13.07.2015 Views

bagwani vikas evam prasar pariyojna in district champawat

bagwani vikas evam prasar pariyojna in district champawat

bagwani vikas evam prasar pariyojna in district champawat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

from <strong>in</strong>gestion of eggs directly from the faeces of def<strong>in</strong>itive hosts or <strong>in</strong>directly by contact with def<strong>in</strong>itivehosts or from contam<strong>in</strong>ated food, water, soil or eat<strong>in</strong>g utensils.There is a close contact of man and animals <strong>in</strong> the tribal areas of Himachal Pradesh, wheredomestic animals are kept <strong>in</strong> basement of the house with human occupants <strong>in</strong> the first floor of samehouse. In addition Gaddis (semi-nomadic tribe) also rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> close contact with sheep, goat and dogsthroughout the year, expos<strong>in</strong>g them to many animal born diseases of occupational risk. The association ofdogs with migratory flock might be play<strong>in</strong>g an important role s<strong>in</strong>ce they accompany the flock all throughthe valley and alp<strong>in</strong>e pastures and also feed on dead/offal of slaughtered sheep and goat, though sylvaticcycle cannot be totally ruled out (Jithendran and Rao, 1996). The authors encountered situations, wherenomads and butchers use the fluid from big hydatid cysts (potentially hazardous) at the site of slaughter.Snacks made from the whole blood collected from the sheep/goat at the time of slaughter is also adelicacy among the migratory tribes. Their migratory life style is likely to have no access to permanenteducational, medical, and veter<strong>in</strong>ary health services. They also may not have safe and sanitary watersupplies lead<strong>in</strong>g to many zoonotic diseases.Risk factors <strong>in</strong> acquir<strong>in</strong>g parasitic <strong>in</strong>fections dur<strong>in</strong>g travel to <strong>in</strong>fested areas of the region hasbeen recorded <strong>in</strong> several <strong>in</strong>stances. Increased thrust on travel tourism and pilgrimage tourism hasenhanced the exposure of the public to these <strong>in</strong>fections. Further, the scal<strong>in</strong>g up of <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> touristsliv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> tents or native dwell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural sett<strong>in</strong>gs and vast number of wild animals <strong>in</strong> thick belt of forestat high mounta<strong>in</strong>s, results <strong>in</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation of environment and <strong>in</strong>fections are contracted either throughcontam<strong>in</strong>ated food or untreated water which is common feature <strong>in</strong> the hilly regions.Human diseases <strong>in</strong> nomadic situationsTable 2 is a summary of the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al parasites, found on stool specimen exam<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>in</strong> theirorder of importance. Some are parasitic zoonoses, which are naturally transmissible from animals to manby various means (Table 3). Zoonoses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g parasites are both common and important, some caus<strong>in</strong>gserious diseases of widely vary<strong>in</strong>g severity from asymptomatic to fatal. Most of the parasitic zoonoses areacquired through contam<strong>in</strong>ated food and water manifest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> subcl<strong>in</strong>ical forms; as a result, it is difficultto visualise the magnitude of the disease problem.Table 2: Parasites reported from human be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Palampur area <strong>in</strong> Himachal PradeshOrganismLocation ReferencesProtozoaGiardia lamblia Intest<strong>in</strong>e Personal observationEntamoeba histolytica Intest<strong>in</strong>e Personal