13.07.2015 Views

Multivariable Advanced Calculus

Multivariable Advanced Calculus

Multivariable Advanced Calculus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92 CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONSlet C ∩ (−∞, x) ≡ A, and C ∩ (x, ∞) ≡ B. Then C = A ∪ B and the sets A and Bseparate C contrary to the assumption that C is connected.Conversely, let I be an interval. Suppose I is separated by A and B. Pick x ∈ Aand y ∈ B. Suppose without loss of generality that x < y. Now define the set,S ≡ {t ∈ [x, y] : [x, t] ⊆ A}and let l be the least upper bound of S. Then l ∈ A so l /∈ B which implies l ∈ A. Butif l /∈ B, then for some δ > 0,(l, l + δ) ∩ B = ∅contradicting the definition of l as an upper bound for S. Therefore, l ∈ B which impliesl /∈ A after all, a contradiction. It follows I must be connected. This yields a generalization of the intermediate value theorem from one variablecalculus.Corollary 5.3.9 Let E be a connected set in a normed vector space and supposef : E → R and that y ∈ (f (e 1 ) , f (e 2 )) where e i ∈ E. Then there exists e ∈ E such thatf (e) = y.Proof: From Theorem 5.3.5, f (E) is a connected subset of R. By Theorem 5.3.8f (E) must be an interval. In particular, it must contain y. This proves the corollary.The following theorem is a very useful description of the open sets in R.Theorem 5.3.10 Let U be an open set in R. Then there exist countably manydisjoint open sets {(a i , b i )} ∞ i=1 such that U = ∪∞ i=1 (a i, b i ) .Proof: Let p ∈ U and let z ∈ C p , the connected component determined by p. SinceU is open, there exists, δ > 0 such that (z − δ, z + δ) ⊆ U. It follows from Theorem5.3.4 that(z − δ, z + δ) ⊆ C p .This shows C p is open. By Theorem 5.3.8, this shows C p is an open interval, (a, b)where a, b ∈ [−∞, ∞] . There are therefore at most countably many of these connectedcomponents because each must contain a rational number and the rational numbers arecountable. Denote by {(a i , b i )} ∞ i=1the set of these connected components. This provesthe theorem. Definition 5.3.11 A set E in a normed vector space is arcwise connected if forany two points, p, q ∈ E, there exists a closed interval, [a, b] and a continuous function,γ : [a, b] → E such that γ (a) = p and γ (b) = q.An example of an arcwise connected topological space would be any subset of R nwhich is the continuous image of an interval. Arcwise connected is not the same asconnected. A well known example is the following.{(x, sin 1 ) }: x ∈ (0, 1] ∪ {(0, y) : y ∈ [−1, 1]} (5.2)xYou can verify that this set of points in the normed vector space R 2 is not arcwiseconnected but is connected.Lemma 5.3.12 In a normed vector space, B (z,r) is arcwise connected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!