13.07.2015 Views

Luther - Works of Martin Luther Vol. 6 - Righteousness is Love

Luther - Works of Martin Luther Vol. 6 - Righteousness is Love

Luther - Works of Martin Luther Vol. 6 - Righteousness is Love

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7LUTHER’S LITURGICALWRITINGSGENERAL INTRODUCTIONThe strictly liturgical writings which came from <strong>Luther</strong>’s pen and otherrelated writings, f1 together with a great number <strong>of</strong> allusions, assertions,denunciations, etc., <strong>of</strong> things liturgical in still other documents, compr<strong>is</strong>ethe material on the bas<strong>is</strong> <strong>of</strong> which an estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>Luther</strong>’s activity and valuein liturgical reform must be establ<strong>is</strong>hed and examined. Two diametricallyopposite estimates are not only possible but may be drawn in fairness fromthese writings; and for each <strong>of</strong> these there <strong>is</strong> evidence enough.The first estimate <strong>is</strong> not much to <strong>Luther</strong>’s credit. It shows. him as either anopportun<strong>is</strong>t or a self-centered, opinionated, determined leader who wantsto dominate th<strong>is</strong> field as he does others. Or, even more, it shows himforced to action much against inclination or desire, and meeting theenforced <strong>is</strong>sue with comparatively meager ability. Th<strong>is</strong> estimate. shows<strong>Luther</strong> to be an amateur, dabbling in a field <strong>of</strong> ecclesiastical learning withwhich he, at best, <strong>is</strong> but little acquainted; lacking both knowledge and anative sense <strong>of</strong> appreciation; uncertain not because <strong>of</strong> timidity but because<strong>of</strong> ignorance; nevertheless entering it with self-reliant boldness; — a“liturg<strong>is</strong>t” <strong>of</strong> the poorest sort. But <strong>Luther</strong> was not a liturg<strong>is</strong>t!The other estimate <strong>is</strong> quite the opposite. As lacking and fully equipped forthe task as the first estimate would have him be, the second reveals him asone imbued with the highest and finest appreciative sense <strong>of</strong> the wholecultus <strong>of</strong> the Church; wedded to it and lovingly loyal to its spiritual beautyand worth; with a reverence for the h<strong>is</strong>toric; a full devotion to the pure andtrue; a holy determination to centralize all in, and measure all after, theteachings and tradition <strong>of</strong> the Chr<strong>is</strong>t and H<strong>is</strong> ancient Church. In th<strong>is</strong>estimate every act at reform <strong>is</strong> emancipation <strong>of</strong> the inherently high andholy, ancient and pure, from the shackles <strong>of</strong> man-welded m<strong>is</strong>use andsuperstition and time’s corroding accretions, and the restoration <strong>of</strong> and tothe rule and purpose <strong>of</strong> Chr<strong>is</strong>t Himself, and the simple and purposefulapplication <strong>of</strong> that to the worship-life <strong>of</strong> the believer. The liturgical, — the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!