13.07.2015 Views

Lecture 10: Geochronology VI: U-Th decay series dating

Lecture 10: Geochronology VI: U-Th decay series dating

Lecture 10: Geochronology VI: U-Th decay series dating

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

.Geol. 655 Isotope Geochemistry<strong>Lecture</strong> <strong>10</strong> Spring 2003reasons, the variation of stable Pb with depth in a corewill likely be quite different than that of 2<strong>10</strong> Pb.<strong>Th</strong>e first step in determining sediment ages using 2<strong>10</strong> Pbis to estimate the supported 2<strong>10</strong> Pb so it can be subtractedthat from the total 2<strong>10</strong> Pb activity to determine unsupportedactivity. One easy solution results from the factthat 2<strong>10</strong> Pb should reach equilibrium in 5 to <strong>10</strong> half-lives.<strong>Th</strong>us sediment deposited more than <strong>10</strong>0-200 years agoshould be in equilibrium, so that the total activity isthe supported activity. <strong>Th</strong>is requires the assumptionthat the flux of 2<strong>10</strong> Pb has been constant over the last <strong>10</strong>0-200 years. Alternatively, the activity of supported Pbcan be determined by determining the activity of 226 Ra.Once the unsupported activity is calculated, we cansolve equation <strong>10</strong>.22 for s, the sedimentation rate.<strong>Th</strong>is can be done as follows. By taking the log of equation<strong>10</strong>.22, we have2<strong>10</strong>ln Pb u = ln 2<strong>10</strong>Pb 0 –lu + 2<strong>10</strong>s z <strong>10</strong>.23Equation <strong>10</strong>.23 is the equation of a straight line on a plotof ln( 2<strong>10</strong> Pb) vs depth, where ln( 2<strong>10</strong> Pb) 0 is the interceptand -l 2<strong>10</strong> /s is the slope. Applying linear regression tothe data in this form, we can determine both the slopeand the intercept. From the slope, we can easily solvefor s. Figure <strong>10</strong>.6 illustrates an example calculated inthis manner.REFERENCES AND SUGGESTIONS FORFURTHER READINGDickin, A. 1995. Radiogenic Isotope Geochemistry.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Faure, G., 1986. Principles of Isotope Geology, 2 nd ed.,Wiley & Sons, New York, 589 p.Huh, C.-A. and T.-L. Ku, 1984. Radiochemical observationson manganese nodules from three sedimentary environments in the north Pacific,Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 48, 951-964.Volpe, A. M. and P. E. Hammond, 1991. 238 U- 230 <strong>Th</strong>- 226 Ra disequilibria in young Mount St. Helens rocks:time constraint for magma formation and crystallization, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., <strong>10</strong>7, 475-486.Depth, cm02468<strong>10</strong>12141618Cayuga LakeBox CoreJJJJJJ200 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4( 2<strong>10</strong> Pb), pCiJJJ( 2<strong>10</strong> Pb) 0 = 5.18 pCis = 0.319 cm/yrFigure <strong>10</strong>.6. Unsupported 2<strong>10</strong> Pb activitymeasured on sediment samples from a boxcore taken from Cayuga Lake. <strong>Th</strong>e upper 4-5 cm are probably disturbed, either bybioturbation or in the coring process. <strong>Th</strong>eline shows the calculated <strong>decay</strong> ofunsupported 2<strong>10</strong> Pb assuming ( 2<strong>10</strong> Pb) 0 = 5.19pCi and s= 0.319 cm/yr. <strong>Th</strong>is was calculatedby averaging the first 2 points anddiscarding the last 3. Unpublished data ofD. Engstrom.68 February 12, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!