observationCestodesTaenia spp. Intest<strong>in</strong>e Personal observationHymenolepis spp. Intest<strong>in</strong>e HPKV Annual report, 1991-92NematodesAscaris lumbricoides Intest<strong>in</strong>e HPKV Annual report, 1990-92Enterobius vermicularis Rectum Personal observationAncylostoma spp. Intest<strong>in</strong>e Personal observationTrichuris spp. Intest<strong>in</strong>e Personal observationThe cystic stage of the tapeworm Ech<strong>in</strong>ococcus granulosus is common <strong>in</strong> sheep, goat, cattle andbuffaloes. Hydatidosis due to the larval stages of Ech<strong>in</strong>ococcus granulosus is of great public healthimportance. Primarily, the domestic herbivorous animals serve as <strong>in</strong>termediate hosts and rarely producecl<strong>in</strong>ical signs despite heavy <strong>in</strong>fection. Hence the metacestode <strong>in</strong>fections are usually diagnosed atnecropsy. Based on a survey <strong>in</strong> abattoir, sheep and goats revealed 4.4 % <strong>in</strong>fection with hydatid cysts withsize rang<strong>in</strong>g from 2 to 4 cm and with high percentage (70 %) of viable cysts (Jithendran, 1996).Jithendran and Rao (1996) discussed the role of nomadic flocks <strong>in</strong> the spread of zoonotic helm<strong>in</strong>thic<strong>in</strong>fections.ENVIS Bullet<strong>in</strong>, Volume 9 No. 1, 5


Table 3: Directly transmitted zoonoses caused by helm<strong>in</strong>th parasites <strong>in</strong> Himachal PradeshParasite Vertebrate host DiseasesCestodesEch<strong>in</strong>ococcus Dog HydatidNematodesAncylostoma spp. Dog Cutaneous larva migransToxocara Dog Visceral larva migransMan is both a f<strong>in</strong>al and an <strong>in</strong>termediate host for Taenia solium, with chances of auto<strong>in</strong>fection.There are already reports of Cysticercus cellulosae <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> pigs of Kangra valley. However, <strong>in</strong> areaswhere villages are not supplied with sanitary facilities, wild pigs come <strong>in</strong> contact with human excreta.Illegal kill<strong>in</strong>g and eat<strong>in</strong>g of these animals further perpetuate the life cycle of T. solium. Heavy <strong>in</strong>fection ofdogs with fleas and Dipylidium can<strong>in</strong>um also helps <strong>in</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fection of D. can<strong>in</strong>um to children, byaccidental <strong>in</strong>gestion of dog flea conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cysticercoid, while play<strong>in</strong>g with dogs. Similarly, observationof Hymenolepis dim<strong>in</strong>uta <strong>in</strong> rats and man of Kangra area also suggest of zoonosis. Enterobius spp.<strong>in</strong>fection is perhaps the most common helm<strong>in</strong>thic diseases endemic <strong>in</strong> migratory lifestyle. Cutaneous andvisceral larva migrans are also reported among children. Ascarid <strong>in</strong>fections occur occasionally <strong>in</strong> childrenwho generally, but not exclusively, have been associated with pigs. Cysticercus cellulosae have also beenrecorded <strong>in</strong> muscles and heart of pig at Kangra valley. Besides this, protozoan <strong>in</strong>fections of Entamoebaand Giardia spp. are most prevalent <strong>in</strong> the region.The various helm<strong>in</strong>thic <strong>in</strong>fection encountered <strong>in</strong> dogs of Himachal Pradesh are Toxocara canis,Ancylostoma can<strong>in</strong>um, Dipylidium can<strong>in</strong>um and less important filariid heart worm (Dirofilaria immitis)and whip worm (Trichuris vulpis). Infection of Toxocara and Ancylostoma species are of greatimportance <strong>in</strong> pups, whereas adults either suffer from acute course or sub latent <strong>in</strong>fection and act asimmune carriers contam<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g kennels and other surround<strong>in</strong>gs and thus transmitt<strong>in</strong>g the diseases <strong>in</strong>young litters, pet owners and