On Multiple Wh-Fronting - University of Chicago

More documents

Recommendations

Info

382 ZÏ E L J K O B O SÏ K O V I ĆIzvorski, Roumyana. 1993. On wh-movement and focus movement in Bulgarian. Paper presented at CON-SOLE 2, University of Tübingen, December 1993.Izvorski, Roumyana. 1996. The syntax and semantics of correlative proforms. In NELS 26, ed. by KiyumiKusumoto, 133–147. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Izvorski, Roumyana. 1998. Non-indicative wh-complements of possessive and existential predicates. InNELS 28, ed. by Pius N. Tamanji and Kiyomi Kusumoto, 159–173. Amherst: University of Massachusetts,GLSA.Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Kidwai, Ayesha. 1999. Word order and focus positions in Universal Grammar. Ms., Jawaharlal NehruUniversity.Kim, Jeong-Seok.1997. Syntacticfocus movement and ellipsis:A minimalist approach.Doctoraldissertation,University of Connecticut, Storrs.King, Tracy Holloway. 1993. Configuringtopic and focus in Russian. Doctoral dissertation,Stanford University,Stanford, Calif.É. Kiss, Katalin. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.É. Kiss, Katalin. 1995. Discourse configurational languages. New York: Oxford University Press.É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74:245–273.Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1999. Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1986. The stuttering prohibition and morpheme deletion in Turkish. In Proceedings of theTurkish Linguistic Conference, 9–10 August 1984, ed. by A. Aksu Koç and E. Erguvanli Taylan,59–83. Istanbul: BogÆ aziçi University.Lambova, Mariana. In press. On A¢-movements in Bulgarian and their interaction. The Linguistic Review.Lasnik, Howard. 2000. Derivation and representation in modern transformational syntax. In The handbookof contemporary syntactic theory, ed. by Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 62–88. Oxford: Blackwell.Merchant, Jason. 1999. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Doctoral dissertation,University of California, Santa Cruz.Müller, Gereon, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1996. Ā-chain formation and economy of derivation. LinguisticInquiry 27:480–511.Napoli, Donna Jo. 1976. The two si’s of Italian. An analysis of reflexive, inchoative, and indefinite subjectsentences in Modern Standard Italian. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Nunes, Jairo. 1999. Linearization of chains and phonetic realization of chain links. In Working minimalism,ed. by Samuel David Epstein and Norbert Hornstein, 217–249. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:303–344.Ochi, Masao. 1998. Move or Attract? In Proceedings of the 16th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics,ed. by Emily Curtis, James Lyle, and Gabriel Webster, 319–333. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.Perlmutter, David. 1972. Evidence for shadow pronouns in French relativization. In The Chicago whichhunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, ed. by Paul Peranteau, Judith Levi, and Gloria Phares,73–105. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in situ: Movement and unselectivebinding. In The representationof (in)definiteness,ed. by Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Pesetsky, David. 1989. The Earliness Principle. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Pesetsky, David. 1997. Optimality Theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation.In Optimality Theory:An overview, ed. by Diana Archangeli and D. Terence Langendoen, 134–170. Oxford: Blackwell.Pesetsky, David. 1998. Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the best good enough?,ed. by Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky, 337–383.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press and MITWPL.Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
O N M U L T I P L E W H - F R O N T I N G 383Pollock, Jean-Yves, Nicola Munaro, and Cecilia Poletto. 1998. Eppur si muove! On comparing French,Portuguese, and Bellunese wh-movement. Ms., CNRS, Lyon, and University of Padua.Pope, Emily. 1976. Questions and answers in English. The Hague: Mouton.Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Interface economy: Focus and markedness. In The role of economy principles inlinguistictheory,ed. by Chris Wilder, Hans-MartinGärtner, and ManfredBierwisch, 146–169.Berlin:Akademie Verlag.Rice, Curt, and Peter Svenonius. 1998. Prosodic V2 in Northern Norwegian. Paper presented at the 17thWest Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Richards,Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language?Doctoral dissertation,MIT, Cambridge,Mass.Richards, Norvin. 1998. Shortest moves to (anti-)superiority.In Proceedings of the 16th West Coast Conferenceon Formal Linguistics, ed. by Emily Curtis, James Lyle, and Gabriel Webster, 335–349. Stanford,Calif.: CSLI Publications.Roberts, Ian. 1997. Restructuring, head movement, and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28:423–460.Rochemont, Michael. 1986. Focus in generative grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Natural Language & LinguisticTheory 6:445–501.Rudin, Catherine. 1993. On focus position and focus marking in Bulgarian questions. In Proceedings ofFLSM 4, ed. by Alice Davison, 252–265. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Linguistics.Runner, Jeffrey. 1998. Noun phrase licensing and interpretation. New York: Garland.Schütze, Carson. 1994. Serbo-Croatian second position clitic placement and the phonology-syntaxinterface.In Papers in phonology and morphology, ed. by Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Tony Bures,373–473. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics21. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguisticsand Philosophy, MITWPL.Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23:443–468.Sinicyn, Misha. 1982. Strange questions in Slavic languages. GLOW Newsletter 8.Stepanov, Arthur. 1998. On wh-fronting in Russian. In NELS 28, ed. by Pius N. Tamanji and KiyomiKusumoto, 453–467. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Stjepanović, Sandra. 1998. Short-distance movement of wh-phrases in Serbo-Croatian matrix clauses. Paperpresented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Spencer, Ind., June 1998.Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999a. Multiple sluicing and superiority in Serbo-Croatian. In NELS 29, ed. by PiusN. Tamanji, Masako Hirotani, and Nancy Hall, 145–159. Amherst: University of Massachusetts,GLSA.Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999b. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-frontinghave in common? Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Strahov, Natalya. 2000. A scrambling analysis of Russian wh-questions. Paper presented at Formal Approachesto Slavic Linguistics 9, Indiana University, Bloomington, February 2000.Tomić, Olga MisÏ eska. 1996. The Balkan Slavic clausal clitics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14:811–872.Wachowicz, Krystyna A. 1974. Against the universality of a single wh-question movement. Foundationsof Language 11:155–166.Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and chain formation. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.Department of Linguistics, U-145University of ConnecticutStorrs, Connecticut 06269boskovic@sp.uconn.edu
Page 1 and 2: On Multiple Wh-FrontingZÏeljko Bos
Page 3 and 4: O N M U L T I P L E W H - F R O N T
Page 31: O N M U L T I P L E W H - F R O N T

On Multiple Wh-Fronting - University of Chicago

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?