21% numberincreasein theof physician-owned communityoncology clinics thatare closing.And consolidation of practice sitescontinues; of the 1,254 private communityoncology practices in the study, 392 practiceswere purchased by hospitals and 132practices had merged or were acquired bya corporate entity. 9 It is documented thatoncology consolidation will increase costsand create treatment access problemsfor cancer patients – especially in ruralareas. 7,9,10Although the provider landscape inoncology is rapidly changing, payers putthe cost of other aspects of oncology carebefore the movement from communitybasedcare to hospital-affiliated practices.However, the priorities for payers are stillcost drivers, such as the cost of hospitalizationsor the cost of high-priced productsas shown in Figure 1-1. 11Considering the increased focusby payers on the high price of new drugproducts and the cost of hospitalizationsshown in Figure 1-1, several independentresearchers have assessed the impact ofcare in hospital-owned outpatient clinicsversus private community outpatientpractices. An analysis of three years ofcommercial health-plan data revealed thatoncology patients treated in an HOPDare more costly to manage, regardless ofepisode length, and patients have higherhospitalization rates. The average cost foroffice-managed chemotherapy episodeslasting one month or more was $7,350versus $9,903 for HOPD-managed chemotherapy.A chemotherapy episode was definedas the duration between the first andlast date of chemotherapy being administeredto a patient. Compared with patientsmanaged in a community office-based setting,the average cost per chemotherapyepisode was 24 percent higher for HOPDpatients across the most common types ofcancer. 9When hospitalization rates and thesite of chemotherapy delivery were considered,14 out of 100 patients had at leastone hospitalization during their chemotherapyepisode in the hospital outpatientsetting versus 11 out of 100 patients whoreceived treatment in the office-managedsetting. 9When reviewing the overall distributionof office-managed patients receivingchemotherapy versus HOPD-managedPercentage of Payers Per Priority LevelP100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%Payer Priorities in OncologyPriority #1High-pricednew productsPriority #2Cost ofhospitalizationsSelected Payer Prioritieschemotherapy episodes, over 78 percentof chemotherapy episodes for men wereoffice-managed compared to 70 percentof episodes for women. Patients 70 yearsof age and older utilized outpatient office-managedchemotherapy services at ahigher rate than patients 49 years of ageand younger. In Medicare patients, reportsdemonstrated that fewer patients receivechemotherapy in both hospital outpatientand physician offices, but rather select aspecific setting (n=7,128; 9.0 percent forboth settings). Primarily, Medicare patientsreceived treatment in office-basedchemotherapy centers (n=53,087; 66.9percent) versus HOPD chemotherapy(n=19,161; 24.1 percent). 10Total costs per year were higherfor Medicare patients receiving chemotherapyin hospital outpatient settings at$54,000, compared to $47,500 in the communitysetting. Similarly, patient out-ofpocketamounts were 10 percent higherfor patients receiving chemotherapy inhospital outpatient settings. 10Although existing data indicate thatthe cost of care may be higher in the outpatienthospital setting, there are limi-Priority #10Movement ofcommunity-basedcare to hospitalaffiliated practicesExtremely high priorityHigh priorityModerate priorityNeutralSomewhat priorityLow priorityNot at all a priority38 InsideOut
tations to these analyses that attenuatehow these findings should be interpreted.Patients treated in an outpatient hospitalsetting were younger. Therefore, it ispossible more aggressive chemotherapyregimens could have been used, whichmay have resulted in higher costs at thesesites. These studies failed to evaluate differencesin the comorbidities of these patients,which again could have skewed differencesin costs.A recent survey of healthcare plansindicated that the shift of oncology fromthe community setting to the hospital settingwas not a major concern at this time. 11However, if payers are interested in reducingor effectively slowing the increasein oncology-related healthcare costs, thistrend should be more closely evaluated.While this shift in care can substantiallyimpact payers, patients may be impactedthe most. Previous studies indicatethat out-of-pocket costs for Medicarepatients receiving chemotherapy for thetreatment of breast cancer were calculatedat $759 for care in the office-managedsetting versus $814 in the hospitaloutpatient setting. 10 It has been reportedthat private community practices offeredlower out-of-pocket costs for Medicarepatients or patients without supplementalinsurance, and greater accessibility forpatients in varying geographical regionsand rural areas. 