Jason Papacosma, Arlington, VA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Challenges moving ahead Can consensus be achieved among EPA, DCR,MS4s, and advocacy community? Will the ‘perfect’ be the enemy of the ‘good?’ Are the 35% and 60% reductions achievable by2027? Is the public really on board for scale, type, andcost of infrastructure re-construction needed?12
The ‘ideal’ permit? Ambitious permits to push local programs farther Recognition that stormwater cannot be managed like atrue point source Regulatory/advocacy community desire for‘enforceability’ MS4 permittee desire for ‘compliance’ Reality of long timeframes for local implementation Sound use of limited resources Common desire for local and regional watershedimprovements Recognition of limits of urban watershed restoration13
Page 1 and 2: Arlington, VAMS4 Permit andTMDL cha
Page 3 and 4: 2008 - established dedicated fundin
Page 5 and 6: Why this MS4 Permit is different Ch
Page 7 and 8: Chesapeake Bay TMDL& Arlington MS4
Page 9 and 10: Costs Scenario 1: Estimated costs i
Page 11: Interim strategy Use surplus N and

Jason Papacosma, Arlington, VA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?