children. Majority of can<strong>in</strong>e helm<strong>in</strong>thic diseases escape early detection dueto non-specific symptoms.Cl<strong>in</strong>ical manifestations of parasitic diseasesThe most common symptoms of <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al parasitic <strong>in</strong>fections are constipation or diarrhoea.Diarrhoea may be bloody or purulent. Cramp<strong>in</strong>g abdom<strong>in</strong>al pa<strong>in</strong> may be predom<strong>in</strong>ant feature <strong>in</strong> thosediseases <strong>in</strong> which the bowel mucosa or wall is <strong>in</strong>vaded by the parasite, such as hookworms. Heavy<strong>in</strong>fections with Ascaris can result <strong>in</strong> obstruction of the gut. Patients with tapeworms may beasymptomatic, except for weight loss despite <strong>in</strong>creased appetite and food <strong>in</strong>take.Peripheral blood eos<strong>in</strong>ophelia (15-50 %) is one of the most important markers for parasitic<strong>in</strong>fections. However, the lack of eos<strong>in</strong>ophils <strong>in</strong> either the blood or body fluids does not preclude thediagnosis of parasitic <strong>in</strong>fections <strong>in</strong> which eos<strong>in</strong>ophilia is not a common manifestation or the load of theparasites may be very low.Wild life diseases shared by nomadic pastoralistsClose contact facilitates exchange of many zoonotic diseases (protozoan, entomological andhelm<strong>in</strong>thic) and non- zoonotic diseases. Often nomadic pastoralists eat wild animals. Studies onparasitism of wild life are scanty and some of the parasites reported from captive wild and zoo animals isshown <strong>in</strong> Table 4. Wild animals occur <strong>in</strong> abundance and diversity, particularly <strong>in</strong> areas <strong>in</strong>habited bynomadic pastoralists. Wild animals <strong>in</strong>crease the number of def<strong>in</strong>itive and <strong>in</strong>termediate host species,expand<strong>in</strong>g the number parasite’s range over space and time. The occurrence of parasite <strong>in</strong>fections <strong>in</strong> wildlife reservoirs complicates control efforts.Table 4: Incidence of some gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al helm<strong>in</strong>th parasites <strong>in</strong> wild/zoo animals <strong>in</strong> Himachal PradeshParasite Host Location ReferenceToxascaris leon<strong>in</strong>a Lion, leopard Intest<strong>in</strong>e Kishtwaria et al., 1998Toxascaris spp. Lion cub Intest<strong>in</strong>e Agnihotri et al., 1998Toxocara spp. Lion cub Intest<strong>in</strong>e Agnihotri et al., 1998,6Himalayan Ecology and


Kishtwaria et al., 1998Strongyle spp. Lion cub Intest<strong>in</strong>e Agnihotri et al., 1998Muellerius capillaris Deer Lung Sharma et al. 1996Taenia taeniaformis Leopard/cat Intest<strong>in</strong>e IVRI Annual report,1997-98;Jithendran and Somvanshi,1997Railliet<strong>in</strong>a tetragonaDove, mynah,House sparrowPigeon, parrot Intest<strong>in</strong>e Chahota et al., 1997Cotugnia digonopora Pigeon Intest<strong>in</strong>e Chahota et al., 1997Spirometra spp. Leopard Intest<strong>in</strong>e IVRI Annual report, 1997-98Ancylostoma spp. Leopard, lion Intest<strong>in</strong>e IVRI Annual report, 1997-98,Kishtwaria et al., 1998Capillaria hepatica Monal, rodents Liver HPKV Annual report, 1990-91,Chahota et al.,1997Ascaridia spp. Monal Intest<strong>in</strong>e HPKV Annual reports, 1990-91Cyathostoma spp. Night<strong>in</strong>gale Air sac Chahota et al., 1997Table 5: Parasites <strong>in</strong> dairy cattle and buffaloes <strong>in</strong> Palampur (Himachal Pradesh)No (%) <strong>in</strong>fected*Parasites ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------1986-1990 1993-97--------------------------------- ---------------------------------Cattle Buffalo Cattle Buffalo(n=1552) (n=530) (n=1407) (n=107)FlukesFasciola spp. 559 (36.0) 258 (48.7) 88 (6.3) 22 (20.6)Amphistome spp. 257 (16.6) 81 (15.3) 212 (15.1) 12 (11.2)Dicrocoelium spp. 177 (11.4) 99 (18.7) 29 (2.1) 2 (1.9)Schistosoma spp. 9 (0.6) 2 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)CestodesMoniezia spp. 45 (2.9) 15 (2.8) 12 (0.9) 2 (1.9)NematodesStrongyle spp. 487 (31.4) 155 (29.2) 190 (13.5) 17 (15.9)Strongyloides spp. 142 (9.1) 22 (4.2) 24 (1.7) 6 (5.6)Toxocara spp. 69 (3.9) 24 (4.5) 27 (2.1) 2 (1.9)Dictyocaulus spp. 30 (1.9) 3 (0.6) 9 (0.7) 0 (0.0)Trichuris spp. 81 (5.2) 12 (2.3) 21 (1.6) 0 (0.0)Capillaria spp. 21 (1.4) 6 (1.1) 12 (0.9) 0 (0.0)_______________________________________________________________________________________* Total numbers and total percentage of animals exceed expected values ow<strong>in</strong>g to multiple parasitismParasite control programme for nomadsProgress <strong>in</strong> nomadic communities is h<strong>in</strong>dered by lack of adequate epidemiological data onparasitic diseases. The most appropriate, practical and cost effective methods to deliver health andveter<strong>in</strong>ary care to nomadic population and their livestock is still a matter of debate. Mobile andseasonally flexible primary health care and veter<strong>in</strong>ary services match<strong>in</strong>g the needs of specific nomadicpopulations should be developed, besides seasonal check post for monitor<strong>in</strong>g and surveillance of healthaspects at some transit po<strong>in</strong>ts.Table 6: Prevalence of gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al parasites <strong>in</strong> sheep and goats Himachal PradeshNo (%) <strong>in</strong>fected*Parasites ------------------------------------------------------------ENVIS Bullet<strong>in</strong>, Volume 9 No. 1, 7


Sheep Goat Overall(n=335) (n=158) (n=493)FlukesFasciola spp. 32 (9.6) 14 (8.8) 46 (9.3)Amphistome spp. 13 (3.8) 4 (2.5) 17 (3.4)Dicrocoelium spp. 24 (7.2) 4 (2.5) 28 (5.7)Schistosoma spp. 4 (1.2) 1 (0.6) 5 (1.0)CestodesMoniezia spp. 9 (2.7) 2 (1.3) 11 (2.2)NematodesStrongyle spp. 307 (91.6) 158 (100) 465 (94.3)Strongyloides spp. 16 (4.8) 8 (5.1) 24 (4.9)Dictyocaulus spp. 4 (1.2) 2 (1.3) 6 (1.2)Trichuris spp. 48 (14.3) 2 (1.3) 75 (15.2)*Total numbers and total percentage of animals exceed expected values ow<strong>in</strong>g to multiple parasitismPersonal hygiene, respect for good animal husbandry and health practices throughout theproduction, harvest<strong>in</strong>g and process<strong>in</strong>g of food for human consumption contributes to reduc<strong>in</strong>g the risk oftransmission to man. Regular dog treatments, strict dog control, a prohibition on the feed<strong>in</strong>g of uncookedoffal to dogs and regulation of open slaughter of livestock could prevent most common zoonoses.Increase <strong>in</strong> numbers of both human and animal has also altered the ecological balance <strong>in</strong> the region.Hence role of pets, domestic and wild animals <strong>in</strong> the spread of parasitic zoonoses should be carefullyconsidered <strong>in</strong> health plann<strong>in</strong>g.The preparation of herbal medic<strong>in</strong>es rema<strong>in</strong>s an important part of healthcare for both human andlivestock, especially <strong>in</strong> rural areas <strong>in</strong> the state by the traditional migratory communities. The small andsubsistence farmers <strong>in</strong> remote communities and the nomads like Gaddis depend largely on the use ofmedic<strong>in</strong>al plants based on <strong>in</strong>digenous knowledge, <strong>in</strong> the absence of veter<strong>in</strong>arians and modern veter<strong>in</strong>arymedic<strong>in</strong>es at high alp<strong>in</strong>e Himalayan pasture land which is considered to be a museum of aromatic andmedic<strong>in</strong>al plants. There is a grow<strong>in</strong>g need for identification and development of human and veter<strong>in</strong>arydrugs based on locally available plant resources.REFERENCESAgnihotri, R.K., Kistwaria, R.S. and Mittra, S. (1998). Severe ascarid <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> a lion cub. Abstractsubmitted <strong>in</strong> X NCVP, Jabalpur, 4-6 December, 