EXPERT VIEWSDominic FarnsworthPartner in <strong>the</strong> Media, Br<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong>Technology Department, Lewis SilkinThe term ‘sponsorship contract’ does notreflect <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> modern relationship.The term ’br<strong>and</strong> partnership’ is more suitable.We are less frequently looking at simpleagreements where <strong>the</strong> property owner is paidto allow <strong>the</strong> sponsor to be associated with anevent, it is more of a two-way, br<strong>and</strong>-buildingexercise. A key area in a number of contractsis not what you can give us, <strong>and</strong> what wecan give you, but what can we achieve if ourcollective contacts, know-how <strong>and</strong> resourceswork toge<strong>the</strong>r - this could be media content,new product developments or events.Contracts, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, need to be drafted in away that recognises <strong>and</strong> accommodates <strong>the</strong>BRANDS & MARKETINGBRANDS + MARKEfluidity of <strong>the</strong> modern relationship.Sure, <strong>the</strong>re are plenty of definites to becaptured in <strong>the</strong> agreement, but it needs tobe able to create <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>for</strong> future,<strong>and</strong> as yet unknown projects. From a legalperspective contracting to agree on futureprojects is fraught with uncertainties but <strong>the</strong>building blocks <strong>for</strong> successful co-operationcan be put in place. Morality clauses, <strong>for</strong>example, are often a source of heateddebate during negotiations. An interestingdevelopment is <strong>the</strong> realisation that ’morality’clauses should be capable of biting both ways.A player/athlete may not want to be associatedwith a <strong>sports</strong>wear br<strong>and</strong> found to operatesweatshops, or a company responsible <strong>for</strong>a huge environmental disaster. It’s an arealong- destined to provide column inches.Charlie DundasDirector of Sports & EntertainmentSponsorship, MediaComIn my opinion, no two contracts can everbe <strong>the</strong> same given that individual clientrequirements are never going to be directlycomparable. However, <strong>the</strong> nub of this issuegoes back once again to <strong>the</strong> due diligencecarried out by <strong>the</strong> sponsor in <strong>the</strong> lead upto <strong>the</strong> deal. I accept that not all deals canhappen with <strong>the</strong> luxury of a long lead time.Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is incumbent upon anybr<strong>and</strong> considering sponsorship that <strong>the</strong>yhave clear <strong>and</strong> realistic expectations of <strong>the</strong>medium coupled with at least an outline ofa feasible activation programme that can bebespoke to suit <strong>the</strong> contract. The pay off fromthis approach should be that it is easier todraw up a bespoke contract which is free ofconfusion <strong>and</strong> one that enables both partiesto progress into a partnership. It is criticalin my opinion that <strong>the</strong> rights holder views<strong>the</strong>ir role as ‘partner’ in <strong>the</strong> project. Thesponsorship should be mutually beneficial<strong>and</strong> on that basis, <strong>the</strong> rights holder has tobe obligated to support <strong>and</strong> assist <strong>the</strong> clientwith <strong>the</strong> successful delivery. Hence a wellconstructed,tailored contract is fundamentalto providing <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>and</strong> rules ofengagement on both sides.E.on have partnered <strong>the</strong> FA Cup since 2006 - Getty Images Sportarea - <strong>for</strong> example McDonalds <strong>and</strong> footballcoaches - in an attempt to give br<strong>and</strong>s st<strong>and</strong>-out.”Today, <strong>the</strong> FA Cup is <strong>the</strong> centre of a powerstruggle in more ways than one. The incumbentsponsor E.on - a Germany-based energy firm,which has been <strong>the</strong> trophy’s partner since 2006- in a deal worth £8.3million a year to <strong>the</strong> FA.However, having decided not to renew <strong>the</strong>deal, E.on has agreed to extend <strong>the</strong> relationship<strong>for</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r year, on <strong>the</strong> same terms, followinga late offer from <strong>the</strong> FA, which had failed tofind a replacement.“About 18 months ago we in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>the</strong> FAwe wouldn’t be extending that contract,” saidSimon Breakell, E.on’s sponsorship manager.“It’s been a good partnership, we wouldn’t bewhere we are without it. But we didn’t wantano<strong>the</strong>r long-term deal.