPs, warn<strong>in</strong>g systems, emergency action plan, emergency managementAllen, Dave, Boyle, Jason, Campbell, Jason, Clay, Robert, Galloway, Meg, Kannik, Mia and Nance,David. Midwest Flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2008: State <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Officials' Response. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -06/2009 (V. 7 N. 2)2008 was a record year <strong>of</strong> precipitation and flood<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> Midwest. The first six months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year hadmultiple periods <strong>of</strong> heavy ra<strong>in</strong>fall lead<strong>in</strong>g up to <strong>the</strong> largest wide-spread ra<strong>in</strong> event, which happened <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>first half <strong>of</strong> June. Dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, a large-scale wea<strong>the</strong>r pattern consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a high pressure systemover <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn pla<strong>in</strong>s and Ohio Valley and abnormally low pressure situated over <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Pla<strong>in</strong>screated a focal po<strong>in</strong>t at its boundary for <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> heavy ra<strong>in</strong>fall and severe storms.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> NOAA Climate Prediction Center, <strong>the</strong> three factors that played an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>June 2008 Midwest flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cluded: 1) above-average precipitation <strong>the</strong> previous months, which causedhigh soil moisture and high river levels, 2) an atmospheric circulation pattern dur<strong>in</strong>g this time that wassimilar to <strong>the</strong> Great Midwest floods <strong>of</strong> 1993, and 3) <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> two prom<strong>in</strong>ent tropical


climate patterns, La N<strong>in</strong>a and Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO), that contributed to several exceptionallyheavy precipitation events dur<strong>in</strong>g February-June 2008. A precipitation map for <strong>the</strong> first 15 days <strong>of</strong> June2008, developed by NOAA Midwest Regional Climate Center, shows that <strong>the</strong> hardest hit areas were parts<strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast M<strong>in</strong>nesota, sou<strong>the</strong>rn Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, nor<strong>the</strong>ast Iowa and parts <strong>of</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois and Indiana. The ra<strong>in</strong>sdid not stop <strong>in</strong> June. At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> July, <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern half <strong>of</strong> Missouri received 15 <strong>in</strong>ches <strong>in</strong> three days.This area received more than three times <strong>the</strong> normal monthly ra<strong>in</strong>fall. The total January-July precipitationfor <strong>the</strong> Midwest as a whole was <strong>the</strong> highest on record. This paper is a state-by-state account <strong>of</strong> howdams and levees <strong>in</strong> this region performed dur<strong>in</strong>g this period and how <strong>the</strong> state dam safety <strong>of</strong>ficialsresponded.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Iowa, Ill<strong>in</strong>ois, M<strong>in</strong>nesota, Mississippi, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, Ohio, IndianaSubject terms: floods, state programs, <strong>in</strong>cidents, emergency management, emergency action plan, EAPs,guidel<strong>in</strong>es, failures, hydrologyFarrell, Laurence M. and Dillabough, Michael. Warm Spr<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>Dam</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Motorized Outlet TunnelInspection Vehicle (MOTIV). <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2009 (V. 7 N. 2)The unique Motorized Outlet Tunnel Inspection Vehicle (MOTIV) completed its maiden voyage <strong>in</strong> SonomaCounty, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn California <strong>in</strong> September 2008 as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 5-year <strong>in</strong>spection <strong>of</strong> Warm Spr<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>Dam</strong>.Past <strong>in</strong>spections required complete shut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water flow with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> outlet tunnel, but due to recentlydiscovered endangered species <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area, this practice is no longer viable. A new <strong>in</strong>spection methodthat did not <strong>in</strong>terrupt <strong>the</strong> water flow h<strong>in</strong>ged on build<strong>in</strong>g a vehicle that could safely travel above <strong>the</strong> waterflow <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tunnel: <strong>the</strong> MOTIV.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: CaliforniaSubject terms: technology, <strong>in</strong>spection, outlet works, conduits, environment, embankment dams,<strong>in</strong>strumentation, designFrance, John W. and W<strong>in</strong>ckler, Christ<strong>in</strong>a J.C. Rapid drawdown analysis - What is an analyst to do?