13.07.2015 Views

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypothyroidism in Adults ...

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypothyroidism in Adults ...

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypothyroidism in Adults ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR HYPOTHYROIDISM IN ADULTS 1205BestevidencelevelTable 3. Grade-Recommendation Protocol2010 AACE Protocol <strong>for</strong> Production of <strong>Cl<strong>in</strong>ical</strong> <strong>Practice</strong><strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong>—Step III: Grad<strong>in</strong>g of recommendations;How different evidence levels can be mappedto the same recommendation gradeSubjectivefactorimpactTwothirdsRecommendationconsensus Mapp<strong>in</strong>g a grade1 None Yes Direct A2 Positive Yes Adjust up A2 None Yes Direct B1 Negative Yes Adjust down B3 Positive Yes Adjust up B3 None Yes Direct C2 Negative Yes Adjust down C4 Positive Yes Adjust up C4 None Yes Direct D3 Negative Yes Adjust down D1,2,3,4 N/A No Adjust down DAdopted by the AACE and the ATA <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Hypothyroidism</strong> CPG.a Start<strong>in</strong>g with the left column, best evidence levels (BELs),subjective factors, and consensus map to recommendation grades<strong>in</strong> the right column. When subjective factors have little or no impact(‘‘none’’), then the BEL is directly mapped to recommendationgrades. When subjective factors have a strong impact, then recommendationgrades may be adjusted up (‘‘positive’’ impact) or down(‘‘negative’’ impact). If a two-thirds consensus cannot be reached,then the recommendation grade is D.Source: Mechanick et al., 2010 (5).N/A, not applicable (regardless of the presence or absence ofstrong subjective factors, the absence of a two-thirds consensusmandates a recommendation grade D).enables authors to use this language even when the best evidencelevel available is ‘‘expert op<strong>in</strong>ion.’’ Although differentgrad<strong>in</strong>g systems were employed, an ef<strong>for</strong>t was made to makethese recommendations consistent with related portions of‘‘Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis:Management <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> of the American Thyroid Associationand American Association of <strong>Cl<strong>in</strong>ical</strong> Endocr<strong>in</strong>ologists’’(8,9), as well as the ‘‘<strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> of the American ThyroidAssociation <strong>for</strong> the Diagnosis and Management of ThyroidDisease Dur<strong>in</strong>g Pregnancy and Postpartum’’ (10).The shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs of this evidence-based methodology <strong>in</strong>these CPGs are that many recommendations are based onweak scientific data (Level 3) or consensus op<strong>in</strong>ion (Level 4),rather than strong scientific data (Levels 1 and 2). There arealso the problems of (i) subjectivity on the part of the authorswhen weigh<strong>in</strong>g positive and negative, or epidemiologicversus experimental, data <strong>in</strong> order to arrive at an evidencebasedrecommendation grade or consensus op<strong>in</strong>ion, (ii) subjectivityon the part of the authors when weigh<strong>in</strong>g subjectiveattributes, such as cost effectiveness and risk-to-benefit ratios,<strong>in</strong> order to arrive at an evidence-based recommendationgrade or consensus op<strong>in</strong>ion, (iii) potentially <strong>in</strong>complete reviewof the literature by the authors despite extensive diligence,and (iv) bias <strong>in</strong> the available publications, whichorig<strong>in</strong>ate predom<strong>in</strong>antly from experienced cl<strong>in</strong>icians andlarge academic medical centers and may, there<strong>for</strong>e, not reflectthe experience at large. The authors, through an a priorimethodology and multiple levels of review, have tried toaddress these shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs by discussions with three experts(see Acknowledgments).Summary of recommendation gradesThe recommendations are evidence-based (Grades A, B, andC) or based on expert op<strong>in</strong>ion because of a lack of conclusivecl<strong>in</strong>ical evidence (Grade D). The ‘‘best evidence’’ rat<strong>in</strong>g level(BEL), which corresponds to the best conclusive evidencefound, accompanies the recommendation grade. Details regard<strong>in</strong>gthe mapp<strong>in</strong>g of cl<strong>in</strong>ical evidence rat<strong>in</strong>gs to these recommendationgrades have already been provided [see Levels ofscientific substantiation and recommendation grades (transparency)].In this CPG, a substantial number of recommendations areupgraded or downgraded because the conclusions may notapply <strong>in</strong> other situations (non-generalizability). For example,what applies to an elderly population with established cardiacdisease may not apply to a younger population without cardiacrisk factors. Whenever expert op<strong>in</strong>ions resulted <strong>in</strong> upgrad<strong>in</strong>gor downgrad<strong>in</strong>g a recommendation, it is explicitly stated afterthe recommendation.TOPICS RELATING TO HYPOTHYROIDISMEpidemiology<strong>Hypothyroidism</strong> may be either subcl<strong>in</strong>ical or overt. Subcl<strong>in</strong>icalhypothyroidism is characterized by a serum TSHabove the upper reference limit <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with a normalfree thyrox<strong>in</strong>e (T 4 ). This designation is only applicable whenthyroid function has been stable <strong>for</strong> weeks or more, the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroidaxis is normal, and there is norecent or ongo<strong>in</strong>g severe illness. An elevated TSH, usuallyabove 10 mIU/L, <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with a subnormal free T 4characterizes overt hypothyroidism.The results of four studies are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 4.The National Health and Nutrition Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Survey(NHANES III) studied an unselected U.S. population over age12 between 1988 and 1994, us<strong>in</strong>g the upper limit of normal <strong>for</strong>Table 4. Prevalence of <strong>Hypothyroidism</strong>Study Subcl<strong>in</strong>ical Overt TSH CommentNHANES III 4.3% 0.3% 4.5Colorado Thyroid Disease Prevalence 8.5% 0.4% 5.0 Not on thyroid hormoneFram<strong>in</strong>gham 10.0 Over age 60 years: 5.9% women; 2.3% men; 39% ofwhom had subnormal T 4British Whickham 10.0 9.3% women; 1.2% menSources: Hollowell et al., 2002 (11); Canaris et al., 2000 (12); Saw<strong>in</strong> et al., 1985 (13); Vanderpump et al., 1995 (14); Vanderpump andTunbridge, 2002 (15).NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Survey.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!