commodity materials from UEPs to be 50–55 percent steel, 30 percent plastics, 10–12 percent aluminum, and 5–6 percent circuit boards bearing precious metals. 25<strong>Exports</strong> <strong>of</strong> monitors and televisions containing CRTs represented only 6 percent 26 <strong>of</strong> thetotal volume (and 3 percent 27 <strong>of</strong> total value) <strong>of</strong> recycled UEP exports, but, consistent withanecdotal information, these were the most commonly exported whole goods fordismantling and recycling abroad. 28 Together, shredded and whole circuit boardsaccounted for 17 percent <strong>of</strong> the total volume <strong>of</strong> recycled exports <strong>of</strong> UEPs in 2011, butmade up 38 percent <strong>of</strong> the total value <strong>of</strong> such exports, likely owing to their relatively highprecious metals content. As discussed in chapter 5, most circuit boards are exported tolarge secondary smelters in OECD countries. 29In 2011, estimated U.S. exports <strong>of</strong> shredded circuit boards for recycling totaled nearly40,000 tons, while such exports <strong>of</strong> whole circuit boards amounted to just under17,000 tons. The recycling value <strong>of</strong> circuit boards varies, depending on their preciousmetal content, which in turn depends on the machine they originate from. A distinction ismade between high-grade boards (found in servers, cell phones, and PCs) and low-gradeboards(found in printers, copiers, and other digital imaging equipment). High-gradeboards contain more concentrated amounts <strong>of</strong> precious metals and are therefore morevaluable.Industry practice is to export high-grade circuit boards to secondary smelters whole,while lower-grade circuit boards may be shredded domestically and then exported. Highgradeboards are not shredded domestically for two reasons: (1) domestic shredders donot allow a perfect separation <strong>of</strong> the precious metal elements, so domestic shreddingwould dilute their value, and (2) some dust containing precious metals could be lostduring processing and shipment <strong>of</strong> shredded boards. 30It is more difficult to determine the final value <strong>of</strong> lower-grade circuit boards, so U.S.companies are likely to shred and sample the material domestically to determine thevalue <strong>of</strong> precious metals before exporting to a larger smelter. There are no domesticsecondary smelters that can process circuit boards completely, at least not on a largescale. 31 The start-up costs for such a facility are reportedly around $2 billion. 3225 Industry representative, telephone interview by <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, February 28, 2012.26 Low precision estimate; RSE equal to 64 percent.27 Low precision estimate; RSE equal to 65 percent.28 Industry representative, telephone interview by <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, February 24, 2012.29 According to industry sources, these large smelters can recover up to 20 precious elements fromcircuit boards while U.S. smelters recover between 8 and 12. Government representative, telephone interviewby <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, January 25, 2012.30 Industry representative, telephone interview by <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, April 27, 2012.31 At least three U.S. companies reportedly break down circuit boards to successfully remove preciousmetals, but they are not secondary smelters. For final processing, as noted earlier, circuit boards are typicallysent to secondary copper smelters in OECD countries (Japan, Belgium, Sweden, Canada, and Korea).Industry representative, telephone interview by <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, February 18, 2012; industry representative,telephone interview by <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, February 2, 2012; <strong>US</strong>ITC, hearing transcript, May 15, 2012, 76–77, 96(testimony <strong>of</strong> Renee St. Denis, Sims Recycling Solutions).32 Government representative, telephone interview by <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, January 25, 2012.3-8
