13.07.2015 Views

S.c. - Nsez.gov.in

S.c. - Nsez.gov.in

S.c. - Nsez.gov.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M<strong>in</strong>utes of Meet<strong>in</strong>g of Approval Committee, NSEZdated 11/08/2011Page 2 of7It was made clear that the Zone had shortage of built up space. Also as regards nonsubscriptionof Provident Fund, the Committee was <strong>in</strong>formed by the representative that <strong>in</strong>the last year the proprietorship concern had been converted <strong>in</strong>to Pvt. Ltd. Company and thelegal obligation regard<strong>in</strong>g ProvidentFund was be<strong>in</strong>g fulfilled by them. The Committeedecided to approve the proposal subject to (i) availability of space and (ii) the matter be<strong>in</strong>greferred to PF commissioner for necessary action.2. Application of M/ s Citixsys Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. for sett<strong>in</strong>g up a unit <strong>in</strong>Noida SEZ for software development and consultancy.On the directions of the BOA, the proposal was reconsidered by the Committee. Therepresentative director was given another opportunity to expla<strong>in</strong> proposal vis-a-vis groundsquoted by the Committee while reject<strong>in</strong>g it. The representative director conveyed that thespace as small as 100-120 SQ M. was quoted keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the actual requirement and theproposed activities would be carried out from the SEZ . The Committee felt it appropriate toget the ITRs of the promoters checked thoroughly as the same reflects losses which was thereason for doubts as regards source of f<strong>in</strong>ances at the disposal of the promoters.In view ofthis, the Committee decided to approve the proposal subject to availability of space of thesize required for the project and satisfactory report from 0/0. Jo<strong>in</strong>t Commissioner(IncomeTax), Noida on the records relat<strong>in</strong>g ITRs of the promoters/Company,Balance Sheet andClash Flow of the Company for last three years. Letter would be issued to the Applicant topresent himself before the JC(IT) , Noida, on a suitable date and time.3. Application ofM/s Lakshman Overseas (India) for sett<strong>in</strong>g up a unit <strong>in</strong> Noida SEZfor Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g & Trad<strong>in</strong>g of consumer electronic items such as CD Player,DVD, electronic products, electronic office equipment, readymade garment,chemicals, calculators, water purifiers, communicators, palm top, laptops,mobiles, spares & accessories & computers, spares and accessories.The Applicant Shri Ashwani Aggarwal, Proprietor of M/s. Lakshman Overseas(India) appeared and presented the proposal before the Committee.discussed and concluded as below:The Committee ma<strong>in</strong>ly(i) The proposed activity <strong>in</strong> the proposal was manufactur<strong>in</strong>g & trad<strong>in</strong>g of consumerelectronic items such as CD Player, DVD, electronic products, electronic office equipment,readymade garment, chemicals, calculators, water purifiers, communicators, palm top,laptops, mobiles, spares & accessories & computers, spares and accessories. Most of these


M<strong>in</strong>utes of Meet<strong>in</strong>g of Approval Committee, NSEZdated 11/08/2011Page 3 of7items were also allowed vide LOA dated 25.10.2002 issued to M/s. Lakshman Overseas,proprietorship concern of Shri Vipul Aggarwal. Shri Vipul Aggarwal along with his fatherShri Ashwani Aggarwal(Applicant) had been charged with mis-declaration of value anddiversion of high value imported goods en-route to NSEZ from Airport and br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>substandard/junk goods <strong>in</strong>to the NSEZ for export <strong>in</strong> the Show Cause Notices dated05.09.2006 and 30.04.2010 of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence(DRI). Further, the LOA ofM/s. Lakshman Overseas was cancelled vide letter dated 23.02.2006, for the violation, aftergiv<strong>in</strong>g due opportunity and no appeal had been preferred by the proprietor of M/s.Lakshman Overseas aga<strong>in</strong>st the order of cancellation of the said LOA. Therefore, theapplicant could not be allowed to carry out the same activity for which he had been chargedof serious violations <strong>in</strong> the past. As per Rule 18( 4)(f) of the SEZ Rules, 2005, no proposalshall be considered if there is any <strong>in</strong>stance of violation of law or public policy by thepromoters hav<strong>in</strong>g bear<strong>in</strong>g on the merits of the proposal.(ii)The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi <strong>in</strong> its Order dated 11.05.2011 directed that asregards properties at Plot No. 19 and 67 <strong>in</strong> NSEZ, the Petitioners would be given access tothe office premises and be permitted to run their bus<strong>in</strong>esses. The Committee was <strong>in</strong>formedthat Plot No. 19 and 67 were allotted on sub-lease basis, and build<strong>in</strong>gs on the plots, as perrecords, were <strong>in</strong> the name of Shri Vipul Aggarwal, Proprietor, M/s. Lakhman Overseas andhe had already been allowed access <strong>in</strong>to NSEZ as per Hon'ble Court's directions. Though theApplicant <strong>in</strong> the proposal, Shri Ashwani Aggarwal, was a petitioner <strong>in</strong> the matter before theHon'ble Court, he had not been issued LOA <strong>in</strong> the past. Therefore, the Order of the Hon'bleHigh Court does not appear to have any bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stant case. Further, lease rent ofthe premises at Plot No. 19 and 67 were not paid s<strong>in</strong>ce July, 2005 and total lease rent of Rs.49,64,270 was outstand<strong>in</strong>g as on 11.08.2011 and hence the application could not beconsidered for this ground also.On the above grounds, the Committee did not approve the proposal.4. Application of M/s Smart Identity Devices Pvt. Ltd. for sett<strong>in</strong>g up a unit <strong>in</strong> Noida SEZfor manufactur<strong>in</strong>g of I - Scan and L-scan.The Committee, after deliberations, approved the proposal on the basis of profile ofthe promoters, performance of their trad<strong>in</strong>g unit <strong>in</strong> DTA, subject to availability of space. Thedocuments found deficient would be obta<strong>in</strong>ed before the LOA is issued.


