1 Adoption, Profitability, Impacts and Scaling-Up of Agroforestry ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

34Michigan State University international development working paper no. 61, EastLansing, Michigan 48824, USA.ICRAF 1997 Annual Report 1996, ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaIIRR (International Institute of Rural Reconstruction) 2000. Going to scale: Can We Bring MoreBenefits to More People More Quickly? IIRR, Silang, Cavite, Phillipines. 114pp.Jera R, Ajayi OC, A Agumya and L Hove 2006 Profitability and adoption of fodder banktechnology among small-scale farmers in Zimbabwe, ICRAF Zimbabwe WorkingPaper 20 ppKeil A. 2001. Improved Fallows Using Leguminous Trees in Eastern Zambia: Do InitialTesters Adopt the Technology? MSc Thesis, University of Goettingen, Germany, 94pp.Keil, A, Zeller, M. and Franzel, S. (2005) Improved tree fallows in smallholder maizeproduction in Zambia: do initial testers adopt the technology? Agroforestry Systems64, 225-236.Kuntashula, E., Ajayi, O.C., Phiri, D., Mafongoya, P. and Franzel, S. (2002) Factorsinfluencing farmers’ decision to plant improved fallows: a study of four villages ineastern Zambia. In: Kwesiga, F., Ayuk, E. and Agumya, A. (eds) Proceedings of the14 th Southern African Regional Review and Planning Workshop, 3–7 September2001, ICRAF Regional Office, Harare, Zimbabwe, pp. 104-110.Kuntashula, P.I.; Mafongoya, P.I.; Sileshi, G.; Lungu, S. World Agroforestry Centre(ICRAF), Chipata (Zambia) 2004. Potential of biomass transfer technologies insustaining vegetable production in the wetlands (Dambos) of eastern Zambia.Experimental Agriculture 40(1) p. 37-51.Kwesiga F., and Beniest, J. 1998. Sesbania Improved Fallow for Eastern Zambia: An ExtensionGuide. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya, 57p.Kwesiga, F. and Coe, R. (1994) The effect of short rotation Sesbania sesban plantedfallows on maize yield Forest ecology and management 64, 199-208.
35Kwesiga, F., Akinnifesi, F.K., Mafongoya, P.L, McDermott, M.H. and Agumya, A.(2003) Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s:review and challenges ahead. Agroforestry systems 59 (3), 173-186.Kwesiga, F.R., Franzel, S., Place, F., Phiri, D. and Simwanza, C.P. (1999) Sesbaniasesban improved fallow in eastern Zambia: their inception, development and farmerenthusiasm. Agroforestry Systems 47, 49–66.Mafongoya, P.L., Chintu, R., Chirwa, T.S, Matibini, J. and Chikale, S. (2003) Tephrosiaspecies and provenances for improved fallows in southern Africa. Agroforestrysystems 59 (3): 279-288.Mercer, D.E. (2004) Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: a reviewAgroforestry systems 61: 311-328Mithöfer D. and Waibel H. 2003. Income and labour productivity of collection and use ofindigenous fruit tree products in Zimbabwe. Agroforestry Systems 59: 295–305.Mitti J., Jacquet de Haveskercke C. and P. Thangata 2004. Trip report for visit to ICRAFMalawi Project (3 to 6 May 2004). Trip Report 6 Scaling Up. 9 pMuhdara M., Hilderbrand P.E and P.K.R. Nair 2003 Potential of adoption of sesbaniasesban improved fallows in Zimbabwe: A linear programming-based case study ofsmall-scale farmers Agroforestry systems 59: 307-315Nyadzi G.I, Otsyina R.M., Banzi F.M., Bakengesa S.S., Gama, B.M., Mbwambo, L. andD. Asenga 2003 Rotational woodlot technology in north western Tanzania: treespecies and crop performance Agroforestry systems 59: 253-263Peterson J.S. 1999. Kubweletza Nthaka: Ethnographic Decision Trees and ImprovedFallows in the Eastern Province of Zambia, Gender and Soil Fertility in AfricaCollaborative Research Support Program (CRSP), University of Florida, USA andInternational Center for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), NairobiPhiri, D., Franzel, S., Mafongoya, P., Jere, I., Katanga, R. and Phiri, S. (2004) Who isusing the new technology? The association of wealth status and gender with theplanting of improved tree fallows in eastern Zambia Agroforestry Systems 79: 131-144.
Page 1 and 2: 1Adoption, Profitability, Impacts a
Page 3 and 4: 31.0 IntroductionDue to a mix of ag
Page 5 and 6: 52.1 “Fertilizer tree systems”T
Page 7 and 8: 7estimated that yield of 3 t/ha of
Page 9 and 10: 92.5 Fodder banks:This involves the
Page 11 and 12: 11adoption of agroforestry; why do
Page 13 and 14: 13technologies from the perspective
Page 15 and 16: 15sesban fallow fields, an extra 1.
Page 17 and 18: 17National Agroforestry Steering Co
Page 19 and 20: 195.2 Number of farmers reached thr
Page 21 and 22: 21southern Africa has not been too
Page 23 and 24: 23development work on agroforestry
Page 25 and 26: 25to which farmers are able to sour
Page 27 and 28: 27take-off point, and have provided
Page 29 and 30: 29technologies, access to roads and
Page 31 and 32: 31comparisons of the results diffic
Page 33: 33Bekunda M.A., A. Bationo and H. S
Page 37: 37Thangata, P.H. and J.R.R. Alavala

1 Adoption, Profitability, Impacts and Scaling-Up of Agroforestry ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?