OPINIONSiege mentalityHostility to immigration has deep roots in human psychologythat will be difficult to overcome, says Victoria EssesIN SEPTEMBER 2014, the US faceda crisis. Tens of thousands ofunaccompanied children fromCentral America had crossed theMexican border illegally and werebeing held in detention centres.There were polarised, angrydebates on how to respond.President Obama called the issuea “humanitarian crisis” andworked to house and feed thechildren. Others opposed usingUS resources to care for them.Around the same time, a rowerupted in Europe over migrantships in the Mediterranean. Italysuspended its rescue missionsand the UK refused to supporta new European Union searchand rescue operation, claiming itwould encourage more migrantsto attempt the crossing. Aidagencies and the UN HighCommissioner for Refugeesretorted that such operationswere necessary to save lives.International migration is oneof the major social issues of theday. More people live outsidetheir country of birth than at anyother time in history – 232 millionin 2013 – and this number isexpected to carry on rising.The swell in migration is theresult of many global trends,including growing inequalitiesbetween nations, demand forlabour in countries with a fallingbirth rate and a rise in the numberof refugees and asylum seekers.Opposition to immigrationis widespread in many Westernnations. Anti-immigrationactivists, the media and politicalelites have created a crisismentality in which immigrantsare portrayed as “enemies at thegate”. Immigrants – particularlynon-whites – are blamed for all ofsociety’s woes. Such depictionsencourage support for moreextreme political platforms.Even legal immigrationhas become controversial,with groups such as the UKIndependence Party proposingstricter controls on migrantsfrom certain parts of the EU.Psychologists have much tocontribute to the understandingof what may be driving theseattitudes and behaviours. Yet,with a few exceptions, we havebeen slow to enter the field.We are not starting fromscratch. Attitudes and prejudiceshave been studied for decades,and there are experimentalmethods for probing theirunderlying causes.One especially pertinent areaof research looks at the perceivedrole of competition in intergrouprelations. Psychologists have beendebating this for many years. Inthe context of immigration, itturns out to be very important.As a rule, members of sociallydominant groups tend to believethat their group is superior andhence entitled to resources andprivileges. To maintain their“ More people live outsidetheir country of birth thanat any time and the numberwill carry on rising”dominance, they must fend off“invading” groups who are seenas competing with them for finiteresources including jobs, politicalpower and cultural and religiousinfluence. This can occurirrespective of whether thereare indeed limited resources andactual competition over them.This belief in zero-sumcompetition is central to attitudesabout immigration. There is awidespread belief that any gainsimmigrants make must be at theexpense of members of the hostsociety. This belief is deeplyembedded in Western society,even though it is seldom justified.The upshot of these attitudes ishostility toward immigrants, selfaggrandisement– often in theform of nationalism – andsupport for the exclusion ofimmigrants and refugees.When migrants are allowed tosettle in a new country, they areoften faced with a “damned ifthey do, damned if they don’t”dilemma. If they are economicallysuccessful, they are seen as havingtaken jobs or opportunities awayfrom local people; if they are notsuccessful, they are seen as a drainon the system.Refugees and asylum seekersare especially likely to be treatedwith hostility. Research hasshown that common themesin the media – including claimsthat asylum-seekers are “bogus”and associated with criminals,terrorists and disease – leads todehumanisation. This perceptionallows some in the host nations toassert that refugees deserve theunfair and inhumane treatmentthey receive.26 | <strong>New</strong><strong>Scientist</strong> | 7 March 2015
