Test Proficiency Rubric (pdf)

GRADING RUBRIC: STANDARDIZED TEST PROFICIENCY Student __________________ Test ________ADMINSCORINGINTERPAny:__ Items scored incorrectly__ Incorrect calculations__ Incorrect score transfer &conversionwith significant impact on resultingscores__ Incorrect norms table used__ Failed to graph results__ Incorrectly graphed results__ Failed to identify subtests ofstrength/weakness__ Incorrectly identified subtests ofstrength/weakness__ Major omissions of identifyinginformationConcern Satisfactory Commendable(on one or more subtests) Low High__ Didn’t follow standardization with __ Some variation from__ Standardized__ Natural style in administrationprobable impact on student’sstandardization, but would not __ Smooth administration__ Maintains student’s involvementperformanceaffect student’s performance __ Over-questioned or over-tested between subtests__ Robotic administration__ Stilted administrationbut scored correctly__ Good rapport__ Failed to establish basal__ Poor handling of test materials __ Good handling of test materials __ Clear & smooth examples &__ Failed to establish ceiling__ Examples/explanations OK __ Clear examples/explanations explanations__ Confusing examples or explanations __ Inconsistently or incorrectly __ Systematically recorded student’s __ Student’s responses recorded verbatim__ Failed to record student’s responses recorded student’s responses responses__ Recognized all administrative errors &__ Failed to recognize administrative __ Recognized some (but not all) __ Recognized all administrative noted knowledge of correct procedure inerrors in self-critiqueadministrative errors in self-errors in self-critiqueself-critiquecritiqueSeveral:__ Items scored incorrectly__ Incorrect calculations__ Incorrect score transfer &conversionwithout significant impact onreulting scores__ Major graphs completedcorrectly with 68% confidenceintervals__ Correctly identified subtests ofstrength/weakness__ Minor omissions of identifyinginformation__ Inaccurate narrative descriptionA few:__ Items scored incorrectly__ Incorrect calculations__ Incorrect score transfer &conversionwithout significant impact onresulting scores__ All graphs completed correctlywith 68% confidence intervals__ Offered hypotheses regardingunderlying strengths/weaknesses bysubtest__ All identifying informationcompleted__ Narrative description is accurateAll:__ Items scored correctly__ Correct calculations__ Correct score transfer & conversion__ All graphs completed correctly with90% confidence intervals__ Offered unifying hypotheses regardingunderlying strengths/weakness acrosssubtests__ Narrative description summarizesperformance accurately & completelyOverall:__ Congratulations! You have demonstrated basic proficiency in administration and scoring of this test and may now use the test under supervision in your field placement(supervisor to double check scoring and discuss interpretation or pattern analyses.)__ You have demonstrated basic proficiency in administration; however, we have concerns about your scoring. You may use this test under very close supervision in yourfield placement (supervisor to score with you and discuss interpretation or pattern analyses.)__ You have demonstrated basic proficiency in administration; however, your scoring is of sufficient concern to require review of additional protocols (with patternanalyses) until you demonstrate basic proficiency. You may not yet use this test in your field placement.__ You have not yet demonstrated basic proficiency with the full administration of this test. Please practice administration (submit protocols for review) and, when youfeel ready, submit another full package (i.e., videotape, protocol, self-critique, pattern analysis) for review.__ Copy sent to Field Supervisor, date _____________ © V. Cook-Morales, 1999

GRADE: ____ (__ Not Graded) _______________________________, Reviewer Date ______________________ Copy sent to Field Supervisor, date _____________ © V. Cook-Morales, 1999