Jason Papacosma, Arlington, VA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2012 3/12: Pre-draft 7/31: DCR sends draft to EPA for 30 day review 8/30: EPA notifies DCR – 60 additional days review 10/29: EPA provides DCR ‘official’ comments 11/20: DCR provides response to EPA comments 12/19: EPA provides ‘response to DCR response’2013 1/4: More EPA comments 1/22: DCR responseMS4 Permit Status 2/6: EPA, DCR, <strong>Arlington</strong> conference call to resolve outfall repairrequirements 2/10: Draft permit released for public comment 3/22: Public hearing; 3/29: Comment deadline 4
Why this MS4 Permit is different Chesapeake Bay TMDL pollutant load reductions Local TMDL action plans Performance measures More training More inspections More analysis, modeling, monitoring More emphasis on ‘enforceability’5
Page 1 and 2: Arlington, VAMS4 Permit andTMDL cha
Page 3: 2008 - established dedicated fundin
Page 7 and 8: Chesapeake Bay TMDL& Arlington MS4
Page 9 and 10: Costs Scenario 1: Estimated costs i
Page 11 and 12: Interim strategy Use surplus N and
Page 13 and 14: The ‘ideal’ permit? Ambitious p

Jason Papacosma, Arlington, VA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?