13.07.2015 Views

Ethics of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification - FAO.org

Ethics of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification - FAO.org

Ethics of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification - FAO.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9<strong>Intensification</strong> isassociated withperiods <strong>of</strong> humanpopulation growthWhen isintensificationethically good?A utilitarianmodel<strong>Agricultural</strong> intensification is a processthat occurs when individual humanbeings, communities or <strong>org</strong>anizationstake actions <strong>of</strong> one sort or another. The ethicsframework previously discussed can be appliedto the actions <strong>of</strong> individuals, associations and<strong>org</strong>anized corporate bodies. The frameworkillustrates three ways in which questions aboutthe justifiability and ethical acceptability <strong>of</strong> anyparticular course <strong>of</strong> conduct might be posed andanalysed. Applied to agricultural intensification,these become questions that might be pertinentto the acts <strong>of</strong> farmers, input suppliers, technologydevelopers, or to any number <strong>of</strong> public andprivate agencies whose activities affect the productivity <strong>of</strong> agricultural inputs. Suchquestions might be asked by a person or group evaluating their own options and mightalso be posed as part <strong>of</strong> a general discussion and debate about what actions shouldbe taken by governments, international agencies or, indeed, any actor in the foodsystem. Since policies are, in fact, actions taken by governments or other <strong>org</strong>anizations,it is possible to evaluate the institution <strong>of</strong> any policy that would affect intensificationin much the same way as one evaluates any ordinary act. The first ethical questionis to determine what it is about intensification that makes it a good thing, somethingto be encouraged or brought about in a particular set <strong>of</strong> circumstances and, correlatively,what circumstances might make intensification an ethically bad thing.Consequentialist ethical approaches provide the most straightforward and obviousway to evaluate an entire system <strong>of</strong> food and fibre production. The consequentialistunderstands what is right, good and proper to be determined by the impact <strong>of</strong> theaction or policy on health, wealth andwell-being. <strong>Intensification</strong> is, in theprototypical case, intended to increase thetotal amount <strong>of</strong> food available withoutincreasing the use <strong>of</strong> inputs. Since food ismaterial to human life and health, theproduction <strong>of</strong> more food can be considereda beneficial impact, especially under the<strong>FAO</strong>/19698/G. BIZZARRIcircumstances <strong>of</strong> food scarcity that havebeen too typical <strong>of</strong> human history. Asnoted, intensification is associated withperiods <strong>of</strong> human population growth.Without a correlative growth in food

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!