10,12,13Given the increased costs and higherinpatient hospitalizations associated withthe delivery of chemotherapy in a hospitaloutpatient environment, and given thedrive in healthcare reform to lower costswhile improving care, it seems the trendof providers, payers and patients shouldbe toward the community oncology centers.It isn’t – and the diminishing numberof community practices reveals this unfortunatereality. To change this reality, itbecomes critical to recognize and communicatethe advantages of community oncologycare to ensure the ongoing sustainabilityof these practices and the benefitsthey deliver.Recently, the Community Countscampaign was launched to help demonstratethis value and communicate thereal, measurable benefits of communityoncology. This physician-led movementgives community practices the tools theyneed to build a unified voice and maketheir value known. A broader knowledgeof this value would provide payers, oncologypractitioners and stakeholders realworldinsight they could use to give physiciansmore choices in where they delivercare and give patients greater options andability to receive that care from a communityprovider.You can download a complimentarycopy of The Value of CommunityOncology: Site of Care Cost Analysis, fromwhich this article was excerpted. Thisstudy fills in the gaps in current cost-analysisof community and hospital oncologyutilization and cost benefits. To downloadthe study now and learn more about theCommunity Count campaigns, visit www.OurCommunityCounts.org and see the adon page 2.Top 10 Payer Priorities in Oncology1. High-priced new products2. Cost of hospitalizations3. Ability to compare and analyzepharmacy and medical benefit4. Need to increase use of generics5. Appropriate use of biomarkers6. Pathway implementation7. Appropriate use of hospice8. Compliance and persistency withoncology drugs9. Cost of emergency room visits10. Movement of community-basedcare to hospital-affiliated practicesReferences:1. Association of Community Cancer Centers. The changing face of oncology. 2012. http://www.accc-cancer.org/association/History.asp. Accessed September 1, 2012.2. Dollinger, M. Guidelines for hospitalization for chemotherapy. Oncologist. 1996;1(1,2):107-111.3. American Society of Clinical Oncologists. ASCO Statement on Medicare Drug Reimbursement. June 2, 2000. http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Press+Center/ Latest+News+Releases/ASCO+Statement+on+Medicare+Drug+Reimbursement. Accessed September 20, 2012.4. Goldstein, M. Systems perspective: the community-based oncology practice. Ensuring quality cancer care through the oncology workforce: sustaining research and care in the 21st century. Presentation at: ASCO NationalCare Policy Forum Workshop. October 20-21, 2008.5. Kuznar, W. Community oncology clinics under increasing financial pressure. Association for Value-Based Cancer. http://www.valuebasedcancer.com/article/community-oncolo-gy-clinics-under-increasing-financial-pressure.Accessed September 18, 2012.6. Guy, GP Jr, Richardson, LC. Visit duration for outpatient physician office visits among patients with cancer. Am J Manag Care. 2012 May;18(5 Spec No. 2):SP49-56.7. Community Oncology Alliance. Practice Impact Report. April 4, 2012. http://www.communityoncology.org/pdfs/community-oncology-practice-impact-report.pdf Accessed August 23, 2012.8. Goins, R. The Oncology Landscape: Complexity, Cost, Care, and Coordination. Pharmacy Times. May 18, 2011. http://www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/specialty- pt/2011/May2011/The-Oncology-Landscape-Complexity-Cost-Care-and-Coordination. Accessed September 18, 2012.9. Avalere Health, LLC. Avalere Health Analysis Report of National Association of Managed Care Physicians member data. Total cost of cancer care by site of service: physician office vs outpatient hospital. March 2012.http://www.avalerehealth.net/news/2012-04-03_COA/Cost_of_Care.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2012.10. Fitch K, Pyenson B. Milliman Client Report: Site of service cost differences for Medicare patients receiving chemotherapy. October 19, 2011. http://publications.milliman.com/publications/health-published/pdfs/site-of-service-cost-differences.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2012.11. Xcenda. Managed Care Network. PayerPulse June 2012.12. Shea AM, Curtis LH, Hammill BG, et al. Association between the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 and patient wait times and travel distance for chemotherapy. JAMA.2008;300(2):189-196.13. Neuss MN, Guidi T. Commentary: when it comes to chemotherapy, location matters. J Oncol Pract. 2010 Sep;6(5):235-237.<strong>ASD</strong> <strong>Healthcare</strong> 39