“Then, at <strong>the</strong> semi-finals in April, <strong>the</strong> FAapproached us to ask whe<strong>the</strong>r we would go <strong>for</strong> ashort-term deal. At that time we were reviewingour sponsorship options, working with our<strong>global</strong> head office in Dusseldorf to put toge<strong>the</strong>ra unified strategy. We didn’t think a short-termoption would be on <strong>the</strong> table. It allows us to taketime to work on our strategy.”Some observers point to <strong>the</strong> entrance intofootball of E.on’s competitor Npower (as titlesponsor of <strong>the</strong> Football League from thisseason) as a reason <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> German company’sabout turn. “Npower coming in to football doeschange <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape,” admits Breakell. “Wewere <strong>the</strong> only energy company in <strong>the</strong> game <strong>for</strong><strong>the</strong> last four years. Did it effect our decision?No. We were reviewing our options <strong>and</strong> notreacting to what o<strong>the</strong>r people do.”For sponsors, <strong>the</strong> essence of this story is,what do you buy when you buy <strong>the</strong> FA Cup?Tradition, romance, national coverage, football’sability to make headlines: each of <strong>the</strong>se playa part. But in today’s more crowded sponsorenvironment, how do you put a price on that?A detailed breakdown of <strong>the</strong> property’s mediavalue was carried out <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> FA by researchagency Sport + Markt, which was used as abenchmark by <strong>the</strong> FA during negotiations.The German research agency claimed<strong>the</strong> famous trophy was worth £33 milliona year, with <strong>the</strong> domestic media rights valuedat £18.8 million, which Sport+Markt brokedown in <strong>the</strong> following way: association value<strong>and</strong> status of <strong>the</strong> competition - £1.5 million;primary matchday media exposure -£5.5 million; secondary in-stadia mediaexposure - £1.1 million; print media value -£4.7 million; internet media value -£5.5 million; corporate hospitality, tickets -£500,000; <strong>and</strong> additional marketing assets- £100,000.Regardless of <strong>the</strong> values involved, <strong>the</strong>breakdown of <strong>the</strong> rights in this way offers aglimpse of how rights holders such as <strong>the</strong> FAare cutting <strong>and</strong> dicing <strong>the</strong>ir inventory. This is aprocess that will only continue to evolve, saysE.on’s Simon Breakell: “Gone are <strong>the</strong> days whenyou take an off-<strong>the</strong>-shelf package <strong>and</strong> that’s all youget. The more creative br<strong>and</strong>s are looking at how<strong>the</strong>y use sponsorship to reward <strong>the</strong>ir customers.”John Taylor, who has monitored <strong>the</strong> changesat first h<strong>and</strong> since that first FA Cup deal, says<strong>the</strong> current trend sees <strong>global</strong> rights holdersseeking fewer <strong>and</strong> deeper relationships. “Thiswill continue because br<strong>and</strong> guardians seemwilling to pay higher fees in an attempt to avoidbr<strong>and</strong> clutter,” says Taylor. “Everyone is seeking<strong>the</strong> holy grail of br<strong>and</strong> differentiation <strong>and</strong>engagement. Any br<strong>and</strong> seeking this now hasto be extra careful in negotiating its rights <strong>and</strong>devising a creative activation programme.”The question <strong>for</strong> football’s rights holders is,can <strong>the</strong>y deliver on this dream?SportBusiness International • No.161 • 10.10 21
MEDIASHORTSTOPGoogle: The internet search engineannounced it will launch a freeservice allowing internet browsing viatelevision sets in <strong>the</strong> US this autumn.LFP: France’s top tier football leaguewas considering a buyout of FranceTelecom’s IPTV pay-television serviceOrange Sport, according to a leakedleague document. The plat<strong>for</strong>mwould become <strong>the</strong> basis of a leaguetelevision channel.DFL: The German football leaguewill tender <strong>the</strong> domestic rights to<strong>the</strong> Bundesliga <strong>for</strong> 2013-14 onwardssometime in <strong>the</strong> next year. The tenderis being produced early to allow time<strong>for</strong> regulatory scrutiny of any deals by<strong>the</strong> German cartel authority <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>European Commission.English Premier League: Indovisionacquired <strong>the</strong> rights in Indonesia from2010-11 to 2012-13 in a deal with rightsholderESPN Star Sports. Matcheswill be shown on Indovision’s pay-TVchannels <strong>and</strong> on its sister free-to-aircommercial channels Global <strong>and</strong> TPI.Serie A: The 20 clubs of Italy’s topfootball division again failed to reachan agreement on how to distribute <strong>the</strong>revenues from this season’s centrallysoldtelevision deals at a leagueassembly. Income from broadcasterswill continue to be shared on <strong>the</strong> basisof last season’s individually-sold dealsuntil an agreement is reached.Mark Thompson: The director-generalof UK public-service broadcaster <strong>the</strong>BBC said pay-TV operator BSkyB shouldpay retransmission fees to <strong>the</strong> free-toairchannels it carries. His