Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering - PEER - University of ...

Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering: Takingthe Guesswork out of Future EarthquakesJohn Q. FirstauthorDepartment of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of California, BerkeleyWilliam B. SecondauthorDepartment of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of California, DavisCharles L. ThirdauthorDepartment of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesPEER Report 200x/xxPacific Earthquake Engineering Research CenterCollege of EngineeringUniversity of California, Berkeley

Month 200xii

ABSTRACTThe abstract should be not more than 200 words and should include the context, contents, andconclusions of the report.A list of keywords is optional. It should be restricted to no more than six words that donot appear in the title.iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSA contractual agreement with the National Science Foundation requires one of the followingacknowledgment statements without alteration:This work was supported primarily by the Earthquake Engineering Research CentersProgram of the National Science Foundation under award number EEC-9701568 through thePacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).Any opinions, findings, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the National ScienceFoundation.ORThis work was supported in part by the Earthquake Engineering Research CentersProgram of the National Science Foundation under award number EEC-9701568 through thePacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the National ScienceFoundation.For research supported by other sources but making use of PEER shared facilities,the following statement is required:This work made use of the Earthquake Engineering Research Centers Shared Facilitiessupported by the National Science Foundation under award number EEC-9701568 through thePacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).Any opinions, findings, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the National ScienceFoundation.iv

CONTENTSABSTRACT............................................................................................................................. iiiACKNOWLEDGMENTS........................................................................................................ivTABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................vLIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................viiLIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................ix1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................11.1 The Importance of Nonstructural Earthquake Costs.....................................................11.2 Previous Research.......................................................................................................32 MODELING LOSSES: INPUTS AND OUTPUTS ........................................................52.1 Impact Models and the Southern California Planning Model (SCPM-2)......................52.2 The Elysian Park Scenario ..........................................................................................62.3 Losses by Location and Type......................................................................................62.4 Income Distribution Impacts.....................................................................................142.4.1 Descriptive Socioeconomic Analysis of Affected Cities ................................152.4.2 Identification of Social Subgroups Using Multiple SocioeconomicVariables.......................................................................................................152.4.3 Income Distribution Impact Analysis: Gini Coefficients...............................182.5 Descriptive Results ...................................................................................................203 CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS......................................................39REFERENCES........................................................................................................................41APPENDIX A..........................................................................................................................43APPENDIX B..........................................................................................................................51v

Document Setup (Word)Table of Contents Tabsvi

LIST OF FIGURESFig. 2.1Fig. 2.2Fig. 2.3Los Angeles and Orange counties by census tracts......................................................7Direct impact (opportunity cost of production, $1,000) by city, SCAGPlanning Region........................................................................................................11Total impact ($1,000) by labor’s city of residence, SCAG Planning Region..............12vii

viii

LIST OF TABLESTable 1.1Joint design example for Specimen B1......................................................................3ix

1 Sample Chapter Title for PEER Reports1.1 SECTION HEAD LEVEL 2Sepe humanos affectus aut provocant aut mittigant amplius exempla quam verba (Author 1997).Unde post nonnullam sermonis ad presentem habiti consolationem, de ipsis calamitatum mearumexperimentis consolatoriam ad absentem scribere decrevi, ut in comparatione mearum tuas autnullas aut modicas temptationes recognoscas et tolerabilius feras.Patrem autem habebam litteris aliquantulum imbutum antequam militari cinguloinsigniretur; unde postmodum tanto litteras amore complexus est, ut quoscumque filios haberet,litteris antequam armis instrui disponeret.1.1.1 Section Head Level 3Ego igitur, oppido quodam oriundus quod in ingressu minoris Britannie constructum, ab urbeNamnetica versus orientem octo credo miliariis remotum, proprio vocabulo alatium appellatur,sicut natura terre mee vel gemeris animo levis, ita et ingenio extiti et ad litteratoriam disciplinamfacilis.Tunc ego Melidunum reverses scolas ibi nostras sicut antea constitui; et quantomanifestius eius me persequebatur invidia tanto mihi auctoritatis amplius conferebat iuxta illudpoeticum, “Summa petit livor, perflant altissima venti.”1.1.1.1 Section Head Level 4Ego igitur, oppido quodam oriundus quod in ingressu minoris Britannie constructum, ab urbeNamnetica versus orientem octo credo miliariis remotum, proprio vocabulo alatium appellatur,

sicut natura terre mee vel generis animo levis, ita et ingenio extiti et ad litteratoriam disciplinamfacilis.22a 2 + b = c(1.1)Patrem autem habebam litteris aliquantulum imbutum antequam militari cinguloinsigniretur; unde postmodum tanto litteras amore complexus est, ut quoscumque filios haberet,litteris antequam armis instrui disponeret.Table 1.1 Table title for reportsPatrem autem habebam litteris aliquantulum imbutum antequam militari cinguloinsigniretur; unde postmodum tanto litteras amore complexus est, ut quoscumque filios haberet,litteris antequam armis instrui disponeret .Fig. 1.1 Shaking table test for geotechnical project2

REFERENCESAbove all, be consistent. For example, don’t combine uppercase with lowercase style ofcapitalization: use one or the other. The following examples in the technical, or “down,” style ofcapitalization are typical entries for a (a) journal, (b) book or monograph, (c) report, (d) paperfrom a proceedings, and (e) chronological ordering of works by the exact same author(s). In thisstyle, titles of journals and proceedings, (and proper nouns) are capitalized.(a) Anderson, J. C., and V. V. Bertero. 1987. Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J.Structural Engineering 113(8): 1709–24.(b) Clough, R. W., and J. Penzien. 1993. Dynamics of structures. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.(c) Gilani, A. S., A. S. Whittaker, G. L. Fenves, and E. Fujisaki. 1998. Seismic evaluation of 196kV porcelain transformer bushings. Report PEER 1998/02. Berkeley, Calif.: Pacific EarthquakeEngineering Research Center, University of California.(d) Hamburger, R. O. 1996. Implementing performance-based seismic design in structuralengineering practice. In Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco,Mexico, 1425. New York: Elsevier Science Ltd.(e) Makris, N., and S. P Chang. 2000. Response of damped oscillators to cycloidal pulses. J.Engineering Mechanics 126(2): 123–31.Makris, N., and S. P. Chang. 1998. Effect of damping mechanisms on the response of seismicisolated structures. Report PEER 1998/06. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California.3

Appendix A:Building Performance in RecentEarthquakes5