13.07.2015 Views

Prior User Rights Study Report to Congress - America Invents Act

Prior User Rights Study Report to Congress - America Invents Act

Prior User Rights Study Report to Congress - America Invents Act

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

drastic effects on <strong>America</strong>n businesses and jobs. A representative from a small United States companycommented that the company’s use of trade secret protection enables it <strong>to</strong> provide services at a price levelthat its Chinese competi<strong>to</strong>rs admitted they cannot match. 258 Several representatives of “green” technologycompanies based in the United States noted that disclosure of new technologies via a patent applicationwould allow foreign competi<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> copy the innovation, using cheaper labor and with the assistance offoreign government subsidies, <strong>to</strong> undercut their businesses, at the expense of “creating much-needed jobsfor <strong>America</strong>n workers.” 259Thus, the USPTO finds that:Finding 8:Trade secret protection is of considerable value <strong>to</strong> United States businesses and theUnited States economy, and as such, there are compelling economic and policyjustifications for providing a prior user rights defense <strong>to</strong> patent infringement.On the basis of the above analysis and findings, the USPTO recommends as follows:Recommendation 4:United States patent law should provide for a prior user rights defense as anappropriate balance between trade secret protection and patent protection,which legally co-exist <strong>to</strong> provide competitive advantages for United Statesbusinesses.D. Analysis of Whether a First-<strong>to</strong>-File Patent System Creates a Need for <strong>Prior</strong> <strong>User</strong> <strong>Rights</strong>One of the most fundamental changes under the AIA is in the way that entitlement <strong>to</strong> a patent isdetermined. The United States has his<strong>to</strong>rically awarded a patent <strong>to</strong> the first person <strong>to</strong> have invented thesubject matter, commonly referred <strong>to</strong> as the “first-<strong>to</strong>-invent” standard. According <strong>to</strong> this approach, if twoinven<strong>to</strong>rs file patent applications for the same invention, the patent is awarded <strong>to</strong> the first person <strong>to</strong> haveconceived of the invention and <strong>to</strong> have reduced it <strong>to</strong> practice. 260Since 1998, the United States has been the only country in the world <strong>to</strong> use the first-<strong>to</strong>-inventstandard. 261 Every other patent-granting country awards a patent <strong>to</strong> the first inven<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> have filed anapplication for the subject matter. This approach, known as “first-<strong>to</strong>-file,” relies on application filing258 Comments of Space Exploration Techs. Corp., supra note 47, at 3-4.259 Comments of Greentech, supra note 47, at 1-2.260 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) (2006).261 The Philippines, the last country other than the United States <strong>to</strong> have a first-<strong>to</strong>-invent system, changed its law in1998.47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!