<strong>Police</strong><strong>New</strong>sThe Voice of <strong>Police</strong>The Voice of <strong>Police</strong>VOLUME 43 • NUMBER 2 • march 2010NZ <strong>Police</strong> Association <strong>Police</strong> <strong>New</strong>s is <strong>the</strong> magazine of<strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Association and incorporates <strong>the</strong><strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Journal first published in 1937.March 2010, Vol. 43, No.2ISSN 1175-944533The key <strong>to</strong> kindness34Key’s mindersDeadline for next issue Monday, March 15, 2010.Published by <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> AssociationP.O. Box 12344, Willbank House, 57 Willis Street, Welling<strong>to</strong>n.Phone: (04) 496 6800, Facsmile: (04) 471 1309Edi<strong>to</strong>r: Steve PlowmanEmail: edi<strong>to</strong>r@policeassn.org.nzWebsite: www.policeassn.org.nzPrinted by City Print Communications, Welling<strong>to</strong>n.Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of <strong>the</strong>Association.COPYRIGHT: NZPA <strong>Police</strong> <strong>New</strong>s must not be reproduced inpart or as a whole without <strong>the</strong> formal consent of <strong>the</strong> copyrightholder – <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Association.ContentsFrom <strong>the</strong> President 31Government <strong>to</strong> look at changes <strong>to</strong> knife laws 32<strong>Police</strong> fundraising brings fresh coat <strong>to</strong> Honiara Hospital children’s ward 33A day in <strong>the</strong> life of – The Diplomatic Protection Service 34/5Brain teaser 36NZPA employee does peacekeeping stint in <strong>the</strong> Sinai 3650th reunion for <strong>the</strong> class of 1960 3738Key ingredientsNon-sworn Group Life insurance offer expires 12 April 37<strong>What</strong> you can do <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>the</strong> shiftwork ‘blues’ 38/41Keeping cellphones out of prisons 41Understanding sleep and shiftwork 42Holiday home availability/Bruce’s new ride 43The Prophet and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong>man – book review 44Papakura police officer attributes SRBA with saving his life 44View from <strong>the</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m/Memorial Wall/Quotes of <strong>the</strong> month 45Sports <strong>New</strong>s 46/4946Key competi<strong>to</strong>r• Front page: <strong>Shiftwork</strong> can be a real drag if you don’t get thatbody clock organised properly, eat <strong>the</strong> right foods and get <strong>the</strong>right amounts of exercise and rest. In this month’s issue weconsult <strong>the</strong> experts and bring you <strong>the</strong>ir best tips on how <strong>to</strong>cope with shiftwork and how you can put your life in betterbalance as a result.- Pho<strong>to</strong>s courtesy of Is<strong>to</strong>ckpho<strong>to</strong>.com and Sampyseeds.Thai police officer honoured by NZ colleagues 50How <strong>to</strong> save money on your banking/Home insurance offer 51Keen on wine/Copper’s crossword 52Letters <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Edi<strong>to</strong>r/Useful information and contacts 53/55The minders – a day in <strong>the</strong> life of <strong>the</strong>Diplomatic Protection Service – p3430March 2010
<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Police</strong> AssociationIt is obvious that <strong>the</strong> authorities’ and media’sreaction <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> deaths following failure <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>pincidents contributes significantly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> increasedtendency for criminals <strong>to</strong> ‘have a go’at police when confronted.Assaults on police – timefor a combined strategyI write this following a weekend wherefour of us were seriously assaultedcarrying out our job.Also, we are under fire followingtwo separate crash deaths of fleeingcriminals, where police officers hadattempted <strong>to</strong> prevent <strong>the</strong>ir offending.I hesitate <strong>to</strong> say pursuits because thatimmediately implies police contributed<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> deaths, which is rubbish; <strong>the</strong>fleeing driver’s attempts <strong>to</strong> avoid policewere solely responsible.It is obvious that <strong>the</strong> authorities’ andmedia’s reaction <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> deaths followingfailure <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p incidents contributessignificantly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> increased tendencyfor criminals <strong>to</strong> ‘have a go’ at policewhen confronted.Most young lawbreakers use vehicles.They are all