13.07.2015 Views

The Freeman 1972 - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Freeman 1972 - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Freeman 1972 - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>1972</strong> FREE GIVING VS. THE WELFARE STATE 111shelters, or to pass along his taxcosts in the form of higher prices.<strong>The</strong> easy road to great fortunesand the tax-free status of many ofour wealthiest persons are hallmarksof the welfare state. At theother extreme, the poor man,spending most of his income fornecessities, is locked into the cruelbind of tax and inflation. Whopays for the government's farmprograms? <strong>The</strong> only honest reply:"<strong>The</strong> poor people in the cities." Onthe other hand, farmers are impoverishedby rising costs of machineryand supplies due to governmentpampering of organizedlabor, plus the exorbitant taxesand interest which stem from theprofligate policies of a welfarestate. <strong>The</strong> true charge of Brahminismfits best those welfare policieswhich are designed to fastenthe individual to a place in an arbitrarycaste system of "benefits"while taxing away his chances ofsocial mobility.Failure of the current administrationto even begin to dismantlethe bureaucracy as promised indicatesa need for major surgery.When government officials, in somany cases, seem no more awareof fundamental economic law thanare their constituents, it is difficultto see how correction cancome. It usually takes a greatshock to shake a nation.into agrand decision. <strong>The</strong> blitz-bombingdid it to England. Catastrophic defeat. accomplished it in WestGermany and Japan. Such feats,as in England, are often ephemeral.<strong>The</strong> magic of Germany andJapan may well end in reaction.However, the debacle of 1929,which introduced our welfare stateand started a movement continuingto this day, is some proof ofour persistence, however perverse.Nevertheless, a steady growth ofconservative opposition, both inquantity and quality, has been apparent.Those who are rebuffed areobliged to pursue education andimprove their talents, while thosein power grow slack. It may wellbe that when the next shock comes,as it surely must, voters will beready to listen to the call to turnphilanthropy back to the people. ~IDEAS ONtrlh\W~D.LIBERTYWilliam Featheris better off, one which organizes a new upliftWHICH TOWNmovement every three months, or one which opens a new factory?<strong>The</strong> William Feather Magazine, December 1971

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!