- Page 7 and 8: 4.5.4.3 References by the ECNI and
- Page 9 and 10: APPENDIX B Invocation of the Sexual
- Page 11 and 12: GCN Gay Community NewsGFS Goods, Fa
- Page 13 and 14: Chaptterr 1:: Inttrroductti I ion1.
- Page 15 and 16: cultural support for equality and a
- Page 17 and 18: underscored given commitments to se
- Page 19 and 20: 30%, just over 9% made an official
- Page 21 and 22: In the Republic the primary relevan
- Page 23 and 24: A distinct feature of the Republic
- Page 25 and 26: Commission for Racial Equality for
- Page 27 and 28: The Tribunal offers mediation as an
- Page 29 and 30: employment or GFS laws. There has h
- Page 31 and 32: Hotel 42 the Tribunal found that th
- Page 33 and 34: allowance to the partner of a termi
- Page 35 and 36: Discrimination prohibitions, includ
- Page 37 and 38: A number of publications have addre
- Page 39 and 40: (Research Evaluation Services and S
- Page 41 and 42: Chaptterr Two:: Access tto Rightts:
- Page 43 and 44: case described this as ‘internali
- Page 45 and 46: have a significant “multiplier ef
- Page 47 and 48: 2.3.2.3 Citizens Information Centre
- Page 49 and 50: monthly or eight-weekly basis at ve
- Page 51 and 52: However legal aid may be granted
- Page 53 and 54:
ICTU published revised guidelines f
- Page 55 and 56:
Traveller Movement 83 might be a us
- Page 57 and 58:
Campaign has been operational withi
- Page 60 and 61:
In the ROI, Equality Tribunal proce
- Page 62 and 63:
providers have been tasked with ens
- Page 64 and 65:
exceptional circumstances, to issue
- Page 66 and 67:
I had hoped for three things, for t
- Page 68 and 69:
Chaptterr 3:: Access tto Rightts::
- Page 70 and 71:
generate particular obstacles for L
- Page 72 and 73:
criteria have yet to be interpreted
- Page 74 and 75:
in a lesbian family decided not to
- Page 76 and 77:
and be reluctant to make inquiries
- Page 78 and 79:
y the perpetrator. Technically the
- Page 80 and 81:
these observations are confined to
- Page 82 and 83:
interviewees the notification requi
- Page 84 and 85:
How being ‘out’ will impact upo
- Page 86 and 87:
(Equality Tribunal 2005b, p. 10). C
- Page 88 and 89:
can agree on and which may form the
- Page 90 and 91:
of chairmen and members in the skil
- Page 92 and 93:
3.4 ConclusionThis Chapter has focu
- Page 94 and 95:
Chaptterr Fourr:: The Role off Spec
- Page 96 and 97:
the exercise was to consider the di
- Page 98 and 99:
egime, it was agreed to introduce c
- Page 100 and 101:
intersect many cases will straddle
- Page 102 and 103:
work. The claimants are generally n
- Page 104 and 105:
call such agencies first with a que
- Page 106 and 107:
Some LGB representative organisatio
- Page 108 and 109:
Equality body representatives expla
- Page 110 and 111:
The Equality Authority could useful
- Page 112 and 113:
The Tribunal has a number of mechan
- Page 114 and 115:
NI. It should be noted that the app
- Page 116 and 117:
In this context the litigation know
- Page 118 and 119:
isk has been identified that the ex
- Page 120 and 121:
The ECNI has used its experience in
- Page 122 and 123:
4.5.4.3 References by the ECNI and
- Page 124 and 125:
Economic and Social Forum and the P
- Page 126 and 127:
Table 2: Legislative Framework on S
- Page 128 and 129:
Chaptterr 5:: Comparratti ive Revie
- Page 130 and 131:
A further important factor, which w
- Page 132 and 133:
5.2.4 Outreach: Community Legal Ser
- Page 134 and 135:
and giving her/him the power to dec
- Page 136 and 137:
infrastructure is not immediately f
- Page 138 and 139:
5.3.2 AdvocacyIn general across the
- Page 140 and 141:
5.3.3 Third Party ParticipationThe
- Page 142 and 143:
5.4 Collective Enforcement Mechanis
- Page 144 and 145:
In terms of group justice issues, b
- Page 146 and 147:
Chaptterr 6:: Recommendatti ions6.1
- Page 148 and 149:
set out under Implementing Equality
- Page 150 and 151:
various junctures the bodies have p
- Page 152 and 153:
This is a vital recommendation. Alt
- Page 154 and 155:
Concrete examples of types of claim
- Page 156 and 157:
interview component of this project
- Page 158 and 159:
organisations in partnership with t
- Page 160 and 161:
Citizens Advice Centres and Bureaux
- Page 162 and 163:
NI GovernmentForums of RedressThe R
- Page 164 and 165:
Inadequate redressEstablishment ofp
- Page 166 and 167:
RefferrencesAlsterhag, Sofia (2007)
- Page 168 and 169:
difference to marginalised and vuln
- Page 170 and 171:
(Dublin: Equality Tribunal).Equalit
- Page 172 and 173:
Ballymun Community Law Centre).Grif
- Page 174 and 175:
On the Difficulty of Being so Posit
- Page 176 and 177:
(2006) Awareness of equality issues
- Page 178 and 179:
APPENDIX AResearch MethodologyEach
- Page 180 and 181:
Interviews with Individuals in the
- Page 182 and 183:
the researchers who contacted them
- Page 184 and 185:
8. Interview Schedule for Equality
- Page 186 and 187:
APPENDIX BInvocation of the Sexual
- Page 188 and 189:
Sexual Orientation Ground in Case F
- Page 190 and 191:
Sexual Orientation Grounds Cases in
- Page 192 and 193:
Contacting the Equality CommissionI