well aware that policeofficers will be forced <strong>to</strong> back off if<strong>the</strong>y ‘have a go’. We get offenderscomplaining that police officers shouldhave pulled out from following <strong>the</strong>mas <strong>the</strong>y, <strong>the</strong> offenders, were driving <strong>to</strong>ofast.It is not surprising that <strong>the</strong> same attitudeis applied when <strong>the</strong>y are confronted bypolice officers; <strong>the</strong>y have a go, ei<strong>the</strong>rverbally, or increasingly physically.The Independent <strong>Police</strong> ConductAuthority (IPCA) recently criticisedpolice for ‘instigating’ a pursuit of aspeeding s<strong>to</strong>len car, which crashed,injuring a member of <strong>the</strong> public.Notwithstanding <strong>the</strong>re were somepolicy breaches just before <strong>the</strong> crash,publicly criticising police for evenbeginning <strong>the</strong> pursuit only encouragesoffenders <strong>to</strong> have a go.There will be all sorts of quick fixsolutions proffered <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>the</strong> assaults.Only a combined strategy involving<strong>the</strong> Government, <strong>Police</strong> and all in <strong>the</strong>Justice sec<strong>to</strong>r including <strong>the</strong> IPCA andjudiciary, designed <strong>to</strong> make criminalsrealise <strong>the</strong>re are serious consequencesfor ‘having a go’ at police, from lowlevel abuse upwards, will make policingsafer.Let’s face it, if <strong>the</strong> public don’t believepolice can protect <strong>the</strong>mselves, how canwe expect <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> believe wecan protect <strong>the</strong>m.<strong>Police</strong> Health Plan and ACCIn recent months <strong>Police</strong> Health Plan,like o<strong>the</strong>r health insurers, has seenan increasing number of requests forsurgical procedures that have ei<strong>the</strong>rbeen declined by ACC (or CRM and<strong>the</strong> like) or alternatively seeking copaymentfor surgical proceduresassociated with injuries incurred by amember.Put simply, <strong>the</strong> request is for <strong>Police</strong>Health Plan <strong>to</strong> fund procedures ACChas ei<strong>the</strong>r declined or <strong>to</strong> share <strong>the</strong>costs of a surgical procedure withACC <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re <strong>the</strong> health and wellbeingof a member more quickly thanwaiting for ACC <strong>to</strong> fully fund <strong>the</strong>procedure.In terms of co-payment for aprocedure, <strong>Police</strong> Health Plan willdecline any such request. From aninsurance perspective it is, in ourview and that of o<strong>the</strong>r insurers, not <strong>the</strong>responsibility of <strong>the</strong> insurer <strong>to</strong> makesuch payments, which should be fullyfunded by ACC.Where <strong>the</strong> request is <strong>to</strong> fund a declinedprocedure, which we believe shouldbe funded by ACC, we will work with<strong>the</strong> member <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> get <strong>the</strong> denialreversed. Ultimately, if this does no<strong>to</strong>ccur, PHP will work with <strong>the</strong> memberand external experts and may fund <strong>the</strong>procedure. Where this occurs, we <strong>the</strong>nwork with <strong>the</strong> member and formallyreview <strong>the</strong> refusal by ACC <strong>to</strong> fund. Over<strong>the</strong> past 12 months we have recoveredover $50,000 from ACC through <strong>the</strong>review process and have a number ofo<strong>the</strong>r cases we are challenging.It is important that all membersunderstand <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>Police</strong> HealthPlan <strong>to</strong> take a rigorous approach <strong>to</strong> thisissue. Making co-payments or fullyfunding procedures and treatmentswe believe should be covered by ACCreduces <strong>the</strong>ir costs, and those of <strong>the</strong>employer, where <strong>the</strong>re is a work-relatedinjury, at <strong>the</strong> expense of <strong>the</strong> insurer. Thisin turn impacts on claim and premiumcosts. Members are reminded <strong>the</strong>yalready pay a premium <strong>to</strong> ACC throughpayroll deduction (1.7% of earnings)and mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle registration costs.An expectation <strong>Police</strong> Health Plan willmeet accident-related costs is effectivelypaying a double premium.Members impacted by <strong>the</strong> morestringent approach taken by ACC(and alternative providers) in termsof surgical procedures and treatmentsshould contact <strong>Police</strong> Health Plan(Freephone: 0800 500 122) in <strong>the</strong>first instance for advice and assistance.March 201031