commentsechoed those of US broadcaster Fox,a sister company of BSkyB under <strong>the</strong>News Corp umbrella, which has lobbied<strong>for</strong> retransmission fees to be paid byAmerican pay-TV plat<strong>for</strong>ms.BSkyB: The UK pay-TV broadcasteradded 90,000 subscribers net in <strong>the</strong>three months to end-June, taking itto 9.86 million. The broadcaster is oncourse to reach its target of 10 millionsubscribers be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> year.Cycling: Australian broadcaster SBSagreed a three-year rights deal with<strong>the</strong> Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI),from 2010 to 2012. The deal includesexclusive rights <strong>for</strong> all UCI World Cup<strong>and</strong> World Championship events.SPORTS FANS WANT MOREJust under half of <strong>sports</strong> fans in <strong>the</strong> UK want a broader <strong>and</strong> more diverse spreadof <strong>sports</strong> programming on leading TV channels, according to new research.FOURTY-ONE PER CENT of UK adults whowatch sport on TV ei<strong>the</strong>r strongly agree oragree that lower-profile <strong>sports</strong> should be given agreater amount of broadcast coverage, accordingto research from SMG Insight/YouGovconducted <strong>for</strong> SportBusiness International.The areas of <strong>the</strong> UK where people agreedstrongest were Wales (45 per cent strongly agreeor agree), Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irel<strong>and</strong> (23 per cent stronglyagree), <strong>and</strong> Yorkshire <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Humber (47 percent strongly agree or agree).“Terrestrial channels will rarely give upscheduling time <strong>for</strong> anything o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>‘power <strong>sports</strong>’ <strong>and</strong> one-off ‘National Treasures’such as Wimbledon, The Gr<strong>and</strong> National orBoat Race,” says David Stubley, <strong>for</strong>mer headof business development at UK commercialbroadcaster Channel 4 <strong>and</strong> managing partner ofmedia consultancy Sportent.“You would thinkthat leaves UK <strong>sports</strong>subscriptions channels,like Sky <strong>and</strong> ESPN, witha home-run but, unless it’sfootball, <strong>the</strong>y don’t generallyfeel it drives subscription. Paychannelshave two approachesto smaller <strong>sports</strong>: we’ll show itsomewhere, but won’t pay a rights fee; or youpay us to show it through bringing in a sponsor.”Respondents across a range of demographics- including both <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>and</strong> lowest social<strong>and</strong> economic groups - reacted strongest to dartswhen given a selection of <strong>sports</strong> <strong>the</strong>y wanted tosee more of on TV.No darts event is protected <strong>for</strong> free-to-airbroadcast on <strong>the</strong> UK government’s ‘CrownJewels’ list although public-service broadcaster<strong>the</strong> BBC has <strong>the</strong> rights to <strong>the</strong> BDO’s WorldProfessional Darts Championships at <strong>the</strong>Lakeside until 2013. According to TV SportsMarkets, in <strong>the</strong> top non-football UK <strong>sports</strong>audiences in 2009 on digital <strong>and</strong> satellite TV,darts took nine of <strong>the</strong> top 100 places.Events from rival darts body <strong>the</strong> ProfessionalDarts Corporation, run <strong>and</strong> promoted by BarryHearn, are shown extensively on UK payplat<strong>for</strong>mBSkyB’s <strong>sports</strong> channels.Stubley suggests that with digital mediachanging <strong>the</strong> broadcast l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>London Olympics less than two years away, <strong>the</strong>research indicates that <strong>the</strong> door is open <strong>for</strong> a newapproach to smaller <strong>sports</strong> on UK television.“It’s hard to make a success of freeto-aircontent dedicated to a singlesport such as volleyball or gymnastics,but bringing a group of <strong>sports</strong>toge<strong>the</strong>r under an umbrellabr<strong>and</strong> would work in myview, especially if <strong>the</strong>broadcaster had <strong>the</strong>engine room of anexisting media partner.“It will require funding<strong>and</strong> a smart approach tokeeping production costsunder-control, but Ihave a hunch a mediaWhich, if any, of <strong>the</strong> following <strong>sports</strong> would you be interested in seeing morecoverage of on leading UK TV Channels?Total Gender Social GradeSportBase Male Female ABC1 C2DECycling 14% 15% 13% 14% 14%Darts 16% 18% 12% 14% 18%Equestrian Show Jumping 7% 2% 13% 8% 5%Go Karting 8% 12% 3% 5% 12%Horse Racing 7% 9% 5% 5% 9%Jet Ski Racing 7% 7% 7% 6% 8%Motor Cycle Racing 13% 16% 7% 10% 16%Powerboating 8% 9% 6% 6% 9%Sailing 7% 9% 5% 8% 7%Snooker 14% 18% 9% 12% 17%Stockcar Racing 11% 14% 6% 8% 13%Superleague Formula Motor Racing 8% 10% 5% 7% 9%Rowing 8% 7% 9% 7% 8%Base: All GB who watch sport at least once a month Source: SMG Insight / YouGov Plc.22 SportBusiness International • No.161 • 10.10