13.07.2015 Views

Transfer of environmental liabilities in the oil and gas sector - WSP

Transfer of environmental liabilities in the oil and gas sector - WSP

Transfer of environmental liabilities in the oil and gas sector - WSP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Transfer</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong><strong>WSP</strong> Environment & EnergyHop<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> best while prepar<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> worstFor each party, <strong>the</strong>re must be a balance between hop<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong>best while prepar<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> worst with regards to <strong>environmental</strong>response costs. Due diligence helps to narrow <strong>the</strong> spectrum <strong>of</strong>risk, however, it is extremely difficult to accurately characterize<strong>the</strong> full extent <strong>of</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation through a Phase I or Phase II ESA;<strong>the</strong>refore, leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong> on <strong>the</strong>table. Environmental liability transfer solutions, such as <strong>WSP</strong>’s ownActive <strong>Transfer</strong> program, have <strong>the</strong> capacity to protect all partiesfrom <strong>the</strong> entire spectrum <strong>of</strong> potential risk.Our Active <strong>Transfer</strong> program, like any responsible <strong>environmental</strong>management program, requires a detailed <strong>environmental</strong><strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> an asset; identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong>contam<strong>in</strong>ation, def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> program goals, outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>overall strategy, <strong>and</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> basel<strong>in</strong>e aga<strong>in</strong>st which <strong>the</strong>seller is protected, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> progress toward site closure ismeasured. Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liability ensures <strong>the</strong> selleris not discount<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asset too deeply, while <strong>the</strong>buyer is gett<strong>in</strong>g a fair depreciated value for <strong>the</strong> quantified<strong>environmental</strong> impacts.Perception <strong>of</strong> Total Cost <strong>of</strong> Transaction by PartyPerception <strong>of</strong> Total Cost <strong>of</strong> Transaction by Party140120100How does <strong>environmental</strong> liability transfer deliver value?Liability transfer can be structured to enable multi-national <strong>oil</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>gas</strong> companies to unlock <strong>the</strong> potential value <strong>of</strong> underperform<strong>in</strong>gproperties <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir portfolios. <strong>WSP</strong>’s Active <strong>Transfer</strong> allows <strong>the</strong>seller to uncouple <strong>the</strong> asset from <strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> liability.By transferr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> liability to <strong>WSP</strong>, <strong>the</strong>unencumbered asset can be sold at fair market value. Thisprovides multiple benefits to <strong>the</strong> seller:1. The number <strong>of</strong> potential buyers can be exp<strong>and</strong>ed to <strong>in</strong>cludecompanies that can maximize <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asset even if <strong>the</strong>yhave no appetite for <strong>environmental</strong> management;2. The transaction can focus on <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess. The negotiation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asset value without <strong>the</strong> potentially uncerta<strong>in</strong> range <strong>of</strong><strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong> is a much more focused discussion;3. The <strong>environmental</strong> liability is gone. There is no risk that an upset<strong>in</strong> a buyers’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess plan will divert funds from <strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong>obligations to support operations, leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legacy to return to<strong>the</strong> seller. No liability transferred to <strong>WSP</strong> has ever reverted backto a seller; <strong>and</strong>$ <strong>in</strong> $ <strong>in</strong> millions806040204. While <strong>WSP</strong> is manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legacy liability, our eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>and</strong>geoscientistsBuyer's Perceptionwill be able to discern any change <strong>in</strong> conditions dueto Seller's new Perception operations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> buyer, elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>WSP</strong>'s Projected Costrisk be<strong>in</strong>g managed on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seller <strong>and</strong> buyer.It is not just <strong>the</strong> seller that benefits:1. The buyer can focus on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment without staff<strong>in</strong>g for<strong>environmental</strong> remediation management;0Total PerceivedCost by PartyTotal Precieved Costby PartyClaimManagementClaim ManagementGroundwaterRemediationS<strong>oil</strong> RemediationS<strong>oil</strong>RemediationWasteManagementWaste Management2. The transaction can focus on <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess. The negotiation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> asset value without <strong>the</strong> potentially uncerta<strong>in</strong> range <strong>of</strong><strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong> is a much more focused discussion;Buyer's Buyer’s PerceptionSeller's Seller’s Perception<strong>WSP</strong>'s <strong>WSP</strong>’s Projected Potential CostsNote: This graph illustrates how each party <strong>in</strong> a transaction views<strong>the</strong> total cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> liability based on observationsfrom hundreds <strong>of</strong> transactions <strong>WSP</strong> has supported. We have<strong>the</strong> tools to manage <strong>the</strong> program <strong>in</strong> a manner that ensures fairmarket value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> liability transaction for allparties <strong>in</strong>volved.3. The <strong>environmental</strong> liability is gone. The buyer does not haveto worry about reserves for liability that is be<strong>in</strong>g managed by<strong>WSP</strong> <strong>and</strong> funded by <strong>the</strong> seller; <strong>and</strong>4. While <strong>WSP</strong> is manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legacy liability, our eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>and</strong>geoscientists will be able to protect <strong>the</strong> buyer from potential claimsthat conditions, which were simply unknown at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sale, are due to <strong>the</strong> operations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> buyer. The responsibility for“unknowns” will be <strong>WSP</strong>s, elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> negotiations<strong>and</strong> potential litigation.Page 2.t


