13.07.2015 Views

PARA/ INQUIRY Postmodern Religion and Culture Victor E ... - IMIC

PARA/ INQUIRY Postmodern Religion and Culture Victor E ... - IMIC

PARA/ INQUIRY Postmodern Religion and Culture Victor E ... - IMIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

writer therefore work without rules <strong>and</strong> in order to establish the rules [règles] for what will havebeen made. This is why the work <strong>and</strong> the text can take on the properties of an event; it is alsowhy they would arrive too late for their author, or, in what amounts to the same thing, why thework of making them would always begin too soon. Post-modern would be underst<strong>and</strong>ingaccording to the paradox of the future (post) anterior (modo). 10The peculiarity of the age of postmodernism is that one may anxiously await that which hasalready arrived [de là aussi qu’ils arrivent trop tard pour leur auteur, ou, ce qui revient au même,que leur mise en oeuvre commence toujours trop tôt]. And, since it has already arrived, it is yetto arrive. Or, its arrival marks its “not yetness.” This paradox, for Lyotard, presents itself inmodern art. Modern art was postmodern before it was modern. That is to say, modern art waspostmodern as long as it did not discover <strong>and</strong> obey its rules: “Thus understood,postmodernism is not modernism at its end, but in a nascent state, <strong>and</strong> this state isrecurrent” 11 [Le postmodernisme ainsi entendu n’est pas le modernisme à sa fin, mais à l’étatnaissant, et cet état est constant]. If one returns for some clarification to Lyotard’s earlierbook, The <strong>Postmodern</strong> Condition: A Report on Knowledge, this paradoxical event appears, notas an historical event, but as an event outside of linearity. Lyotard’s subtitle is fitting giventhat he is addressing a crisis in thought; an epistemological <strong>and</strong> political crisis that is linkedto larger or gr<strong>and</strong>er narratives of an “age.” Again, this is not to say that Lyotard is justreporting on the state of knowledge; he is reporting on the condition of knowledge.Simply understood, postmodern is that collection of historical events that take place aftermodernism. The “post” in this instance merely indicates a conclusion to the modern <strong>and</strong> thebeginning of something afterward <strong>and</strong> new, postmodernism. This initial <strong>and</strong>, albeit, literal16reading of the “post” depends upon a pre-thought or a condition of thinking which makespossible “history” as a linear progression <strong>and</strong> procession of happenings, events that can berun together as a continuity from ontos to telos. This continuity, Borges’s enumeration, is notassumed in Lyotard’s report on knowledge. For Lyotard, the postmodern comes before themodern in the sense that it occurred as a condition <strong>and</strong> not as an event in a sequence ofevents. How is this non-linearity possible? The postmodern, for Lyotard, is that instance ofinstability “prior” to the concretization of rules. It is “before” the event, the writing, the art, isjoined to a rule or a gr<strong>and</strong> narrative.In drawing our attention to the condition of knowledge – that it is conditioned by a largerdiscursive practice – Lyotard actually postpones the arrival of the postmodern by indicatingthat, once an event is linked, finds a place beneath the rule, it ceases to be postmodern. Thepostmodern, then, takes events to be particles within an infinite flux of data. Each event hasan undirected trajectory in this flux until it is linked to a gr<strong>and</strong> narrative. The infinite stream ofdata is cut, <strong>and</strong> that portion is grafted onto one or many discursive structures. Theapportionment, however, is not ontologically determined: “Enchaîner est nécessaire, unenchaïnement ne l’est pas.” 12 That the event must be linked is not the same as dictating how itis to be linked. It is at this point that Lyotard identifies the condition of knowledge as in crisis.Events are likely to be linked to the dominant or gr<strong>and</strong> narratives of the time. These totalizingdiscourses eclipse the event-particle by totalizing the unstable field of data. These gr<strong>and</strong>narratives attempt to exhaust the infinite stream of data, excluding <strong>and</strong> delegitimating any<strong>and</strong> all links that do not fit the direction of the gr<strong>and</strong> narrative itself. Or, as Lyotard hasdescribed it, postmodernism is “ … an incredulity toward metanarratives.” 13<strong>Postmodern</strong> inquiry, para/inquiry, one could argue from this particular definition, is not the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!