Was There a Xià Dynasty? - Sino-Platonic Papers

Victor H. Mair, “Was There a Xià Dynasty?”Sino-Platonic Papers, 238 (May 2013)XIX(E. Bruce Brooks, 14 August 2002, updated 2 May 2013)BAMBOO ANNALS 竹 書 紀 年9. The Bamboo Annals, in our view, cannot be based on a chronicle of Ngwèi 魏 (thearchaizing initial ng- is a convention meant to distinguish Mencius’s Wèi, the Jìnsuccessor state, from the older and less powerful state of Wèi 衛 ), to mention no earlierdocument. Claims that many Spring and Autumn states kept chronicles, including somepassages in the Mencius and several in MZ 31, do not predate the completion anddissemination of the Dzwǒ Jwàn, which popularized the Lǔ chronicle (the Chūn/Chyōu),and demonstrated how it might be made a potent vehicle for historical claims. Only if theLǔ CC was a unique document are the Chí theorists likely to have made use of it for theirconcealed statecraft document [the Dzwǒ Jwàn] with its intimation that Chí has a futureas the single dominant power. The BA can only have been undertaken by Ngwèi courtiersafter the DJ became more widely known, which we put in the very late 04c, c0312. TheBA was an imitation, not of the DJ, but of the certifying Lǔ chronicle at its core.10. That the CC as politicized by the Dzwǒ Jwàn was intensely studied in Ngwèi can beshown by archaeology. Among the contents of the tomb of Ngwèi Syāng-wāng, besidesthe Bamboo Annals itself, as reported by the seemingly competent team of court scholarsthat was put in charge of the recovered texts in the 3rd century, were (a) a subsequentlylost text called the Shr̄ Chūn 師 春 , which was described as a collection of the Yìpredictions extracted from the Dzwǒ Jwàn, and (b) a complete Yì text, said not to varyfrom the standard 3c version. It is exactly the DJ predictive material that still fascinatesenthusiasts of that text. It would seem that the predictive aspect of the DJ had made ahuge impression on the Ngwèi court. The Bamboo Annals, which as a pro-Jìn and indeedpro-Ngwèi document was clearly composed in Ngwèi, was probably compiled on orderof Syāng-wáng himself, as witness its having been buried with him, which suggests apersonal text rather than a state chronicle (which would have needed to remain aboveground in order to be continued, year by year).11. We are fortunate to have a contemporary description of Ngwèi Syāng-wáng, and indeed atranscript of Mencius’s brief and unsatisfactory interview with him, from the year 0319,20