1998. PP. 50-51.Anonymous. (1985). Himachal Pradesh, brief facts. Directorate of economics and statistics, Shimla,(H.P.).Anonymous. (1994). Statistical outl<strong>in</strong>e, Himachal Pradesh. Directorate of economics and statistics,Shimla, (H.P.).Berkes, F., Hunt, I.D. and Hunt, K.D. (1998). Diversity of common property resource use and diversityof social <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> the western Indian Himalaya. Mounta<strong>in</strong> Research and Development.,18: 19-33.Bhas<strong>in</strong>, V. and S<strong>in</strong>gh, D. (1995). Migration of sheep <strong>in</strong> Himachal Pradesh-constra<strong>in</strong>ts and solutions. Int.J. Anim.Sci., 10: 145-146Chahota, R., Israni, R.K, Katoch, R.C. and Jithendran, K.P. (1997 b). Hepatic capillariasis <strong>in</strong> a wild rat (Rattusratus). J. Vet. Parasitol., 11: 87-90Chahota, R., Katoch, R.C., Jithendran, K.P. and Israni, R.K. (1997 a). Helm<strong>in</strong>thic <strong>in</strong>festations among freeliv<strong>in</strong>g fauna around Dhauladhar valley of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 67: 302-303.Chakravarty-Kaul, M. (1998). Transhumance and customary pastoral rights <strong>in</strong> Himachal Pradesh:Claim<strong>in</strong>g the high pastures for Gaddis. Mounta<strong>in</strong> Research and Development., 18: 5-17.8Himalayan Ecology and


Duffield, C., Gardner, J.S., Berkes, F. and S<strong>in</strong>gh, R.B. (1998). Local knowledge <strong>in</strong> the assessment ofresource susta<strong>in</strong>ability: Case studies <strong>in</strong> Himachal Pradesh, India and British Columbia, Canada.Mounta<strong>in</strong> Research and Development.,18: 5-17.Durie, P.H. (1961). Parasitic gastroenteritis of cattle: the distribution and survival of <strong>in</strong>fective strongylelarvae on pasture . Australian J. Agri. Res., 12: 1200-1211.H<strong>in</strong>z, E. (1996). Geometrical aspects of parasitology. In: H. Mehlhorn (Editor) Parasitology In FocusSpr<strong>in</strong>ger, Berl<strong>in</strong>.).HPKV Annual reports (1990-92). Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Palampur (HimachalPradesh).IVRI Annual reports (1997-98). Indian Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Research Institute, Izatnagar (Uttar Pradesh).Jithendran K.P. and Somvanshi, R (1998). Experimental <strong>in</strong>fection of mice with Taenia taeniaformis eggs fromcats-course of <strong>in</strong>fection and pathological studies. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 36: 523-525.Jithendran, K.P. (1996). Occurrence of hydatidosis and various liver fluke <strong>in</strong>fections In sheep and goats<strong>in</strong> Kangra valley: An abattoir study. J. Vet Parasitol., 10: 63-67Jithendran, K.P. and Rao J.R.. (1996). Parasitic zoonoses : Role of migratory sheep and goats <strong>in</strong>Himachal Pradesh. Hima Paryavaran. 8:6-8.Katoch, V.C. and Jithendran K.P. (1999). A note on Dirofilaria immitis <strong>in</strong> a dog. Indian Vet. J., 76:459-460.Kishtwaria, R.S., Kanwar, M.S. and Nigam, J.M. and Sharma, A.K. (1998). H<strong>in</strong>d quarter paralysis <strong>in</strong>lions (Panthera leo). Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of Second Pan Commonwealth Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Conference ,Bangalore (India), 22-27, February 1998 (Vol. II) pp. 1266-1267.Macpherson, C.N.L. (1994). Epidemiology and control of parasites <strong>in</strong> nomadic situations. Vet. Parasitol.54: 87-102.Mittoo, H.K. (1993). Himachal Pradesh. National Book Trust (India). 126 p.Omar, M.A. (1992). Health care for nomads too please. World Health Forum, 13: 307- 310.Sharma, A.K., Joshi, V.B., Sharma, M., Katoch, V., S<strong>in</strong>gh, S.P., Katoch, R.C., Batta, M.K. and Asrani, R.K.(1996). Concurrent chlamydial and verm<strong>in</strong>ous pneumonia <strong>in</strong> a bark<strong>in</strong>g deer (Munpiacus muntzak).Indian Vet. J., 73: 876-878.ENVIS Bullet<strong>in</strong>, Volume 9 No. 1, 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!