<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2009 (V. 7 N. 2)In <strong>the</strong> authors' experience rapid drawdown analysis <strong>of</strong> embankment dams is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mostmisunderstood slope stability analysis cases. As a result, <strong>in</strong>appropriate analysis methods have <strong>of</strong>tenbeen used. This paper beg<strong>in</strong>s with a review <strong>of</strong> fundamental soil behavior dur<strong>in</strong>g rapid drawdown,followed by a discussion <strong>of</strong> both appropriate and <strong>in</strong>appropriate analysis methods. An example damillustrates <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> results obta<strong>in</strong>ed with different methods and, f<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> authors' conclusionsare provided.Subject terms: embankment dams, drawdown, stability analysis, slope stability, guidel<strong>in</strong>es, models,computer programs, federal programsNoble-Blair, Mishelle R., Zamensky, Erica D. and Zamensky, Greg. There and back aga<strong>in</strong>: A damowner's tale <strong>of</strong> emergency action plann<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2009 (V. 7 N. 3)Development and implementation <strong>of</strong> an emergency action plan (EAP) may overwhelm dam owners;however, all dam owners - especially those <strong>of</strong> high or significant hazard dams - have an obligation toengage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> emergency plann<strong>in</strong>g process. Moreover, some owners are required by law to exercise <strong>the</strong>irEAP to ensure its adequacy and functionality. One dam owner, Fairfax Water (Fairfax, Virg<strong>in</strong>ia), hasrealized <strong>the</strong> immeasurable value ga<strong>in</strong>ed by putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir plan to <strong>the</strong> test. Drills, tabletop exercises andfunctional exercises allowed Fairfax Water to improve communication and plann<strong>in</strong>g processes associatedwith <strong>the</strong>ir EAP. Additionally, Fairfax Water realized <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> full owner and emergencymanagement agency <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam emergency plann<strong>in</strong>g process. These


approaches ensure an exceptional emergency plan that reflects <strong>the</strong> best response that emergencymanagement agencies and dam owners can provide. Understand<strong>in</strong>g that emergency plann<strong>in</strong>g mustevolve to meet chang<strong>in</strong>g conditions, Fairfax Water has adopted a process focused on cont<strong>in</strong>ualimprovement, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Plan-Do-Check-Act model to guide <strong>the</strong>ir emergency plann<strong>in</strong>g efforts. Includeslessons learned dur<strong>in</strong>g 1864 Mill River <strong>Dam</strong> catastrophe <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S., Massachusetts, Virg<strong>in</strong>iaSubject terms: EAPs, emergency action plan, ownership, public awareness, failures, historical <strong>in</strong>terest,tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gStoessel, John, Charlwood, Rob<strong>in</strong> G. and Knarr, C. Michael. The Installation <strong>of</strong> a geomembranel<strong>in</strong>er At Gem Lake <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2009 (V. 7 N. 3)Gem Lake <strong>Dam</strong>, owned and operated by Sou<strong>the</strong>rn California Edison (SCE), is located <strong>in</strong> on <strong>the</strong> EasternSlope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sierra Nevada Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, about 300 miles nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles, California. Thismultiple arch, concrete dam serves to impound water used by Rush Meadows Powerhouse to generateup to 13 megawatts <strong>of</strong> electric power.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: CaliforniaSubject terms: case studies, design, construction, geosyn<strong>the</strong>tics, concrete dams, arch dams, Reservoirs,concrete, seepage, freeze-thaw deteriorationVan Aller, Hal. Failure <strong>of</strong> bonneted sluice gate system at Savage River <strong>Dam</strong>. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2009 (V. 7 N. 3)The Upper Potomac River Commission (UPRC) owns and operates <strong>the</strong> Savage River <strong>Dam</strong> (Figure 1) <strong>in</strong>Garrett County, Maryland. In December 2007, dur<strong>in</strong>g normal operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Savage River Reservoir, <strong>the</strong>UPRC discovered that one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four large gates at <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reservoir could not be opened,elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ability to control outflow through half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility’s outlet structure. Currently, only <strong>the</strong> leftside gates can be operated. The exist<strong>in</strong>g gates were <strong>in</strong>stalled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>facility and have been <strong>in</strong> service s<strong>in</strong>ce 1952. The eng<strong>in</strong>eer has recommended that all four gates bereplaced, which will require temporarily dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reservoir dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> 2009-2010.