For more opinion articles, visit newscientist.com/opinionThese reactions ebb and flowdepending on external factorsthat increase uncertainty andanxiety, and challenge the statusquo. Economic recession, naturaldisasters and demands for equalrights for migrants can exacerbateperceptions of zero-sumcompetition and threat fromoutsiders. The Ebola outbreak, forexample, helped to fan the flamesof anti-immigration sentimentagainst Hispanics in the US, eventhough there were no cases ofEbola in Latin American countries.Changing these attitudes is noteasy. We know that just tellingpeople that immigrants are nottaking resources can backfire.This may occur because zero-sumbeliefs are so deeply embeddedand well defended.Change may be easier innations built on immigration ,such as Canada, the US andAustralia. Focusing on theirhistory, on what today’simmigrants have in commonwith yesterday’s, and on thebenefits that immigrants bringcan help forge a common identityand more positive attitudes.However, this will not workin nations, such as the UK, thatdo not see themselves as beingbuilt on immigration. In thesecountries, attempting to describeimmigrants as part of the nationalin-group may simply reinforcenegative attitudes.What is abundantly clear is thatimmigration and asylum-seekingare not going away. Countries thatintegrate immigrants successfullyare less likely to feel the stress andmore likely to reap the benefits.Many have recently come to thisrealisation and are implementingnew policies: President Obama’sTask Force on <strong>New</strong> Americans isan example. Those countries thatsimply try to slam the door shutare asking for trouble. ■Victoria Esses is professor ofpsychology and director of the Centrefor Research on Migration and EthnicRelations at the University of WesternOntario in London, CanadaONE MINUTE INTERVIEWWhen autism wears a maskMore women have autism spectrum disorders than peoplethink, says Hannah Belcher – we’re just better at hiding itPROFILEHannah Belcher is a PhD student in psychologyat Anglia Ruskin University, UK, who wasdiagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome at age 23.She is conducting an online survey to betterunderstand possible misdiagnoses in femalesWhat led to you being diagnosed so late?I’d had a lot of isolated problems that nobody hadreally pieced together as I was growing up. I wasin therapy when somebody finally said: “I thinkall these difficulties you’ve been having couldactually be autism rather than mental illness.”How did you react to that idea?It was a massive shock. Despite studying autismin my psychology degree, I had never considered Imight have a form of it. That’s also when I realisedthat there is a big issue with diagnosis in general.Did things make sense to you at that point?Definitely. At first I thought: I have friends, Isocialise, it can’t possibly be that. But underneathI’m having the same problems: a lot of anxiety,especially in social situations, and problems likesensory overload. I realised I’m just masking it a lot.So that led to your current research?Yes, I wanted to find out how many otherfemales are out there who are also maskingtheir symptoms and so haven’t been discoveredyet, just because what they are displaying isn’tstereotypical autism spectrum disorder (ASD)behaviour. My research involves a nationwidescreening project and anybody, male or female,can take part at psychscreen.co.uk.How might women be masking symptoms?Females are placed under a lot of pressure to fitin, and I think that drives us to develop copingmechanisms. I read a paper on memory that saidfemale brains are naturally better than male onesat storing up scripts in social situations. When Iwas growing up, I would observe people aroundme, see how they were behaving, and develop ascript to get myself through it. Also, when femaleswith ASD get an obsession it’s not typically withthe same things that males with ASD get into. I’venever been interested in trains or timetables – I’mnot collecting information. I was obsessed withmore normal things.What do you get obsessed with?When I was younger it was music – I would listen tothe same song over and over and drive everyoneup the wall. <strong>No</strong>w I’m obsessed with psychology.What would an earlier diagnosis have meant?I dropped out of school when I was 14 becauseI couldn’t cope with the pressures. With adiagnosis, that wouldn’t have happened – I wouldhave had the correct support. I think a lot ofundiagnosed females develop other mentalhealth conditions because of the pressure theyare under. Only a fifth of girls with ASD arediagnosed before the age of 11, compared withover half of boys with it, so I think there areprobably more girls with ASD than we realise.Having left school so young, how did youmanage to turn yourself into a researcher?I’m not very good in a group or at understandingpeople, so I found it easier to teach myself. Itaught myself GCSEs, A levels and most of mydegree. It was just second nature to me.Interview by Catherine de Lange7 March 2015 | <strong>New</strong><strong>Scientist</strong> | 27