U.S. <strong>Exports</strong> <strong>of</strong> UEPs for Disposal 33Several industry representatives indicated that U.S. exports for disposal are driven by alack <strong>of</strong> domestic processing capacity and were likely to include used CRTs andbatteries. 34 Estimates for disposal based on the questionnaire data, while imprecise,support this anecdotal information. CRTs, mercury lamps, and batteries accounted for thehighest volume and costs <strong>of</strong> disposal <strong>of</strong> all U.S. exports <strong>of</strong> UEPs for disposal in 2011(table 3.3). Other products with large shares by value or weight included commoditymaterials and circuit boards. As previously discussed, the value <strong>of</strong> printed circuit boardsis driven by their high precious-metal content, and these circuit boards are likely destinedfor secondary smelters in OECD countries.TABLE 3.3 Estimated U.S. exports <strong>of</strong> UEPs for disposal, 2011Product Cost VolumeMillion $TonsSeparated CRTs, mercury lamps, and batteries 15.5139,958Commodity metals, plastics, and glass (not including CRTs)3.058,948Shredded printed circuit boards8.312,723Televisions and other video and audio equipment1.66,562Cell phones and other telecommunication equipment1.52,049Wires and cables from any electronic product0.51,014Whole printed circuit boards0.2133Monitors and televisions containing CRTs0.047Computers 023Office imaging equipment 08Medical imaging equipment 07Flat screen monitors 05Computer peripheral equipment 0 0Other12.119,802Unknown1.8 0Total 44.3 241,279Source: <strong>US</strong>ITC calculations <strong>of</strong> weighted responses to the Commission questionnaire.Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. Since data on weights and values are not precise, they do not allow forcomparisons <strong>of</strong> value per ton for different products with any confidence.a Low-precision estimates, with RSE above 50 percent.b Less than $0.1 million.c” Other” encompasses a wide range <strong>of</strong> varied products that did not precisely match the survey categories (e.g.,parts and mixed electronics).The widespread popularity <strong>of</strong> flat screen TVs and monitors has curtailed global demandfor CRT glass. 35 As a result, most used CRTs are reportedly recycled, rather than reused.Furnaces to manufacture CRT glass are scarce; reportedly, there are no remainingfacilities in developed countries. 36 Industry sources indicated that several processors forrecycling <strong>of</strong> used CRT glass exist in the United States (box 3.2). Still, the limiteddomestic capacity for recycling CRTs, compounded by firms’ stockpiling in order toavoid paying disposal costs, has ensured continued U.S. exports <strong>of</strong> CRTs for recycling. 3733 Disposal is defined in the questionnaire as “end-<strong>of</strong>-life disposition <strong>of</strong> used electronic products that arecycler or disassembler pays to dispose <strong>of</strong> rather than products that bring in income because they are sold asthe output <strong>of</strong> a recycling process.”34 Industry representative, telephone interview by <strong>US</strong>ITC staff, February 2, 2012.35 <strong>US</strong>ITC, hearing transcript, May 15, 2012, 74 (testimony <strong>of</strong> Gordon Scott, Forever Green Recycling).36 Cauchi, presentation at ISRI Conference, April 10, 2012.37 Resource Recycling, “CRT Glass Headed to CA Landfills,” September 27, 2012.3-9
- Page 1 and 2:
United States International Trade C
- Page 3 and 4:
U.S. International Trade Commission
- Page 5:
AbstractAs the world’s leading ma
- Page 8 and 9:
CONTENTS—ContinuedChapter 3 Chara
- Page 10 and 11:
CONTENTS—ContinuedFigures—Conti
- Page 12 and 13:
CONTENTS—ContinuedTables—Contin
- Page 14 and 15: ACRONYMSAUVBANCEACECCRTEACREMSEPAHT
- Page 16 and 17: FIGURE ES.1 Used electronic product
- Page 18 and 19: The top five destinations for U.S.
- Page 20 and 21: FIGURE ES.4 Most 2011 U.S. exports
- Page 22 and 23: TABLE ES.5 Estimated U.S exports of
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 1IntroductionOverviewAs the
- Page 29 and 30: Disposal (Basel Convention). 11 Box
- Page 31 and 32: FIGURE 1.1 Used electronic products
- Page 33 and 34: Approachforeign markets, or knowled
- Page 35 and 36: Census DataIn addition to survey re
- Page 37 and 38: industry more broadly, also surveyi
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 2Overview of U.S. Used Elec
- Page 41 and 42: ecovery, and goods intended for dis
- Page 43 and 44: FIGURE 2.2 Commercial collections w
- Page 45 and 46: For other industry segments, the up
- Page 47 and 48: Summary of UEP exports (million $)E
- Page 49 and 50: TABLE 2.3 Exports of UEPs by U.S. c
- Page 51 and 52: TABLE 2.4 Destination of U.S. expor
- Page 53 and 54: The largest non-OECD destination ma
- Page 55 and 56: FIGURE 2.10 Cell phones, Schedule B
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 3Characteristics of U.S. Us
- Page 59 and 60: this category accounted for one-qua
- Page 61 and 62: According to one U.S. computer refu
- Page 63: BOX 3.1 A shift from domestic refur
- Page 67 and 68: Shipment Characteristics and Produc
- Page 69 and 70: BOX 3.3 Disagreements regarding rep
- Page 71 and 72: TABLE 3.4 U.S. exports of UEPs, by
