West Virginia CO2 Sequestration Working Group

More documents

Recommendations

Info

WVCCS <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong>Legal Conclusions• An alternative to the wholesale conveyance ofproperty rights is necessary• Not all use of private land results in a compensabletaking• Use of pore space below 2500 feet should generallybe considered public use• A trust fund should be linked to liability transfer• A robust regulatory program is necessary• New legislation is required22
RECOMMENDED CCS LEGISLATION23
Page 6 and 7: IOGCC MODEL STATUTE*• Agency appr
Page 8 and 9: CLASS VI UIC RULES*Goals• Protect
Page 10 and 11: NATIONAL COAL COUNCIL*- CCS has not
Page 12 and 13: WEST VIRGINIA12
Page 14 and 15: INITIAL WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATIONAd
Page 16 and 17: MEMBERS OF WEST VIRGINIA CCS WORKIN
Page 18 and 19: MEMBERS OF WEST VIRGINIA CCS WORKIN
Page 20 and 21: WVCCS Working GroupFeasibility Conc
Page 24 and 25: KEY ELEMENTS OF RECOMMENDEDLEGISLAT
Page 26 and 27: Environmental PermittingDISCUSSION
Page 28 and 29: PORE SPACE USAGE28
Page 30 and 31: DISCUSSION DRAFTWEST VIRGINIA CARBO
Page 32 and 33: EMINENT DOMAIN / POOLING32
Page 34 and 35: OTHER PROPERTY INTERESTS34
Page 36 and 37: OPERATIONAL LIABILITY36
Page 38 and 39: POST-CLOSURE LIABILITY38
Page 40 and 41: Schematic Risk Profile for a CO2 St
Page 44 and 45: CCS Working GroupDISCUSSION DRAFTWE
Page 46 and 47: Cooperative agreementsDISCUSSION DR
Page 48 and 49: Legislative reportsDISCUSSION DRAFT
Page 56 and 57: CONCLUSIONS• West Virginia Legisl

West Virginia CO2 Sequestration Working Group

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?