13.07.2015 Views

E-business in New Zealand, 2000-2002 by Delwyn Clark, Stephen ...

E-business in New Zealand, 2000-2002 by Delwyn Clark, Stephen ...

E-business in New Zealand, 2000-2002 by Delwyn Clark, Stephen ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

feasibility issues l<strong>in</strong>ked to f<strong>in</strong>ancial returns, marketsize and resources (specifically time and costs). Therole of partners, customers and suppliers <strong>in</strong>e-<strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> implementation was recognised and thelack of read<strong>in</strong>ess of these groups to do <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>electronically was perceived <strong>by</strong> the non-websitecompanies as a major source of difficulties. Thesef<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs also <strong>in</strong>dicate that the <strong>in</strong>hibitors ofe-<strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> extend beyond thetechnological resources required, to <strong>in</strong>corporatea wide range of <strong>in</strong>ternal organisational andexternal contextual factors.STATUS OF E-BUSINESSIN NEW ZEALANDhree major patterns were identified <strong>in</strong> thisT research on e-<strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>companies: (1) size matters, (2) <strong>in</strong>dustry matters,and (3) what matters differs for the ICT players andICT observers. The adoption of ICTs was affected<strong>by</strong> organisational size (measured us<strong>in</strong>g FTEemployees). This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g reflects both the scale ofresources available for <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> newtechnologies (larger companies have greater accessto resources) and the requirements of <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>processes (much greater scale and capabilities areneeded to co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate communication and <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>processes <strong>in</strong> a large diversified company than <strong>in</strong> asmall or micro <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong>).The uptake of ICTs for <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> activities varies<strong>by</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. The nature of the product/service andthe core activities <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry value cha<strong>in</strong> affectthe types of activities that can be conducted onl<strong>in</strong>eor supported with web technologies. Most <strong>in</strong>dustriesare not offer<strong>in</strong>g digital products or sell<strong>in</strong>g physicalproducts on the <strong>in</strong>ternet. However, ICTs can be usedfor many other types of <strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> activities such asprocurement of supplies, operations, market<strong>in</strong>g,distribution, communication, or companyadm<strong>in</strong>istration. The key is to identify the areas whereimprovements <strong>in</strong> efficiency and effectiveness of<strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> processes can be made with ICT support.Significant differences were found <strong>in</strong> perspectivesand priorities for the companies that had adoptedICTs (e.g. websites) and those that were stillwatch<strong>in</strong>g/observ<strong>in</strong>g the emerg<strong>in</strong>g technologies fromthe sidel<strong>in</strong>es (non-adopters). This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g was l<strong>in</strong>kedto assessment of the <strong>in</strong>hibitors/difficulties fore-<strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> implementation and the measures toimprove uptake. The uptake and effectiveness ofe-<strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> activities is <strong>in</strong>fluenced <strong>by</strong> many contextualfactors beyond an organisation’s boundaries andcontrol. For the website companies, the two top<strong>in</strong>hibitors <strong>in</strong> 2001 and <strong>2002</strong> were “low customerTABLE 3Inhibit<strong>in</strong>g factors: mean importance values*Website companies2001 <strong>2002</strong> 2001 <strong>2002</strong>Low customer use of e-commerce 3.25 1 3.15 1 3.14 5 3.03High costs of comput<strong>in</strong>g and network technology 3.00 2 3.10 2 2.93 3.21 2(implementation)Limited knowledge of technologies 2.98 3 2.89 5 2.89 2.95Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of f<strong>in</strong>ancial benefits 2.89 4 2.87 3.49 1 3.19 3Concerns about security aspects 2.88 5 3.01 3 3.05 3.08Lack of time to start new projects 2.87 3.00 4 3.25 3 3.14 4Lack of experienced IT staff 2.85 2.86 3.07 3.05Limited knowledge of e-<strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> models 2.81 2.59 3.10 2.94Bus<strong>in</strong>ess partners not ready 2.79 2.69 3.19 4 2.92Limited size of target market 2.77 2.77 3.41 2 3.24 1Low supplier use of e-commerce 2.73 2.67 3.11 3.06Concerns about quality of telecommunications 2.70 2.77<strong>in</strong>frastructureCannot see benefits yet 3.07 3.12 5Note: *<strong>Clark</strong> et al. (<strong>2002</strong>). Importance rat<strong>in</strong>gs for factors were made ona scale of 1-5, where 1 is very low, 3 is moderate and 5 is very high.Non-website companiesUNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDBus<strong>in</strong>ess ReviewVolume 5 Number 2 20038

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!