Do emotions matter? Coherent preferences under anchoring and ...

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 66 (2008) 700– 711711Green, D., Jacowitz, K.E., Kahneman, D., McFadden, D., 1998.Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingnessto pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Economics 20 (2),85–116.Hanemann, W.M., 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuationexperiments with discrete responses. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics 66, 332–341.Hanemann, W., 1985. Some issues in continuous and discreteresponse contingent valuation studies. Northeast Journal ofAgricultural Economics 14, 5–13.Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J., Kanninen, B., 1991. Statisticalefficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingentvaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73,1255–1263 (Nov).Harrison, G.W., List, J.A., 2004. Field Experiments. Journal ofEconomic Literature 42 (4), 1013–1059.Heberlein, T.A., Wilson, M.A., Bishop, R.C., Schaeffer, N.C., 2005.Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity incontingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics andManagement 50 (1), 1–22.Herriges, J., Shogren, J., 1996. Starting point bias in dichotomouschoice valuation with follow-up questioning. Journal ofEnvironmental Economics and Management 30, 112–131.Heuer, F., Reisberg, D., 1990. Vivid memories of emotional events:The accuracy of remembered minutiae. Memory & Cognition18, 496–506.Hilgard, E.R., 1980. Consciousness in contemporary psychology.Annual Review of Psychology 31, 1–26.Hsee, C.K., Rottenstreich, 2004. Music, pandas and muggers: on theaffective psychology of value. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology. General 133 (1), 23–30.Idzikowski, C., Baddeley, A., 1983. Fear and dangerousenvironments. In: Hockey, Robert (Ed.), Stress and Fatigue inHuman Performance. Wiley, New York, pp. 123–144.Isen, A.M., Johnson, M.M.S., Mertz, E., Robinson, G.F., 1985. Theinfluence of positive affect on the unusualness of wordassociations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48,1413–1426.Isen, A.M., Daubman, K.A., Gorgoglione, J.M., 1987. Theinfluence of positive affect on cognitive organization:implications for education. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, J.M. (Eds.),Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ,pp. 143–164.Kahneman, D., 1973. Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall,Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., 1992. Valuing public goods: thepurchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management 22 (1), 57–70.Kahneman, D., Frederick, S., 2002. Representativeness revisited:attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich, T.,Griffin, D., Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases.Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 49–81.Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Schkade, D., 1999. Economic preferencesor attitude expressions? an analysis of dollar responses topublic issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 220–242.Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A., 1982. Judgment underuncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press,New York.Kahn, B., Isen, A.M., 1993. The influence of positive affect onvariety-seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal ofConsumer Research 20, 257–270.Kauffman, B.E., 1999. Emotional arousal as a source of boundedrationality. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38,135–144.Langford, I., Bateman, I., Langford, H., 1996. A multilevel modellingapproach to triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingentvaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics 7 (3),197–211.Larsen, R.J., Diener, E., 1987. Affect intensity as an individualdifference characteristic: a review. Journal of Research inPersonality 21, 1–39.Lazarus, R., 1984. On the primacy of cognition. AmericanPsychologist 39, 124–129.Lazarus, R., 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford.Leibenstein, M., 1987. Inside the Firm. Harvard University Press,Cambridge, MA.Lerner, J., Keltner, D., 2001. Feer, anger, and risk. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology 81, 146–159.Leventhal, H., Scherer, K., 1987. The relationship of emotion tocognition: a functional approach to a semantic controversy.Cognition and Emotion 1 (1), 3–28.Li, K., 1998. Bayesian inference in a simultaneous equation modelwith limited dependent variables. Journal of Econometrics 85,387–400.Loewenstein, G., 2000. Emotions in economic theory and economicbehaviour. American Economic Review: Papers andProceedings 90, 426–432.McConnell, K.E., 1990. Models for referendum data. Journal ofEnvironmental Economics and Management 18, 19–34.McFadden, D., 1999. Rationality for economists. Journal of Risk andUncertainty 19 (1/3), 73–105.McFadden, D., Leonard, G., 1993. Issues in the contingent valuationof environmental goods: methodologies for data collection andanalysis. In: Hausman, J. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A criticalAssessment. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 165–208.Oatley, K., 1992. Best Laid Schemes: The Psychology of Emotions.Cambridge University Press, New York.Poe, G.L., Clark, J.E., Rondeau, D., Schulze, W.D., 2002. Provisionpoint mechanisms and field validity tests of contingentvaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics 23,105–131.Rondeau, D., Schulze, W.D., Poe, G.L., 1999. Voluntary revelation ofthe demand for public goods using a provision pointmechanism. Journal of Public Economics 72, 455–470.Scarpa, R., Bateman, I., 2000. Efficiency gains afforded by improvedbid design versus follow-up valuation questions in discretechoice CV studies. Land Economics 76, 299–311.Sen, A., 1982. Choice, Welfare, and Measurement. HarvardUniversity Press, Cambridge.Sloman, S.A., 1996. The empirical case for two systems ofreasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119, 3–22.Slovic, P. (2000). The Construction of Preference in Kahneman, D.,and Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, Values and Frames. New York:Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G., 2002. The affectheuristic. In: Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D. (Eds.),Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment.CambridgeUniversity Press, New York, pp. 397–420.Smith, A. (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. London, A.Millar, Edinburgh, A. Kincaid & J. Bell.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1986. Rational choice and the framingof decisions. Journal of Business 59.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131.Whitehead, 2002. Incentive incompatibility and starting pointbias. Land Economics 78 (2), 285–297.Yates, J.F., 1990. Judgement and Decision Making. Prentice-Hall,Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Yerkes, R.M., Dodson, J.D., 1908. The relation of strength ofstimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of ComparativeNeurology and Psychology 18, 459–482.Zajonc, R.B., 1980. Feeling and thinking: preferences need noinferences. American Psychologist 35, 151–175.Zellner, A., 1971. Introduction to Bayesian Inference inEconometrics. Wiley, New York.