13.07.2015 Views

1 - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

1 - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

1 - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There are typically three ways that individuals or groups may participate in a hearing:• Write a letter of comment: This method is chosen by interested parties who want toshare their views on a project but not formally participate in a hearing. Letters ofcomment will be taken into consideration during the hearing process. They will not beconsidered sworn evidence <strong>and</strong> are not subject to questioning. As a result, letters ofcomment may not be given the same weight as sworn evidence in a hearing, althoughthe weight of the letters depends on a number of factors, including the content.• Make an oral statement: Similar to the option to write a letter, this method is chosen byinterested parties who want to share their views but are not considered to beintervenors.• Become an intervenor: An intervenor is someone who has an interest in a proposedproject <strong>and</strong> would like to formally participate in the hearing, including l<strong>and</strong>owners, arearesidents, government agencies, Aboriginal groups, companies, or any other individualor group. Being an intervenor has financial implications including evidence preparation,legal fees, travel <strong>and</strong> accommodations, <strong>and</strong> hiring of expert witnesses to testify, ifnecessary. Intervenors may present evidence, question other witnesses <strong>and</strong> give finalarguments during the written <strong>and</strong> oral portions of the hearing. Intervenors can also bequestioned on any evidence they present.The NEB has a Participant Funding Program to support public participation. Eligible recipientsinclude individuals, Aboriginal groups, l<strong>and</strong>owners, incorporated non-industry not-for-profitorganizations, or other interest groups who seek to intervene in the public review process forprojects in which they have a meaningful interest. As noted, the NEB advised that there will notbe an oral evidence portion of the hearing, but only written evidence <strong>and</strong> oral final argument.Accordingly, it is likely the only two methods of participating in the hearing will be writing a letterof comment or becoming an intervenor. To date, staff has not filed notice of its interest inparticipating in the hearing as the Application to Participate has not been released by the NEB.Staff has advised of its interest, <strong>and</strong> requested notice be given when the application is available.Staff is prepared to review the Application to Participate when hearing details are released bythe NEB, seek legal advice, seek direction from the <strong>Authority</strong> or the CEO/Chair as appropriatedepending on timing, <strong>and</strong> file the necessary paperwork for either intervenor status or a lettersubmission. Staff interests will include both TRCA watershed <strong>and</strong> environmental matters, aswell as with respect to its interests as a major watershed-wide l<strong>and</strong>owner in the vicinity of, <strong>and</strong>immediately downstream of, the Project. The NEB has advised that Participant Funding will bemade available for this proceeding. TRCA will review information on the Participant FundingProgram once it has been made available <strong>and</strong> if eligible, make the appropriate application.The details of hearing process will be more completely defined in a hearing order to be issuedby the NEB in early 2013. The Board anticipates that its assessment process for the applicationwill include the following steps:1. Hearing Order Issued by the NEB, including a List of Issues2. Public Comments on the List of Issues3. Amendments to List of Issues, if any4. Applications to Participate5. List of Participants released by NEB6. Additional Written Evidence submitted by Enbridge7. Two rounds of Information Requests to Enbridge from the Intervenors8. Second round used to clarify responses from first round, if necessary9. Intervenor Written Evidence36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!