Do emotions matter? Coherent preferences under anchoring and ...

710 ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 66 (2008) 700– 7114. A little sad5. It has little effect on me16. I am involved in a situation in which I must do well, such asan important exam or job interview. I feel:1. It has little effect on me2. Slightly anxious3. Anxious4. Very anxious5. So extremely anxious I can think of nothing else17. I am in an argument. I feel:1. It has little effect on me2. Mildly angry3. Angry4. Very angry5. Extremely angryREFERENCESAadland, D., Caplan, A., 2004. Incentive incompatibility andstarting-point bias in iterative valuation questions: comment.Land Economics 80 (2), 312–315.Alberini, A., 1995. Optimal designs for discrete choice contingentvaluation surveys: single-bound, double-bound and bivariatemodels. Journal of Environmental Economics andManagement 28, 187–306.Alberini, A., Kanninen, B., Carson, R.T., 1997. Modelling responseincentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuationdata. Land Economics 73, 309–324.Albert, J.H., Chib, S., 1993. Bayesian analysis of binary andpolichotomous response data. Journal of American StatisticalAssociation 88, 669–679.Allais, M., 1953. Le Comportement de L'homme Rationnel Devantle Risque: Critique de Postulats et Axiomes de L'écoleAméricaine. Econometrica 21, 503–546 (1953).Araña, J.E., León, C.J., 2005. Bayesian estimation of dichotomouschoice contingent valuation with follow-up. In: Scarpa, R.,Alberini, A. (Eds.), Applications of Simulation Methods in EnvironmentalResource Economics. Springer Academic Publisher.Araña, J.E., León, C.J., 2007. Repeated dichotomous formats foreliciting willingness to pay: simultaneous estimation andanchoring effects. Environmental and Resource Economics36 (4), 75–497.Ariely, D., Loewestein, G., Prelec, D., 2003. Coherent arbitrariness:stable demand curves without stable preferences. QuarterlyJournal of Economics 73–105 (Feb.).Arrow, K., 1982. Risk perception in psychology and economics.Economic Inquiry 20 (1), 1–9.Ashcraft, H., Faust, M., 1994. Mathematics anxiety and mentalarithmetic performance: an exploratory investigation.Cognition and Emotion 8 (2), 97–125.Bachorowski, J.A., Braaten, E.B., 1994. Emotional intensity: measurementand theoretical implications. Personality and IndividualDifferences 17, 191–199.Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Jones, A.P., Kerr, G.N., 2001. Bound andpath effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choicecontingent valuation. Resource and Energy Economics 23 (3),191–213.Ben-Ze'ev, 2000. Review of Griffiths' book ‘what emotions reallyare’. European Legacy 5, 267–269.Braaten, E.B., Bachorowski, J.A., 1993. Emotional intensity scale:psychometric and behavioral validation. Paper presented atthe annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain. PsychologicalAssociation, Phoenix, AZ.Brouwer, R., Powe, N., Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H.,1999. Public attitudes to contingent valuation and publicconsultation. Environmental Values 8 (3), 325–347.Brown, S.P., Homer, P.M., Inman, J.F., 1998. A meta-analysis ofrelationships between ad-evoked feelings and responses toadvertising. Journal of Marketing Research 35, 114–126.Burton, A.C., Carson, S., Chilton, S., Hutchinson, W.S., 2003. Anexperimental investigation of explanations for inconsistenciesin responses to second offers in double referenda. Journal ofEnvironmental Economics and Management 46, 472–489.Camerer, C., Lovallo, D., 1999. Overconfidence and excess entry: anexperimental approach. American Economic Review 89 (1),306–318 (March).Cameron, T.A., 1988. A new paradigm for valuing non-marketgoods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimationby censored logistic regression. Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management 15, 355–379.Cameron, T., Quiggin, J., 1994. Estimation using contingentvaluation data from a ‘dichotomous choice withfollow-up'questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management27, 218–234.Carson, R. (1985), Three Essays on Contingent Valuation, PhDthesis, University of California, Berkeley.Carson, R.T., Groves, T., 2007. Incentive and informationalproperties of preference questions. Environmental andResource Economics 37 (1), 181–210.Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E., Meade, N.F., 2001. Contingent valuation:controversies and evidence. Environmental and ResourceEconomics 19 (2), 173–210.Chapman, G.B., Johnson, E.J., 1999. Anchoring, activation, and theconstruction of values. Organizational Behavior and HumanDecision Processes 79 (2), 115–153 (39).Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., 1999. Dual-process theories in socialpsychology. Guilford Press, New York.Chib, S., 1992. Bayes inference in the Tobit censored regressionmodel. Journal of Econometrics 51, 79–99.Commons, J.R., 1934. Institutional Economics: Its Place in PoliticalEconomy. MacMillan, New York.Cooper, J.C., 1993. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous contingentvaluation surveys. Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management 24, 25–40.Cooper, J.C., Hanemann, W.M., 1995. Referendum contingentvaluation: how many bounds are enough? Working Paper,USDA Economic Research Service, Food and ConsumerEconomics Division.Damasio, A.R., 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and theHuman Brain. Avon, New York.DeShazo, J.R., 2002. Designing transactions without framingeffects in iterative question formats. Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management 43, 360–385 (2002).Diamond, P., Hausman, J., 1994. Contingent valuation: is somenumber better than no number? Journal of EconomicPerspectives 8.Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Isen, A.M., Lowrance, R., 1995. Grouprepresentations and intergroup bias: positive affect, similarity,and group size. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 21,856–865.Eysenck, M., 1982. Attention and Arousal: Cognition andPerformance. Springer, New York.Fischer, A., Hanley, N.D., 2007. Analysing decision behaviour instated preference surveys: a consumer psychologicalapproach. Ecological Economics 61, 303–314.Flachaire, E., Hollard, G., 2006. Controlling starting-point bias indouble bounded contingent valuation surveys. LandEconomics 82 (1), 103–111.Frank, R., 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of theEmotions. Norton, New York.Geuens, M., Pelsmacker, P., 2002. Validity and reliability of scoreson the reduced emotional intensity scale. Educational andPsychological Measurement 62 (2), 299–315.Gifford, A., 2002. Emotion and self-control. Journal of EconomicBehavior & Organization 49 (1), 113–130 (September 2002).