Updating Bearing Capacity – SPT Graphs - Maryland State Highway ...
Updating Bearing Capacity – SPT Graphs - Maryland State Highway ...
Updating Bearing Capacity – SPT Graphs - Maryland State Highway ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
qult[ 3×37.75 + 2×28.15] 18650= 110 =For a factor of safety of 3qallThe computations for the other widths are thus:18,6502= = 6217 lb/ft3B(ft)q ult(psf)q all(pfs)2 18,650 6,2174 24,844 8,2816 31,036 10,3468 37,230 12,410Figure 5.2 shows the allowable bearing pressure as a function of the width B plottedusing the <strong>State</strong> graphs and using the new graphs. Again the <strong>State</strong> charts produce veryconservative results.Example 3In this example, the footing of the retaining wall of Example 1, is now resting on clayeysoils with an average blow count of 10 blows/ft.Solution:a) Using the MD, SHA charts (D-79-18(4)), (Fig. 1.2) the allowable bearing capacitywill range from 1000 psf to 2800 psf.b) Using the new graphs, the allowable bearing capacity is a function of the type of clay.If the clay is of medium plasticity, q all for a factor of safety of 3 will vary from 1680to 3913 psf. If the clay is of high plasticity, q all will vary from 3913 to 5967 psf.Again the <strong>State</strong> charts produce very conservative results.5-4