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: MarylandSubject terms: <strong>in</strong>cidents, gates, case studies, historical <strong>in</strong>terest, outlet works, RehabilitationPaul, Dave, Cyganiewicz, John, Slaven, Chris and France, John. Assessment <strong>of</strong> Potential FailureModes for <strong>the</strong> Truckee Canal at Fernley, Nevada. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2009 (V. 7 N. 4)At approximately 4:00 AM on January 5, 2008, <strong>the</strong> downhill embankment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Truckee Canal failed atapproximate canal station 714+00, releas<strong>in</strong>g water <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> town <strong>of</strong> Fernley, Nevada. Approximately fivehundred and n<strong>in</strong>ety homes were flooded. The canal dra<strong>in</strong>ed through <strong>the</strong> breach from both <strong>the</strong> upstreamand downstream directions. Reportedly, water flowed through <strong>the</strong> breach for up to 9 hours and waterdepths <strong>of</strong> up to 8 feet occurred <strong>in</strong> some locations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> town <strong>of</strong> Fernley, with water depths <strong>of</strong> 1 to 4 feetcommon throughout hous<strong>in</strong>g developments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> town. No fatalities occurred as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flood<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>Dam</strong>ages were estimated to be approximately $50,000,000. Prior to January 4, 2008, <strong>the</strong> TruckeeCarson Irrigation District (TCID) had been divert<strong>in</strong>g water through <strong>the</strong> canal at an approximate averagedaily rate <strong>of</strong> 370 cfs. A storm event <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reno/Sparks area on January 4, 2008 generated 1.91 <strong>in</strong>ches <strong>of</strong>precipitation, which resulted <strong>in</strong> significant <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Truckee River flows and diversions <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>Truckee Canal. Based on data from a USGS gaug<strong>in</strong>g station about 4 miles upstream <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> breach site, itis estimated that <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> canal was approximately 750 cfs at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> breach occurred. This


paper <strong>in</strong>cludes discussion <strong>of</strong>: 1) technical <strong>in</strong>formation pert<strong>in</strong>ent to <strong>the</strong> failure, 2) <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>canal and breach site, 3) <strong>the</strong> potential failure modes to help expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> failure, 4) details <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> breach repair.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: NevadaSubject terms: canals, failures, f<strong>in</strong>ancial aspects, damages, failure analysis, failure modesRobison, E. George and Craven, Michael. Room to Spare? A systematic evaluation <strong>of</strong> spillwaysiz<strong>in</strong>g for exist<strong>in</strong>g high and significant hazard dams <strong>in</strong> Oregon. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2009(V. 7 N. 4)Accord<strong>in</strong>g to one compilation <strong>of</strong> dam failures, approximately 34% <strong>of</strong> failures are caused by overtopp<strong>in</strong>gdur<strong>in</strong>g floods, with spillway capacity play<strong>in</strong>g a significant role <strong>in</strong> failure (ICOLD, 1995). In ano<strong>the</strong>rcompilation, <strong>the</strong> percent <strong>of</strong> failures related to overtopp<strong>in</strong>g is 66% (Salisbury, 1998). Even though<strong>in</strong>adequate spillway siz<strong>in</strong>g can be a significant factor <strong>in</strong> dam failures, systematic evaluations <strong>of</strong> spillwaysizes over large populations <strong>of</strong> dams are rare. In Oregon, dams range <strong>in</strong> age from new to over 100 yearsold. The standards and methods for spillway siz<strong>in</strong>g have evolved over this period. <strong>Dam</strong>s built <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>time periods may not be up to current standards and practices. To determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> extent to which dams <strong>in</strong>Oregon may have <strong>in</strong>adequate spillway discharge capacity, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oregon WaterResources Department evaluated spillway capacity for 208 high and significant hazard embankmentdams <strong>in</strong> Oregon with sizable watersheds upstream. As part <strong>of</strong> this study, spillway capacity was evaluateddam by dam and also by region and <strong>the</strong> time at which it was designed and built. For each dam, a ratio <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> spillway capacity to <strong>the</strong> peak 100-year flow was computed. Reasons for differences <strong>in</strong> this ratioamong dams were <strong>the</strong>n exam<strong>in</strong>ed by analyz<strong>in</strong>g long-term hydrologic records for given streamflow gagesnear two case study dams with problematic spillway siz<strong>in</strong>g. This study focused on high and significanthazard dams because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir failure. S<strong>in</strong>ce concrete dams can generally withstandsome overtopp<strong>in</strong>g without failure, <strong>the</strong>y were excluded from this study. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, earth and rockembankment dams that have small watersheds and are filled by canals and pump<strong>in</strong>g were also excludedbecause <strong>the</strong> 100-year peak flow analysis is not relevant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spillways for <strong>the</strong>se structures.This left a data set <strong>of</strong> 208 dams to be evaluated. For each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se 208 dams, <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spillwaycapacity to <strong>the</strong> peak 100-year flow was computed.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: OregonSubject terms: state programs, spillway capacity, spillways, hazard classification, standards, design,design floodSchultz, Mark, Lessman, Jim and Pi, Melissa. A regulatory perspective on <strong>the</strong> St. Francis <strong>Dam</strong>failure. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2009 (V. 7 N. 4)When St. Francis <strong>Dam</strong> failed near <strong>the</strong> stroke <strong>of</strong> midnight on March 12, 1928, it released a devastat<strong>in</strong>g38,000 acre-feet <strong>of</strong> water <strong>in</strong> a massive wave <strong>of</strong> destruction. At least 450 people were killed, and manyo<strong>the</strong>rs were never accounted for. By several measures, this tragedy was <strong>the</strong> worst eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g disaster<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20th century <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States. Public outrage from <strong>the</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 205-ft highconcrete gravity-arch dam led to comprehensive dam safety regulation <strong>in</strong> California and <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>the</strong>licens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional eng<strong>in</strong>eers. This article reviews forensic evidence regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mode <strong>of</strong> failure,<strong>the</strong> regulatory environment <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> dam was constructed, and <strong>the</strong> effect that additional oversightmight have had. The design and construction <strong>of</strong> St. Francis <strong>Dam</strong> was exempt from regulatory oversight <strong>in</strong>place at <strong>the</strong> time, enacted <strong>in</strong> 1917 state dam safety legislation. For comparison, <strong>the</strong> authors exam<strong>in</strong>e twosimilar dams constructed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same period under regulatory review by <strong>the</strong> State Eng<strong>in</strong>eer.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: CaliforniaSubject terms: failures, state programs, Regulations, seepage, design, construction, historical <strong>in</strong>terest,


Regulatory exemptions, failure analysis, failure modes, arch dams, gravity dams, concrete damsRoberts, Thomas I. Graded Filter Dra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Dam</strong>s – Successes and Failures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Western Part <strong>of</strong>Virg<strong>in</strong>ia. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2010 (V. 8 N. 1)Hundreds <strong>of</strong> dams fail suddenly every year due to preventable <strong>in</strong>ternal erosion (soil pip<strong>in</strong>g), yet <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>tuitive approaches used by some pr<strong>of</strong>essional eng<strong>in</strong>eers to address dam seepage problems <strong>of</strong>tenexacerbate <strong>the</strong> problems by mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> seepage less <strong>in</strong>spectable, <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternalerosion rates, and creat<strong>in</strong>g a false appearance and sense <strong>of</strong> security. The application <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tuitive, but<strong>in</strong>appropriate, approaches to seepage control to dams can be a formula for disaster. This paper <strong>in</strong>cludesdiscussion <strong>of</strong>: (1) General <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> basic components <strong>of</strong> a properly designed and constructedgraded filter dra<strong>in</strong> (2) Several examples <strong>of</strong> dams successfully retr<strong>of</strong>itted with graded filter dra<strong>in</strong>s (3)Several examples <strong>of</strong> dams with improperly designed or <strong>in</strong>stalled graded filter dra<strong>in</strong>s.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Virg<strong>in</strong>iaSubject terms: state programs, dra<strong>in</strong>age systems, filters, design, permits, construction, geotechnical<strong>in</strong>vestigations, seepage, pip<strong>in</strong>g, erosion, case studiesScott, Gregg A. Shedd<strong>in</strong>g some light on this th<strong>in</strong>g called risk assessment: Part I – Risk AnalysisBasics. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2010 (V. 8 N. 1)Although dam safety risk assessment has been around for decades, recently it has become a hot topicand has found its way <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> dam safety conferences and literature. However, <strong>the</strong> papers andexplanations <strong>of</strong>ten assume <strong>the</strong> audience has some familiarity with probabilistic methodology andterm<strong>in</strong>ology. For those who have had limited exposure to <strong>the</strong>se concepts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g most eng<strong>in</strong>eers andscientists who had a s<strong>in</strong>gle college level course <strong>in</strong> probability and statistics, it is difficult to follow <strong>the</strong>discussion. This article is <strong>in</strong>tended to provide some basic background <strong>in</strong>formation to help dam safetypr<strong>of</strong>essionals understand what this th<strong>in</strong>g called risk assessment is all about, draw<strong>in</strong>g upon <strong>the</strong> morepractical methods <strong>in</strong> use at <strong>the</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: Risk assessment, federal programs, guidel<strong>in</strong>esTurner, Kenneth R. and Wooten, R. Lee. Lake Burnt Mills <strong>Dam</strong> Rehabilitation. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> - 03/2010 (V. 8 N. 1)Lake Burnt Mills <strong>Dam</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> seven reservoirs that supply fresh water to Norfolk and adjacentcommunities. Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2006, <strong>the</strong> City undertook remedial measures to address several dam safetydeficiencies; <strong>the</strong> most urgent <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ability to safely pass <strong>the</strong> Probable Maximum Flood ,<strong>in</strong>adequate safety factor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>take tower and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g walls, severe deterioration <strong>of</strong> concrete below <strong>the</strong>waterl<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spillway crest for <strong>the</strong> loads and flow at <strong>the</strong> maximum designhead. GEI Consultants designed several remedial measures. Due to <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> low-level outlet,<strong>the</strong> entire system was replaced. The replacement system <strong>in</strong>cluded a new <strong>in</strong>take tower and a microtunneledlow-level outlet. The spillway and embankment were modified by:--extend<strong>in</strong>g and rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g parapet wall and <strong>the</strong> ends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> embankment to prevent overtopp<strong>in</strong>g;--a partial demolition and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g ogee crest to match <strong>the</strong> high flow expected from<strong>the</strong> PMF;--repair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spillway channel floor and walls to <strong>in</strong>clude filtered seepage collection and dra<strong>in</strong>age<strong>in</strong>terceptor trenches; and--replacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> riprap on <strong>the</strong> upper channel side slopes to provide suitable erosion protection andrepair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deteriorated concrete.


The major challenge <strong>of</strong> this project was to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> dam safety and allow cont<strong>in</strong>ued operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>reservoir dur<strong>in</strong>g remedial construction. Ano<strong>the</strong>r major challenge was <strong>the</strong> change <strong>of</strong> design for <strong>the</strong> lowleveloutlet dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> design phase. The <strong>in</strong>itial low-level outlet design was a siphon structure which wasreplaced by a large diameter micro-tunneled low-level outlet. The City chose <strong>the</strong> micro-tunneled low-leveloutlet, with its <strong>in</strong>creased risks <strong>of</strong> tunnel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to full reservoirs, due to concerns about safe yield dur<strong>in</strong>gtimes <strong>of</strong> low reservoir levels and because <strong>of</strong> its <strong>in</strong>creased reliability and ease <strong>of</strong> operations compared to<strong>the</strong> siphon option.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Virg<strong>in</strong>iaSubject terms: Rehabilitation, design, construction, case studies, Embankment dams, outlet works,Riprap, spillways, Erosion, concrete, seepage, dra<strong>in</strong>age systems, dam rais<strong>in</strong>gR. Cannon, G. Robblee, T. Marshall, G. Paxson, M. K<strong>in</strong>g and A. Williams. Replac<strong>in</strong>g LakeTownsend <strong>Dam</strong>. The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2010 (V. 8 N. 2)Lake Townsend <strong>Dam</strong> impounds <strong>the</strong> primary water supply for <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Greensboro, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a. Theconcrete gated spillway is suffer<strong>in</strong>g from severe deterioration due to alkali silica reactivity (ASR) and has<strong>in</strong>adequate hydraulic capacity to meet spillway design storm (SDS) requirements <strong>of</strong> North Carol<strong>in</strong>a <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong>. The project <strong>in</strong>cludes a replacement spillway designed to have hydraulic capacity similar to <strong>the</strong>exist<strong>in</strong>g gated spillway. The