13.07.2015 Views

Legacy Progress Director's Production of Documents (Part 3 ... - NCUC

Legacy Progress Director's Production of Documents (Part 3 ... - NCUC

Legacy Progress Director's Production of Documents (Part 3 ... - NCUC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The filing does not say what cause Johnson had to resign. Duke'investor relations people have toldanalysts during the day that the company did hot have to file a reason, which indicates that whateverthe reason was, it is not material to the company's operations.The filing says he will receive a payment <strong>of</strong> more than $7.4 mil I ion, representing three-times theannual salary and bonus.specified.in his Duke.employment contract;He will get almost $1.4 million, which would have been a^OIS bonus-payment and a lump payment<strong>of</strong> up to. $1.5 million in addition to that.He also gets "continued health ; and ; welfare.benefits i reimbursement for relocation expenses andaccelerated vesting <strong>of</strong> ajl his equity, compensation awards." But'the filling does not specjfy the value<strong>of</strong> those items.S&P places Duke on CreditWatch negative after CEO shake-upSNL Energy, 7-3-12By Amy PoszywakStandard & Poor's Ratings Services late oh July-S placed Duke Energy Corp.'s ratings onCreditWatch with negative implications following the company's announcement that Bill Johnson hadresigned from the companyi which had just finalized its merger with <strong>Progress</strong> Energy Inc.The rating agency said the action is in response to the abrupt change in executive leadership.Johnson, 58, who had been president and CEO <strong>of</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> Energy; will be replaced by Jim Rogers,64, Duke's previous president and CEO, who had; planned on becoming chairman <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong>directors <strong>of</strong>the combined company.S&P also revised the CreditWatch implications on its BBB+ corporate credit rating on <strong>Progress</strong>Energy and its subsidiaries, •_and:.6n the companies';issue;"ratings, to. deyelo'pihg frompositive."The sudden shift in management raises concerns-about'effective corporate governance, successfulhandling <strong>of</strong> the anticipated merger integration,'and the ongoing effective management <strong>of</strong> pendingchallenges that face the combined:entity," Standard &>Poor's creditanalystDimitri Nikas said in anews releaise.The rating agency expects to resolve.the CreditWatch listing jn the near term, after a closer reviewand assessment <strong>of</strong>the implications <strong>of</strong> the change in leadership and itsJmpact on the combined entity.Earlier in the day, Moody's affirmed the ratings and stable outlooks on Duke and <strong>Progress</strong>. Moody'salso assigned a Baa2 senior unsecured rating to: Duke's unsecured bank revolving credit facility,which is in place arid has been ; increased to $6 billion frbm $4 billi6ri through a previously agreedupon arrangement with the banks to accommodate the merger.The'falloutIn the roughly 18 months that followed Duke and <strong>Progress</strong>' initial merger announcement that.lead upto the closure <strong>of</strong> the'utilities'.$32 billion deal, it can be argued that the last-minute CEO shake-up stolethe show.The company saidlh a-calLwith.analysts July 3 thatit would : not be commentirig on the:board's'LEGPGNDIR001146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!