PCORI FUNDamentals - Intermountain Healthcare

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Implications for research design• RCTs– Pragmatic ‐ real‐world settings; large N’s to assess subgroups– Focus on effect size, not just superiority– Bayesian and adaptive approaches to design, accounting forprior probabilities• Observational studies– Causal inference modeling– Tension for studies using pure administrative data –powerful and low‐cost; lack high‐quality patient‐centric data• Cost and cost‐effectiveness– <strong>PCORI</strong> not allowed to evaluate cost as a primary outcome inmaking coverage recommendations, won’t fund “pure” CEA– Cost can be studied as it relates to out‐of‐pocket costs andas a secondary outcome
Research Plan• Specific Aims (1 page)• Research Strategy (10 pages)• References Cited• Protection of Human Subjects• Consortium/Contractual• Letters of Support• No appendices are allowed and will be removed by<strong>PCORI</strong> before sending to reviewers
Page 1 and 2: PCORI FUNDamentalsSubmitting Propos
Page 3 and 4: Institute of Medicine (IOM) ReportR
Page 5 and 6: Patient Protection & Affordable Car
Page 7 and 8: Further CER Investment via PCORI•
Page 9 and 10: PCORI MissionPCORI helps people mak
Page 11 and 12: Working Definition: PCOR(continued,
Page 13 and 14: Stakeholder Engagement in CER• Su
Page 15 and 16: Stakeholder Insight• October 26
Page 17 and 18: 5 Priorities Driving Research Agend
Page 19 and 20: Funding ProjectionsPFA Cycle 1 Cycl
Page 21: PCOR Methods• Lays out acceptable
Page 25 and 26: Review Process• Initial assignmen
Page 27 and 28: 9‐Point Score Scale DescriptorsIm
Page 29 and 30: Review Criteria (continued)• 7: R
Page 31 and 32: Local Resources/Shared Learning•
Page 33: For Support/More Information• CCT

PCORI FUNDamentals - Intermountain Healthcare

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?