embankment will be armored to allow overtopp<strong>in</strong>g for storms up to <strong>the</strong> SDS.Subsurface <strong>in</strong>vestigations revealed s<strong>of</strong>t and loose alluvial soils <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al stream and floodpla<strong>in</strong>.Excavation and replacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se soils is necessary for support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new spillway and ear<strong>the</strong>mbankments. The effect <strong>of</strong> spillway submergence suggests that a fixed crest labyr<strong>in</strong>th weir is moreappropriate than a gated spillway. In addition, <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Greensboro prefers <strong>the</strong> limited operation andma<strong>in</strong>tenance requirements <strong>of</strong> a fixed crest spillway. The replacement spillway is a seven cycle, 300 ftwide, 20 foot high labyr<strong>in</strong>th weir. The embankment will be armored with articulat<strong>in</strong>g concrete blocks(ACB) to protect aga<strong>in</strong>st failure from overtopp<strong>in</strong>g. The design <strong>in</strong>cluded hydraulic model<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>gcomputational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a physical model study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labyr<strong>in</strong>th and energy dissipater.The structural design <strong>in</strong>cluded f<strong>in</strong>ite element model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> labyr<strong>in</strong>th weir. Plans and specificationswere completed <strong>in</strong> 2008 and construction began <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 2009.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: North Carol<strong>in</strong>aSubject terms: spillway capacity, Rehabilitation, concrete growth, spillways, design flood, state programs,design, construction, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigations, weirs, modelsS. Carter, E. Guy and G. Hensley. Indiana <strong>Dam</strong> and Levee Distress Observations dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008Midwest Flood<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2010 (V. 8 N. 2)Record precipitation dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> 2008 caused widespread flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Midwest. In centraland sou<strong>the</strong>rn Indiana, historic flood<strong>in</strong>g occurred <strong>in</strong> June dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> largest ra<strong>in</strong>fall period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year.Flood levels <strong>in</strong> several regions exceeded records set <strong>in</strong> 1913, and a major disaster declaration issued for29 counties enabled <strong>the</strong> state to receive federal assistance. The State <strong>of</strong> Indiana requested federalsupport <strong>in</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g geotechnical assessments <strong>of</strong> more than 100 privately owned, high-hazard-potentialdams <strong>in</strong> flood-affected counties, and <strong>the</strong> Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) tasked <strong>the</strong>U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers (USACE) with this mission. With<strong>in</strong> a few days after <strong>the</strong> heavy Junera<strong>in</strong>fall, teams <strong>of</strong> USACE and state personnel completed <strong>the</strong>se assessments. Field evaluationsdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed whe<strong>the</strong>r dams had survived <strong>the</strong> event and rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g threat levels to downstream life andproperty. Immediately follow<strong>in</strong>g this mission, USACE personnel traveled to southwestern Indiana tocomplete assessments <strong>of</strong> levee systems along <strong>the</strong> White and Wabash rivers, which were near<strong>in</strong>g orsurpass<strong>in</strong>g record levels. These field evaluations also assessed current threat levels to landward life andproperty and provided situational awareness and flood fight<strong>in</strong>g guidance to local sponsors and leveeboard members. This article briefly presents examples <strong>of</strong> dam and levee distress observations made <strong>in</strong>


June 2008 dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> above-stated missions. Included are examples <strong>of</strong> conditions pos<strong>in</strong>g threats toear<strong>the</strong>n structures, such as overtopp<strong>in</strong>g, spillway erosion, slope <strong>in</strong>stability, foundation pip<strong>in</strong>g/erosion, and<strong>in</strong>adequate project design and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: IndianaSubject terms: floods, levees, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigations, Embankment dams, state programs, federalprograms, overtopp<strong>in</strong>g, Erosion, slope stability, foundations, pip<strong>in</strong>g, design, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, vegetation,spillway capacity, <strong>in</strong>cidents, operationD. M. Temple, S. L. Hunt and G. J. Hanson. Observations on <strong>Dam</strong> Overtopp<strong>in</strong>g Breach Processesand Prediction. The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 06/2010 (V. 8 N. 2)Research conducted over <strong>the</strong> last decade has led to an improved understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physicalprocesses associated with <strong>the</strong> response <strong>of</strong> an ear<strong>the</strong>n embankment to overtopp<strong>in</strong>g flows. This researchhas demonstrated that vegetation and cohesive soil material properties play an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>erosion processes and rate <strong>of</strong> erosion dur<strong>in</strong>g overtopp<strong>in</strong>g. The overall breach process has beenobserved to <strong>in</strong>volve vegetation failure, surface detachment, headcut development and migration, andbreach widen<strong>in</strong>g. Computational procedures based on <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this research are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>corporated<strong>in</strong>to new s<strong>of</strong>tware tools for use <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> dams and levees subjected to overtopp<strong>in</strong>gdur<strong>in</strong>g extreme flood events. Proper application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se tools and correct <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>computational results require that <strong>the</strong> user understand <strong>the</strong> concepts represented and <strong>the</strong> extent to whichsimplification <strong>of</strong> complex processes is required <strong>in</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> computational procedures.Subject terms: Research, overtopp<strong>in</strong>g, models, Embankment dams, Erosion, vegetation, federalprograms, sedimentation, dambreak analysisB. Harr<strong>in</strong>gton and R. T<strong>in</strong>sley. Monocacy Boulevard <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>in</strong> Karst Topography The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2010 (V. 8 N. 3)Monocacy Boulevard <strong>Dam</strong>, a high hazard stormwater management dam and reservoir <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong>Frederick, Maryland were completed <strong>in</strong> July 2010. The Maryland State Highway Adm<strong>in</strong>istration (SHA)applied for a permit through <strong>the</strong> MD Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Environment’s <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Division <strong>in</strong> 2004 toconstruct Monocacy Boulevard <strong>Dam</strong> for stormwater management control <strong>in</strong> karst topography. The damand reservoir are part <strong>of</strong> a larger project <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g Interstate I-70 widen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> MD 85 and anew East Street to provide a third “gate way” to <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Frederick. Monocacy Boulevard was extendedto <strong>the</strong> west and north <strong>of</strong> I-70 approximately 2,800 feet to MD 85. The roadway embankment forMonocacy Boulevard <strong>in</strong>cludes a 600-foot long earth dam with geotechnical <strong>in</strong>strumentation, and is builtadjacent to a 12-acre reservoir and high capacity pump station. The dam is located on MonocacyBoulevard between South and East Streets on <strong>the</strong> north side <strong>of</strong> I-70. The dam captures run<strong>of</strong>f from anapproximate 400-acre watershed.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Virg<strong>in</strong>iaSubject terms: design, construction, rehabilitation, state programs, geotechnical <strong>in</strong>vestigations, geology,Embankment dams, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, stormwater managementS. McCubb<strong>in</strong>-Ca<strong>in</strong> and B. A. Tschantz. Wanted: More <strong>Dam</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eers. The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -09/2010 (V. 8 N. 3)This paper was orig<strong>in</strong>ally published <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> American Society for Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Education (ASEE), held June 20-23, 2010 <strong>in</strong> Louisville, Kentucky.It was repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> by courtesy <strong>of</strong> ASEE, <strong>the</strong> copyright owner. It discusses <strong>the</strong>


student outreach <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> State <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Officials (ASDSO), a national nonpr<strong>of</strong>itassociation <strong>of</strong> more than 2,800 members represent<strong>in</strong>g state and federal agencies, consult<strong>in</strong>g firms,dam and levee owners, manufacturers and suppliers, researchers, college faculty, students and o<strong>the</strong>rsdedicated to ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> our nation’s dams. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to surveys conducted by <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>in</strong>2004 and 2009, <strong>the</strong>re is an <strong>in</strong>adequate supply <strong>of</strong> qualified candidates for jobs relat<strong>in</strong>g to dam and leveesafety, and <strong>the</strong> shortage will likely <strong>in</strong>crease as “boomer-era” experts retire. This paper looks at currenthir<strong>in</strong>g needs with<strong>in</strong> government and private sector communities; outl<strong>in</strong>es how ASDSO’s projects arehelp<strong>in</strong>g to attract students to pr<strong>of</strong>essions <strong>in</strong> dam and levee safety; and challenges <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>the</strong>eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g education community to foster greater collaboration between universities and practic<strong>in</strong>geng<strong>in</strong>eers who specialize <strong>in</strong> dam eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: U.S.Subject terms: tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programs, public awareness, partnershipsG. A. Scott and W. F. Fiedler. Shedd<strong>in</strong>g some light on this th<strong>in</strong>g called risk assessment: Part II –Example Risk Analysis. The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 09/2010 (V. 8 N. 3)Part I <strong>of</strong> this article was published <strong>in</strong> Volume 8, Issue 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> (April, 2010). It covered <strong>the</strong> basics<strong>of</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g risk analyses and <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g risk estimates. Risk, by def<strong>in</strong>ition, mustconsider both <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> failure and <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> failure. In Part II, <strong>the</strong> risk analysis processis solidified through presentation <strong>of</strong> an example.Subject terms: risk assessment, federal programs, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, failure analysis, case studies, failuremodes, failures, stability analysisW. J. Graham. The Banqiao and Shimantan <strong>Dam</strong> Failures. The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2010 (V.8 N. 4)Banqiao and Shimantan dams and 60 o<strong>the</strong>rs failed <strong>in</strong> Henan Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>in</strong> August 1975.Information on <strong>the</strong>se failures rema<strong>in</strong>ed hidden from <strong>the</strong> outside world for two decades. The failuresresulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> largest loss <strong>of</strong> life ever from any dam failure, with fatality estimates rang<strong>in</strong>g from 26,000 to230,000. More than 10 million people were impacted by <strong>the</strong> floods, and 5,240,000 houses collapsed.Why did <strong>the</strong> dam failures occur and why did so many people die? Could a similar event occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>United States or <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r developed countries?Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Ch<strong>in</strong>aSubject terms: failures, floods, fatalities, historical <strong>in</strong>terest, <strong>in</strong>ternational programs, public awarenessD. L. Johnson. The Unpermitted <strong>Dam</strong> Initiative <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State. The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> -12/2010 (V. 8 N. 4)This paper discusses an <strong>in</strong>itiative by Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State’s dam safety program to f<strong>in</strong>d, <strong>in</strong>spect and br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>to compliance dams constructed without state approval. The <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Office (DSO) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology has jurisdiction over any dam that can impound 10 or moreacre-feet <strong>of</strong> water at its crest. In March 2008, <strong>the</strong> DSO began an effort to f<strong>in</strong>d unpermitted dams that metthis threshold. Over <strong>the</strong> next four months, this search uncovered some 600 water bodies that appearedto be impounded beh<strong>in</strong>d unpermitted dams. DSO personnel visited each site where aerial photossuggested <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a high-hazard-potential dam, and assessed <strong>the</strong> condition and hazard-potentialclassification <strong>of</strong> those confirmed. Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se evaluations, <strong>the</strong> DSO required <strong>the</strong> dams’ owners to firstmake emergency repairs; <strong>the</strong>n hire eng<strong>in</strong>eers to perform fur<strong>the</strong>r assessments and design neededmodifications based on current standards. Provided <strong>the</strong>se modifications were completed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> time


frame specified by <strong>the</strong> DSO, <strong>the</strong> dams would be considered <strong>in</strong> compliance with state law.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: Wash<strong>in</strong>gtonSubject terms: state programs, ownership, legal aspects, Enforcement, Regulations, Regulatoryexemptions, permitsD. T. Woosley. Have You Ever Seen <strong>the</strong> Ra<strong>in</strong>? Georgia Flood Event <strong>of</strong> September 2009. The<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> - 12/2010 (V. 8 N. 4)In September 2009, parts <strong>of</strong> Georgia experienced record-break<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>fall, with some areas record<strong>in</strong>gmore than 20 <strong>in</strong>ches <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a 24-hour period. This paper describes how <strong>the</strong> Georgia Safe <strong>Dam</strong>sProgram responded to this extreme event.Geographic <strong>in</strong>terest: GeorgiaSubject terms: floods, failures, Emergency management, state programs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!