Tomasello
Tomasello
Tomasello
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
250M. <strong>Tomasello</strong> / Cognition 74 (2000) 209±253Clark, E. (1996). Early verbs, event types, and in¯ections. In C. Johnson, & J. Gilbert, Children'slanguage. vol. 9, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Collado-Vides, J. (1991). A syntactic representation of the units of genetic information. Journal ofTheoretical Biology, 148, 401±429.Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information,University of Chicago Press.DeLancey, S. (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language, 57, 626±657.DeVilliers, J. (1985). Learning how to use verbs: Lexical coding and the in¯uence of input. Journal ofChild Language, 12, 587±596.DeVilliers, J., & DeVilliers, P. (1973). Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journalof Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 331±341.Diessel, H., & <strong>Tomasello</strong>, M. (1999). Why complement clauses do not include a that-complementizer inearly child language. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society,.Dodson, K., & <strong>Tomasello</strong>, M. (1998). Acquiring the transitive construction in English: The role ofanimacy and pronouns. Journal of Child Language, 25, 555±574.Dryer, M. (1997). Are grammatical relations universal? In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. Thompson, Essayson language function and language type, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Fillmore, C. (1985). Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. Berkeley LinguisticSociety, 11, 73±86.Fillmore, C., Kaye, P., & O'Connor, M. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions:The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501±538.Fischer, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children's interpretation ofsentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 41±84.Foley, W., & Van Valin, R. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retireval. CognitiveScience, 19, 141±205.Foulkes, D. (1978). A grammar of dreams, New York: Basic Books.Gathecole, V., SebastiaÂn, E., & Soto, P. (1999). The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology:Across-the-Board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism,.Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155±170.Gentner, D., & Markman, A. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist,52, 45±56.GivoÂn, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Gleitman, L. R., & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: The state of the art. In E. Wanner, & L. R.Gleitman, Language acquisition: The state of the art, New York: Cambridge University Press.Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure, Universityof Chicago Press.Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1991). Language comprehension: A new look at some old themes. InN. Krasnegor, D. Rumbaugh, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & R. Schiefelbusch, Biological and behavioralaspects of language acquisition, (pp. 301±320). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The origins of grammar: Evidence from early languagecomprehension, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Hyams, N. (1994). Non-discreteness and variation in child language: Implications for Principle andparameter models of language acquisition. In Y. Levy, Other children. other languages, Erlbaum:Hillsdale, NJ.Ingham, R. (1993). Critical in¯uences on the acquisition of verb transitivity. In D. Messer, & G. Turner,Critical in¯uences on child language acquisition and development, London: Maximillian Press.Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music, Cambridge: MIT Press.Jackendoff, R. (1996). Twistin' the night away. Language, 73, 534±559.Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations. Language, 75,1±33.