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 4Domestic Exporting Entitie
- Page 75 and 76: ecycling. 10 Entities primarily eng
- Page 77 and 78: TABLE 4.3 Nonexporting UEP handlers
- Page 79 and 80: TABLE 4.4 Types of exporters of UEP
- Page 81 and 82: BOX 4.1 IT asset managers—collect
- Page 83 and 84: Some refurbishers operate as nonpro
- Page 85 and 86: States. They did export an estimate
- Page 87 and 88: BrokersIn the UEP industry, brokers
- Page 89 and 90: Other large retailers, including te
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 5End Uses and Foreign Buyer
- Page 93 and 94: those were described as exports des
- Page 95 and 96: facilities. Among the reasons cited
- Page 97 and 98: manually separated. The burning of
- Page 99 and 100: TABLE 5.3 Major smelting and refini
- Page 101 and 102: U.S. firms exporting to foreign aff
- Page 103 and 104: types of materials, including rare
- Page 105: Li, B., H.Z. Du, H.J. Ding, and M.Y
- Page 108 and 109: FIGURE 6.1 Certain factors encourag
- Page 110 and 111: of electronic products that were re
- Page 112 and 113: Some states have specific benchmark
- Page 114 and 115:
BOX 6.1 Responsible Electronics Rec
- Page 116 and 117:
BOX 6.2 Principal differences betwe
- Page 118 and 119:
In addition to requiring that their
- Page 120 and 121:
FIGURE 6.6 Average hourly labor com
- Page 122 and 123:
Restrictions on Trade in Used Elect
- Page 124 and 125:
TABLE 6.2 Regulations limiting impo
- Page 126 and 127:
Lepawsky, Josh, and Chris McNabb.
- Page 129:
APPENDIX ARequest Letter
- Page 132 and 133:
• the forms, activities and chara
- Page 135 and 136:
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 22
- Page 137 and 138:
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 22
- Page 139 and 140:
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.P
- Page 141 and 142:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:I. Abstra
- Page 143:
APPENDIX CHearing Witnesses
- Page 146 and 147:
PANEL 2: REF URBISHERS/EXPORTERS:OR
- Page 149:
APPENDIX DSummary of Views of Inter
- Page 152 and 153:
valuable working equipment to overs
- Page 154 and 155:
iFixit 14Kyle Wiens, CEO of iFixit,
- Page 156 and 157:
InterConnection 22trade of commodit
- Page 158 and 159:
Mr. Bullock estimated that the aver
- Page 160 and 161:
Commission investigation has certai
- Page 162 and 163:
procedure for all of its locations,
- Page 164 and 165:
that these shipments pose the same
- Page 166 and 167:
Umicore USA (Umicore) 39In her test
- Page 169:
APPENDIX ESurvey Methods
- Page 172 and 173:
processing, and wholesale sales of
- Page 174 and 175:
Stratifying by the three dimensions
- Page 176 and 177:
the Commission received a total of
- Page 178 and 179:
TABLE E.6 Determinants of survey pa
- Page 180 and 181:
E-12TABLE E.7 Detailed weighting fo
- Page 183:
APPENDIX FWritten Questionnaire
- Page 186 and 187:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 188 and 189:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 190 and 191:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 192 and 193:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 194 and 195:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 196 and 197:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 198 and 199:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 200 and 201:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 202 and 203:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 204 and 205:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 206 and 207:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 208 and 209:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 210 and 211:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 212 and 213:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 214 and 215:
USITC Electronics Sector Questionna
- Page 217 and 218:
This appendix presents data compile
- Page 219 and 220:
UEP Exports by Primary Activity of
- Page 221 and 222:
FIGURE G.4 Unit volume share of ref
- Page 223 and 224:
TABLE G.9 Number of reported UEP bu
- Page 225 and 226:
UEP Exports by Organization SizeTot
- Page 227:
BibliographyU.S. Census Bureau (Cen
- Page 231 and 232:
Analysis of Selected Schedule B Exp
- Page 233 and 234:
TABLE H.2 Laptop computers: U.S. ex
- Page 235 and 236:
TABLE H.5 Summary of U.S. Census ex
- Page 237 and 238:
CRTs and Products Containing CRTsCR
- Page 239 and 240:
TABLE H.10 CRT TV’s: U.S. exports
- Page 241 and 242:
TABLE H.14 CRT monitors: U.S. expor
- Page 243 and 244:
TABLE H.18 CRTs w/ automatic data p
- Page 245 and 246:
TABLE H.22 CRTs Bare: U.S. exports
- Page 247 and 248:
TABLE H.25 Summary of U.S. Census e
- Page 249 and 250:
TABLE H.29 Summary of U.S. Census e