M<strong>in</strong>utes of Meet<strong>in</strong>g of Approval Committee, NSEZ dated 11/08/2011Page 4 of75. Application of Mis DSM International for sett<strong>in</strong>g up a unit <strong>in</strong> Noida SEZ formanufactur<strong>in</strong>g and trad<strong>in</strong>g of garment items.The Committee heard submissions of the proprietor of the Applicant firm anddeliberated on the proposal. The Committee approved the proposal only for manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>itially and the proposal for trad<strong>in</strong>g would be exam<strong>in</strong>ed subsequently after see<strong>in</strong>g theperformance of the unit.6. Mis. Divya Creations (Plot No. 97, NSEZ.)- Inclusion of additional items ofmanufacture <strong>in</strong> LOA and monitor<strong>in</strong>g of performance.The representative of the Unit expla<strong>in</strong>ed that due to price rise <strong>in</strong> the precious metalsespecially gold, there was demand <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational market for alternative jewellery whichwas less expensive. It was expla<strong>in</strong>ed that base metal would be brass, copper or alum<strong>in</strong>umand precious metal would be ma<strong>in</strong>ly gold. The representative <strong>in</strong>formed that they haveOrders with them. In view of the above, the Committee approved the proposal of the Unit.7. Mis. ANG Auto Ltd. SDF (1-11,12)- change of name & change of directors, andmonitor<strong>in</strong>g of performance & renewal of LOA.The representative of the unit expla<strong>in</strong>ed that they had changed the name to M/ s.ANG Industries Ltd. as they wanted to diversify from Auto segment to other <strong>in</strong>dustries.However, the explanationwas not found sufficient as the Unit changed name frequentlywhich created doubts about the real <strong>in</strong>tention of such changes <strong>in</strong> the name of theCompany.Therefore, the Committee decided-that the matter, as well as the matter relat<strong>in</strong>gto changes <strong>in</strong> Board of Directors, would be decided by the DC, NSEZ on the basis ofreport <strong>in</strong> this regard from Jo<strong>in</strong>t Commissioner (Income Tax), Noida. Further, Therepresentative had been directed to make submission to JC (IT) Noida on 18.08.2011. Asregards performance of the unit, the Committee expressed dissatisfaction over downwardslide <strong>in</strong> performanceof the Unit <strong>in</strong> every subsequent year dur<strong>in</strong>g its last 5 year block.However, the Committee decided to renew the LOA for 5 years w.e.f. 04.10.2010.


M<strong>in</strong>utes of Meet<strong>in</strong>g of Approval Committee, NSEZdated 11/08/2011Page 5 of78. Mis. Davanam Jewellers - grant<strong>in</strong>g of Personal Hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the SCN issued to theunit.As no representative of the unit appeared before the Committee, the Committeedecided to defer the matter for the next Meet<strong>in</strong>g.9. Mis. RPS Cloth<strong>in</strong>g and L<strong>in</strong>en Pvt. Ltd. - Extension of LOA.No representativefrom the Unit appeared before the Committee. The Committeeconsidered the matter and decided to defer the matter and give f<strong>in</strong>al opportunity to the Unit<strong>in</strong> the next meet<strong>in</strong>g.10. Mis. Rohit Agro Products Ltd. - Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of performance.No representative of the Unit appeared before the Committee. The Committeedecided to issue Show Cause Notice to the Unit to expla<strong>in</strong> why LOA as well as allotmentshould not be cancelled andlor penalty should not be imposed under FTDR Act for nonfulfillmentof terms and conditions of the LOA. The Committee further empowered the DC,NSEZ, to issue the show cause notice and take further necessary action, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gcancellation of LOA and the allotment, <strong>in</strong> the matter. DC would also take action forcancell<strong>in</strong>g ofIEC.11. MI s. Pitambra Hardware and Metal Exports Pvt. Ltd. - Monitor<strong>in</strong>g ofperformance .As per request of the unit, the matter was deferred to the next meet<strong>in</strong>g.12.Mis. Sunehari Export Ltd.(Unit-1) - Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of performance.The representative of the Company expla<strong>in</strong>ed that as they were work<strong>in</strong>g from twounits <strong>in</strong> similar type of items, certa<strong>in</strong> clearances relat<strong>in</strong>g to Trade Tax Department could notbe obta<strong>in</strong>ed. However, the delay of nearly two years' time for comply<strong>in</strong>g to exit formalitieswas found unacceptable by the Committee. The Committee concluded that s<strong>in</strong>ce the LOAwas no longer valid and the same was not renewed, the LOA had already been lapsed andhence should be cancelled. Consequently, the Committee cancelled the allotment of PlotNo. 165, which had been ly<strong>in</strong>g unutilized s<strong>in</strong>ce the year 2002. However, as adequate penalaction was be<strong>in</strong>g taken, no penalty under FTCDR) Act was contemplated. The Company


