13.07.2015 Views

Multivariable Advanced Calculus

Multivariable Advanced Calculus

Multivariable Advanced Calculus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.5. DETERMINANTS 41Summing over all ordered lists, (r 1 , · · · , r n ) where the r i are distinct, (If the r i are notdistinct, sgn (r 1 , · · · , r n ) = 0 and so there is no contribution to the sum.)∑∑(r 1 ,··· ,r n ) (k 1 ,··· ,k n )n! det (A) =sgn (r 1 , · · · , r n ) sgn (k 1 , · · · , k n ) a r1k 1· · · a rnk n.This proves the corollary. since the formula gives the same number for A as it doesfor A T .Corollary 3.5.7 If two rows or two columns in an n×n matrix, A, are switched, thedeterminant of the resulting matrix equals (−1) times the determinant of the originalmatrix. If A is an n × n matrix in which two rows are equal or two columns are equalthen det (A) = 0. Suppose the i th row of A equals (xa 1 + yb 1 , · · · , xa n + yb n ). Thendet (A) = x det (A 1 ) + y det (A 2 )where the i th row of A 1 is (a 1 , · · · , a n ) and the i th row of A 2 is (b 1 , · · · , b n ) , all otherrows of A 1 and A 2 coinciding with those of A. In other words, det is a linear functionof each row A. The same is true with the word “row” replaced with the word “column”.Proof: By Proposition 3.5.4 when two rows are switched, the determinant of theresulting matrix is (−1) times the determinant of the original matrix. By Corollary3.5.6 the same holds for columns because the columns of the matrix equal the rows ofthe transposed matrix. Thus if A 1 is the matrix obtained from A by switching twocolumns,det (A) = det ( A T ) = − det ( A T )1 = − det (A1 ) .If A has two equal columns or two equal rows, then switching them results in the samematrix. Therefore, det (A) = − det (A) and so det (A) = 0.It remains to verify the last assertion.det (A) ≡∑sgn (k 1 , · · · , k n ) a 1k1 · · · (xa ki + yb ki ) · · · a nkn= x+y(k 1 ,··· ,k n )∑(k 1 ,··· ,k n )∑(k 1 ,··· ,k n )sgn (k 1 , · · · , k n ) a 1k1 · · · a ki · · · a nknsgn (k 1 , · · · , k n ) a 1k1 · · · b ki · · · a nkn≡ x det (A 1 ) + y det (A 2 ) .The same is true of columns because det ( A ) T = det (A) and the rows of A T are thecolumns of A.The following corollary is also of great use.Corollary 3.5.8 Suppose A is an n × n matrix and some column (row) is a linearcombination of r other columns (rows). Then det (A) = 0.Proof: Let A = ( a 1 · · · a n)be the columns of A and suppose the conditionthat one column is a linear combination of r of the others is satisfied. Then by usingCorollary 3.5.7 you may rearrange the columns to have the n th column a linearcombination of the first r columns. Thus a n = ∑ rk=1 c ka k and sodet (A) = det ( a 1 · · · a r · · · a n−1∑ rk=1 c ka k).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!