TRANSFEROR OF OBLIGATIONS<strong>Transfer</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong><strong>WSP</strong> Environment & EnergyTime is moneyTime is money, especially <strong>in</strong> asset transactions. There are manycases where <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> a contam<strong>in</strong>ated property has beenh<strong>in</strong>dered by: uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> exact value <strong>of</strong> liability;concerns about <strong>the</strong> adequacy <strong>of</strong> clean-up by a purchaser; <strong>and</strong>,<strong>the</strong> companies’ view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulatory agencyrequir<strong>in</strong>g a site clean-up, if not already required. Active <strong>Transfer</strong>“un-h<strong>in</strong>ders” <strong>and</strong> streaml<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> process.With Active <strong>Transfer</strong>, we have been able to save clients tens <strong>of</strong>millions <strong>of</strong> dollars through efficiency <strong>and</strong> technical expertise byreduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> conventional <strong>environmental</strong> remediation. Thescenario below shows <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs we deliveredto a client us<strong>in</strong>g Active <strong>Transfer</strong> for a site <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States.THIRD-PARTYLAW-SUITSTECHNICAL SOLUTION REMOVES RISK & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTSMANAGEMENT OF CONTRACT & INSURANCE BY <strong>WSP</strong>TRANSFER BACKED BY INSURANCE PRODUCTSCONTRACTUAL TRANSFER TO THE ACTIVE TRANSFER ENTITYCLIENTSKNOWNENVIRONMENTALOBLIGATIONSCost sav<strong>in</strong>gs result due to:• Implementation <strong>of</strong> alternative remediation technologies• Proper scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> remediation system• Streaml<strong>in</strong>ed process through remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> opportunityfor disputes between parties• Increased efficiency for project <strong>in</strong>itiativesGeneralized Cost Cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>Remediation us<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>gSt<strong>and</strong>ard St<strong>and</strong>ard Practice PracticeGeneralized Cost Cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>Active Active <strong>Transfer</strong> <strong>Transfer</strong>InfrastructurePotential Future CostInfrastructurePotential Future Cost0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<strong>Transfer</strong> FeesActive <strong>Transfer</strong> One-time FeesValue <strong>of</strong> Active <strong>Transfer</strong> (cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs)<strong>Transfer</strong> FeesNote: Active These <strong>Transfer</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs One-time Fees do not <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs associatedwith Value divest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Active <strong>Transfer</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g (cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs) costs (to <strong>the</strong> seller), <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong>management required (buyer), or <strong>the</strong> capital <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong>remediation prior to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Active <strong>Transfer</strong>program. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs are potentially greater than<strong>the</strong> percentages shown above.How is <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial structure secured?In <strong>the</strong> current market conditions, <strong>the</strong> ability to quantify <strong>and</strong> manage<strong>liabilities</strong> <strong>and</strong> risks effectively is paramount. A properly structuredliability transfer can provide multiple layers <strong>of</strong> protection for both<strong>the</strong> seller <strong>and</strong> buyer. Our approach, establish<strong>in</strong>g a separate entityprotected by a trust, is capable <strong>of</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eventthat all parties to <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al transaction dissolve.UNKNOWNENVIRONMENTALOBLIGATIONSAbove: The layers <strong>of</strong> protection between our client <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> risks associated with an <strong>environmental</strong>ly impaired asset.InfrastructureInfrastructurePotential Future CostPotential Future CostScenarios for Active <strong>Transfer</strong>Active <strong>Transfer</strong> has <strong>the</strong> ability to br<strong>in</strong>g a client peace <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d bymanag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir known <strong>and</strong> unknown <strong>environmental</strong> obligations,changes <strong>in</strong> regulation <strong>and</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> exposure to third-partylawsuits. Active <strong>Transfer</strong> is a favorable solution <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong>scenarios, some <strong>of</strong> which are described below:<strong>Transfer</strong> Fees<strong>Transfer</strong> Active <strong>Transfer</strong> Fees One-time FeesCHANGESINREGULATIONDeadlock Active Value <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transfer</strong> <strong>in</strong> Active a transactionOne-time <strong>Transfer</strong> (cost Feessav<strong>in</strong>gs)Value <strong>of</strong> Active <strong>Transfer</strong> (cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs)Sell<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>environmental</strong>ly-impaired property <strong>in</strong>volves negotiationsbetween <strong>the</strong> responsible party(ies), regulators, buyers, auditors,<strong>and</strong> lawyers. Buyers <strong>of</strong>ten quantify <strong>the</strong> oversight <strong>and</strong> management<strong>of</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> obligations significantly higher than expected,cit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y are burdensome <strong>and</strong> distract<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>ggoals <strong>of</strong> a company. By <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g a third party to accept <strong>the</strong><strong>environmental</strong> obligation, clear ownership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong>obligation is established to overcome historic liability cha<strong>in</strong>s.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>demnity is transferrable <strong>and</strong> can followownership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> property.Clean-up balance sheetsOil <strong>and</strong> <strong>gas</strong> companies typically establish f<strong>in</strong>ancial reserves for<strong>environmental</strong> obligations at active, <strong>in</strong>active or closed assets.Closed or <strong>in</strong>active assets are associated with a negative cashflow due to ongo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>environmental</strong> costs, carry<strong>in</strong>g costs, taxes,<strong>in</strong>surance, utilities, <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, among o<strong>the</strong>r expenditures.Active <strong>Transfer</strong> can elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>environmental</strong> liability from <strong>the</strong>balance sheet <strong>and</strong> cap <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> liability whiletransferr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> risk. This is accomplished by <strong>WSP</strong> through accurate<strong>and</strong> fully auditable estimated reserves for <strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong><strong>and</strong> added protection above <strong>the</strong> reserve estimates.Page 3.


