As. J. Energy Env. 2006, 7(02), 315-323 322Thermodynamic calculati<strong>on</strong>sThermodynamic predicti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gas products at different temperatures were extensivelyc<strong>on</strong>ducted using HSC s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware but the figures are not present here due to the space limit. Itcould be known from the calculati<strong>on</strong> that the releasing patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gas products from pyrolysis<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> shell and EFB are similar with that from fiber. The pyrolysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>palm</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>wastes</str<strong>on</strong>g> could bedivided into four z<strong>on</strong>es, according to temperatures. In the first z<strong>on</strong>e (T 900 0 C),pyrolysis reaches the end. Almost no reacti<strong>on</strong> occurs. The c<strong>on</strong>tents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H 2 (45 mol.%) and CO(30 mol.%) keep high and stable.An increase in the reacti<strong>on</strong> temperature favors endothermic reacti<strong>on</strong>s. Thus, higher yields <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>H 2 and CO and lower yields <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> CH 4 and H 2 O are obtained at higher temperatures. Thepredicted changing tendency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gas products with respect to temperature is similar to thesimulati<strong>on</strong> work d<strong>on</strong>e by Zhang [10], and also supported by other experimental results [2, 5].As predicted, high temperature is in favor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>producti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H 2 during pyrolysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>palm</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>wastes</str<strong>on</strong>g>, supports at certain extent our experimental observati<strong>on</strong> with TGA-FTIR where H2<str<strong>on</strong>g>producti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> at over 355 0 C was suggested based <strong>on</strong> mass balance, although the directmeasurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H 2 was not c<strong>on</strong>ducted in this study. The trend <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> decreasing C residue aspredicted, is also c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the experiments results from TGA. The corresp<strong>on</strong>dingtemperatures used <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> grouping the 4 z<strong>on</strong>es might not be the same with those found in realsituati<strong>on</strong>, due to the limitati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thermodynamic calculati<strong>on</strong>. Nevertheless, this simulati<strong>on</strong>approach provides a better understanding to the influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> temperature <strong>on</strong> pyrolysisproducts.C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>sThe following c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s could be reached:1. Palm <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>wastes</str<strong>on</strong>g> are easily degraded and their pyrolysis can be divided into four stages:moisture evoluti<strong>on</strong> (340 0 C). The weight loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thestudied <str<strong>on</strong>g>palm</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>wastes</str<strong>on</strong>g> is focused at 220-340 0 C. The activati<strong>on</strong> energy is <strong>on</strong>ly about 60kJ/mol and the degradati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>palm</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>wastes</str<strong>on</strong>g> is in general first order reacti<strong>on</strong> at the studiedc<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s: sample mass (20-25 mg), flow rate (40 ml/min).2. Gaseous products, identified by FTIR, are mainly CO 2 , CO, CH 4 , H 2 O, and a few organics.Most gaseous product evolved at 250-350 0 C, which is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the observati<strong>on</strong>obtained from the thermoanalysis.3. Temperature has dem<strong>on</strong>strated significant influence <strong>on</strong> pyrolysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>palm</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>wastes</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Thedifferent patterns related to pyrolysis rate and gas evolving pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ile at low (355 0 C) are observed and it indicates the different reacti<strong>on</strong> pathway (ormechanism) involved. The experimental study using TGA-FTIR and thermodynamicmodeling <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gas product releasing showed similar results: gas yield is increased withtemperature at the expense <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> char residue.
As. J. Energy Env. 2006, 7(02), 315-323 3234. Thermodynamic equilibrium simulati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>palm</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>wastes</str<strong>on</strong>g> pyrolysis show that the maingas products are H 2 , CO, CH 4 , and CO. It c<strong>on</strong>firmed the evolving <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H 2 at highertemperatures. Yields <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H 2 and CO are increased as temperature increasing to 900 0 C, andthey get their stable yield <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 45 mol.% and 30 mol.%, respectively.References[1] Islam, M.N., Zailani, R., and Ani, F.N. (1999) Pyrolytic <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> from fluidized bed pyrolysis<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>oil</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>palm</str<strong>on</strong>g> shell and its characterizati<strong>on</strong>, Renewable Energy, 17, pp. 73-84[2] Williams, P.T. and Nugranad, N. (2000) Comparis<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> products from the pyrolysis andcatalytic pyrolysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rice husks, Energy, 25, pp. 493-513.[3] Demirbas, A. (2002) Gaseous products from biomass by pyrolysis and gasificati<strong>on</strong>:effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> catalyst <strong>on</strong> hydrogen yield, Energy C<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> and Management, 43, (7), pp.897-909[4] Chen, G., Andries, J., and Splieth<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f, H. (2003) Catalytic pyrolysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>hydrogen rich fuel gas <str<strong>on</strong>g>producti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, Energy C<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> and Management, 44, pp. 2289-2296.[5] Blasi, C.D., Signorelli, G., Russo, C.D., and Rea, G. (1999) Product distributi<strong>on</strong> frompyrolysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> wood and agricultural residues, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, pp. 2216-2224.[6] Pletka, R., Brown, R.C., and Smeenk, J. (2001) Indirectly heated biomass gasificati<strong>on</strong>using a latent heat ballast. Part 2: modeling. Biomass and Bioenergy, 20, pp. 307-315.[7] Mckendry, P. (2003) Energy <str<strong>on</strong>g>producti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> from biomass (part 1): overview <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass.Bioresource Technology, 83, pp. 37-46[8] Raveendran, K., Ganesh, A., and Khilar, K.C. (1996) <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pyrolysis</str<strong>on</strong>g> characteristics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomassand biomass comp<strong>on</strong>ents, Fuel, 75, (8), pp. 987-998.[9] Williams, P.T. and Horne, P.A. (1994) The role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> metal salts in the pyrolysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>biomass, Renewable Energy, 4, (1), pp. 1-13.[10] Zhang, J.L. (1996) <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pyrolysis</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biomass, MississippiState University, Thesis <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> Masterdegree, USA.