M<strong>in</strong>utes of Meet<strong>in</strong>g of Approval Committee, NSEZdated 11/08/2011Page 6 of7was directed to apply for transfer of Plot Nos. 155, 156,157 to the Unit-II of the Companywith<strong>in</strong> one month of communication to the unit regard<strong>in</strong>g cancellation of LOA of Unit-I.Unit-I should submit APRs for the period from 2006-07 to 2010-11 with<strong>in</strong> 15 days from thedate of issue of communication <strong>in</strong> this regard.13.Mis. Sunehari Export Ltd.(Unit-m - Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of performance.S<strong>in</strong>ce the performance of the Unit was very low, the Committee directed to improveperformance as precious Government allotted space was not be<strong>in</strong>g utilized by the Uniteffectively. The Committee also directed to submit APRs for 2009-10 and 2010-11 with<strong>in</strong> 15days of issue of communication <strong>in</strong> this regard.14. Approval of Services:1. Mis. Dharampal Premchand Ltd.: The Committee approved both the lists ofservices of the Unit with a modification that Bank<strong>in</strong>g and other f<strong>in</strong>ancial services andpractic<strong>in</strong>g CA services to be shifted to list of services consumed outside the SEZ.11. MI s. Baba Global Ltd. : The Committee approved both the lists of services of theUnit with a modification that Bank<strong>in</strong>g and other f<strong>in</strong>ancial services and practic<strong>in</strong>gCA services to be shifted to list of services consumed outside the SEZ.111. Mis. Thomson Digital (Unit -ij and (iv) MI s. Thomson Digital (Unit -Il): TheseUnits applied aga<strong>in</strong> for approval of their list as the they have DTA unit too. TheCommittee did not approve the lists as default list for all the units would alsoapplicable <strong>in</strong> their case.v. Mis. Groz Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Tools Pvt. Ltd.; The Committee was <strong>in</strong>formed that Servicesat Sl.No.3, 5,8,11 had been permitted as per Default List. The Committee approved otherservicesof the list submittedby the Unit.15. Build<strong>in</strong>g Plan of Mis. Stalwart Overseas - Plot No. 12, Noida SEZ:The Committee was <strong>in</strong>formed that the Unit removed deficiencies po<strong>in</strong>ted out bythe panel Architect and deposited requisite fees. The Committee approved the Build<strong>in</strong>g Planas submitted by the Unit's promoters.


M<strong>in</strong>utes of Meet<strong>in</strong>g of Approval Committee, NSEZdated 11/08/2011Page 70f716.Additional itemReview of Performance of Mis. Balaji Universal Tradel<strong>in</strong>k Pvt. Ltd.(Trad<strong>in</strong>gUnit) and change of entrepreneur and approval of change <strong>in</strong> the Board of Directorsof Mis. Balaji Universal Tradel<strong>in</strong>k Pvt. Ltd.The Committee was <strong>in</strong>formed that based on the performance of the Unit <strong>in</strong> the firstyear, the matter was placed before the Approval Committee <strong>in</strong> its meet<strong>in</strong>g dated 25.11.2009,for monitor<strong>in</strong>g. The Unit's representative assured that they would achieve positive NFE bythe end of 2009-10. At the end of f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 2009-10, the Unit not only failed to achievecumulative positive NFE but also ended up <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g negative NFE. In view of negativeNFE for first two years, Show Cause Notice was issued to Mis. Ba1aji Universal Tradel<strong>in</strong>kPvt. Ltd. (Trad<strong>in</strong>g Unit), to expla<strong>in</strong> why suitable action should not be <strong>in</strong>itiated and penaltyshould not be imposed for non-fulfilment of terms and conditions of SEZ Act, 2005/SEZRules 2006. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>teraction, Unit's representative <strong>in</strong>formed the Committee that theywere contemplat<strong>in</strong>g on debond<strong>in</strong>g of the trad<strong>in</strong>g unit as they would not likely to make theirNFE Earn<strong>in</strong>gs positive <strong>in</strong> this unit over the period of five years. The Approval Committeeobserved that the Unit achieved Negative NFE Earn<strong>in</strong>gs to the tune of Rs. 1.5 Crore anddecided to impose penalty of Rs. 25,000. Adjudication order of the Show Cause Noticedated 29.11.2010 would be issued by the DC. Further, the matter of change of directorswould be considered by the DC, NSEZ.The Meet<strong>in</strong>g ended with vote of thanks to the Chair.(C.P .S.Jo<strong>in</strong>t Developakshi)ent Commissioner~.(S.C. Panda)Development Commissioner*****

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!