13.07.2015 Views

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 Section 2: <strong>The</strong> neuropsychiatric evaluationAsking questions <strong>and</strong> eliciting information<strong>The</strong> procedural skills <strong>of</strong> the physical examination take time to learn. In thegeneral medical examination, how <strong>and</strong> when to test reflexes, cerebellar function,liver size <strong>and</strong> consistency, for example, are precise over-learned manipulations <strong>of</strong>the patient. Examining the brain is no different. Questions, comments <strong>and</strong> socialinteractions are the probes, palpations, <strong>and</strong> percussions <strong>of</strong> this part <strong>of</strong> the medicalexamination, but they are no less precise <strong>and</strong> also require practice. Specificlanguage is presented below, in the chapter appendix, <strong>and</strong> in subsequent chapters.<strong>The</strong> examination should be conversational. Medical jargon should be avoided,<strong>and</strong> colloquialisms <strong>and</strong> idioms used freely. Most patients will recognize theirmedications by their trade names, not generic names.Mentioning current events <strong>and</strong> mundane matters such as the weather early inthe introductory phase <strong>of</strong> the examination, <strong>and</strong> using humor appropriately easespatient anxiety. Inpatients expect the same questions that have previouslyannoyed them, <strong>and</strong> can be disarmed by the unexpected personal approach, suchas with Patient 5.1.Patient 5.1A 50-year-old manic man agreed to participate in a teaching conference, buton the morning <strong>of</strong> the conference was irritable <strong>and</strong> mostly uncooperative.<strong>The</strong> resident warned the examiner that the patient was likely to bolt with theleast provocation.When the patient entered the room, the examiner stood <strong>and</strong> greeted thepatient, introduced himself, asked if the patient would sit in the chair that waspositioned for him, <strong>and</strong> when both he <strong>and</strong> the patient were seated, said “That’sa great hat you have on. I like the colors. Where did you get it?” <strong>The</strong> patientsmiled broadly <strong>and</strong> after a brief discussion about his hat, spontaneously begantelling the examiner about his illness.Stating the obvious is <strong>of</strong>ten better at putting the patient at ease than beginningwith socially stereotypic greetings. Most patients in critical care settings, indwellingtubes everywhere, <strong>and</strong> under an array <strong>of</strong> monitors, have little patience for theautomatic “How are you today?” Articulating the patient’s present experiencefosters confidence that the examiner knows what “is going on”. Helpful openingsare “I’m doctor XX, are you as uncomfortable as you look? ...Youlook likeyou’re in a lot <strong>of</strong> pain. How bad is it?”Examination structureAlthough a good examination appears conversational, it is systematic <strong>and</strong>thorough. It has a structure. It follows a reasoned sequence. Chapters 6 through

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!