<strong>Transfer</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong><strong>WSP</strong> Environment & EnergyComplex portfoliosA property transaction, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a complex portfolio <strong>of</strong> sites,carries <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> improper sale <strong>of</strong> <strong>environmental</strong>ly impairedreal-estate <strong>and</strong> may put <strong>the</strong> seller at risk if <strong>the</strong> buyers are notcapable <strong>of</strong> responsible care. If <strong>the</strong> buyers opt not to address<strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> issues <strong>of</strong> a site, obligation may fall back on<strong>the</strong> seller. Active <strong>Transfer</strong> can remove <strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> liabilityassociated with <strong>the</strong> transaction before, dur<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> after <strong>the</strong>transaction has taken place, us<strong>in</strong>g tailored solutions to eachunique property <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> portfolio.Active <strong>Transfer</strong> <strong>in</strong> practiceFacilitat<strong>in</strong>g Redevelopment <strong>in</strong> New YorkA site-specific transaction company (a Liability <strong>Transfer</strong> entity)was formed to manage, remediate, <strong>and</strong> assume liability for<strong>the</strong> <strong>environmental</strong> conditions at properties located <strong>in</strong> aformer <strong>in</strong>dustrial section <strong>of</strong> a major city <strong>in</strong> New York State.The liability transfer structure used protected <strong>the</strong> sellers,<strong>the</strong> buyer/developer, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> future occupant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> propertyaga<strong>in</strong>st liability for <strong>the</strong> transferred <strong>environmental</strong> conditionsat <strong>the</strong> properties.The Liability <strong>Transfer</strong> entity was <strong>in</strong>dividually established <strong>and</strong>uniquely tailored to address both <strong>the</strong> known <strong>and</strong> unknown<strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong>. The buyer <strong>and</strong> sellers deposited <strong>the</strong>estimated clean-up funds <strong>in</strong>to two separate <strong>in</strong>dependentlymanaged trusts that were used solely for <strong>environmental</strong> workto be performed at <strong>the</strong> properties. More importantly, <strong>the</strong>Liability <strong>Transfer</strong> entity provided a seamless <strong>in</strong>demnity to <strong>the</strong>parties. The liability transfer structure provided a solution thateffectively addressed ongo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>environmental</strong> obligations <strong>and</strong>enabled <strong>the</strong> parties to each focus on <strong>the</strong>ir core bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong>contribute to <strong>the</strong> economic vitality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community.A Certificate <strong>of</strong> Completion was received for <strong>the</strong> parcelfrom <strong>the</strong> New York State Department <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentalConservation. The project demonstrated <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> liability transfer process to align <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sellers, buyer, developer, municipal government, <strong>and</strong> stateregulatory authority.Demonstrated successThe ongo<strong>in</strong>g divestiture <strong>of</strong> underperform<strong>in</strong>g assets seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>oil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>gas</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry will be accelerated by <strong>environmental</strong> liabilitytransfer solutions. In place <strong>of</strong> a limited number <strong>of</strong> potential buyers<strong>and</strong> slow progress toward closure caused by archived liability, aprogram such as Active <strong>Transfer</strong> opens up <strong>the</strong> market by sett<strong>in</strong>ga value on responsibly ext<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> liability <strong>in</strong>dependent from<strong>the</strong> property transaction. Oil <strong>and</strong> <strong>gas</strong> companies will benefit fromthis freedom to transact <strong>the</strong> asset at a fair market value, confidentthat <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>environmental</strong> <strong>liabilities</strong> will not return to surprise <strong>the</strong>m<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future.Contact UsFor more <strong>in</strong>formation on this subject <strong>and</strong> about <strong>WSP</strong>’sservices please contact any <strong>of</strong> our specialist advisors:John Black, Executive Vice PresidentT. 703-318-3913E. john.black@wspgroup.comSteve Kretschman, Vice PresidentT. 412-604-1040E. steve.kretschman@wspgroup.comCraig Anderson, Senior Technical ManagerT. 612-343-0510E. craig.<strong>and</strong>erson@wspgroup.comUNITEDBY OURDIFFERENCEwww.wsp<strong>environmental</strong>.com/usa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!