13.07.2015 Views

1 Adoption, Profitability, Impacts and Scaling-Up of Agroforestry ...

1 Adoption, Profitability, Impacts and Scaling-Up of Agroforestry ...

1 Adoption, Profitability, Impacts and Scaling-Up of Agroforestry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28different sections <strong>of</strong> the community (Ajayi <strong>and</strong> Kwesiga, 2003; Ajayi, 2001).Collaborative efforts by traditional chiefs, village headmen, farmers <strong>and</strong> research <strong>and</strong>development organizations <strong>and</strong> policy dialogues between the different stakeholders haveresulted in various approaches to try <strong>and</strong> find ways <strong>of</strong> dealing with the problem <strong>of</strong>livestock browsing <strong>and</strong> fire.7.0 Discussion <strong>and</strong> way forwardThis chapter describes the adoption, pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>and</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestrytechnologies with special reference to the southern Africa region. In doing this, a largeamount <strong>of</strong> knowledge has been generated. A number <strong>of</strong> important lessons have also beenlearnt.The first lesson is that while the technical characteristics <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry technologies areimportant, they are neither the exclusive nor sufficient conditions to guarantee theiradoption by smallholder farmers. Therefore, in addition to technological fixes, theadoption <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry can be increased considerably by also focusing on underst<strong>and</strong>ing<strong>and</strong> influencing the processes <strong>of</strong> innovation, intervention <strong>and</strong> policy. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestrytechnologies should therefore be socially situated, not only in bio-physical domains.Second, adoption <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is not a simple direct relationship based on technology<strong>and</strong> farmers’ characteristics alone, but it is a mix <strong>of</strong> several factors. These includehousehold-specific factors (e.g. age, education), technological factors (e.g. “waitingperiod” before farmers obtain benefits, quantity <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> labor inputsrequirements to manage the technology), institutional <strong>and</strong> policy factors (e.g. l<strong>and</strong> tenuresystem, agricultural subsidies, incidence <strong>of</strong> fire <strong>and</strong> grazing) <strong>and</strong> geographical factors(e.g. type <strong>and</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> soils which determine the bio-physical limits <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!